scholarly journals Effectiveness of a brief behavioural intervention to prevent weight gain over the Christmas holiday period: randomised controlled trial

BMJ ◽  
2018 ◽  
pp. k4867 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frances Mason ◽  
Amanda Farley ◽  
Miranda Pallan ◽  
Alice Sitch ◽  
Christina Easter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Weight Gain ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Behavioural Intervention ◽  
Prevent Weight Gain ◽  
Comparator Group ◽  
Holiday Period ◽  
Baseline Weight ◽  
Randomised Controlled

Abstract Objective To test the effectiveness of a brief behavioural intervention to prevent weight gain over the Christmas holiday period. Design Two group, double blinded randomised controlled trial. Setting Recruitment from workplaces, social media platforms, and schools pre-Christmas 2016 and 2017 in Birmingham, UK. Participants 272 adults aged 18 years or more with a body mass index of 20 or more: 136 were randomised to a brief behavioural intervention and 136 to a leaflet on healthy living (comparator). Baseline assessments were conducted in November and December with follow-up assessments in January and February (4-8 weeks after baseline). Interventions The intervention aimed to increase restraint of eating and drinking through regular self weighing and recording of weight and reflection on weight trajectory; providing information on good weight management strategies over the Christmas period; and pictorial information on the physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) of regularly consumed festive foods and drinks. The goal was to gain no more than 0.5 kg of baseline weight. The comparator group received a leaflet on healthy living. Main outcome measures The primary outcome was weight at follow-up. The primary analysis compared weight at follow-up between the intervention and comparator arms, adjusting for baseline weight and the stratification variable of attendance at a commercial weight loss programme. Secondary outcomes (recorded at follow-up) were: weight gain of 0.5 kg or less, self reported frequency of self weighing (at least twice weekly versus less than twice weekly), percentage body fat, and cognitive restraint of eating, emotional eating, and uncontrolled eating. Results Mean weight change was −0.13 kg (95% confidence interval −0.4 to 0.15) in the intervention group and 0.37 kg (0.12 to 0.62) in the comparator group. The adjusted mean difference in weight (intervention−comparator) was −0.49 kg (95% confidence interval −0.85 to −0.13, P=0.008). The odds ratio for gaining no more than 0.5 kg was non-significant (1.22, 95% confidence interval 0.74 to 2.00, P=0.44). Conclusion A brief behavioural intervention involving regular self weighing, weight management advice, and information about the amount of physical activity required to expend the calories in festive foods and drinks prevented weight gain over the Christmas holiday period. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN15071781 .

Translational delivery of Cool Little Kids to prevent child internalising problems: Randomised controlled trial

2017 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jordana K Bayer ◽  
Ruth Beatson ◽  
Lesley Bretherton ◽  
Harriet Hiscock ◽  
Melissa Wake ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Standard Deviation ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Adjusted Odds Ratio ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Internalising Problems

Objective: To determine whether a population-delivered parenting programme assists in preventing internalising problems at school entry for preschool children at-risk with temperamental inhibition. Methods: Design: a randomised controlled trial was used. Setting: the setting was 307 preschool services across eight socioeconomically diverse government areas in Melbourne, Australia. Participants: a total of 545 parents of inhibited 4-year-old children: 498 retained at 1-year follow up. Early intervention: Cool Little Kids parenting group programme was implemented. Primary outcomes: the primary outcomes were child DSM-IV anxiety disorders (assessor blind) and internalising problems. Secondary outcomes: the secondary outcomes were parenting practices and parent mental health. Results: At 1-year follow up (mean (standard deviation) age = 5.8 (0.4) years), there was little difference in anxiety disorders between the intervention and control arms (44.2% vs 50.2%; adjusted odds ratio = 0.86, 95% confidence interval = [0.60, 1.25], p = 0.427). Internalising problems were reduced in the intervention arm (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: abnormal – 24.2% vs 33.0%; adjusted odds ratio = 0.56, 95% confidence interval = [0.35, 0.89], p = 0.014; symptoms – mean (standard deviation) = 2.5 (2.0) vs 2.9 (2.2); adjusted mean difference = –0.47, 95% confidence interval = [–0.81, –0.13], p = 0.006). Parents’ participation in the intervention was modest (29.4% attended most groups, 20.5% used skills most of the time during the year). A priori interaction tests suggested that for children with anxious parents, the intervention reduced anxiety disorders and internalising symptoms after 1 year. Conclusion: Offering Cool Little Kids across the population for inhibited preschoolers does not impact population outcomes after 1 year. Effects may be emerging for inhibited children at highest risk with parent anxiety. Trial outcomes will continue into mid-childhood.

scholarly journals Weight change over two years in people prescribed olanzapine, quetiapine and risperidone in UK primary care: Cohort study in THIN, a UK primary care database

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (10) ◽  
pp. 1098-1103 ◽  
Author(s):  
David PJ Osborn ◽  
Irene Petersen ◽  
Nick Beckley ◽  
Kate Walters ◽  
Irwin Nazareth ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Weight Change ◽  
Antipsychotic Treatment ◽  
Weight Changes ◽  
Baseline Weight ◽  
Care Database

Background: Follow-up studies of weight gain related to antipsychotic treatment beyond a year are limited in number. We compared weight change in the three most commonly prescribed antipsychotics in a representative UK General Practice database. Method: We conducted a cohort study in United Kingdom primary care records of people newly prescribed olanzapine, quetiapine or risperidone. The primary outcome was weight in each six month period for two years after treatment initiation. Weight changes were compared using linear regression, adjusted for age, baseline weight and diagnosis. Results: N = 6338 people received olanzapine, 12,984 quetiapine and 6556 risperidone. Baseline weight was lowest for men treated with olanzapine (80.8 kg versus 83.5 kg quetiapine, 82.0 kg risperidone) and women treated with olanzapine (67.7 kg versus 71.5 kg quetiapine 68.4 kg risperidone. Weight gain occurred during treatment with all three drugs. Compared with risperidone mean weight gain was higher with olanzapine (adjusted co-efficient +1.24 kg (95% confidence interval: 0.69–1.79 kg per six months) for men and +0.77 kg (95% confidence interval: 0.29–1.24 kg) for women). Weight gain with quetiapine was lower in unadjusted models compared with risperidone, but this difference was not significant after adjustment. Conclusion: Olanzapine is more commonly prescribed to people with lower weight. However, after accounting for baseline weight, age, sex and diagnosis, olanzapine is still associated with greater weight gain over two years than risperidone or quetiapine. Baseline weight does not ameliorate the risks of weight gain associated with antipsychotic medication. Weight gain should be assertively discussed and managed for people prescribed antipsychotics, especially olanzapine.

scholarly journals Planned delivery to improve postpartum cardiac function in women with preterm pre-eclampsia: the PHOEBE mechanisms of action study within the PHOENIX RCT

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1-28
Author(s):  
Fergus P McCarthy ◽  
Jamie O’Driscoll ◽  
Paul Seed ◽  
Anna Brockbank ◽  
Alice Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Diastolic Dysfunction ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Expectant Management ◽  
England And Wales ◽  
Management Group ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
The Phoenix

Background Women whose pregnancies are affected by hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, in particular preterm pre-eclampsia, are at increased risk of long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Objectives To investigate the hypothesis that prolongation of a pregnancy affected by preterm pre-eclampsia managed by expectant management compared with planned early delivery would result in worse cardiovascular function 6 months postpartum. Design A randomised controlled trial. Setting 28 maternity hospitals in England and Wales. Participants Women who were eligible for the Pre-eclampsia in HOspital: Early iNductIon or eXpectant management (PHOENIX) study were approached and recruited for the PHOEBE study. The PHOENIX (Pre-eclampsia in HOspital: Early iNductIon or eXpectant management) study was a parallel-group, non-masked, multicentre, randomised controlled trial that was carried out in 46 maternity units across England and Wales. This study compared planned early delivery with expectant management (usual care) with individual randomisation in women with late preterm pre-eclampsia who were 34 weeks’ gestation to less than 37 weeks’ gestation and having a singleton or dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy. Interventions Postpartum follow-up included medical history, blood pressure assessment and echocardiography. All women had blood sampling performed on at least two time points from recruitment to the 6-month follow-up for assessment of cardiac necrosis markers. Main outcome measures Primary outcome was a composite of systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction (originally by 2009 guidelines then updated by 2016 guidelines, with an amended definition of diastolic dysfunction). Analyses were by intention to treat, together with a per-protocol analysis for the primary and secondary outcomes. Results Between 27 April 2016 and 30 November 2018, 623 women were found to be eligible, of whom 420 (67%) were recruited across 28 maternity units in England and Wales. A total of 133 women were allocated to planned delivery, 137 women were allocated to expectant management and a further 150 received non-randomised expectant management within usual care. The mean time from enrolment to delivery was 2.5 (standard deviation 1.9) days in the planned delivery group compared with 6.8 (standard deviation 5.3) days in the expectant management group. There were no differences in the primary outcome between women in the planned delivery group and those in the expectant management group using either the 2009 (risk ratio 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 1.40) or the 2016 definition (risk ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 1.86). Overall, 10% (31/321) of women had a left ventricular ejection fraction < 55% and 71% of the cohort remained hypertensive at 6 months postpartum. No differences were observed between groups in cardiorespiratory outcomes prior to discharge from hospital or in systolic or diastolic blood pressure measurements. Variables associated with the primary outcome (2009 definition) at 6 months postpartum were maternal body mass index (adjusted odds ratio 1.33 per 5 kg/m2, 95% confidence interval 1.12 to 1.59 per 5 kg/m2) and maternal age (adjusted odds ratio 2.16, 95% confidence interval 1.44 to 3.22 per 10 years). Limitations include changing definitions regarding systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction. Conclusions Preterm pre-eclampsia results in persistence of hypertension in the majority of women with late preterm pre-eclampsia at 6 months postpartum and systolic dysfunction in 10%. Pre-eclampsia should not be considered a self-limiting disease of pregnancy alone. Future work Interventions aimed at reducing cardiovascular dysfunction. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN01879376. Funding This project was funded by the Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation (EME) programme, a Medical Research Council and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) partnership. This will be published in full in Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation; Vol. 8, No. 12. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

scholarly journals Effectiveness of a behavioural intervention involving regular weighing and feedback by community midwives within routine antenatal care to prevent excessive gestational weight gain: POPS2 randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. e030174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Daley ◽  
Kate Jolly ◽  
Susan A Jebb ◽  
Andrea Roalfe ◽  
Lucy Mackilllop ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Physical Activity ◽  
Weight Gain ◽  
Gestational Weight Gain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Behavioural Intervention ◽  
Maximum Weight ◽  
Gestational Weight ◽  
Excessive Gestational Weight Gain ◽  
Community Midwives ◽  
Randomised Controlled

ObjectivesTo assess the effectiveness of a brief behavioural intervention based on routine antenatal weighing to prevent excessive gestational weight gain (defined by US Institute of Medicine).DesignRandomised controlled trial.SettingAntenatal clinic in England.ParticipantsWomen between 10+0and 14+6weeks gestation, not requiring specialist obstetric care.InterventionsParticipants were randomised to usual antenatal care or usual care (UC) plus the intervention. The intervention involved community midwives weighing women at antenatal appointments, setting maximum weight gain limits between appointments and providing brief feedback. Women were encouraged to monitor and record their own weight weekly to assess their progress against the maximum limits set by their midwife. The comparator was usual maternity care.Primary and secondary outcome measuresExcessive gestational weight gain, depression, anxiety and physical activity.ResultsSix hundred and fifty-six women from four maternity centres were recruited: 329 women were randomised to the intervention group and 327 to UC. We found no evidence that the intervention decreased excessive gestational weight gain. At 38 weeks gestation, the proportions gaining excessive gestational weight were 27.6% (81/305) versus 28.9% (90/311) (adjusted OR 0.84, 95% CI: 0.53 to 1.33) in the intervention and UC group, respectively. There were no significant difference between the groups in anxiety or depression scores (anxiety: adjusted mean −0.58, 95% CI:−1.25 to –0.8; depression: adjusted mean −0.60, 95% CI:−1.24 to –0.05). There were no significant differences in physical activity scores between the groups.ConclusionsA behavioural intervention delivered by community midwives involving routine weighing throughout pregnancy, setting maximum weight gain targets and encouraging women to weigh themselves each week to check progress did not prevent excessive gestational weight gain. There was no evidence of psychological harm.Trial registration numberISRCTN67427351

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document