scholarly journals Patient-reported outcome measurements in clinical routine of trauma, spine and craniomaxillofacial surgeons: between expectations and reality: a survey among 1212 surgeons

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. e020629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander Joeris ◽  
Christian Knoll ◽  
Vasiliki Kalampoki ◽  
Andrea Blumenthal ◽  
George Gaskell
2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miss Charlotte L. Moss ◽  
Ajay Aggarwal ◽  
Asad Qureshi ◽  
Benjamin Taylor ◽  
Teresa Guerrero-Urbano ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are emerging as an important component of patient management in the cancer setting, providing broad perspectives on patients’ quality of life and experience. The use of PROMs is, however, generally limited to the context of randomised control trials, as healthcare services are challenged to sustain high quality of care whilst facing increasing demand and financial shortfalls. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify any oncological benefit of using PROMs and investigate the wider impact on patient experience, in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity specifically. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE (Pubmed) and Ovid Gateway (Embase and Ovid) until April 2020. Studies investigating the oncological outcomes of PROMs were deemed suitable for inclusion. Results A total of 21 studies were included from 2167 screened articles. Various domains of quality of life (QoL) were identified as potential prognosticators for oncologic outcomes in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity, independent of other clinicopathological features of disease: 3 studies identified global QoL as a prognostic factor, 6 studies identified physical and role functioning, and 2 studies highlighted fatigue. In addition to improved outcomes, a number of included studies also reported that the use of PROMs enhanced both patient-clinician communication and patient satisfaction with care in the clinical setting. Conclusions This review highlights the necessity of routine collection of PROMs within the pelvic abdominal cancer setting to improve patient quality of life and outcomes.


2019 ◽  
Vol 80 (5) ◽  
pp. 1445-1447.e4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oluwatobi Ogbechie-Godec ◽  
Sarah Azarchi ◽  
Jasmine Lee ◽  
David E. Cohen ◽  
Andrea Neimann ◽  
...  

10.2196/17422 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. e17422
Author(s):  
Marscha M Engelen ◽  
Sandra van Dulmen ◽  
Saskia Puijk-Hekman ◽  
Hester Vermeulen ◽  
Maria WG Nijhuis-van der Sanden ◽  
...  

Background Web-based self-management programs have the potential to support patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) in their self-management (eg, by focusing on behavior change and improving physical activity). The intervention mapping framework was used to develop a web-based program called Vascular View. The Vascular View program contained 6 modules (coping with CVD, setting boundaries, lifestyle, healthy nutrition, being physically active, interaction with health professionals) aiming to increase self-management behavior by tailoring to the perceived problems and (support) needs of patients after CVD. Objective The aim was to test the effectiveness of Vascular View before embarking on a full-scale randomized clinical trial (RCT) by evaluating the potential effectiveness and effect sizes of the Vascular View program and identifying outcome measures most likely to capture the potential benefits. Methods An explorative RCT was performed. Both control and intervention groups received care as usual and, in addition, the intervention group received 12 months of access to a web-based self-management program. Assessment occurred at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months. Outcome measures included general patient-reported outcome measurements: Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ), Rand-36, Patient Activation Measure, and patient self-efficacy. Module-specific patient-reported outcome measurements were Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire, International Physical Activity Questionnaire, Dutch Healthy Diet Index, Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND), Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test, and Perceived Efficacy in Patient-Physician Interaction. Linear mixed models for repeated measures using intention-to-treat and per-protocol analysis were applied to study differences between the patients in the intervention and control groups. Floor and ceiling effects were explored to give insight into the outcome measures most likely to capture the potential benefits. Results A total of 105 patients in the control group and 103 patients in the intervention group participated in the study. A positive direction of change between baseline and 12 months was shown for most outcome measurements in favor of the intervention group, of which 2 out of 10 outcomes showed a significant effect: attribution of cause of the disease to risk factors and immunity factors (IPQ) and dependency of nicotine (FTND). Floor and ceiling effects were seen in the IPQ, Rand-36, and the self-efficacy questionnaire. Conclusions No conclusion for the efficacy of the Vascular View program or selection of outcome measurements can be taken yet. A process evaluation will be conducted to gain thorough insight into the working elements of the program, patient needs in eHealth, and the use of the program by patients. This can determine for whom web-based self-management programs will work and help to adapt the program. Trial Registration Dutch Trial Register NTR5412; https://www.trialregister.nl/trial/5303 International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/resprot.6352


2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 230949902091510
Author(s):  
Takao Kaneko ◽  
Norihiko Kono ◽  
Yuta Mochizuki ◽  
Masaru Hada ◽  
Shinya Toyoda ◽  
...  

Objective: Insall advocated that a successful clinical outcome of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) depends on soft tissue balance procedure. Spacer blocks, balancer, and instrumented tibial sensor (VERESENSE, OrthoSensor, Dania, Florida, USA) are the current methods of soft tissue balancing during TKA. The purpose of the study is to assess intraoperative medial and lateral tibiofemoral compressive force (TFCF) using novel insert sensor and investigate the relationship between TFCF and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs). Methods: Twenty-five patients who underwent bicruciate stabilized (BCS) TKA were evaluated retrospectively. We measured intraoperative medial and lateral TFCF in neutral position as well as the force ratio (FR %:medial TFCF/medial + lateral TFCF) in varus and valgus position using the novel insert sensor throughout the range of motion (ROM) and assessed the relationship between intraoperative medial and lateral TFCF and PROM at 6 months after TKA. Results: Medial TFCF increased and lateral TFCF decreased throughout ROM. The mean FR was 0.44% ± 0.22 throughout ROM. Medial and lateral TFCF differences at 60° of ROM in neutral position showed a positive correlation with physical function in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities scores ( r = 0.60, p < 0.05). Medial and lateral TFCF differences at 30° and 140° of ROM in valgus stress test showed a positive correlation with symptoms in 2011 Knee Society Scores ( r = 0.49, p < 0.05; r = 0.51, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The present study revealed that BCS TKA reproduces the coronal laxity, which is similar to healthy knee. These results suggest that intraoperative medial stability is important for function and symptoms, therefore, surgeons should not release medial soft tissue for achieving better clinical outcomes after BCS TKA. Level of Evidence: II


2019 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 555-563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brittany R. Lapin ◽  
Ryan D. Honomichl ◽  
Nicolas R. Thompson ◽  
Susannah Rose ◽  
David Sugano ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 22 (06) ◽  
pp. 274-275
Author(s):  
Helena Thiem

Gamper EM et al. Evaluation of Noncompletion Bias and Long-Term Adherence in a 10-Year Patient-Reported Outcome Monitoring Program in Clinical routine. Value in Health 2017; 20: 610-617 Die Datenqualität aus der klinischen Forschung ist nicht zuletzt für die Entscheidungsträger im Gesundheitswesen von großer Bedeutung. So sollen Risiken, Nutzen und Kosten medizinischer Interventionen sowohl unter patientenrelevanten als auch gesundheitspolitischen Aspekten beleuchtet werden. Derzeit existieren nur wenige Kenntnisse darüber, wie nachhaltig und repräsentativ die realitätsbezogenen „real-life“-Daten aus patient reported outcomes (PROs) sind. In einer Auswertung von PRO-Daten sollten mögliche Einflussfaktoren für unvollständige Angaben oder eine geringe Adhärenz ausgemacht werden.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document