scholarly journals Protocol for a feasibility study of smoking cessation in the surgical pathway before major lung surgery: Project MURRAY

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
pp. e036568
Author(s):  
Sebastian T Lugg ◽  
Amy Kerr ◽  
Salma Kadiri ◽  
Alina-Maria Budacan ◽  
Amanda Farley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Pilot Study ◽  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Pulmonary Complications ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Ethical Approval ◽  
Surgical Pathway

IntroductionSmoking prior to major thoracic surgery is the biggest risk factor for development of postoperative pulmonary complications, with one in five patients continuing to smoke before surgery. Current guidance is that all patients should stop smoking before elective surgery yet very few are offered specialist smoking cessation support. Patients would prefer support within the thoracic surgical pathway. No study has addressed the effectiveness of such an intervention in this setting on cessation. The overall aim is to determine in patients who undergo major elective thoracic surgery whether an intervention integrated (INT) into the surgical pathway improves smoking cessation rates compared with usual care (UC) of standard community/hospital based NHS smoking support. This pilot study will evaluate feasibility of a substantive trial.Methods and analysisProject MURRAY is a trial comparing the effectiveness of INT and UC on smoking cessation. INT is pharmacotherapy and a hybrid of behavioural support delivered by the trained healthcare practitioners (HCPs) in the thoracic surgical pathway and a complimentary web-based application. This pilot study will evaluate the feasibility of a substantive trial and study processes in five adult thoracic centres including the University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust. The primary objective is to establish the proportion of those eligible who agree to participate. Secondary objectives include evaluation of study processes. Analyses of feasibility and patient-reported outcomes will take the form of simple descriptive statistics and where appropriate, point estimates of effects sizes and associated 95% CIs.Ethics and disseminationThe study has obtained ethical approval from NHS Research Ethics Committee (REC number 19/WM/0097). Dissemination plan includes informing patients and HCPs; engaging multidisciplinary professionals to support a proposal of a definitive trial and submission for a full application dependent on the success of the study.Trial registration numberNCT04190966.

Phase II trial to evaluate combination of folfox6 + bevacizumab in initially unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (crc)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14603-14603 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Malavasi ◽  
C. Dealis ◽  
R. Depenni ◽  
S. Zironi ◽  
F. Bertolini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Outcome ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Pet Scan ◽  
Major Surgery ◽  
Surgery Complications ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Combination Regimens

14603 Introduction: The gold standard treatment of CRC liver metastases is surgical resection. Bevacizumab has proved efficacy in advanced disease. Primary objective of the study is to evaluate resecability rate of liver metastases and incidence of major surgery complications. Secondary objective is to relate tumor and serum biomarkers (EGFR, VEGF, TS, Ki67, ERCC1, MSH2, MLH1 and VEGF ) to clinical outcome Methods: Baseline requires evaluation by CT-PET scan, biopsy of metastases; PET scan is needed after first administration to describe preliminary response. The treatment consists of FOLFOX6 regimen associated to Bevacizumab, 5mg/Kg, every two weeks; elective surgery is planned after 6 cycles (the last one excludes Bevacizumab dose) by CT-PET scan; if resection is appropriate, it will be performed, otherwise the treatment will continue to 12 cycles. Biomarkers are assessed at baseline, following the first administration and before surgery Results: Up to now 11 patients have been enrolled (M/F:6/5; median age:64, range:46–72); ECOG: 0/1. 10 patients reached surgical step while 1 patient is still on chemotherapy. Three patients (27%) were not suitable for resection and received further chemotherapy: 1 had PR, 1 PD and 1 became resectable after 12 cycles. In the other 7 patients (63%): 2 CR (18%) histologically confirmed; 4 macroscopic and curative resection of liver metastasis; 1 is receving two stage epathectomy (portal vein occlusion before major liver resection). Life threatening toxicities: 1 TVP causing discontinuation of Bevacizumab, 1 hospitalization for gastro-intestinal and G4 neutropenia both causing discontinuation of the whole therapy. Bevacizumab complications before major surgery did not occurred; 1 patient reported post operative delay wound healing. Less severe toxicities: haematological G3 in 2 patients (18%), G1 in 1 patient (9%); 3 gastrointestinal G2 (27%); neuropathic in 1 patient (9%). The VEGF serum decreased after the first dose of Bevacizumab in all specimens Conclusions: Systemic chemotherapy with combination regimens may downstage liver metastases and thus increase resecability rate without important surgery complications; biomarkers related to clinical outcome are in evaluation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Pilot study investigating an oncofertility program in adults with breast or sarcoma cancers.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e23096-e23096
Author(s):  
Manali A. Bhave ◽  
Fang Fang ◽  
Kelley M. Kidwell ◽  
Gloria Lola Smith ◽  
Rashmi Chugh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Cancer Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Patient Navigator ◽  
Provider Education ◽  
Childbearing Age ◽  
Medical Provider ◽  
Post Intervention ◽  
Patient Reported

e23096 Background: Cancer survival is at an all-time high; however, patients often face long-term consequences including infertility. Loss of fertility can be devastating and lead to long-lasting emotional distress. Despite consensus guidelines encouraging providers to discuss infertility risk and refer for fertility preservation (FP) consultations, fertility counseling and FP occur in only 10-29% of patients of childbearing age. A few identified barriers include lack of provider knowledge on FP, constraints on time and lack of available resources. Methods: This is a prospective pilot study evaluating the efficacy of an oncofertility program in increasing discussions on infertility risk and FP between providers and patients. The oncofertility program includes medical provider education, an electronic medical record (EMR)-based best practice alert with smart order set, patient education pamphlets and a patient navigator through Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility (REI). Our primary objective was to increase documentation on fertility in the EMR, while our secondary objective was to increase referrals to REI for females and orders for semen cryopreservation for males. Provider and patient-reported outcomes were also obtained. Results: 19 patients with a new diagnosis of breast or sarcoma (7 pre-intervention and 12 post-intervention) were enrolled and 17 providers participated in the study at the University of Michigan. There was no change in documentation on fertility in the EMR and no increase in fertility referrals placed. However, patients reported a statistically significant change in amount of information provided on infertility risk and FP from "too little" to "the right amount." Providers also reported increased confidence in initiating a conversation about FP and a trend towards increased comfort documenting their conversations on FP in the EMR. Conclusions: With an increase in cancers diagnosed in young adults, there is a need to improve counseling on the risk of infertility with cancer treatment and FP options. Through an easily implemented oncofertility program, we were able to improve medical provider confidence in initiating this important conversation, provide patients with education on infertility risk and FP and streamline the process for FP referrals utilizing the EMR.

scholarly journals Assessing change in patient-reported quality of life after elective surgery: protocol for an observational comparison study

F1000Research ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vanessa L. Kronzer ◽  
Michelle R. Jerry ◽  
Michael S. Avidan
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Elective Surgery ◽  
Minimum Clinically Important Difference ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Patient Decision Making ◽  
Study Protocols ◽  
Patient Decision ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Assess Quality

Despite their widespread use, the two main methods of assessing quality of life after surgery have never been directly compared. To support patient decision-making and study design, we aim to compare these two methods. The first of these methods is to assess quality of life before surgery and again after surgery using the same validated scale. The second is simply to ask patients whether or not they think their post-operative quality of life is better, worse, or the same. Our primary objective is to assess agreement between the two measures. Secondary objectives are to calculate the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) and to describe the variation across surgical specialties. To accomplish these aims, we will administer surveys to patients undergoing elective surgery, both before surgery and again 30 days after surgery. This protocol follows detailed guidelines for observational study protocols.

Payroll Contracting for Smoking Cessation: A Worksite Pilot Study

1988 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W. Jeffery ◽  
Alfred M. Pheley ◽  
Jean L. Forster ◽  
F. Matthew Kramer ◽  
Mary Kaye Snell
Keyword(s):  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Pilot Study

The Student Room Survey: Changes in the Post Graduate Study for Cardiothoracic Surgery

2020 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 71-74
Author(s):  
Md Faizus Sazzad ◽  
Mohammed Moniruzzaman ◽  
Dewan Iftakher Raza Choudhury ◽  
Arif Ahmed Mohiuddin ◽  
Raafi Rahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Thoracic Surgery ◽  
Retrospective Analysis ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Graduate Study ◽  
Postgraduate Students ◽  
Depth Interview ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Cardio Vascular ◽  
The University ◽  
Day By Day

Background: The number of postgraduate students in Cardiac surgical discipline is increasing day by day with incremental proportion are measurably suffering from the unnecessary lingering of the present course curriculum. The primary objective of this study was to find out the last 5 years’ of results of Masters in Surgery course under the University of Dhaka from a student room survey. A secondary objective was to find out positive changes that could show us the way of a step toward up-gradation. Methods: It is a retrospective analysis of all examination results of Cardio-vascular & Thoracic Surgery published since January 2008 to January 2013 from the University of Dhaka with in depth interview of 11 participants. Results: 85.24% students failed to pass part-I of Masters in Surgery for Cardio-vascular & Thoracic Surgery course while, 82.18% in part-II and 71.28% failed to pass the final part. Average 2.51 attempts needed to complete each part of the designed course resulted into lingering of course duration for 42.18 months/student. In the thoracic surgery discipline the number of students alarmingly reduced up to 0% in the recent academic sessions. Conclusions: Masters in Surgery is resulting in unnecessary prolongation of the course. We should step forward to meet the next generation challenge. Journal of Surgical Sciences (2019) Vol. 23(2): 71-74

scholarly journals Tracking, Prioritising, Streamlining and Auditing the Surgical Pathway with the Swalis Live Audit Model. A Feasibility-pilot Study in the Barts Health HPB Service

HPB ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S403
Author(s):  
R. Valente ◽  
K. Ryan ◽  
I. Porro ◽  
A. Abraham ◽  
S. Bhattacharya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Surgical Pathway
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document