scholarly journals Glenoid failure after total shoulder arthroplasty with cemented all-polyethylene versus metal-backed implants: a systematic review protocol

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. e043449
Author(s):  
Renato Aroca Aroca Zan ◽  
Rafael Fuchs Lazarini ◽  
Fabio Teruo Matsunaga ◽  
Nicola Archetti Netto ◽  
João Carlos Belloti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Selection Of

IntroductionAnatomical total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an effective treatment adopted for patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis (OA). The glenoid component failure is the main risk that occurs in this therapeutic choice; however, doubts remain regarding the selection of the best implant for avoiding complication. This systematic review aims to evaluate the glenoid component in TSA by comparing the complications of different types of implants.Methods and analysisA systematic review of randomised clinical trials or quasi-randomised trials will be performed by applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis protocols and comparing polyethylene (keeled and pegged) versus metal-backed implants in adult patients with glenohumeral OA. Our search strategy will be performed using MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE and Web of Science. Data management and extraction will be performed using a data withdrawal form and by analysing study method characteristics, participant characteristics, intervention characteristics, results and methodological domains. The database search will be performed by February 2021. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation will be used for assessing the quality of evidence of each study selected; however, some critical and important outcomes were determined such as the shoulder function through functional scores (Constant-Murley and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons), complications represented by pain (Visual Analogue Scale), surgical revision, radiograph radiolucency and loosening. The confidence in estimated effects for these outcomes will be applied as the overall confidence. The outcomes will be defined as early or late, according to the postoperative follow-up of less than or greater than 1 year, respectively, for complications and radiographs. For the shoulder function, follow-ups will be divided into 6, 12 and 24 months. Heterogeneity is expected in systematic reviews; therefore, the selection of outcomes, as well as the sample size, and specific statistical analysis can lead to meta-analysis; however, if it fails, narrative evidence synthesis will be conducted. Other analyses such as descriptive, subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed whenever possible. This systematic review will, therefore, provide evidence concerning the best clinical practice for avoiding complications.Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Universidade Federal de São Paulo (protocols 0725/2017, 2.157.415 and 70473017.5.0000.5505), and the findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018079537.

scholarly journals Glenoid Failure after Total Shoulder Arthroplasty, cemented all-polyethylene versus metal-backed: A Systematic Review Protocol

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renato Aroca Zan ◽  
Rafael Fuchs Lazarini ◽  
Fábio Teruo Matsunaga ◽  
Nicola Archetti Netto ◽  
João Carlos Belloti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Science Data ◽  
Functional Scores

Abstract BackgroundAnatomical Total Shoulder Arthroplasty (TSA) is an effective treatment adopted in patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The glenoid component failure is the main risk that occurs in this therapeutic choice; however, doubts remain, regarding the selection of the best implant in order to avoid such complication.MethodsA systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or quasi will be carried out, applying the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) protocols, comparing polyethylene (keeled and pegged) versus metal back implants in adult patients with glenohumeral osteoarthritis.Our search strategy will be carried out in the MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, Web of Science. Data management and extraction will be performed using a data withdrawal form and by analyzing study method characteristics, participant characteristics, intervention characteristics, results, methodological domains. The summaries of research evidence will be accessed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Shoulder function through functional scores such as Constant-Murley (CM) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), pain (Visual Analogue Scale), infection, procedure failure, radiograph radiolucency and loosening, are the selected outcomes. Another analysis such as subgroup, heterogeneity, sensitivity and statistical are going to be performed whenever possible.DiscussionThis systematic review aims to analyze how glenoidal implants behave in Total Shoulder Arthroplasties and therefore provide evidence concerning the best clinical practice to avoid complication. Systematic review registrationPROSPERO, CRD 42018079537.

scholarly journals Interventional radiology versus operative management for splenic injuries: a study protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e028172
Author(s):  
Masahiro Kashiura ◽  
Noritaka Yada ◽  
Kazuma Yamakawa
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Interventional Radiology ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Operative Management ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Definitive Treatment ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Statistical Heterogeneity ◽  
Non Operative Management

IntroductionOver the past decades, the treatment for blunt splenic injuries has shifted from operative to non-operative management. Interventional radiology such as splenic arterial embolisation generally increases the success rate of non-operative management. However, the type of intervention, such as the first definitive treatment for haemostasis (interventional radiology or surgery) in blunt splenic injuries is unclear. Therefore, we aim to clarify whether interventional radiology improves mortality in patients with blunt splenic trauma compared with operative management by conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis.Methods and analysisWe will search the following electronic bibliographic databases to retrieve relevant articles for the literature review: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. We will include controlled trials and observational studies published until September 2018. We will screen search results, assess the study population, extract data and assess the risk of bias. Two review authors will extract data independently, and discrepancies will be identified and resolved through a discussion with a third author where necessary. Data from eligible studies will be pooled using a random-effects meta-analysis. Statistical heterogeneity will be assessed by using the Mantel-Haenszel χ² test and the I² statistic, and any observed heterogeneity will be quantified using the I² statistic. We will conduct sensitivity analyses according to several factors relevant for the heterogeneity.Ethics and disseminationOur study does not require ethical approval as it is based on the findings of previously published articles. This systematic review will provide guidance on selecting a method for haemostasis of splenic injuries and may also identify knowledge gaps that could direct further research in the field. Results will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentations at relevant conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018108304.

scholarly journals Journey of the glenoid in anatomic total shoulder replacement

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Castagna ◽  
Raffaele Garofalo
Keyword(s):  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Current Practice ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Shoulder Function ◽  
Patient Specific ◽  
Glenoid Component ◽  
Shoulder Replacement ◽  
Final Destination ◽  
Component Loosening

Anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSR) has been shown to generate good to excellent results for patients with osteoarthritis and a functioning rotator cuff. Many studies have reported that the glenoid component loosening and failure remain the most common long-term complication of total shoulder arthroplasty. The approach to glenoid component is critical because a surgeon should consider patient-specific anatomy, preserving bone stock and joint line restoration, for a good and durable shoulder function. Over the years, different glenoid design and materials have been tried in various configurations. These include cemented polyethylene, uncemented metal-backed and hybrid implants. Although advances in biomechanics, design and tribology have improved our understanding of the glenoid, the journey of the glenoid component in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty has not yet reached its final destination. This article attempts to describe the evolution of the glenoid component in anatomic TSR and current practice.

Stemless anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (9) ◽  
pp. 1928-1937
Author(s):  
Eva Y. Liu ◽  
Dorsa Kord ◽  
Nolan S. Horner ◽  
Timothy Leroux ◽  
Bashar Alolabi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty

scholarly journals Return to Sport after Anatomic and Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty in Elderly Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 1576
Author(s):  
Rocco Papalia ◽  
Mauro Ciuffreda ◽  
Erika Albo ◽  
Chiara De Andreis ◽  
Lorenzo Alirio Diaz Balzani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Total Shoulder Arthroplasty ◽  
Case Series ◽  
Return To Sport ◽  
Rate Of Return ◽  
Cochrane Library

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the rate of return to sport in elderly patients who underwent anatomic (ATSA) and reverse (RTSA) total shoulder arthroplasty, to assess postoperative pain and functional outcomes and to give an overview of postoperative rehabilitation protocols. A systematic search in Pubmed-Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar was carried out to identify eligible randomized clinical trials, observational studies, or case series that evaluated the rate of return to sport after RTSA or ATSA. Six retrospective studies, five case series, and one prospective cohort study were included in this review. The overall rate of return to sport was 82% (95% CI 0.76–0.88, p < 0.01). Patients undergoing ATSA returned at a higher rate (90%) (95% CI 0.80–0.99, p < 0.01) compared to RTSA (77%) (95% CI 0.69–0.85, p < 0.01). Moreover, the results showed that patients returned to sport at the same or a higher level in 75% of cases. Swimming had the highest rate of return (84%), followed by fitness (77%), golf (77%), and tennis (69%). Thus, RTSA and ATSA are effective to guarantee a significative rate of return to sport in elderly patients. A slightly higher rate was found for the anatomic implant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document