THE EFFICACY OF MEDICAL SIMULATION COURSE ON IMPROVING ULTRASOUND—GUIDED CENTRAL VENOUS CATHETER INSERTION

2015 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 41.2-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sawsan M Alyousef ◽  
Mohammed Almaani ◽  
Jihad Zahraa ◽  
Ali Hassan ◽  
Hani Lababidi
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Training Programs ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Skill Assessment ◽  
Medical Simulation ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Knowledge And Skills ◽  
Hands On

BackgroundWhile insertion of CVC (central venous catheter) is common, it is an intricate procedure and not risk-free. Traditionally, inexperienced residents learn to insert CVC on real patients and thus can put patients' life at risk. One way to reduce medical errors is to use high-fidelity simulation for training tomorrow's practitioners on ultrasound-guided CVC insertion.ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of medical simulation based learning course on knowledge and skills improvement on ultrasound-guided CVC insertion.MethodsA pre-assessment was performed through a pre-test and hands-on skill assessment for central line insertion under U/S guidance (Internal Jugular, Subclavian or Femoral lines) utilizing a standardized checklist. All candidates then attended one day course that included theoretical and hands-on simulation training using phantoms. A post-test and hands-on assessment was performed at the end of the day.ResultsTwenty residents from Internal Medicine and Paediatrics were enrolled in the study at King Fahad Medical City Simulation Center. There was significant improvement in the knowledge based training: 90% showed significant increase in their MCQ scores (p<0.001), 10% had equal scores and none showed decline in their scores. For the hands-on skills: All 20 candidates showed significant improvement in their skills (p<0.001).ConclusionA one day simulation course on CVC insertion under ultrasound guidance significantly improves the knowledge and skills for residents in training programs.RecommendationsSuch courses and other similar should be compulsory for all Residents training programs as it is called safe training.

scholarly journals Estratégia Multidimensional na Redução de Infeção Associada a Cateter Venoso Central em Pediatria

2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 373
Author(s):  
Jorge Rodrigues ◽  
Andrea Dias ◽  
Guiomar Oliveira ◽  
José Farela Neves
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Bloodstream Infection ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Pediatric Intensive Care ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Line ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Group 2

<p><strong>Introduction:</strong> To determine the central-line associated bloodstream infection rate after implementation of central venous catheter-care practice bundles and guidelines and to compare it with the previous central-line associated bloodstream infection rate.<br /><strong>Material and Methods:</strong> A prospective, longitudinal, observational descriptive study with an exploratory component was performed in a Pediatric Intensive Care Unit during five months. The universe was composed of every child admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit who inserted a central venous catheter. A comparative study with historical controls was performed to evaluate the result of the intervention (group 1 <em>versus</em> group 2).<br /><strong>Results:</strong> Seventy five children were included, with a median age of 23 months: 22 (29.3%) newborns; 28 (37.3%) with recent surgery and 32 (43.8%) with underlying illness. A total of 105 central venous catheter were inserted, the majority a single central venous catheter (69.3%), with a mean duration of 6.8 ± 6.7 days. The most common type of central venous catheter was the short-term, non-tunneled central venous catheter (45.7%), while the subclavian and brachial flexure veins were the most frequent insertion sites (both 25.7%). There were no cases of central-line associated bloodstream infection reported during this study. Comparing with historical controls (group 1), both groups were similar regarding age, gender, department of origin and place of central venous catheter insertion. In the current study (group 2), the median length of stay was higher, while the mean duration of central venous catheter (excluding peripherally inserted central line) was similar in both groups. There were no statistical differences regarding central venous catheter caliber and number of lumens. Fewer children admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit had central venous catheter inserted in group 2, with no significant difference between single or multiple central venous catheter.<br /><strong>Discussion:</strong> After multidimensional strategy implementation there was no reported central-line associated bloodstream infection<br /><strong>Conclusions:</strong> Efforts must be made to preserve the same degree of multidimensional prevention, in order to confirm the effective reduction of the central-line associated bloodstream infection rate and to allow its maintenance.</p>

Electrocardiography-controlled central venous catheter tip positioning in patients with atrial fibrillation

2018 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 528-534 ◽  
Author(s):  
Folkert Steinhagen ◽  
Maximilian Kanthak ◽  
Guido Kukuk ◽  
Christian Bode ◽  
Andreas Hoeft ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Superior Vena ◽  
Vena Cava ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Catheter Tip ◽  
Tip Position ◽  
The Right

Introduction: A significant increase of the p-wave of a real-time intracavitary electrocardiography is a reliable and safe method to confirm the central venous catheter tip position close to the atrium. However, conflicting data about the feasibility of electrocardiography exist in patients with atrial fibrillation. Methods: An observational prospective case–control cohort study was set up to study the feasibility and accuracy of the electrocardiography-controlled central venous catheter tip placement in 13 patients with atrial fibrillation versus 10 patients with sinus rhythm scheduled for elective surgery. Each intervention was crosschecked with ultrasound-guided positioning via right supraclavicular fossa view and chest radiography. Ultrasound-guided supraclavicular venipuncture of the right subclavian vein and guidewire advancement were performed. A B-mode view of the superior vena cava and the right pulmonary artery was obtained to visualize the J-tip of the guidewire. The central venous catheter was advanced over the guidewire and the electrocardiography was derived from the J-tip of the guidewire protruding from the central venous catheter tip. Electrocardiography was read for increased p- and atrial fibrillation waves, respectively, and insertion depth was compared with the ultrasound method. Results: Electrocardiography indicated significantly increasing fibrillation and p-waves, respectively, in all patients and ultrasound-guided central venous catheter positioning confirmed a tip position within the lower third of the superior vena cava. Conclusion: Electrocardiography-guided central venous catheter tip positioning is a feasible real-time method for patients with atrial fibrillation. Combined with ultrasound, the electrocardiography-controlled central venous catheter placement may eliminate the need for postinterventional radiation exposure.

Pre- and post-review of a standardized ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization curriculum evaluating procedural skills acquisition and clinician confidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
pp. 440-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy R Spencer ◽  
Amy J Bardin-Spencer
Keyword(s):  
Central Venous Catheter ◽  
Central Venous Catheterization ◽  
Venous Catheter ◽  
Catheter Insertion ◽  
Central Venous Catheter Insertion ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Central Venous ◽  
Clinical Simulation ◽  
Venous Catheterization ◽  
Simulation Based

Background: To evaluate novice and expert clinicians’ procedural confidence utilizing a blended learning mixed fidelity simulation model when applying a standardized ultrasound-guided central venous catheterization curriculum. Methods: Simulation-based education and ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion aims to provide facility-wide efficiencies and improves patient safety through interdisciplinary collaboration. The objective of this quality improvement research was to evaluate both novice (<50) and expert (>50) clinicians’ confidence across 100 ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion courses were performed at a mixture of teaching and non-teaching hospitals across 26 states within the United States between April 2015 and April 2016. A total of 1238 attendees completed a pre- and post-survey after attending a mixed method clinical simulation course. Attendees completed a 4-h online didactic education module followed by 4 h of hands-on clinical simulation stations (compliance/sterile technique, needling techniques, vascular ultrasound assessment, and experiential complication management). Results: The use of a standardized evidence-based ultrasound-guided central venous catheter curriculum improved confidence and application to required clinical tasks and knowledge across all interdisciplinary specialties, regardless of level of experience. Both physician and non-physician groups resulted in statistically significant results in both procedural compliance ( p < 0.001) and ultrasound skills ( p < 0.001). Conclusion: The use of a standardized clinical simulation curriculum enhanced all aspects of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion skills, knowledge, and improved confidence for all clinician types. Self-reported complications were reported at significantly higher rates than previously published evidence, demonstrating the need for ongoing procedural competencies. While there are growing benefits for the role of simulation-based programs, further evaluation is needed to explore its effectiveness in changing the quality of clinical outcomes within the healthcare setting.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document