Effect of In Situ High-Fidelity Simulation Training on the Emergency management of Pneumonia (INSTEP): a mixed-methods study

2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (4) ◽  
pp. 190-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Owain Michael Leng ◽  
Charlotte Rothwell ◽  
Annamarie Buckton ◽  
Catherine Elmer ◽  
Jan Illing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Simulation Education ◽  
Audit Data ◽  
Semistructured Interviews ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundThe patient safety agenda has propelled the rise of simulation education, but relatively few evaluations of simulation-based educational interventions have focused on patient outcomes.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of an in situ, high-fidelity simulation teaching intervention on the management of community-acquired pneumonia in the ambulatory care unit of a district general hospital.MethodsThis study used a mixed-methods approach to evaluate the impact of a programme of 10 in situ high-fidelity simulation education sessions delivered to a total of 10 junior doctors, nine nurses and seven healthcare assistants. Participants were tasked with managing a manikin simulating a patient with pneumonia in real time in a working clinical area. Subsequent structured debrief emphasised key themes from the national guidelines on pneumonia management. The intervention was evaluated through an immediate feedback form, follow-up semistructured interviews by independent qualitative researchers that underwent content analysis and triangulation with audit data on compliance with national pneumonia guidelines before and after the simulation intervention.ResultsThe in situ simulation intervention was valued by participants both in immediate written feedback and in follow-up semistructured interviews. In these interviews, 17 of 18 participants were able to identify a self-reported change in practice following the simulation intervention. Furthermore, most participants reported observing a change in the clinical practice of their colleagues following the training. Collected audit data did not show a statistically significant change in compliance with the guidelines for the management of pneumonia.ConclusionThis study found evidence of a change in both self-reported and observed clinical practice following a simulation intervention, supporting expert opinion that simulation education can impact clinician behaviours and patient outcomes in complex clinical scenarios. Furthermore, this feasibility study provides a transferrable method to evaluate the real-world impact of simulation education that merits further investigation through an appropriately powered study.

scholarly journals Effects of high-fidelity simulation education on medical students’ anxiety and confidence

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. e0251078
Author(s):  
Ji Hye Yu ◽  
Hye Jin Chang ◽  
Soon Sun Kim ◽  
Ji Eun Park ◽  
Wou Young Chung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Medical Students ◽  
Patient Care ◽  
Clinical Setting ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Simulation Education ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Care Situation

Introduction Psychological factors such as anxiety and confidence that students have in the patient care situation are important in that this affects the actual clinical performance. Students who are just starting clinical practice have a lack of clinical knowledge, skill proficiency, and patient communication skills, so they experience anxiety and lack of confidence in clinical setting. Practice in a safe environment, such as simulation education, can help students perform more settled and competently in patient care. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of high-fidelity simulation experience on anxiety and confidence in medical students. Materials and methods This study enrolled 37 5th-year students at Ajou University School of Medicine in 2020. Two simulation trainings were implemented, and a survey was conducted to measure students’ level of anxiety and confidence before and after each simulation. Based on the research data, a paired t-test was conducted to compare these variables before and after the simulation, and whether this was their first or second simulation experience. Results Students had a significantly lower level of anxiety and a significantly higher level of confidence after the simulation than before. In addition, after one simulation experience, students had less anxiety and more confidence before the second simulation compared to those without simulation experience. Conclusions We confirmed that medical students need to be repeatedly exposed to simulation education experiences in order to have a sense of psychological stability and to competently deliver medical treatment in a clinical setting. There is a practical limitation in that medical students do not have enough opportunities to meet the patients during clinical practice in hospitals. Therefore, in order to produce excellent doctors, students should have the expanded opportunities to experience simulation education so they can experience real-world medical conditions.

scholarly journals Acute care simulation training for foundation doctors: The perceived impact on practice in the workplace

2013 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 151-158
Author(s):  
Prabir Patel ◽  
◽  
Indu Sockalingam ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Clinical Experience ◽  
Simulation Training ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Main Contributor ◽  
Perceived Impact ◽  
Applied Skills

High fidelity simulation allows training of foundation doctors in a safe, structured environment. We explored the perceived impact of such training on subsequent clinical practice. 82 doctors attended and 52% responded to a follow up questionnaire sent two months after their training. 88% felt better able to manage the acutely ill patient than they did before their training. All cited simulation training as a reason for this and 44% felt simulation training was the main contributor. The remainder cited clinical experience as the main contributor. 53% gave real clinical examples where they applied skills attributed to simulation training. Doctors reflected positively on simulation training sometime after the experience, demonstrated transference of learnt skills and felt more confident at work.

The challenges of developing and evaluating complex care scenarios using simulation in nursing education

2012 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 329-345 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Gobbi ◽  
Eloise Monger ◽  
Mark J. Weal ◽  
John W. McDonald ◽  
Danius Michaelides ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nursing Education ◽  
Patient Outcomes ◽  
Theoretical Models ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
Complex Data ◽  
Complex Care ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
High Current ◽  
The Impact

Demonstrating the impact and effectiveness of educational interventions, including medium and high-fidelity simulation, has long been fraught with methodological challenges and ambiguities. This is particularly the case when there are several confounding factors and variables operating in situations where control trials are inappropriate, and investigative costs can be high. Current theoretical and empirical evidence, while emerging, is parsimonious and fails to take account of the characteristics of different modes of simulation, their contested theoretical models of learning and the opportunities presented by cutting edge computer science. Medium and high-fidelity simulations, situated within technology-rich environments, generate new forms of complex data that have the potential to provide insights into ‘real-world’ practices. Drawing on a range of locally based studies, we argue that until the methodological questions and data management systems can be addressed, the evidence to determine the judicious and optimal use of simulation to improve student and practitioner performance and patient outcomes will remain primarily reliant on proxy measures of self-efficacy and competence.

scholarly journals Is the use of two versus one long-acting bronchodilator by patients with COPD associated with a higher risk of acute coronary syndrome in real-world clinical practice?

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. e000840
Author(s):  
Lianne Parkin ◽  
Sheila Williams ◽  
David Barson ◽  
Katrina Sharples ◽  
Simon Horsburgh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Real World ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Treatment Intensification ◽  
Cardiovascular Comorbidity ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundCardiovascular comorbidity is common among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and there is concern that long-acting bronchodilators (long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMAs) and long-acting beta2 agonists (LABAs)) may further increase the risk of acute coronary events. Information about the impact of treatment intensification on acute coronary syndrome (ACS) risk in real-world settings is limited. We undertook a nationwide nested case–control study to estimate the risk of ACS in users of both a LAMA and a LABA relative to users of a LAMA.MethodsWe used routinely collected national health and pharmaceutical dispensing data to establish a cohort of patients aged >45 years who initiated long-acting bronchodilator therapy for COPD between 1 February 2006 and 30 December 2013. Fatal and non-fatal ACS events during follow-up were identified using hospital discharge and mortality records. For each case we used risk set sampling to randomly select up to 10 controls, matched by date of birth, sex, date of cohort entry (first LAMA and/or LABA dispensing), and COPD severity.ResultsFrom the cohort (n=83 417), we identified 5399 ACS cases during 281 292 person-years of follow-up. Compared with current use of LAMA therapy, current use of LAMA and LABA dual therapy was associated with a higher risk of ACS (OR 1.28 (95% CI 1.13 to 1.44)). The OR in an analysis restricted to fatal cases was 1.46 (95% CI 1.12 to 1.91).ConclusionIn real-world clinical practice, use of two versus one long-acting bronchodilator by people with COPD is associated with a higher risk of ACS.

scholarly journals The use of multiple-criteria decision-making theory to measure students’ perceptions of high-fidelity simulation

2017 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. 88-93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maureen Anne Jersby ◽  
Paul Van-Schaik ◽  
Stephen Green ◽  
Lili Nacheva-Skopalik
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Learning Experience ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
Initial Exposure ◽  
Repeated Measures Design

BackgroundHigh-Fidelity Simulation (HFS) has great potential to improve decision-making in clinical practice. Previous studies have found HFS promotes self-confidence, but its effectiveness in clinical practice has not been established. The aim of this research is to establish if HFS facilitates learning that informs decision-making skills in clinical practice using MultipleCriteria DecisionMaking Theory (MCDMT).MethodsThe sample was 2nd year undergraduate pre-registration adult nursing students.MCDMT was used to measure the students’ experience of HFS and how it developed their clinical decision-making skills. MCDMT requires characteristic measurements which for the learning experience were based on five factors that underpin successful learning, and for clinical decision-making, an analytical framework was used. The study used a repeated-measures design to take two measurements: the first one after the first simulation experience and the second one after clinical placement. Baseline measurements were obtained from academics. Data were analysed using the MCDMT tool.ResultsAfter their initial exposure to simulation learning, students reported that HFS provides a high-quality learning experience (87%) and supports all aspects of clinical decision-making (85%). Following clinical practice, the level of support for clinical decision-making remained at 85%, suggesting that students believe HFS promotes transferability of knowledge to the practice setting.ConclusionOverall, students report a high level of support for learning and developing clinical decision-making skills from HFS. However, there are no comparative data available from classroom teaching of similar content so it cannot be established if these results are due to HFS alone.

scholarly journals POS0941 IN SPONDYLOARTHRITIS PATIENTS THE PRESENCE OF COMORBIDITIES IS AN INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR OF INSUFFICIENT RESPONSE TO THERAPY WITH BIOLOGIC AGENTS AND TREATMENT DISCONTINUATION

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 733.2-734
Author(s):  
I. Flouri ◽  
N. Kougkas ◽  
N. Avgustidis ◽  
A. Repa ◽  
A. Eskitzis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Disease Duration ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Independent Predictor ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Treatment Discontinuation ◽  
Randomized Controlled Studies ◽  
Insufficient Response ◽  
The Impact

Background:Long-term observational studies of patients under biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD) therapies in routine clinical practice can provide us with important data regarding patients with comorbidities, who are usually excluded from randomized controlled studies.Objectives:To study the impact of comorbidities in the outcome (response and persistence to therapy) of patients with spondyloarthritis (SpA) receiving bDMARDs in real-world clinical practice.Methods:Prospective study of all patients who start a bDMARD in a tertiary centre University Hospital after their consent. All patient comorbidities [among a list of approximately 100 pre-specified major comorbidities] are registered by treating physicians at baseline and during follow-up.Comorbidities were studied as total Comorbidities Count (CC) and rheumatic disease comorbidity index (RDCI). Statistical analyses were performed using logistic and Cox regression models, adjusting for the potential confounding of age, sex, disease duration, diagnosis (axial vs. peripheral SpA), number of previous conventional synthetic and biologic DMARDs, year of therapy start, and co-administered methotrexate and corticosteroids (yes/no). Analyses of response to therapy also included baseline BASDAI or ASDAS indices as confounding variables.Results:A total of 603 biologic treatments (1st: 298, 2nd: 157, ≥3rd: 148) were analyzed. Half (51%) of the patients were female, 413 patients had axial SpA (AxSpA) and 190 peripheral SpA (perSpA). At baseline, median (IQR) age: 48 (38-57) years, disease duration: 11 (4-19) years, CC: 2 (1-4) and RDCI: 1 (0-2). Both comorbidity indices were significantly higher in perSpA compared to AxSpA (p<0.001).At 6 months of therapy, 31% of patients with AxSpA achieved BASDAI50 and 39% had ASDAS-ESR < 2.1. Higher CC was an independent predictor of insufficient response according to BASDAI50 [OR (95%) = 0.70 (0.52-0.94), p=0.019] and higher RDCI was predicting failure to achieve ASDAS-ESR < 2.1 [OR (95%) = 0.59 (0.37-0.94), p=0.027]. Other independent predictors of non-response were age, longer disease duration and (for ASDAS-ESR<2.1) higher baseline disease activity.During 1405 patient-years of follow-up, 349 (58%) treatments were discontinued. The adjusted hazard ratio for bDMARD discontinuation within the first 2 years of treatment due to insufficient response was doubled in patients with CC ≥2 versus those with CC ≤1 [HR = 2.27 (1.14-4.53), p=0.020] or with RDCI ≥1 (vs. RDCI = 0) [HR = 2.23 (1.22-4.07), p=0.009]. Comorbidities’ indices were not significant predictors of treatment discontinuations due to adverse events.Conclusion:The presence of comorbidities in patients with SpA is an independent predictor for insufficient 6-month response to bDMARDs and resultant treatment discontinuation due to failure.Acknowledgements:This research is co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund- ESF) through the Operational Programme «Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning» in the context of the project “Reinforcement of Postdoctoral Researchers - 2nd Cycle” (MIS-5033021), implemented by the State Scholarships Foundation (ΙΚΥ).Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Glioma patient-reported outcomes: patients and clinicians

2021 ◽  
pp. bmjspcare-2020-002699
Author(s):  
Marthe Peeters ◽  
Germaine Ottenheijm ◽  
Paul Bienfait ◽  
Daniëlle Eekers ◽  
Anja Gijtenbeek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Nurse Specialist ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Semistructured Interviews ◽  
Routine Assessment

IntroductionRoutine assessment of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in oncology has shown to improve the quality of the delivered care and to prolong survival. However, for successful implementation of routine assessment of PROs, more knowledge on their usability in clinical practice is needed.ObjectiveThis study aimed to cross-sectionally assess the perspective of patients and clinicians on the practicality of routinely measuring PROs in clinical practice for glioma patients.MethodsSemistructured interviews were conducted evaluating the role of healthcare professionals (HCP) in discussing results of PRO measures (PROMs), and the preferred topics, methods and frequency of PRO assessment. Glioma patients, their proxies and HCPs involved in the treatment of glioma patients from eight centres in the Netherlands were included.ResultsTwenty-four patients, 16 proxies and 35 HCPs were interviewed. The majority of patients, proxies and HCPs (92%, 81% and 80%, respectively) were willing to discuss PRO results during consultations. Although HCPs prefer that results are discussed with the nurse specialist, only one-third of patients/proxies agreed. Functioning of daily life was considered important in all three groups. Most participants indicated that discussion of PROM results should take place during standard follow-up visits, and completed at home about 1 week in advance. On group level, there was no preference for administration of questionnaires on paper or digitally. Lastly, all centres had staff available to send questionnaires on paper.ConclusionThis study shows that routine assessment of PROs is desired by patients, proxies and HCP’s in neuro-oncological care in Dutch hospitals.

Validity of a questionnaire developed to measure the impact of a high‐fidelity simulation intervention: A feasibility study

2019 ◽  
Vol 75 (11) ◽  
pp. 2673-2682
Author(s):  
Kristine Haddeland ◽  
Åshild Slettebø ◽  
Elisabeth Svensson ◽  
Patricia Carstens ◽  
Mariann Fossum
Keyword(s):  
Feasibility Study ◽  
High Fidelity ◽  
High Fidelity Simulation ◽  
The Impact
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document