Benzodiazepine dependence – a helpful new report

1993 ◽  
Vol 31 (13) ◽  
pp. 52-52

Recently we outlined a prescribing policy designed to help reduce benzodiazepine use in hospitals.1 Most benzodiazepine prescribing takes place in general practice and, although benzodiazepine use has fallen in the last 15 years, many GPs will still have up to 50 long-term users on their lists. In May, the Mental Health Foundation published guidelines on benzodiazepine use in primary care.*

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e033688 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristien Coteur ◽  
Marc Van Nuland ◽  
Marc Vanmeerbeek ◽  
Gilles Henrard ◽  
Sibyl Anthierens ◽  
...  

IntroductionProblematic benzodiazepine use is a global health issue. Although the adverse side effects of long-term use of benzodiazepines are well known, it remains difficult to implement interventions for discontinuation in primary care. Considering the success of blended care for the treatment of sleeping disorders and the support of substance use disorders, evidence suggests that a blended care approach, combining face-to-face consultations with the general practitioner with web-based self-learning by the patient, is beneficial for the discontinuation of chronic benzodiazepine use for primary insomnia in general practice. Therefore, the aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of such an approach for the discontinuation of benzodiazepine and zolpidem, zopiclone and zaleplon drugs ((z-)BZD) use in the long term and evaluate the implementation process.Methods and analysisThis study is a multicentre, pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial with 1200 patients, included by 120 general practitioners. Allocation to usual or blended care happens at the level of the general practice in a 1:1 ratio using a block randomisation system stratified per language. The study population consists of adult primary care patients who have been using (z-)BZD for primary insomnia on a daily basis for at least 6 months. Primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients that discontinued (z-)BZD at 12 months assessed by toxicological screening for (z-)BZD in urine. Secondary outcomes include discontinuation of (z-)BZD at 6 months, quality of life and the number of defined daily doses of (z-)BZD prescribed. Data will be collected using a study-specific online platform and analysed using the intention-to-treat approach. The process of implementing blended care will be evaluated in a nested study.Ethics and disseminationThis trial was approved by the Ethics Committee for Research of UZ/KU Leuven (ref. S61194). Study results will be disseminated via open-access, peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.Trial registration numberNCT03937180.


2000 ◽  
Vol 34 (1_suppl) ◽  
pp. A131-A136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian R. H. Falloon

Objective The process of detecting people at high risk of schizophrenia from a community sample is a major challenge for prevention of psychotic disorders. The aim of this paper is to describe early detection procedures that can be implemented in primary care settings. Methods A selected literature review is supplemented by experiences and data obtained during the Buckingham Integrated Mental Health Care Project. Results General medical practitioners have been favoured as the agents most likely to prove helpful in detecting the key risk factors that predict the onset of schizophrenic disorders, as well as in recognising the earliest signs and symptoms of these conditions. However, the practical problems of screening for multiple and subtle risk factors in general practice are substantial, and general practitioners (GPs) often have difficulty recognising the earliest signs of a psychotic episode. A range of strategies to assist GPs detect early signs of psychosis in their patients are considered. Conclusions It is feasible to implement primary care setting early detection procedures for people at risk of schizophrenia. Implementation is aided by the use of a brief screening questionnaire, training sessions and case supervision; and increased collaboration with mental health services and other community agencies.


2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 656-663
Author(s):  
Denise Gleeson

Benzodiazepines are only recommended for short periods (2–4 weeks), yet there is evidence of substantial long-term use across the UK. Poor availability of services is one major challenge in supporting withdrawal. Confusion about terminology can lead to inaccurate or inadequate diagnosis of benzodiazepine dependence and addiction, and sub-optimal management of these patients. This article provides an overview of benzodiazepines, diagnostic criteria and available management strategies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. e22-e22
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Young ◽  
Rachel Goldfarb ◽  
Laurie Green ◽  
Kathleen Hollamby ◽  
Karen Weyman ◽  
...  

Abstract Background At our inner city hospital, we developed a shared care model between family health teams (FHTs), pediatricians and developmental pediatricians to care for children with mental health and developmental disorders. In phase one of our study, 84 FHT members participated in focus groups to inform the development of our clinic. Family physicians described their role as “referral agent”, “long term supporter” and “healthcare coordinator”. They expressed the desire to “learn” and “do more”, but noted barriers to providing care, including limited training, lack of service knowledge, limited communication, and cumbersome access to mental health and dual diagnosis services. Phase One was completed and accepted for publication. Phase Two describes the implementation of our clinic using a mixed methods approach and report preliminary findings. Objectives To evaluate the first two years of implementation of the developmental clinic housed within a family health team (FHT) an obtain feedback from members of the shared care model. Design/Methods Mixed methods were used including chart review of all patients referred to the clinic and semi structured interviews with primary care physicians, pediatricians and developmental pediatricians regarding their roles in managing children with developmental and mental health disorders, as well as use and impact of the developmental clinic. Results A total of 115 charts were reviewed between Feb 2016 and Jan 2018. Of all patients seen, 34% were female 64% male and 2% transgender. Ages ranged from 1-17 years. Eighty-one percent had an existing diagnosis and were referred for re-assessment while 43% received a new diagnosis: ASD (72%), ADHD (11%), GDD (11%), learning disorder (3%), Anxiety (1%), Other (1%). There was an 8% no show rate. Providers endorsed improved communication through use of a shared EMR for documentation and messaging, and improved service knowledge through availability of a pediatric service navigator who also used EMR to document service and funding applications. Longer term follow up, namely the roles and responsibilities of pediatrics vs. developmental pediatrics vs. primary care remained unclear. Conclusion Implementation of the shared care model for this population with primary care is feasible, and does address some stated barriers to care, including improved communication, increased service knowledge, and provision of reassessments. Further areas to develop include clarifying the roles and responsibilities of the different healthcare providers of children with mental health and developmental disorders, and determining what is needed for long-term follow up and transitional care.


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek K. Tracy ◽  
Frank Holloway ◽  
Kara Hanson ◽  
Nikita Kanani ◽  
Matthew Trainer ◽  
...  

SUMMARY Part 1 of this three-part series on integrated care discussed the drivers for change in healthcare delivery in England set out in the NHS Long Term Plan. This second part explores the evolution of mental health services within the wider National Health Service (NHS), and describes important relevant legislation and policy over the past decade, leading up to the 2019 Long Term Plan. We explain the implications of this, including the detail of emerging structures such as integrated care systems (ICSs) and primary care networks (PCNs), and conclude with challenges facing these novel systems. Part 3 will address the practical local implementation of integrated care.


2017 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 184-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
David Crepaz-Keay

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to look at peer support in the context of broader communities. Design/methodology/approach It builds on the author’s experience working with the Mental Health Foundation of developing delivering and evaluating several self-management and peer support initiatives in a variety of settings with a range of different peer groups. It will consider what constitutes a peer and a community, and explore the notion of community solutions for community problems. Findings Peer support in community settings has the capacity to address social isolation, build skills and self-esteem and give individuals a better quality of life – it can also add value to whole communities and reframe the way entire groups are considered within them. It has the ability to be both more accessible and less stigmatising and thus reach more people. This also offers community based peer support as a contributor to preventing the deterioration of mental health and potentially reducing the impact of mental ill-health. Social implications The author needs to think more in terms of whole community and get better at improving how the author measures and articulates this community benefit. This will allow us to make better decisions about how best to apply resources for long term whole community gain. Peer support and peer leadership needs to be at the heart of this process. Originality/value This paper places a familiar approach in a different setting placing peer support firmly outside services and within comunities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document