scholarly journals 53 Implementation of a Developmental Outreach Clinic housed within a Family Health Team - preliminary findings in building a shared care model for children and youth with mental health and developmental disorders

2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. e22-e22
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Young ◽  
Rachel Goldfarb ◽  
Laurie Green ◽  
Kathleen Hollamby ◽  
Karen Weyman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Developmental Disorders ◽  
Family Health ◽  
Shared Care ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Roles And Responsibilities ◽  
Shared Care Model ◽  
Family Health Team

Abstract Background At our inner city hospital, we developed a shared care model between family health teams (FHTs), pediatricians and developmental pediatricians to care for children with mental health and developmental disorders. In phase one of our study, 84 FHT members participated in focus groups to inform the development of our clinic. Family physicians described their role as “referral agent”, “long term supporter” and “healthcare coordinator”. They expressed the desire to “learn” and “do more”, but noted barriers to providing care, including limited training, lack of service knowledge, limited communication, and cumbersome access to mental health and dual diagnosis services. Phase One was completed and accepted for publication. Phase Two describes the implementation of our clinic using a mixed methods approach and report preliminary findings. Objectives To evaluate the first two years of implementation of the developmental clinic housed within a family health team (FHT) an obtain feedback from members of the shared care model. Design/Methods Mixed methods were used including chart review of all patients referred to the clinic and semi structured interviews with primary care physicians, pediatricians and developmental pediatricians regarding their roles in managing children with developmental and mental health disorders, as well as use and impact of the developmental clinic. Results A total of 115 charts were reviewed between Feb 2016 and Jan 2018. Of all patients seen, 34% were female 64% male and 2% transgender. Ages ranged from 1-17 years. Eighty-one percent had an existing diagnosis and were referred for re-assessment while 43% received a new diagnosis: ASD (72%), ADHD (11%), GDD (11%), learning disorder (3%), Anxiety (1%), Other (1%). There was an 8% no show rate. Providers endorsed improved communication through use of a shared EMR for documentation and messaging, and improved service knowledge through availability of a pediatric service navigator who also used EMR to document service and funding applications. Longer term follow up, namely the roles and responsibilities of pediatrics vs. developmental pediatrics vs. primary care remained unclear. Conclusion Implementation of the shared care model for this population with primary care is feasible, and does address some stated barriers to care, including improved communication, increased service knowledge, and provision of reassessments. Further areas to develop include clarifying the roles and responsibilities of the different healthcare providers of children with mental health and developmental disorders, and determining what is needed for long-term follow up and transitional care.

Health care utilization among long-term cancer survivors.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 22-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily Jo Rajotte ◽  
Leslie Heron ◽  
Karen Leslie Syrjala ◽  
Kevin Scott Baker
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
General Population ◽  
Cancer Survivors ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Shared Care ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Clinic Appointment ◽  
Shared Care Model

22 Background: Survivors of adult cancer face lifetime health risks that are dependent on their cancer, cancer treatment exposures, comorbid health conditions, and lifestyle behaviors. A shared care model, including planned and formal transition of the cancer survivor from the oncologist to the primary care physician needs to be established to ensure appropriate care. Methods: As a LIVESTRONG Survivorship Center of Excellence Network member, the Survivorship Program at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center has established an outpatient clinic at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance to meet the clinical needs of cancer survivors. Before their survivorship-focused clinic appointment, adult cancer survivors are asked to complete a comprehensive survey that includes questions on health care utilization. Results: Between August 2013 to December 2014, 142 clinic patients completed the survey. They were 70.4% female, mean age 48 years (SD 16.3, range 22-83) and 21.1% breast cancer, 30.2% leukemia/lymphoma, and 17.6% reproductive cancer survivors. Patients were a mean of 7.8 years (SD 9.5, range 0-43) from their cancer diagnosis at the time of clinic appointment. 70.4% reported receiving oncology care and 87.3% primary care within the 12 months before their survivorship visit. Forty percent reported more than 12 clinic visits in the past year in which they saw a physician, nurse practitioner or physician assistant compared with 6.5 clinic visits in the general population based on CDC, National Health Care Survey reference data. 41.5% had one or more visits to a hospital emergency or urgent care facility within the last year, compared with 39.4% in the CDC NHCS survey. Conclusions: Cancer survivors seen in a Survivorship Clinic utilize healthcare at a much higher rate than the general population. A shared-care model for cancer survivors, including a delineation of roles and specific points of communication, between the oncologist and the primary care physician may help address issues surrounding over-utilization. A cancer treatment summary and a survivorship care plan may be valuable tools to facilitate this shared care approach.

P2-275: DEMENTIA CARE INTEGRATION BETWEEN PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER AND TERTIARY HOSPITALIST: AN INNOVATIVE DEMENTIA SHARED CARE MODEL

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. P577-P577
Author(s):  
Mei Sian Chong ◽  
Colin Tan ◽  
Cindy Yeo ◽  
Kang Yih Low ◽  
Philomena Anthony ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Care Provider ◽  
Primary Care Provider ◽  
Dementia Care ◽  
Shared Care ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Care Integration ◽  
Shared Care Model

scholarly journals Toward a Shared-Care Model of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: Role of the Primary Care Practitioner

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-312 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiwon Oh ◽  
Marie-Sarah Gagné-Brosseau ◽  
Melanie Guenette ◽  
Catherine Larochelle ◽  
François Lemieux ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Safety Monitoring ◽  
Promotion De La Santé ◽  
Shared Care ◽  
Prise En Charge ◽  
Sclérose En Plaques ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Shared Care Model

AbstractThe objective of this study was to develop a shared-care model to enable primary-care physicians to participate more fully in meeting the complex, multidisciplinary healthcare needs of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).Design:The design consisted of development of consensus recommendations and a shared-care algorithm.Participants:A working group of 11 Canadian neurologists involved in the management of patients with MS were included in this study.Main message:The clinical management of patients with multiple sclerosis is increasing in complexity as new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) become available, and ongoing safety monitoring is required. A shared-care model that includes primary care physicians is needed. Primary care physicians can assist in the early detection of MS of individuals presenting with neurological symptoms. Additional key roles for family physicians are health promotion, symptom management, and safety and relapse monitoring of DMT-treated patients. General principles of health promotion include counseling MS patients on maintaining a healthy lifestyle; performing standard screening measures; and identifying and treating comorbidities. Of particular importance are depression and anxiety, which occur in >20% of MS patients. Standard work-ups and treatments are needed for common MS-related symptoms, such as fatigue, pain, bladder dysfunction, sexual dysfunction, spasticity, and sleep disorders. Ongoing safety monitoring is required for patients receiving specific DMTs. Multiple sclerosis medications are generally contraindicated during pregnancy, and patients should be counseled to practice effective contraception.Conclusions:Multiple sclerosis is a complex, disabling illness, which, similar to other chronic diseases, requires ongoing multidisciplinary care to meet the evolving needs of patients throughout the clinical course. Family physicians can play an invaluable role in maintaining general health, managing MS-related symptoms and comorbidities, monitoring for treatment-related adverse effects and MS relapses, and coordinating allied health services to ensure continuity of care to meet the complex and evolving needs of MS patients through the disease course.RÉSUMÉ:Élaborer un modèle de soins partagés dans les cas de sclérose en plaques récurrente-rémittente.Objectif:Élaborer un modèle de soins partagés afin de permettre aux médecins de première ligne de mieux répondre aux besoins complexes et multidisciplinaires de patients atteints de la sclérose en plaques (SP).Conception :Recommandations résultant d’un consensus et élaboration d’un algorithme en matière de soins partagés.Participants :Un groupe de travail formé de onze neurologues canadiens impliqués dans la prise en charge de patients atteints de la SP.Message-clé :La prise en charge clinique de patients atteints de la SP est de plus en plus complexe dans la mesure où des médicaments modificateurs de l’évolution de la maladie (MMSP) deviennent accessibles et où un suivi permanent en matière de sécurité est nécessaire. Soulignons aussi qu’un modèle de soins partagés incluant les médecins de première ligne est nécessaire. Ces professionnels peuvent permettre un dépistage plus rapide de la SP chez des individus présentant des symptômes neurologiques. Ils peuvent aussi jouer un rôle de premier plan en matière de promotion de la santé, de soulagement des symptômes et de suivi de patients traités avec des MMSP en ce qui a trait à leur sécurité et à de possibles rechutes. Parmi les principes généraux de promotion de la santé, on peut inclure les suivants : offrir aux patients atteints de la SP des conseils leur permettant de maintenir de saines habitudes de vie ; adopter des mesures de dépistage standards ; identifier et traiter les comorbidités. À cet égard, l’anxiété et la dépression sont d’une importance particulière et sont fréquemment signalées (> 20 %) chez les patients atteints de SP. Des démarches d’investigation et des traitements standards sont nécessaires dans le cas des symptômes courants reliés à la SP, par exemple de la fatigue, des douleurs, une dysfonction vésicale, des dysfonctions sexuelles, de la spasticité et des troubles du sommeil. On l’a dit, un suivi permanent s’impose dans le cas de patients bénéficiant d’un traitement spécifique avec des MMSP. Les médicaments associés à la SP sont généralement contre-indiqués durant la grossesse de sorte qu’on devrait conseiller aux patients d’adopter des méthodes de contraception efficaces.Conclusions :La SP est une maladie complexe et invalidante qui, à l’instar d’autres maladies chroniques, exige des soins multidisciplinaires continus afin de répondre, en lien avec un tableau clinique précis, aux besoins en constante évolution des patients. Les médecins de première ligne peuvent jouer un rôle irremplaçable à plusieurs égards : dans le maintien d’une bonne santé ; le suivi et le soulagement des symptômes et des comorbidités reliés à la SP ; le suivi des rechutes et des effets indésirables associés aux traitements. N’oublions pas non plus la coordination des services paramédicaux afin d’assurer, durant l’évolution de la SP, une continuité des soins répondant aux besoins complexes et en constante évolution des patients atteints de cette maladie.

scholarly journals The Impact of a Primary Care, Pharmacist-Driven Intervention in Patients with Chronic Non-Cancer Pain—A Pilot Study

Pharmacy ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Mo Chen ◽  
Tejal Patel ◽  
Feng Chang
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Chronic Pain ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Family Health ◽  
Primary Care Settings ◽  
Pain Intervention ◽  
Family Health Team ◽  
The Impact

Background: Chronic pain is a prevalent condition, experienced by 15.3% to 55% of Canadians, that is difficult to manage. With their broad accessibility and expertise on drugs, primary care pharmacists can help patients optimize their pain management. Methods: The objective of this study is to examine the effectiveness of a primary care, pharmacist-driven chronic pain intervention on pain and quality of life in patients with chronic non-cancer pain. A three-month naturalistic prospective study was conducted in primary care settings (five community pharmacies and one Family Health Team) across Ontario, Canada with a total of six pharmacists and 19 study participants. The primary care, pharmacist-driven chronic pain intervention consisted of patient assessments, medication reviews, care plan recommendations, and patient education. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention, pain intensity, pain interference, and quality of life were evaluated at baseline and at follow up (week 2 and month 3). Results: Trends towards improvement in pain and quality of life were found, however, these improvements were not statistically significant at follow up (month 3). Conclusions: This study provides the foundational research required to better understand the impact of Ontario pharmacists’ extended role in pain management in non-cancer patients within multiple primary care settings (e.g., Family Health Team, etc.) and has illustrated the importance of modifying and customizing care plans in patients with chronic pain. A larger sample size with tailored outcome measures may be necessary to better highlight significant improvements in pain and quality of life in patients with chronic non-cancer pain using a primary care, pharmacist-driven intervention.

The balanced care model for global mental health

2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (4) ◽  
pp. 849-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Thornicroft ◽  
M. Tansella
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health System ◽  
Mental Health System ◽  
Community Care ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Adult Mental Health ◽  
High Resource

BackgroundFor too long there have been heated debates between those who believe that mental health care should be largely or solely provided from hospitals and those who adhere to the view that community care should fully replace hospitals. The aim of this study was to propose a conceptual model relevant for mental health service development in low-, medium- and high-resource settings worldwide.MethodWe conducted a review of the relevant peer-reviewed evidence and a series of surveys including more than 170 individual experts with direct experience of mental health system change worldwide. We integrated data from these multiple sources to develop the balanced care model (BCM), framed in three sequential steps relevant to different resource settings.ResultsLow-resource settings need to focus on improving the recognition and treatment of people with mental illnesses in primary care. Medium-resource settings in addition can develop ‘general adult mental health services’, namely (i) out-patient clinics, (ii) community mental health teams (CMHTs), (iii) acute in-patient services, (iv) community residential care and (v) work/occupation. High-resource settings, in addition to primary care and general adult mental health services, can also provide specialized services in these same five categories.ConclusionsThe BCM refers both to a balance between hospital and community care and to a balance between all of the service components (e.g. clinical teams) that are present in any system, whether this is in low-, medium- or high-resource settings. The BCM therefore indicates that a comprehensive mental health system includes both community- and hospital-based components of care.

scholarly journals Region wise distribution of childhood malignancies in the state of karnataka and a road map to shared care model.

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (3) ◽  
pp. S13
Author(s):  
A. Thumallapalli ◽  
Uzra Umme ◽  
A.R. Arun Kumar ◽  
M. Padma ◽  
L. Appaji ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
The State ◽  
Shared Care ◽  
Care Model ◽  
Childhood Malignancies ◽  
Road Map ◽  
Shared Care Model

Why care about integrated care? Part 2. Integrated care systems: an irresistible force changing mental health services

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek K. Tracy ◽  
Frank Holloway ◽  
Kara Hanson ◽  
Nikita Kanani ◽  
Matthew Trainer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Integrated Care ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Local Implementation ◽  
The Past ◽  
Care Systems

SUMMARY Part 1 of this three-part series on integrated care discussed the drivers for change in healthcare delivery in England set out in the NHS Long Term Plan. This second part explores the evolution of mental health services within the wider National Health Service (NHS), and describes important relevant legislation and policy over the past decade, leading up to the 2019 Long Term Plan. We explain the implications of this, including the detail of emerging structures such as integrated care systems (ICSs) and primary care networks (PCNs), and conclude with challenges facing these novel systems. Part 3 will address the practical local implementation of integrated care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document