scholarly journals Analysis of primary care prescription trends in England during the COVID-19 pandemic compared against a predictive model

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e001143
Author(s):  
John Scott Frazer ◽  
Glenn Ross Frazer
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Predictive Model ◽  
End Of Life ◽  
Symptom Control ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services

ObjectivesThe COVID-19 pandemic has had an unprecedented impact across primary care. Primary care services have seen an upheaval, and more and more patients are engaging in telephone consultations in order to maintain social distancing. In the present study, we seek to quantify the effect of the pandemic on primary care prescribing.DesignWe conducted a retrospective analysis of the English Prescribing Dataset from January 2014 to November 2020, totalling 7 542 293 921 prescriptions. Data were separated into prepandemic and pandemic sets. A Holt-Winters predictive model was used to forecast individual drug prescribing based on historic trends. Observed data were compared with the forecast quantitatively and qualitatively.SettingAll prescriptions signed in England and dispensed during the years 2014–2020.ParticipantsAll residents of England who received a prescription from primary care facilities during 2014–2020.ResultsPrescribing of numerous health-critical medications was above predicted in March 2020, including salbutamol (53.0% (99% CI (41.2% to 66.9%))), insulin aspart (26.9% (99% CI (18.5% to 36.6%))) and tacrolimus (18.6% (99% CI (8.3% to 31.1%))). Medications for end-of-life symptom control increased in April, including levomepromazine hydrochloride (94.7% (99% CI (54.6% to 163.0%))). Medications requiring face-to-face visits decreased, including the local anaesthetic bupivacaine hydrochloride (86.6% (99% CI (89.3% to 82.0%))). There was no observed change in medications relating to type 2 diabetes, hypertension or mental health conditions.ConclusionsSignificantly increased prescribing of several medications was observed, especially among those critical for health. A dramatic spike in end-of-life prescribing highlights the adversity faced by community practitioners during 2020. Medications involving face-to-face consultations declined, as did contraceptives, travel-related vaccines and drugs used in dementia and Parkinson’s disease. Drugs relating to type 2 diabetes, hypertension and mental health were unchanged.

scholarly journals Factors for Supporting Primary Care Physician Engagement With Patient Apps for Type 2 Diabetes Self-Management That Link to Primary Care: Interview Study (Preprint)

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Ayre ◽  
Carissa Bonner ◽  
Sian Bramwell ◽  
Sharon McClelland ◽  
Rajini Jayaballa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Clinical Tool ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Potential Benefits

BACKGROUND The health burden of type 2 diabetes can be mitigated by engaging patients in two key aspects of diabetes care: self-management and regular contact with health professionals. There is a clear benefit to integrating these aspects of care into a single clinical tool, and as mobile phone ownership increases, apps become a more feasible platform. However, the effectiveness of online health interventions is contingent on uptake by health care providers, which is typically low. There has been little research that focuses specifically on barriers and facilitators to health care provider uptake for interventions that link self-management apps to the user’s primary care physician (PCP). OBJECTIVE This study aimed to explore PCP perspectives on proposed features for a self-management app for patients with diabetes that would link to primary care services. METHODS Researchers conducted 25 semistructured interviews. The interviewer discussed potential features that would link in with the patient’s primary care services. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded. Framework analysis and the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist were employed to ensure rigor. RESULTS Our analysis indicated that PCP attitudes toward proposed features for an app were underpinned by perceived roles of (1) diabetes self-management, (2) face-to-face care, and (3) the anticipated burden of new technologies on their practice. Theme 1 explored PCP perceptions about how an app could foster patient independence for self-management behaviors but could also increase responsibility and liability for the PCP. Theme 2 identified beliefs underpinning a commonly expressed preference for face-to-face care. PCPs perceived information was more motivating, better understood, and presented with greater empathy when delivered face to face rather than online. Theme 3 described how most PCPs anticipated an initial increase in workload while they learned to use a new clinical tool. Some PCPs accepted this burden on the basis that the change was inevitable as health care became more integrated. Others reported potential benefits were outweighed by effort to implement an app. This study also identified how app features can be positively framed, highlighting potential benefits for PCPs to maximize PCP engagement, buy-in, and uptake. For example, PCPs were more positive when they perceived that an app could facilitate communication and motivation between consultations, focus on building capacity for patient independence, and reinforce rather than replace in-person care. They were also more positive about app features that were automated, integrated with existing software, flexible for different patients, and included secondary benefits such as improved documentation. CONCLUSIONS This study provided insight into PCP perspectives on a diabetes app integrated with primary care services. This was observed as more than a technological change; PCPs were concerned about changes in workload, their role in self-management, and the nature of consultations. Our research highlighted potential facilitators and barriers to engaging PCPs in the implementation process.

scholarly journals Screening Neurocognitive Disorders in Primary Care Services: The Quick Mild Cognitive Impairment Approach

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 158-158
Author(s):  
Constanca Paul ◽  
Susana Sousa ◽  
Pedro Santos ◽  
Rónán O’Caoimh ◽  
William Molloy
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cognitive Impairment ◽  
Community Sample ◽  
Neurocognitive Disorders ◽  
Cognitive Status ◽  
Health Concerns ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Mental Health Concerns

Abstract Neurocognitive Disorders (NCD) is an increasingly common condition in the community. The General Practitioner (GP) in Primary Care Services (PCS), have a crucial role in early detection of NCD and is usually the first professional to detect the signs of MCI. The objective of this study was to test the feasibility and utility of the cognitive screening instrument QMCI in Primary Care. A community sample of 436 people 65+ living in the community was randomly selected from a larger group of old people with mental health concerns (N=2734), referred by their GPs. The mean age of the sample was 75.2 years (sd 7.2), with 41.3% men and 58.7% women; 60.4% married followed by 28.7% widows. The education level was low with 21% illiterate and 69,8% people with 4 years education. The QMCI mean was 37.1/100 (sd 16.2). The amount of people screening positive for cognitive impairment QMCI (<62/100) was 94.2%. In the distribution of people with cognitive impairment by Global Deterioration Scale (GDS) three recoded categories, of the 286 people 76,1% where classified as having very mild or mild impairment, 19,4% moderate or moderately serious and 4,5% severe or very severe impairment. These results confirm the perception of GPs about their clients having mental health concerns and the ability of QMCI accurately discriminate MCI. The QMCI is very brief (3-5mins) fitting the short time of GPs to assess cognitive status and timely refer clients to nonpharmacological interventions that could postpone NCD symptoms.

scholarly journals Readiness for enhanced self-health management among people with diabetes mellitus

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 133-139
Author(s):  
Márcio Flávio Moura de Araújo ◽  
Ana Maria Parente Garcia Alencar ◽  
Thiago Moura de Araújo ◽  
Marta Maria Coelho Damasceno ◽  
Joselany Áfio Caetano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Pharmacological Treatment ◽  
Health Management ◽  
Oral Antidiabetic Agents ◽  
Inappropriate Behaviors ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Oral Antidiabetic ◽  
Nursing Diagnosis ◽  
Primary Care Services

OBJECTIVE: To identify the nursing diagnosis, readiness for enhanced self-health management, among people with type 2 diabetes who are adherent to pharmacological treatment. METHODS: The sample consisted of 579 subjects from 12 primary care services who received home visits. To determine adherence to the pharmacological treatment, the pill count test was conducted. Those classified as adherent were given a checklist with the defining characteristics of the nursing diagnosis, readiness for enhanced self-health management. RESULTS: Subjects with type 2 diabetes who presented with the nursing diagnosis were not alcoholics (p = 0.003), did not miss their diabetes consultations (p = 0.000), and had no difficulties / inappropriate behaviors with regard to taking their oral antidiabetic agents (p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: The identification of human responses to the clinical treatment of type 2 diabetes should be continuous, so that nurses can understand the factors involved in the readiness to enhance therapeutic control.

scholarly journals Business as Un-usual: Access to mental health and primary care services for people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 restrictions

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Newbronner ◽  
Panagiotis Spanakis ◽  
Ruth Wadman ◽  
Suzanne Crosland ◽  
Paul Heron ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Severe Mental Illness ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Mental Health Support ◽  
Health Support

Aims: To explore: how satisfied people with severe mental illness (SMI) are with the support received during the pandemic; understand any difficulties encountered when accessing both mental health and primary care services; consider ways to mitigate these difficulties; and assess the perceived need for future support from mental health services. Materials and Methods: A representative sample was drawn from a large transdiagnostic clinical cohort of people with SMI, which was recruited between April 2016 and March 2020. The sample was re-surveyed a few months after the beginning of the restrictions. Descriptive frequency statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data. The free text responses were analysed thematically. Results: 367 participants responded to the survey. Two thirds were receiving support from mental health services with the rest supported in primary care or self-managing. A quarter thought they would need more mental health support in the coming year. Half had needed to used community mental health services during the pandemic and the majority had been able to get support. A minority reported that their mental health had deteriorated but they had either not got the supported they wanted or had not sought help. The biggest service change was the reduction in face-to-face appointments and increasing use of phone and video call support. Nearly half of those using mental health services found this change acceptable or even preferred it; acceptability was influenced by several factors. Participants were more likely to be satisfied with support received when seen in person. Discussion: Although most participants were satisfied with the mental health support they had received, a minority were not. This, couple with findings on future need for mental health support has implications for post pandemic demand on services. Remote care has brought benefits but also risks that it could increase inequalities in access to services.

scholarly journals Comparing the content and quality of video, telephone, and face-to-face consultations: a non-randomised, quasi-experimental, exploratory study in UK primary care

2019 ◽  
Vol 69 (686) ◽  
pp. e595-e604 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victoria Hammersley ◽  
Eddie Donaghy ◽  
Richard Parker ◽  
Hannah McNeilly ◽  
Helen Atherton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Technical Problems ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Information Giving ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Primary Care Clinicians

BackgroundGrowing demands on primary care services have led to policymakers promoting video consultations (VCs) to replace routine face-to-face consultations (FTFCs) in general practice.AimTo explore the content, quality, and patient experience of VC, telephone (TC), and FTFCs in general practice.Design and settingComparison of audio-recordings of follow-up consultations in UK primary care.MethodPrimary care clinicians were provided with video-consulting equipment. Participating patients required a smartphone, tablet, or computer with camera. Clinicians invited patients requiring a follow-up consultation to choose a VC, TC, or FTFC. Consultations were audio-recorded and analysed for content and quality. Participant experience was explored in post-consultation questionnaires. Case notes were reviewed for NHS resource use.ResultsOf the recordings, 149/163 were suitable for analysis. VC recruits were younger, and more experienced in communicating online. FTFCs were longer than VCs (mean difference +3.7 minutes, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.1 to 5.2) or TCs (+4.1 minutes, 95% CI = 2.6 to 5.5). On average, patients raised fewer problems in VCs (mean 1.5, standard deviation [SD] 0.8) compared with FTFCs (mean 2.1, SD 1.1) and demonstrated fewer instances of information giving by clinicians and patients. FTFCs scored higher than VCs and TCs on consultation-quality items.ConclusionVC may be suitable for simple problems not requiring physical examination. VC, in terms of consultation length, content, and quality, appeared similar to TC. Both approaches appeared less ‘information rich’ than FTFC. Technical problems were common and, though patients really liked VC, infrastructure issues would need to be addressed before the technology and approach can be mainstreamed in primary care.

scholarly journals Provision of services in primary care for type 2 diabetes: a qualitative study with patients, GPs, and nurses in the East of England

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (698) ◽  
pp. e668-e675
Author(s):  
Hajira Dambha-Miller ◽  
Simon J Griffin ◽  
Ann Louise Kinmonth ◽  
Jenni Burt
Keyword(s):  
Type 2 Diabetes ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Care Provision ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Face To Face ◽  
Healthcare Experiences ◽  
Provision Of Services ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundThere is little evidence on the impact of national pressures on primary care provision for type 2 diabetes from the perspectives of patients, their GPs, and nurses.AimTo explore experiences of primary care provision for people with type 2 diabetes and their respective GPs and nurses.Design and settingA qualitative primary care interview study in the East of England.MethodSemi-structured interviews were conducted, between August 2017 and August 2018, with people who have type 2 diabetes along with their respective GPs and nurses. Purposive sampling was used to select for heterogeneity in glycaemic control and previous healthcare experiences. Interviews were audio-recorded and analysed thematically. The consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research were followed.ResultsThe authors interviewed 24 patients and 15 GPs and nurses, identifying a changing landscape of diabetes provision owing to burgeoning pressures that were presented repeatedly. Patient responders wanted GP-delivered care with continuity. They saw GPs as experts best placed to support them in managing diabetes, but were increasingly receiving nurse-led care. Nurses reported providing most of the in-person care, while GPs remained accountable but increasingly distanced from face-to-face diabetes care provision. A reluctant acknowledgement surfaced among GPs, nurses, and their patients that only minimum care standards could be maintained, with aspirations for high-quality provision unlikely to be met.ConclusionType 2 diabetes is a tracer condition that reflects many aspects of primary care. Efforts to manage pressures have not been perceived favourably by patients and providers, despite some benefits. Reframing expectations of care, by communicating solutions to both patients and providers so that they are understood, managed, and realistic, may be one way forward.

Mental health and contact with primary care services in old age

1987 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 223-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin Morgan ◽  
Helen Dallosso ◽  
Shah Ebrahim ◽  
Tom Arie ◽  
Peter Fentem
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Old Age ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services

Use of mental health and primary care services by caregivers of patients with bipolar disorder: a preliminary study

2005 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deborah A Perlick ◽  
Jill M Hohenstein ◽  
John F Clarkin ◽  
Richard Kaczynski ◽  
Robert A Rosenheck
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Bipolar Disorder ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Primary Care Services ◽  
Preliminary Study
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document