scholarly journals Quantitation of faecalFusobacteriumimproves faecal immunochemical test in detecting advanced colorectal neoplasia

Gut ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 66 (8) ◽  
pp. 1441-1448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunny H Wong ◽  
Thomas N Y Kwong ◽  
Tai-Cheong Chow ◽  
Arthur K C Luk ◽  
Rudin Z W Dai ◽  
...  
PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. e0203359 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lorena Rodriguez-Alonso ◽  
Francisco Rodriguez-Moranta ◽  
Claudia Arajol ◽  
Pau Gilabert ◽  
Katja Serra ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Yutaka Suehiro ◽  
Yibo Zhang ◽  
Shinichi Hashimoto ◽  
Taro Takami ◽  
Shingo Higaki ◽  
...  

Background As TWIST1 methylation is specific to colorectal neoplasia, detection of TWIST1 methylation from faeces samples might be useful for colorectal neoplasia screening. However, because the content of human DNA in faeces is very small, it is very difficult to detect TWIST1 methylation by conventional bisulphite-based methylation assays. Therefore, we developed a new methylation assay without bisulphite treatment, the combined restriction digital PCR assay, and evaluated its sensitivity and specificity in combination with and without the faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin for colorectal neoplasia detection from faeces samples. Methods For the combined restriction digital PCR assay, DNA was treated with three methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes and an exonuclease, followed by measurement of TWIST1 methylation level by droplet digital PCR. Faecal DNA testing and faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin were performed on 109 patients with colorectal neoplasia and 10 control individuals. Results Basic performance testing showed that the combined restriction digital PCR assay enabled detection of 0.14% of the TWIST1 methylation level for the lymphocyte DNA. The combined restriction digital PCR assay from faeces samples had a sensitivity of 22.2% (95% confidence interval, 2.8–60.0%) for non-advanced adenoma, 47.1% (95% confidence interval, 23.0–72.2%) for advanced adenoma, and 33.7% (95% confidence interval, 23.7–45.0%) for colorectal cancer, and a specificity of 100.0%. Combination of faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin and faecal combined restriction digital PCR assay increased sensitivity to 82.4% (95% confidence interval, 56.6–96.2%) for the detection of advanced adenoma. Conclusions We developed the combined restriction digital PCR assay, a possible highly sensitive methylation assay. Combination of faecal combined restriction digital PCR assay with faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin may provide an alternative screening strategy for colorectal neoplasia, especially for potentially precancerous lesions.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasu Sheel ◽  
Leslie Azzis ◽  
Racehl Hinrichs ◽  
Thomas Imperiale

Background: Although colonoscopy (CY) may be considered the best screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC), annual fecal immunochemical test (FIT), which quantifies fecal hemoglobin is a viable alternative. Countries and healthcare systems using FIT-based screening may need to prioritize which FIT positive persons requires CY sooner (e.g. within the same fiscal year). We conducted a systematic review of published literature to understand how the yield/positive predictive value (PPV) of FIT could be improved.   Study Design: We performed a search of electronic databases for articles published between 2015 and June 2020. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were independently screened. Included studies fulfilled predetermined criteria and had descriptive and quantitative data extracted. We identified studies comparing the yield of FIT for advanced colorectal neoplasia ([AN], CRC plus advanced adenomas) among FIT positive persons to the yield of AN when FIT is combined with risk factors (age, sex, BMI, etc.). Data were extracted to find yield and efficiency of FIT alone vs FIT plus risk factors among FIT positive persons.   Results: From 623 titles reviewed, 4 studies met inclusion criteria. The objective of the studies was to increase the yield of AN or CRC in FIT positive patients. The number needed to scope (NNS) among FIT positives to detect AN significantly decreased for each study when looking at high risk groups as yield/PPV increased. The yield with FIT alone ranged from 24% to 46% and the NNS from 2.2 to 4.1. With risk factors, yield and NNS among those at high risk were 33.2 % to 75.6% and from 1.3 to 3.0, respectively.  Conclusion and Potential Impact: This systematic review quantifies how risk factors improve the yield for AN in FIT positive persons, which is information required for countries and health care settings with limited resources that need to direct CY resources to FIT positive patients at high risk for AN.  


2017 ◽  
Vol 49 (5) ◽  
pp. 557-561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam Hee Kim ◽  
Jung Ho Park ◽  
Dong Il Park ◽  
Chong Il Sohn ◽  
Kyuyong Choi ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document