scholarly journals Advances in non-invasive assessment of hepatic fibrosis

Gut ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (7) ◽  
pp. 1343-1352 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rohit Loomba ◽  
Leon A Adams
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Fibrosis Score ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
Need For Treatment ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Confirmatory Tests

Liver fibrosis should be assessed in all individuals with chronic liver disease as it predicts the risk of future liver-related morbidity and thus need for treatment, monitoring and surveillance. Non-invasive fibrosis tests (NITs) overcome many limitations of liver biopsy and are now routinely incorporated into specialist clinical practice. Simple serum-based tests (eg, Fibrosis Score 4, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease Fibrosis Score) consist of readily available biochemical surrogates and clinical risk factors for liver fibrosis (eg, age and sex). These have been extensively validated across a spectrum of chronic liver diseases, however, tend to be less accurate than more ‘complex’ serum tests, which incorporate direct measures of fibrogenesis or fibrolysis (eg, hyaluronic acid, N-terminal propeptide of type three collagen). Elastography methods quantify liver stiffness as a marker of fibrosis and are more accurate than simple serum NITs, however, suffer increasing rates of unreliability with increasing obesity. MR elastography appears more accurate than sonographic elastography and is not significantly impacted by obesity but is costly with limited availability. NITs are valuable for excluding advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, however, are not sufficiently predictive when used in isolation. Combining serum and elastography techniques increases diagnostic accuracy and can be used as screening and confirmatory tests, respectively. Unfortunately, NITs have not yet been demonstrated to accurately reflect fibrosis change in response to treatment, limiting their role in disease monitoring. However, recent studies have demonstrated lipidomic, proteomic and gut microbiome profiles as well as microRNA signatures to be promising techniques for fibrosis assessment in the future.

scholarly journals Quantification of Liver Fibrosis, Steatosis, and Viscosity Using Multiparametric Ultrasound in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Liver Disease: A “Real-Life” Cohort Study

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 783
Author(s):  
Alexandru Popa ◽  
Felix Bende ◽  
Roxana Șirli ◽  
Alina Popescu ◽  
Victor Bâldea ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Plane Wave ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Multivariate Regression Analysis ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
Non Invasive

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common chronic liver disease worldwide. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of four ultrasound-based techniques for the non-invasive multiparametric (MPUS) assessment of liver fibrosis (LF), steatosis (HS), and inflammation in patients with NAFLD. We included 215 consecutive adult patients with NAFLD (mean age: 54.9 ± 11.7; 54.5% were male), in whom LF, HS, and viscosity were evaluated in the same session using four new ultrasound-based techniques embedded on the Aixplorer MACH 30 system: ShearWave Elastography (2D-SWE.PLUS), Sound Speed Plane-wave UltraSound (SSp.PLUS), Attenuation Plane-wave UltraSound (Att.PLUS), and Viscosity Plane-wave UltraSound (Vi.PLUS). Transient Elastography (TE) with Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) (FibroScan) were considered as control. All elastographic measurements were performed according to guidelines. Valid liver stiffness measurements (LSM) were obtained in 98.6% of patients by TE, in 95.8% of patients by 2D-SWE.PLUS/Vi.PLUS, and in 98.1% of patients by Att.PLUS/SSp.PLUS, respectively. Therefore, 204 subjects were included in the final analysis. A strong correlation between LSMs by 2D-SWE.PLUS and TE (r = 0.89) was found. The best 2D-SWE.PLUS cut-off value for the presence of significant fibrosis (F ≥ 2) was 7 kPa. Regarding steatosis, SSp.PLUS correlated better than Att.PLUS with CAP values: (r = −0.74) vs. (r = 0.45). The best SSp.PLUS cut-off value for predicting the presence of significant steatosis was 1524 m/s. The multivariate regression analysis showed that Vi.PLUS values were associated with BMI and LSM by 2D-SWE.PLUS. In conclusion, MPUS was useful for assessing fibrosis, steatosis, and inflammation in a single examination in patients with NAFLD.

Liver Fibrosis Assessment in a Cohort of Greek HIV Mono-Infected Patients by Non-Invasive Biomarkers

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 173-182
Author(s):  
Theodoros Androutsakos ◽  
Maria Schina ◽  
Abraham Pouliakis ◽  
Athanasios Kontos ◽  
Nikolaos Sipsas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Transient Elastography ◽  
Standard Procedure ◽  
Liver Stiffness ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Metavir Score ◽  
Significant Liver Fibrosis

Background: Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) is common in HIV-infected individuals. Liver biopsy remains the gold-standard procedure for the diagnosis of liver fibrosis, but both Transient Elastography (TE) and Non-invasive Biomarkers (NIBMs) have emerged as alternatives. Objectives: Our study’s aim was to validate commonly used NIBMs for the assessment of liver fibrosis in a cohort of Greek HIV-mono-infected patients. Methods: Inclusion criteria were confirmed HIV-infection and age>18 years and exclusion criteria HBV or HCV seropositivity, liver disease other than NAFLD, alcohol abuse, ascites, transaminases levels>4xULN(upper limit of normal) and Body-Mass index(BMI)>40. Liver stiffness (LS) measurement with TE and thorough laboratory work up and medical history were acquired at study entry. FIB-4, APRI, NFS, BARD, Forns and Lok scores were calculated for each patient. Results: A total of 157 patients were eligible for this study. Significant liver fibrosis, compatible with Metavir score of F3-F4, was found in only 11(7%) patients. These findings were in accordance with those of the NIBMs; the BARD score constituting the only exception, allocating 102(65%) patients as having significant liver fibrosis. In order to obtain a balance between sensitivity and specificity new cut-offs for each NIBM were calculated; FIB-4 score yielded the best results, since by changing the cut-off to 1.49 a sensitivity and specificity balanced for both close to 85% was achieved. Conclusions: Our findings suggest that NIBMs can be used for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in HIV mono-infected patients. New cut-offs for NIBMs should probably be calculated, to help distinguishing patients with significant from those with mild/no fibrosis.

scholarly journals A review of the clinical utility of the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test in multiple aetiologies of chronic liver disease

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-43
Author(s):  
Preya Janubhai Patel ◽  
Declan Connoley ◽  
Freya Rhodes ◽  
Ankur Srivastava ◽  
William Rosenberg
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Liver Biopsy ◽  
Chronic Liver Disease ◽  
Clinical Utility ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Biliary Cirrhosis ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
Functional Changes ◽  
Non Invasive

The rising incidence of chronic liver disease continues to be an increasing health burden. The morbidity and mortality associated with chronic liver disease typically occur in patients with advanced fibrosis. Hence, early identification of those at-risk is of vital importance to ensure appropriate ongoing management. Currently, tools for appropriate risk stratification remain limited. Increasing awareness of the limitations of liver biopsy has driven research into alternative non-invasive methods of fibrosis assessment including serological markers assessing functional changes. One such biomarker, the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test, was initially validated in a cohort of 1021 patients with mixed aetiology chronic liver disease and shown to perform well. Since this pathfinder study, it has been independently validated in cohorts of hepatitis C, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, alcoholic liver disease, primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. In addition to performing well as a diagnostic tool, the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test has been shown to outperform liver biopsy in prognostic studies and is the only non-invasive marker to do so. However, questions remain regarding the use of this test, particularly regarding the possible effect age and alcohol may have on test scores. This review examines the current literature published in relation to the Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test and its clinical utility and highlights areas requiring further study.

scholarly journals Liver Fibrosis Biomarkers Accurately Exclude Advanced Fibrosis and Are Associated with Higher Cardiovascular Risk Scores in Patients with NAFLD or Viral Chronic Liver Disease

Diagnostics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 98
Author(s):  
Stefano Ballestri ◽  
Alessandro Mantovani ◽  
Enrica Baldelli ◽  
Simonetta Lugari ◽  
Mauro Maurantonio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiovascular Risk ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Chronic Liver Disease ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Advanced Fibrosis ◽  
Fibrosis Score ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
Framingham Risk

Liver fibrosis predicts liver-related and cardiovascular outcomes in chronic liver disease patients. We compared the diagnostic performance of various liver fibrosis biomarkers for identifying histological significant/advanced fibrosis. Additionally, the correlations of such liver fibrosis biomarkers with cardiovascular risk (CVR) scores were evaluated. 173 patients with viral hepatitis (157 HCV and 16 HBV) and 107 with a non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) were consecutively enrolled. Various liver fibrosis biomarkers: aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to alanine aminotransferase (ALT) ratio (ARR), AST to Platelet Ratio Index (APRI), Fibrosis-4 (FiB-4), Forns index, NAFLD fibrosis score (NFS), BARD (body mass index (BMI), AAR, Diabetes) score, and Hepamet fibrosis score (HFS), were used to identify significant/advanced fibrosis. CVR was assessed by using the SCORE, the Progetto CUORE, or the Framingham risk scoring systems. Liver fibrosis biomarkers performed better in predicting advanced rather than significant liver fibrosis in all patients, regardless of chronic liver disease aetiology. Forns index and HFS performed best in predicting advanced fibrosis in patients with viral chronic liver disease and NAFLD. Lower cut-offs of these liver fibrosis biomarkers had high negative predictive values for advanced fibrosis overall, as well as in patients with NAFLD or viral chronic liver disease. FIB-4, Forns index, NFS, and HFS were positively correlated with SCORE and Framingham risk scores. In conclusion, liver fibrosis biomarkers accurately exclude advanced fibrosis and positively correlate with CVR scores in patients with chronic liver disease.

scholarly journals Non‐invasive detection of portal hypertension by enhanced liver fibrosis score in patients with different aetiologies of advanced chronic liver disease

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (7) ◽  
pp. 1713-1724 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benedikt Simbrunner ◽  
Rodrig Marculescu ◽  
Bernhard Scheiner ◽  
Philipp Schwabl ◽  
Theresa Bucsics ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Portal Hypertension ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Chronic Liver Disease ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Fibrosis Score ◽  
Non Invasive

Mac‐2 Binding Protein Glycan Isomer as non‐invasive tool to assess liver fibrosis in children with chronic liver disease

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ola G Behairy ◽  
Soha A El‐Gendy ◽  
Dalia Y Ibrahim ◽  
Amira I Mansour ◽  
Ola S El‐Shimi
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Chronic Liver Disease ◽  
Binding Protein ◽  
Chronic Liver ◽  
Non Invasive

scholarly journals Correlation Between Point Shear Wave Elastography and Liver Function Tests as A Predictor of Liver Fibrosis in Patients with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 1936-1939
Author(s):  
Shahla Mohammed Saeed Rasul ◽  
Ali Khalaf Salim ◽  
Hiwa Abubakr Hussein
Keyword(s):  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Liver Function ◽  
Fatty Liver ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Fatty Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Function Tests ◽  
Fibrosis Score ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Background: Nowadays, generating shear waves and simulation of the liver tissue is done using point shear-wave elastographic (pSWE) techniques which uess acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI). Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the correlation between pSWE and liver function tests (LFTs) to predict liver fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Materials and methods: It was a cross sectional study conducted in an Ultrasound Clinic in Suleymaniya city. The duration of the study was from 1st of November, 2018 to 30th of June, 2019 which conducted on 50 NAFLD patients. After confirming NAFLD diagnosis, the patients were referred to Ultrasound Clinic to go under pSWE test. Results: The data showed that the mean PSWE of NAFLD patient was 4.12±0.87 Kpa; and 18% of them had high PSWE (> 4.6). Elastography fibrosis score was distributed to F0 (82%), F1 (6%), F2 (8%) and F3 (4%). There was a significant association between high APRI and high Aspartate Aminotransferase/Alanine Aminotransferase(AST/ALT) ratio (p=0.04). There was also a highly significant association between elastography fibrosis score and APRI fibrosis score among NAFLD patients (p<0.001). Conclusion: This study showed that the pSWE is a valuable noninvasive diagnostic technique for predicting liver fibrosis among NAFLD patients and there is significant correlation between APRI and pSWE scores. Keywords: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, Point shears wave elastography, Liver fibrosis.

Abstract 12917: Prognostic Value of the Combination of Model for End-stage Liver Disease Excluding Inr Score and Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Fibrosis Score in Patients Admitted for Acute Heart Failure

Circulation ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 142 (Suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masatsugu Kawahira ◽  
Takahisa Yamada ◽  
Tetsuya Watanabe ◽  
Takashi Morita ◽  
Yoshio Furukawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Liver Disease ◽  
Liver Fibrosis ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Fatty Liver Disease ◽  
Fibrosis Score ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver ◽  
End Stage Liver Disease ◽  
End Stage ◽  
Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Background: Cardiohepatic interactions have been a focus of attention in heart failure(HF), and the model for end-stage liver disease excluding INR (MELD-XI) has been shown to be useful for prediction of poor outcome in patients (pts) with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). Furthermore, it has been reported that liver stiffness predicts adverse prognosis in pts with HF. Liver fibrosis is assessed by non-invasive fibrosis markers such as Fibrosis-4 (FIB4) index, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease fibrosis score (NFS) and aminotransferase to platelet ratio index (APRI). Recently, a new group of HF pts with mid-range ejection fraction (HFmrEF) has been defined, separated from reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). However, there is little information available on the comparison of prognostic significance of MELD-XI and liver fibrosis scores in ADHF pts, relating to LVEF. Methods: We prospectively studied 466 consecutive ADHF pts (HFrEF (LVEF≦40%): n=164, HFmrEF (40<LVEF<50): n=104 and HFpEF (LVEF≧50%): n=198). At the discharge, we calculated MELD-XI, FIB4 index , NFS, and APRI. The endpoint was all cause death (ACD). Results: During a follow-up period of 2.8±1.5 years, 143 pts had ACD. At multivariate Cox analysis, MELD-XI and FIB4 index was independently associated with ACD irrespective of LVEF. The pts with both greater MELD-XI ([HFrEF]≥25.8, [HFmrEF]≥33.2, [HFpEF]≥30.1) and greater FIB4 index ([HFrEF]≥2.58, [HFmrEF]≥2.58, [HFpEF]≥2.22) had a significantly increased risk of ACD than those with either and none of them in all three groups. Conclusions: The combination of MELD-XI and FIB4 index might be useful for stratifying pts at risk for ACD in ADHF pts with irrespective of LVEF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document