EP986 Hypoalbuminaemia in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC): primary or interval surgery?

Author(s):  
D Dai ◽  
J Balega ◽  
S Sundar ◽  
S Kehoe ◽  
A Elattar ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17104-e17104
Author(s):  
Jesús García-Donas ◽  
Elena Sevillano ◽  
Sergio Muñoz ◽  
Luis Bote ◽  
Monica Yagüe ◽  
...  

e17104 Background: Prognosis of advanced ovarian cancer is dismal with most cases recurring after initial surgery. Current factors able to predict the evolution of the disease are limited to BRCA status and platinum sensitivity. We aim to explore the potential of different clinical variables as prognostic factors using big data analytics in currently available hospitalary departmental information systems. Methods: An observational study with two cohorts (one prospective and one retrospective) was designed. Inclusion criteria were adult patients ( > 18 years old) diagnosed with epithelial ovarian cancer stage IC or superior.Clinical and histological data were recorded by a central data manager to ensure homogeneity in data collection. Big data analytics consisted on building an approximation to the statistical distribution of the tests to distinguish different kinds of features (metric, categorical, free text). Bootstrap resampling allowed to characterize the confidence regions for proportion differences, average differences, and text-profile differences in exitus vs in non-exitus groups. Results: Up to 265 patients in four different hospitals were recruited. Median age was 59 years (range 20-87), stage distribution was 48 (18%) I, 20 (8%) II, 122 (46%) III, 41 (15%) IVand 34 (13%) NA. Histology distribution was 158 (60%) papillary serous, 31 (12%) endometrioid, 18 (7%) clear cell, 11 (4%) mucinous and 47 (18%) NA. 152 (58%) patients underwent upfront surgery, 76 (29%) interval surgery and 10 (4%) no surgical intervention, 27 (10%) NA. 207 (78%) achieved optimal cytoreduction. 232 (88%) received adjuvant chemotherapy, most with carboplatin plus paclitaxel 180 (68%) and 48 (18%) also with bevacizumab. Median follow up was 81.4 months (CI95% 64.1-98.7) The proposed Big Data analytics identified a higher frequency of upfront surgery (vs interval surgery) and bevacizumab administration (vs chemotherapy alone) in the non-exitus group. Conclusions: Our results point to the notion that performance of upfront surgery and bevacizumab administration could have a long term impact in ovarian cancer. Simple Big Data analytics can contribute to identify new prognostic factors and to assess their real impact on patients managed in daily practice.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor E. Martinek ◽  
Sean Kehoe

Initial surgical management is commonly accepted to date as paramount in the treatment of women presenting with epithelial ovarian cancer and permits the assessment of the disease (staging), the histological confirmation of disease type and grade, and the practice of maximal debulking preceding platinum-based chemotherapy. Many studies have shown that the volume of residual disease after initial surgical cytoreduction inversely correlates with survival. Thus, women with optimal debulking performed by a trained specialist have improved median survival. In this review, we will focus on the answers gleaned from clinical trials on primary and interval surgery, which prompts the question on the timing of surgery in respect to chemotherapy. Interval debulking surgery (IDS) is secondary cytoreduction following primary debulking and is carried out in between the courses of chemotherapy. The major clinical trials and the latest systematic reviews seem unable to give any definitive guidance or recommendation for clinical practice. The choice of aggressive primary cytoreduction or upfront chemotherapy followed by second line surgical cytoreduction seems among others to have to be individualized according to tumour load, prediction of its resectability, and response to chemotherapy. The role of tumour biology must also be kept in mind. Finally, concrete answers are awaited on the timing of surgery from the ongoing prospective randomized control trials (CHORUS and EORTC 55971) though preliminary data from the latter have already been presented at major meetings (IGCS 2008; SGO 2009) and ignited strong debate.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (30) ◽  
pp. 3528-3537
Author(s):  
Paul DiSilvestro ◽  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
Giovanni Scambia ◽  
Byoung-Gie Kim ◽  
Ana Oaknin ◽  
...  

PURPOSE In SOLO1, maintenance olaparib (300 mg twice daily) significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with newly diagnosed BRCA1- and/or BRCA2-mutated advanced ovarian cancer compared with placebo (hazard ratio [HR], 0.30; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.41; median not reached v 13.8 months). We investigated PFS in SOLO1 for subgroups of patients based on preselected baseline factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS Investigator-assessed PFS subgroup analyses of SOLO1 included clinical response after platinum-based chemotherapy (complete [CR] or partial response [PR]), surgery type (upfront or interval surgery), disease status after surgery (residual or no gross residual disease), and BRCA mutation status ( BRCA1 or BRCA2). Additionally, we evaluated PFS in patients with stage III disease who underwent upfront surgery and had no gross residual disease. We also report objective response rate. RESULTS The risk of disease progression or death was reduced with olaparib compared with placebo by 69% (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.46) and 63% (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.58) in patients undergoing upfront or interval surgery; 56% (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.77) and 67% (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.46) in patients with residual or no residual disease after surgery; 66% (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.47) and 69% in women with clinical CR or PR at baseline (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.18 to 0.52); and 59% (HR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.56) and 80% (HR 0.20; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.37) in patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, respectively. CONCLUSION Patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer achieve substantial benefit from maintenance olaparib treatment regardless of baseline surgery outcome, response to chemotherapy, or BRCA mutation type.


2011 ◽  
Vol 02 (03) ◽  
pp. 105-106
Author(s):  
Bettina Reich

Seit 1996 ist das zweijährliche Weiterbildungsmeeting der spanischen Ovarialkarzinomgruppe eine Institution. Nunmehr wird es in Kooperation mit der ESMO durchgeführt, um insgesamt mehr Onkologen aus Europa zu erreichen. Denn die Behandlung des rezidivierten Ovarialkarzinoms stellt nach wie vor eine große Herausforderung dar. Zudem das Ovarialkarzinom meist erst im fortgeschrittenen Stadium entdeckt wird. Erst in den vergangenen Jahren konnten die Therapieoptionen in diesem Bereich etwas verbessert werden. Immer mehr zielgerichtete Kombinationen werden eingesetzt. Trotzdem muss eine noch genauere Zieldefinition am Anfang stehen, um letztlich wirklich Erfolge zu erzielen.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document