LION-PAW (lymphadenectomy in ovarian neoplasm) sexual function assessment: a prospective sub-study of the LION trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1548-1553 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annette Hasenburg ◽  
Jalid Sehouli ◽  
Bjoern Lampe ◽  
Alexander Reuss ◽  
Barbara Schmalfeld ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Sexual Function ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Sexually Active ◽  
Limited Information ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
The Impact

BackgroundThere is limited information about the impact of radical surgery including pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy on sexuality in patients with advanced ovarian cancer.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of radical surgery including pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy and subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy on sexuality in patients with advanced ovarian cancer as a sub-protocol of the prospectively randomized LION trial.MethodsThe Sexual Activity Questionnaire was applied to assess sexual function according to its sub-scales activity, pleasure, and discomfort. The 'orgasm' sub-scale from the Female Sexual Function Index was also added. The questionnaire was administered in combination with the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire at baseline prior surgery, after 6, 12, and 24 months. The primary endpoint was changes in sexual function.ResultsOverall, 495 patients received the questionnaires. 254 (51%) responded at baseline. Of these, 55 (22%) patients were sexually active, 182 (72%) were sexually inactive, and for 17 (7%) patients' data were not available. There was a total of 55/495 (11%) patients at 6 months, 139 (28%) patients at 12 months, and 81 (16%) patients at 24 months. Median age was 60.5 years (range 21.4–75.8). At baseline, sexually active responders were significantly younger (median age 51.5 years,) than sexually inactive responders (median age 61.8 years) and tended to have a better performance status. Discomfort evaluated as dryness of the vagina and pain during sexual intercourse was significantly worse at 12 months than at baseline (p<0.001); however, the surgical variable, lymphadenectomy, did not have any impact on this. The orgasm sub-scale showed diverging results with a deterioration from baseline to 12 months in the lymphadenectomy group compared with the no-lymphadenectomy group (p=0.02).ConclusionThe majority of patients were sexually inactive; however, in those who were sexually active, pain during intercourse was worse at 12 months. In addition, the orgasm sub-scale demonstrated worse results in patients who underwent complete lymphadenectomy. The study suggests that surgery in the retroperitoneal space may influence sexual function.

scholarly journals The Role of Ultra-Radical Surgery in the Management of Advanced Ovarian Cancer: State or Art

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Felicia Elena Buruiana ◽  
Lamiese Ismail ◽  
Federico Ferrari ◽  
Hooman Soleymani Majd
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Holistic Approach ◽  
Gynaecological Malignancy ◽  
Optimal Debulking ◽  
Upper Abdomen ◽  
The Impact

The ovarian cancer, also known as “silent killer”, has remained the most lethal gynaecological malignancy. The single independent risk factor linked with improved survival is maximum cytoreductive effort resulting in no macroscopic residual disease. This could be gained through ultra-radical surgery which demands tackling significant tumour burden in pelvis, lower and upper abdomen which usually constitutes bowel resection, liver mobilisation, ancillary cholecystectomy, extensive peritonectomy, diaphragmatic resection, splenectomy, resection of enlarged pelvic, paraaortic, and rarely cardio-phrenic lymph nodes in order to achieve optimal debulking. The above can be achieved through a holistic approach to patient’s care, meticulous patient selection, and full engagement of the family. The decision needs to be carefully balanced after obtaining an informed consent, and an appreciation of the impact of such surgery on the quality of life against the survival benefit. This chapter will describe the complexity and surgical challenges in the management of advanced ovarian cancer.

Primary Surgery or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: The Debate Continues…

2016 ◽  
pp. 153-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Renee Cowan ◽  
Dennis Chi ◽  
Sean Kehoe ◽  
Matthew Nankivell ◽  
Alexandra Leary
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Tumor Biology ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Debulking Surgery ◽  
Primary Debulking Surgery ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
The Impact

Primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by platinum-based chemotherapy has been the cornerstone of treatment for advanced ovarian cancer for decades. Primary debulking surgery has been repeatedly identified as one of the key factors in improving survival in patients with advanced ovarian cancer, especially when minimal or no residual disease is left behind. Achieving these results sometimes requires extensive abdominal and pelvic surgical procedures and consultation with other surgical teams. Some clinicians who propose a primary chemotherapy approach reported an increased likelihood of leaving no macroscopic disease after surgery and improved patient-reported outcomes and quality-of-life (QOL) measures. Given the ongoing debate regarding the relative benefit of PDS versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT), tumor biology may aid in patient selection for each approach. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy offers the opportunity for in vivo chemosensitivity testing. Studies are needed to determine the best way to evaluate the impact of NACT in each individual patient with advanced ovarian cancer. Indeed, the biggest utility of NACT may be in research, where this approach provides the opportunity for the investigation of predictive markers, mechanisms of resistance, and a forum to test novel therapies.

scholarly journals Expectations and Challenges of First-Line Maintenance Therapy for Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Medicina ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 501
Author(s):  
Tadahiro Shoji ◽  
Chie Sato ◽  
Hidetoshi Tomabechi ◽  
Eriko Takatori ◽  
Yoshitaka Kaido ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Targeted Drugs ◽  
First Line ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

The incidence of ovarian cancer, which has had a poor prognosis, is increasing annually. Currently, the prognosis is expected to improve with the use of molecular-targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors as maintenance therapies after the first-line chemotherapy. The GOG218 and ICON7 studies reported the usefulness of bevacizumab and the SOLO-1 and PRIMA (A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study of Niraparib Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer Following Response on Front-Line Platinum-Based Chemotherapy) studies have reported the usefulness of olaparib and niraparib, respectively. The ATHENA study investigating the usefulness of rucaparib is currently ongoing. Although clinical studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors are lagging in the field of gynecology, many clinical studies using programmed death cell-1 (PD-1) and PD-1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies are currently ongoing. Some biomarkers have been identified for molecular-targeted drugs, but none have been identified for immune checkpoint inhibitors, which is a challenge that should be addressed in the future.

The impact of subspecialty training on the management of advanced ovarian cancer

1992 ◽  
Vol 47 (2) ◽  
pp. 203-209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott M. Eisenkop ◽  
Nick M. Spirtos ◽  
Thomas W. Montag ◽  
Richard H. Nalick ◽  
He-Jing Wang
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Subspecialty Training ◽  
The Impact

Multicenter Phase 2 Study of Combined Gemcitabine and Epirubicin as Second-Line Treatment for Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 953-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viviana Murgia ◽  
Roberto Sorio ◽  
Claudia Griso ◽  
Orazio Caffo ◽  
Carmela Arcuri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Gynecology And Obstetrics

Objective:The aim of this phase 2 trial was to evaluate the tolerability and efficacy of combined gemcitabine (G) and epirubicin (E) as second-line treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.Methods:Treatment with G 1000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8) and E 60 mg/m2 (day 1) every 3 weeks for 3 or, in the absence of progression, 6 courses.Results:Fifty patients with advanced ovarian cancer (31 serous, 2 endometrioid, 10 unclassified adenocarcinoma, and 7 other) and a median age of 60 years (range, 38-74 years) were enrolled after giving their informed consent. Performance status according to the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group was 0 in 29 patients (58%), 1 in 17 patients (34%), and 2 in 4 patients (8%), and the initial stages according to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics were I to II in 4 patients (8%), III in 31 patients (62%), and IV in 15 patients (30%). They had previously received a median of 1.5 lines of treatment (range, 1-4). The median platinum-free interval was 5 months (range, 0-12 months): 32 patients had relapse within 6 months and 18 patients had relapse after 6 months.The response rate was 42% (2% complete response and 40% partial response), with a median duration of 7.2 months: the corresponding figures were 37.5% and 5.2 months in the platinum-resistant patients and 50% and 8.8 months in the platinum-sensitive patients. The main grade 3 to 4 hematological toxicity was neutropenia (56% of cases). After a median follow-up of 13.5 months, median progression-free survival was 5 months, and median overall survival was 23.5 months.Conclusions:This E + G combination seems to be active and safe in platinum-resistant/refractory patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document