Validation of the 2021 FIGO staging schema for advanced vulvar cancer

2022 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2021-003168
Author(s):  
Koji Matsuo ◽  
Maximilian Klar ◽  
Shin Nishio ◽  
Mikio Mikami ◽  
Lynda D Roman ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThe International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) revised the vulvar cancer staging schema in 2021. Previous stage IIIA–B diseases were reclassified based on nodal size (≤5 mm for stage IIIA compared with >5 mm for stage IIIB), and previous stage IVA1 disease based on non-osseous organ extension was reclassified to stage IIIA whereas osseous extension remained as stage IVA. This study sought to validate the 2021 FIGO vulvar cancer staging schema.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study examined 889 women with stage III–IV vulvar cancer from 2010 to 2015 in the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Stage shift and overall survival were assessed by comparing the 2021 and 2009 FIGO staging schemas.ResultsStage shift occurred in 229 (25.8%) patients (upstaged 17.7% and downstaged 8.1%). When comparing the new and previous staging schemas, 5 year overall survival rates were 45.6% versus 48.9% for stage IIIA, 47.0% versus 44.2% for stage IIIB, and 13.9% versus 25.1% (interval change −11.2%) for stage IVA diseases. According to the revised staging schema, 5 year overall survival rates were similar for stage IVA and IVB diseases (13.9% vs 14.5%) and for stage IIIA and IIIB disease (45.6% vs 47.0%). For new stage IIIA disease, 5 year overall survival rates differed significantly based on the staging factors (nodal involvement vs non-nodal organ involvement, 48.9% vs 38.7%, difference 10.2%, p=0.038).ConclusionThe 2021 FIGO staging schema results in one in four cases of advanced vulvar cancer being reclassified. Survival rates of patients with new stage IVA disease worsened significantly whereas those of patients with new stage IIIA disease were heterogenous based on the staging factors. The discriminatory ability of the revised 2021 FIGO staging schema for 5 year overall survival rate between patients with stage IIIA and IIIB tumors and those with IVA and IVB tumors is limited in this study population.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17024-e17024 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Jonathan Huang ◽  
Karen Elisabeth Huang

e17024 Background: In the past two decades, several advancements have been made in the treatment of cervical cancer such as concurrent chemotherapy, robotic surgery, intensity modulated radiotherapy, 3D brachytherapy planning, and MRI visualization, yet most published survival data is based on historical treatment paradigms. We sought to report domestic treatment outcomes in the modern era to determine if current treatment paradigms resulted in higher overall survival rates. Methods: We queried the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database for patients with cancers of the cervix uteri diagnosed between 2004-2010, had 5-year survival data recorded, and a specific AJCC 6th edition stage assigned. We excluded patients diagnosed after 2010 as the dataset only included survival information until the end of 2015. We used the FIGO 2006 report on cervical cancer as our historical comparator. Chi-square tests were used to determine statistical significance. Results: 32,028 patients in the database met the criteria specified above. The 5-year survivals by stage are compared in the table below. Survival was statistically inferior in SEER patients with stage IIa disease but superior in SEER patients with stage IIIb, IVa, and IVb disease. When comparing SEER patients diagnosed in the earlier (2004-2007) versus the later half of the study period (2008-2010), there were no clinically relevant differences in 5-year survival except in stage IVA patients (19.8% vs 26.6%, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: The 5-year overall survival rates in women with cervical cancer here in the USA in the modern era were similar to those published in the 2006 FIGO report. Inferior outcomes were seen in stage IIa patients but superior outcomes were seen in stage IIIb+ patients. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wonkyo Shin ◽  
Sun-Young Kim ◽  
Sangyoon Park ◽  
Sokbom Kang ◽  
Myong Cheol Lim ◽  
...  

Abstract Objective To evaluate clinical factors that can help determine the extent of lymphadenectomy required in endometrial cancer patients and confirm the differences of metastatic lymph node regions based on the risk factors for endometrial cancer patients. Methods The medical records of 468 endometrial cancer patients were retrospectively reviewed between January 2006 and December 2018. Patients were categorized into pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) and pelvic plus para-aortic lymph nodes dissection (PPALND) groups. Demographics, recurrence-free survival, and 5-year overall survival rates were compared, and the clinical factors affecting survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards model. Results The median follow-up period was 55 months (range, 6–142 months). The mean age was higher in the PPALND group than in the PLND group (51.0 vs. 54.5 years; P < 0.001). The PPALND group had a higher International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, lymphovascular invasion, endocervical invasion, and FIGO grade (P = 0.001) than the PLND group. The PPALND group had higher 5-year recurrence-free and overall survival rates than the PLND group. While comparing lymph node (LN) metastasis confirmed pathologically, the group with confirmed metastasis showed a higher number of high-risk group patients than lymph node-negative patients. However, no difference was observed in pelvic LN metastasis, pelvic plus para-aortic LN metastasis, and isolated para-aortic LN metastasis groups. Conclusions When treating patients with endometrial cancer, risk group evaluation is an important factor for determining LN dissection. Our study found no differences in clinical factors of metastatic LN regions.


BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihao Lv ◽  
Yuqi Liang ◽  
Huaxi Liu ◽  
Delong Mo

Abstract Background It remains controversial whether patients with Stage II colon cancer would benefit from chemotherapy after radical surgery. This study aims to assess the real effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer undergoing radical surgery and to construct survival prediction models to predict the survival benefits of chemotherapy. Methods Data for stage II colon cancer patients with radical surgery were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed according to receive or not receive chemotherapy. Competitive risk regression models were used to assess colon cancer cause-specific death (CSD) and non-colon cancer cause-specific death (NCSD). Survival prediction nomograms were constructed to predict overall survival (OS) and colon cancer cause-specific survival (CSS). The predictive abilities of the constructed models were evaluated by the concordance indexes (C-indexes) and calibration curves. Results A total of 25,110 patients were identified, 21.7% received chemotherapy, and 78.3% were without chemotherapy. A total of 10,916 patients were extracted after propensity score matching. The estimated 3-year overall survival rates of chemotherapy were 0.7% higher than non- chemotherapy. The estimated 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates of non-chemotherapy were 1.3 and 2.1% higher than chemotherapy, respectively. Survival prediction models showed good discrimination (the C-indexes between 0.582 and 0.757) and excellent calibration. Conclusions Chemotherapy improves the short-term (43 months) survival benefit of stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery. Survival prediction models can be used to predict OS and CSS of patients receiving chemotherapy as well as OS and CSS of patients not receiving chemotherapy and to make individualized treatment recommendations for stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yuyun Wu ◽  
Ningbo Hao ◽  
Suming Wang ◽  
Xin Yang ◽  
Yufeng Xiao ◽  
...  

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies worldwide, and the tumor metastasis leads to poor outcomes of GC patients. Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) have emerged as new regulatory molecules that play a crucial role in tumor metastasis. However, the biological function and underlying mechanism of numerous lncRNAs in GC metastasis remain largely unclear. Here, we report a novel lncRNA, lnc-TLN2-4:1, whose expression is decreased in GC tissue versus matched normal tissue, and its low expression is involved in the lymph node and distant metastases of GC, as well as poor overall survival rates of GC patients. We further found that lnc-TLN2-4:1 inhibits the ability of GC cells to migrate and invade but does not influence GC cell proliferation and confirmed that lnc-TLN2-4:1 is mainly located in the cytoplasm of GC cells. We then found that lnc-TLN2-4:1 increases the mRNA and protein expression of TLN2 in GC cells and there is a positive correlation between the expression of lnc-TLN2-4:1 and TLN2 mRNA in GC tissue. Collectively, we identified a novel lncRNA, lnc-TLN2-4:1, in GC, where lnc-TLN2-4:1 represses cell migration and invasion. The low expression of lnc-TLN2-4:1 is associated with poor overall survival rates of GC patients. These suggest that lnc-TLN2-4:1 may be a tumor suppressor during GC metastasis.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee Sing Chet ◽  
Siti Azrin Ab Hamid ◽  
Norsa'adah Bachok ◽  
Suresh Kumar Chidambaram

Abstract Background: It is well established that antiretroviral therapy (ART) is beneficial in reducing the mortality among patients with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In Malaysia, there is lack of study and information regarding the overall survival rates and prognostic factors for survival in HIV-infected adults treated with ART. Therefore, this study aimed to assess and compare the survival rates as well as to identify the prognostic factors for survival among HIV adults in Malaysia.Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted by reviewing the medical records of HIV patients who started ART between year 2007 and 2016 at a tertiary referral hospital in Malaysia. ART-naive adults aged 15 years and above were included and those who were transferred out were excluded. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, there were 339 cases eligible in this study. Systematic sampling method was applied. Kaplan Meier survival curve and log-rank test were used to compare the overall survival rates. Cox proportional hazards regression was applied to determine the prognostic factors for survival.Results: The estimated overall survival rates were 95.9%, 93.8%, 90.4%, 84.9%, and 72.8% at 6 months, 1 year, 3 years, 5 years and 10 years, respectively. The overall survival rates were significantly different according to age group (p<0.001), employment status (p<0.001), transmission mode (p=0.003), and history of illicit drug use (p=0.017), baseline CD4 cell count (p<0.001), baseline haemoglobin level (p<0.001), tuberculosis co-infection (p<0.001), hepatitis co-infection (p=0.008), first NRTI (p<0.001) and history of defaults (p=0.021). Based on multiple Cox regression, patients who were anaemic had 3.76 times (95% CI: 1.97, 7.18; p<0.001) higher hazard of death than their non-anaemic counterparts. The hazard risk was 2.09 times (95% CI: 1.10, 3.96; p=0.024) higher among HIV patients co-infected with tuberculosis compared to those who were not. Conclusion: Overall survival rates were higher than low-income countries but lower than in high-income countries, and comparable with middle-income countries. Low baseline haemoglobin level and tuberculosis co-infection were strong prognostic factors for HIV survival


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4022-4022
Author(s):  
Cesar Gentille Sanchez ◽  
Joe Ensor ◽  
Akshjot Puri ◽  
Jasleen K. Randhawa ◽  
Shilpan S. Shah ◽  
...  

Introduction Primary cutaneous anaplastic large-cell lymphoma (PCALCL) is a rare T-cell lymphoma that presents as a solitary or grouped nodules. It is characterized by anaplastic-appearing cells that are usually ALK negative but have high expression of CD30. There is paucity of epidemiologic data on PCALCL. A prior analysis of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database by Yu et al. reported only 157 cases from 1973 to 2004. We are presenting an analysis of the patients diagnosed with PCALCL after 2004. Methods We used the SEER database to retrospectively identify patients diagnosed with PCALCL from 2005 to 2016. The database collects data from cancer registries covering approximately 26% of the US population and was used to estimate frequencies and overall incidence rate. Survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests were used to compare survival distributions. We assessed the effect of primary skin site (head and neck) and increasing age on survival as they were suggestive of decreased overall survival on multivariate analysis of the 1973-2004 cohort. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant for all analysis. Results There were 501 cases of PCALCL recorded from 2005 to 2016. Median follow-up was 52 months. The overall incidence rate was found to be 0.12/1,000,000 age adjusted to the 2000 US standard population. More than 50% of the cases were diagnosed after 2010. The median age at diagnosis was 61 years (2-97 years). It was seen most frequently in White (72.9%) patients followed by Hispanic (10.2%) and Black (9.4%) patients. The male to female ratio was 1.42. The most common primary sites affected were the skin of the lower limbs and hip (26.4%) and head and neck (21.3%). A 33.4% of patients required treatment which was mainly excisional (1 patient required amputation). Notably, PCALCL was diagnosed as a second or third malignancy in 19.2% of cases. Overall survival rates at 5 years and 10 years were found to be 80.6% (95% CI: 76.3%, 84.3%) and 61.5% (95% CI: 54.1%, 68.1%) respectively. Age greater than 60 years old was significantly associated with a lower survival (89.7% vs 54.4%, p<0.0001). Survival was not significantly different if head and neck was the site of the primary lesion (64.2% vs 60.8%, p = 0.4371). Conclusion Our analysis of the SEER database for PCALCL is the largest done to our knowledge. Although the number of cases has almost tripled since 2005, it is still a rare type of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Lower extremities and hips are the most frequent primary skin site. Only a third of the patients required treatment with overall survival rates of more than 80% by 5 years. Older age (more than 60 years old) is associated with a worse outcome. Head and neck as the primary skin site does not appear to be associated to lower survival as previously thought. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document