525 KIT mutation with a low MS4A1/CD20 expression is associated with poor prognosis in melanoma

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A561-A561
Author(s):  
Shashank Cingam ◽  
Moises Harari-Turquie ◽  
Dulcinea Quintana ◽  
Leslie Andritsos ◽  
Emrullah Yilmaz

BackgroundMelanoma has high response rate to immune checkpoint inhibitors. KIT, a driver mutation in melanoma seen in ~10% of the patients.1 However, the role of the KIT mutation in immune microenvironment of melanoma is not well established yet. Here we report a case with KIT mutation and a likely impaired B cell activity with poor response to Immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy (ICI). We also describe the overall survival of melanoma depending on KIT mutation and MS4A1/CD20 expression, which encodes CD20, B-lymphocyte-specific membrane protein that plays a role in the development, differentiation, and activation of B-lymphocytes.2MethodsA case with poor response to ICI with KIT mutation and monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis was identified. Clinical and molecular characteristics of melanoma in TCGA was analyzed using cBioPortal web page. TCGA data were analyzed to determine KIT mutation status and MS4A1/CD20 expression in melanoma cohort. Samples in the upper 33 percentile of MS4A1 expression were identified as high expression, and the lower 33 percentile were identified as low expression. Mantel-Cox method was used for overall survival (OS) comparison between the cohorts.Results69-year-old male with initial diagnosis of stage III-B melanoma of the left thumb with local recurrence in the resection site and then lung metastases. Patient was then started on nivolumab/ipilimumab with rapid progression on immunotherapy. He was found to have KIT mutation (exon 13K642EMT), and started on imatinib, but he continued to have progression. He was switched to temozolomide with no response. He also had history of leukopenia, pre-dating the metastatic melanoma and was diagnosed with monoclonal B cell lymphocytosis. With the hypothesis that the patient‘s dysfunctional B cells may have impaired ability of ICI and poor prognosis; we analyzed TCGA database for KIT mutation and MS4A1/CD20 expression- which was used as marker for B cell activity. KIT mutation was seen in 10 of 147 patients with high MS4A1/CD20 expression, and 10 of 135 patients with low MS4A1/CD20 expression. Overall survival was 15 months for the patients with KIT mutation and low MS4A1/CD20 expression, and significantly lower when compared with other groups despite low number of patients. (P<0.0001) (figure 1).Abstract 525 Figure 1KIT mutation and MS41A/CD20 expression - overall survivalLow MS41A/CD20 expression with concurrent KIT mutation is associated with poor overall survivalConclusionsB cells have significant role in immune response to tumor. Lower expression of MS4A1/CD20 is known to be associated with poor prognosis in melanoma and other solid tumors.3 We demonstrated that a concurrent KIT mutation in melanoma with lower expression of MS4A1/CD20 contributes to poor prognosis in melanoma. Therefore, this small subset of aggressive tumors may need combination strategies involving targeting driver pathways with a kinase and immune checkpoint inhibitor.Referencesde Mendonça UB, Cernea CR, Matos LL, de Araujo Lima RR. Analysis of KIT gene mutations in patients with melanoma of the head and neck mucosa: a retrospective clinical report. Oncotarget 2018 May 1;9(33):22886.Tedder TF, Boyd AW, Freedman AS, Nadler LM, Schlossman S. The B cell surface molecule B1 is functionally linked with B cell activation and differentiation. The Journal of Immunology 1985 Aug 1;135(2):973–9.Liu Y, Wang L, Lo KW, Lui VW. Omics-wide quantitative B-cell infiltration analyses identify GPR18 for human cancer prognosis with superiority over CD20. Communications biology 2020 May 12;3(1):1–1.

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4318-4318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela M. B. Collie ◽  
Brian T. Hill ◽  
Elena A. Manilich ◽  
Mitchell R Smith ◽  
Eric D. Hsi

Abstract Background Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease entity with multiple potential prognostic biomarkers. Cell of origin (COO) molecular subtype classification using gene expression profiling with microarrays and immunohistochemical expression of CD30 have been examined as potential prognostic markers, often with conflicting results. A recent study demonstrated that patients with CD30-positive DLBCL had better prognosis compared to patients with CD30-negative DLBCL and had a distinct gene expression profile (Hu S et al. Blood. 121(14): 2715-24, 2013). In addition, due to the development of targeted therapies such as an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody drug conjugate, the identification and prognostic relevance of this biomarker has potential therapeutic impact. We evaluated CD30 expression, determined by immunohistochemistry, in a cohort of de novo DLBCL cases at our institution and examined cell of origin molecular subtype in the CD30-positive and CD30-negative groups. Design 94 adult patients with de novo DLBCL uniformly treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) as first line therapy were identified at The Cleveland Clinic. Clinical data was collected for these patients. A tissue microarray was created and stained with antibodies to CD10, CD20, CD30, BCL-6, and MUM-1. COO subtype was determined for the Hans algorithm in all cases. CD30 was considered positive when expression was seen in ≥ 20% of tumor cells. Results There were no significant differences in sex, age, IPI score, or stage between patients in the CD30-positive and CD30-negative groups. The median age of the DLBCL cohort was 63 years (range 17-91 years) with a male : female ratio of 1:1.1. 54% of patients had stage III or IV disease. Median follow-up was 58 months. 9 of 94 DLBCL samples (9.6%) were positive for CD30 by immunohistochemistry. By Kaplan-Meier analysis, the CD30-positive cases showed a decreased overall survival compared to the CD30-negative cases (Figure 1, p=0.044). Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazard model confirmed that CD30 expression was independent of IPI and a significant factor for overall survival (hazard ratio = 3.05; 95% confidence interval = 1.12-8.30; p = 0.0291). All 9 of the CD30-positive DLBCL samples were of the non-germinal center B-cell-like (NGC) subtype using the Hans immunohistochemical algorithm, which was significantly more than the CD30-negative samples (42/85) (p = 0.003). Conclusion CD30 expression was associated with poor prognosis in our cohort, in contrast to recent studies. However, CD30 expression was highly associated with the NGC subtype of DLBCL and might contribute to the pathogenesis of these lymphomas through NF-κB activation. Given the poor prognosis of NGC DLBCLs, targeting CD30 in DLBCL should be explored. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9503-9503
Author(s):  
Evan J. Lipson ◽  
Hussein Abdul-Hassan Tawbi ◽  
Dirk Schadendorf ◽  
Paolo Antonio Ascierto ◽  
Luis Matamala ◽  
...  

9503 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy has revolutionized the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma. However, novel combinations are needed to optimize the benefit-risk profile. Lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3) regulates an immune checkpoint pathway, which inhibits T-cell activity, and is upregulated in many tumor types including melanoma. Relatlimab (RELA), a human IgG4 LAG-3-blocking antibody, restores effector function of exhausted T cells. RELA in combination with nivolumab (NIVO; anti-programmed death [PD]-1) modulates potentially synergistic immune checkpoint pathways and can enhance antitumor immune responses. RELATIVITY-047 is a global, randomized, double-blind, phase II/III study evaluating a novel immune checkpoint inhibitor combination of RELA+NIVO as a fixed-dose combination (FDC) treatment in first-line advanced melanoma. Methods: Patients with previously untreated advanced melanoma were randomized 1:1 to receive RELA 160 mg + NIVO 480 mg FDC intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks (Q4W) or NIVO monotherapy 480 mg IV Q4W, stratified by LAG-3 expression, programmed death ligand 1 expression, BRAF mutation status, and AJCC (v8) M stage. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 as assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary endpoints were overall survival and objective response rate. PFS in prespecified subgroups and safety were additional objectives. Results: 714 patients were randomized to RELA+NIVO FDC (n = 355) or NIVO (n = 359). Patient characteristics were well balanced between treatment groups. Median follow-up was 13.2 months. Median PFS in the RELA+NIVO FDC group (10.1 months [95% CI, 6.4–15.7]) was significantly longer than in the NIVO group (4.6 months [95% CI, 3.4–5.6]; hazard ratio, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.6–0.9]; P = 0.0055). PFS rates at 12 months were 47.7% (95% CI, 41.8–53.2) and 36.0% (95% CI, 30.5–41.6) for RELA+NIVO FDC and NIVO, respectively. PFS favored RELA+NIVO FDC across key prespecified subgroups. The incidence of grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) was higher in the RELA+NIVO FDC group (18.9%) versus NIVO (9.7%). There were 3 treatment-related deaths with RELA+NIVO FDC and 2 with NIVO. TRAEs (any grade) led to treatment discontinuation in 14.6% and 6.7% of patients in the RELA+NIVO FDC and NIVO groups, respectively. Conclusions: First-line treatment with RELA+NIVO FDC demonstrated a statistically significant PFS benefit compared to NIVO monotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. RELA+NIVO FDC was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile and without unexpected safety signals. This is the first phase III study of a novel FDC to demonstrate a clinically meaningful benefit by dual inhibition of the LAG-3 and PD-1 pathways. Clinical trial information: NCT03470922.


Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 1924-1924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miho Kimura ◽  
Motoko Yamaguchi ◽  
Satoshi Ueno ◽  
Shoko Ogawa ◽  
Kana Miyazaki ◽  
...  

Abstract CD19 is one of the most representative B-cell markers, and is widely used in diagnostic immunophenotyping in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, it is known that the frequency of CD19 expression in DLBCL is less than that of CD20, and the clinical significance of CD19 expression has not yet been thoroughly examined. To clarify the clinical behavior of CD19-negative (CD19−) DLBCL, we have compared the clinical features, immunophenotype, and prognosis in relation to CD19 expression. The diagnosis of DLBCL was made according to the WHO Classification. We examined CD19 expression by means of immunohistochemistry using frozen sections with a monoclonal antibody, Leu12 (Becton Dickinson). Between 1987 and 2002, 227 cases of de novo DLBCL were examined the expression of CD19 in our laboratory. Anthracycline-containing chemotherapies were selected as the first-line treatment in 192 cases (85%). None was treated with rituximab. CD19 was expressed in 205 cases (90%), and 226 cases (99%) were positive for CD20. In 22 cases of CD19-negative (CD19−) DLBCL, the median age was 63 (39–79), and the male/female ratio was 11/11. According to CD19 expression, our DLBCL cases showed the following clinical features: male/female (CD19+ DLBCL 111/94, CD19− DLBCL 11/11: NS), age>60 (70%, 55%: NS), PS>1 (20%, 36%: P=0.07), sLDH>1xN (44%, 73%: P=0.01), extranodal involvement>1 site (12%, 18%: NS), stage III/IV (41%, 54%: NS), B symptom present (29%, 45%: NS). CD19− DLBCL expressed BCL2 protein less frequently than CD19+ DLBCL (P=0.03). The expression of CD5, CD10, CD21, BCL6, and MUM1 did not show a significant difference between CD19+ DLBCL and CD19− DLBCL. CD19− DLBCL showed significantly worse survival than CD19+ DLBCL (P=0.04, log-rank test). These findings suggest that the loss of CD19 expression in DLBCL is associated with high serum LDH level and poor prognosis. Simultaneous examination of CD19 and CD20 in diagnosis of DLBCL is recommended. Overall survival for patients with CD19+ DLBCL and with CD19− DLBCL. Overall survival for patients with CD19+ DLBCL and with CD19− DLBCL.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document