scholarly journals Admission blood glucose and short term survival in primary intracerebral haemorrhage: a population based study

2005 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 349-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
R Fogelholm
2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. e31-e40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Audrey A Thomas ◽  
Alison Pearce ◽  
Linda Sharp ◽  
Robert Alexander Gardiner ◽  
Suzanne Chambers ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. e86444 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Ming Chang ◽  
Wen-Yao Yin ◽  
Chang-Kao Wei ◽  
Cheng-Hung Lee ◽  
Ching-Chih Lee

2006 ◽  
Vol 16 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 11-17 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Paulsen ◽  
K. Kjærheim ◽  
J. KÆRN ◽  
S. Tretli ◽  
C. Tropé

The aim of this study was to study the impact of hospital level and surgical skill on short-term survival of advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer patients in a prospective population-based study. All 198 women with a diagnosis of advanced epithelial invasive ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer in Norway who underwent surgery during 2002 were included in this study. The data were derived from notifications to the Norwegian Cancer Registry and from medical, surgical, and histopathologic records. The hospitals were grouped into teaching and nonteaching hospitals (NTH), and the operating physicians were classified according to specialty (specialist gynecologist, gynecologist, and surgeon). The follow-up period was from 455 to 820 days. The short-term survival at 450 days was 79% for women operated at teaching hospitals (TH) and 62% at NTH (P= 0.02). After simultaneous adjustment for seven prognostic factors and residual disease, the risk of death within 600 days at NTH was unchanged compared to TH, hazard ratio 1.83. The women operated on by specialist compared to general gynecologists had a 20% increased short-term survival (P < 0.0001). TH and specialist gynecologists achieved better short-term survival of patients operated for advanced ovarian, tubal, and peritoneal cancer. Centralization and specialization of ovarian cancer surgery might improve the outcome for this patient group.


2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 40-47
Author(s):  
Ashraf Mansour ◽  
Husam Salama ◽  
Sufwan Alomar ◽  
Sabry Ahmed ◽  
Nazla Mahmoud ◽  
...  

Background: Caring about ELBW newborns at the limit of viability is demanding with a high rate of mortality and long-term morbidity. Society expectations become high and persistent while health care coast inside NICU is very high. Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine the short-term survival (till discharge) of extremely low birth weight (ELBW) newborns at limits of viability 23–26 weeks gestation (WG) age in a large tertiary maternity hospital. Methods: A population-based retrospective study of babies born at 23–26 WG age over 3 years period. Results: Over the study period 2016 to mid-2018, a total of 283 ELBW newborns were delivered in our institute. Of those, 250 were admitted to NICU (88%). The number of newborns who survived till discharge from NICU was 174 (61.5%) while the rate of delivery room death was 33 newborns (11.75%). The survival rates during 2016–2018 period were 35%, 64%, 73%, and 81.4% for 23, 24, 25, and 26 WG respectively. 76 newborns (26.9%) of NICU admissions died before discharge. Most deaths occurred during the first two weeks of life (64%). The main cause of death inside the NICU during the first 2 weeks was respiratory failure, followed by infection. Conclusion: Counseling Parent using local data become more convincing and reflecting local experience. Short term survival rate of ELBW is comparable to those reported in the literature. The first two weeks are very crucial where the mortality rate is highest.


Author(s):  
Jacob C Jentzer ◽  
Benedikt Schrage ◽  
David R Holmes ◽  
Salim Dabboura ◽  
Nandan S Anavekar ◽  
...  

Abstract Aims Cardiogenic shock (CS) is associated with poor outcomes in older patients, but it remains unclear if this is due to higher shock severity. We sought to determine the associations between age and shock severity on mortality among patients with CS. Methods and results Patients with a diagnosis of CS from Mayo Clinic (2007–15) and University Clinic Hamburg (2009–17) were subdivided by age. Shock severity was graded using the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Intervention (SCAI) shock stages. Predictors of 30-day survival were determined using Cox proportional-hazards analysis. We included 1749 patients (934 from Mayo Clinic and 815 from University Clinic Hamburg), with a mean age of 67.6 ± 14.6 years, including 33.6% females. Acute coronary syndrome was the cause of CS in 54.0%. The distribution of SCAI shock stages was 24.1%; C, 28.0%; D, 33.2%; and E, 14.8%. Older patients had similar overall shock severity, more co-morbidities, worse kidney function, and decreased use of mechanical circulatory support compared to younger patients. Overall 30-day survival was 53.3% and progressively decreased as age or SCAI shock stage increased, with a clear gradient towards lower 30-day survival as a function of increasing age and SCAI shock stage. Progressively older age groups had incrementally lower adjusted 30-day survival than patients aged &lt;50 years. Conclusion Older patients with CS have lower short-term survival, despite similar shock severity, with a high risk of death in older patients with more severe shock. Further research is needed to determine the optimal treatment strategies for older CS patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document