scholarly journals O83 Phase 1 study of an anti-CD27 agonist as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A2.1-A2
Author(s):  
Ronnie Shapira-Frommer ◽  
Marloes GJ van Dongen ◽  
Konstantin Dobrenkov ◽  
Elliot Chartash ◽  
Fang Liu ◽  
...  

BackgroundMK-5890 is a humanized agonist monoclonal antibody that binds to CD27 to provide a costimulatory signal that enhances T-cell–mediated responses. This first-in-human phase 1 study of MK-5890 evaluated the safety and efficacy of escalating doses of MK-5890 as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsKey eligibility criteria included histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced solid tumor, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1, and ECOG PS ≤1. MK-5890 was tested alone (dose range, 2-700 mg) or with pembrolizumab (fixed dose, 200 mg). Patients with disease progression following MK-5890 monotherapy were eligible to cross over to combination treatment. The primary objective was safety and tolerability. Objective response rate by investigator per RECIST v1.1 was also evaluated. The database cutoff for this analysis was May 30, 2019.ResultsOf 44 patients enrolled, 25 received MK-5890 and 19 received MK-5890 plus pembrolizumab; their median age was 59.0 years, 61.4% were female, 47.7% had ECOG PS 1, and 13.6% previously received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. In the initial phase, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported in 3 patients receiving MK-5890 and 1 patient receiving MK-5890 plus pembrolizumab; all DLTs were associated with infusion-related adverse events. Maximum tolerated dose was defined. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 40 patients (90.9%): 22 patients (88.0%) receiving MK-5890 and 18 patients (94.7%) receiving MK-5890 plus pembrolizumab. The most common TRAEs were fatigue (28.0%) and infusion-related reactions (28.0%) with MK-5890 and fatigue (36.8%) and pruritus (31.6%) with MK-5809 plus pembrolizumab. Grade 3-4 TRAEs were reported in 10 patients (22.7%): 6 patients (24.0%) receiving MK-5890 and 4 patients (21.1%) receiving MK-5890 plus pembrolizumab; no grade 5 events were observed. One patient (4.0%) achieved a partial response (PR) with MK-5890 and 1 patient (5.3%) achieved a PR with MK-5890 plus pembrolizumab. Fourteen patients entered the crossover phase to receive MK-5890 plus pembrolizumab. In the crossover phase, no DLTs were reported. TRAEs were reported in 12 patients (85.7%); the most common were pruritus (21.4%), rash (21.4%), and headache (14.3%). One patient (7.1%) reported grade 3-4 TRAEs of increased amylase and increased lipase; no grade 5 events were observed. Two patients (14.3%) achieved a complete response and 2 patients (14.3%) achieved a PR.ConclusionsTreatment with MK-5890, alone and in combination with pembrolizumab, demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. Early antitumor activity was observed in patients with advanced solid tumors in both monotherapy and combination therapy arms.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshuo Cao ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  

Abstract BackgroundPreclinical studies have supported a potential synergistic antitumor activity between surufatinib and anti-programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). We describe here the results of a single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with surufatinib combined with toripalimab, an inhibitor of PD-L1.MethodsThis is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with solid tumors who had failed standard therapies or had no effective treatment. In the dose escalation stage, 3 cohorts of patients were treated with surufatinib, at dose levels of 200, 250, or 300 mg once daily (QD) in combination with a fixed dose of toripalimab 240 mg, every 3 weeks (Q3W), to evaluate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion phase to further assess the efficacy, safety, and PK profile.ResultsFrom April 1, 2019 to July 10, 2020, 31 patients were screened, of which 28 patients were enrolled. One patient in the 300 mg cohort experienced dose limited toxicity (DLT), a grade 3 hyperthyroidism. The top 3 most common treatment-related adverse events of ≥ grade 3 were transaminases increased (17.9%), hypertension (14.3%) and blood bilirubin increased (10.7%). No treatment-related death or treatment discontinuation was identified. The RP2D was determined to be surufatinib 250 mg QD plus toripalimab 240 mg Q3W. Overall objective response rate was 22.2% [95% confidential interval (CI) 8.6‒42.3], and disease control rate reached 81.5% (95% CI 61.9‒93.7). ConclusionsSurufatinib plus toripalimab was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals, and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03879057; Registered March 18, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879057


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3055-3055
Author(s):  
Victor Moreno ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Piotr Rutkowski ◽  
Carmen Beato ◽  
Enriqueta Felip ◽  
...  

3055 Background: Cetrelimab (CET) is an investigational checkpoint inhibitor (CI). In part 1 of a first-in-human (FIH) trial (LUC1001; NCT02908906), pts with advanced solid tumors with ≥1 prior treatment received CET 80–800 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W. Response rates and safety profiles were similar to other CIs. Based on preclinical and clinical data, a phase 1/2 study (NORSE; NCT03473743) of CET + erdafitinib (ERD) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) + FGFR alterations (alt) was initiated and is ongoing. Methods: In LUC1001 Part 2, pts with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma (MEL), or MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer (CRC) received CET IV 240 q2w. Overall response rates (ORR = % complete response + partial response [PR] confirmed) were assessed as per RECIST v1.1. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed for all patients receiving CET IV 240 q2w in parts 1 and 2. Results: As of July 1, 2019, 122 pts with NSCLC (n=30); MEL (n=50); or CRC (n= 42) had been treated in Part 2. Median age ranged from 58 to 64 yrs (overall range, 23–86 yrs). Duration of treatment was 8.1 mos (range, 0.0-24.7) for NSCLC; 5.5 mos (range, 0.0-25.0) for MEL; and for 3.0 mos (0.0-16.1) for CRC. ORR was 37% in NSCLC; 53% in PD-L1+ NSCLC (≥50% by IHC), 28% in MEL; 32% in non-uveal MEL, 14% in CRC and 24% in centrally confirmed MSI-high CRC. In all CET IV 240 q2w treated pts in the FIH study (N= 162), treatment-related grade ≥3 and serious AEs were reported in 15% and 12% of pts, respectively. All grade and grade ≥3 immune-related (ir) AEs were reported in 41% and 8% of pts, respectively Most common ir AE: hypothyroidism (8%), asthenia (6%), diarrhea (4%), rash (4%), hyperthyroidism (4%), dyspnea (3%), pruritis (3%) and pneumonitis (3%). There was 1 treatment-related death due to myasthenia gravis. In the phase 1 combination study (NORSE), pts with mUC + FGFR alt (n=17) received fixed-dose CET IV 240 q2w + ERD 6mg, 8 mg or 8mg + up titration (UpT) to 9 mg to establish the RP2D for the combination as CET + ERD 8mg + UpT. In the RP2D group (n=10), 60% had treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs. ORR (all confirmed PR) was 50% in the all treated response-evaluable group (n=16). Conclusions: CET is a CI with efficacy and safety profiles in advanced solid tumors similar to approved CIs. In NORSE phase 1, CET+ ERD demonstrated antitumor activity in mUC with an acceptable safety profile. NORSE phase 2 is evaluating this combination as first-line therapy in pts with mUC with FGFR alt. References: Rutkowski, et al J Clin Oncol.2019; 37 (8 suppl): 31-31. Moreno, et al. ASCO-GU Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. February 13-15, 2020. San Francisco, CA. Clinical trial information: NCT02908906 and NCT03473743 .


2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3127-3127
Author(s):  
Filippo G. De Braud ◽  
Wentao Jason Wu

3127 Background: Resistance to mTORC1 inhibition may develop through feedback loop leading to upregulation of mTORC2. XP-105, also known as BI 860585, is a potent dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor designed to overcome such resistance. This Phase 1 trial (NCT01938846) was performed to determine the MTD and activity of XP-105 alone or in combination with exemestane or paclitaxel in pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: A 3+3 escalation design was used; Pts received XP-105 (5–300 mg/day) monotherapy or (40–220 mg/day) combined with fixed-dose exemestane 25 mg/day, or 80–160 mg/day combined with paclitaxel 60 or 80 mg/m2/week. A reduction of pAKT/total AKT ratio was used as a PD marker of target inhibition. Results: 90 pts were treated (41 with monotherapy, 25 and 24 in combination with exemestane, or paclitaxel respectively). XP-105 MTD was defined as 220 mg daily for monotherapy, and 160mg daily with exemestane 25 mg/d or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2/week. In the monotherapy arm, stable disease (SD) was reported in 8 pts (20%), with a median duration of 11 months. In the exemestane combination arm, 4 (16%) partial responses (PR) were reported. In the paclitaxel combination arm, 1 complete response (CR) and 4 PRs were reported (OR rate 21%). Disease control rate (CR/PR/SD) was 20%, 28%, and 58% in the monotherapy, XP-105/exemestane, and XP-105/paclitaxel arms, respectively. A sustained reduction in pAKT/total AKT to < 50% of baseline levels was observed with XP-105 ≥120mg daily. Overall, XP-105 was well tolerated; in the XP-105/paclitaxel combination the most frequent drug-related AEs were diarrhea and fatigue (58.3% each), hyperglycaemia (54.2%), anaemia (50%). Grade ≥3 AEs were hyperglycaemia, fatigue, diarrhea, anaemia, leukopenia. No PK interaction was observed. Conclusions: The MTD for XP-105 monotherapy and in combination with exemestane or paclitaxel was defined as 220 mg and 160mg once daily, respectively. Combination regimens showed higher activity as compared to monotherapy with durable OR in about 20% of pts. The observed safety profile of XP-105 compared favorably to those reported from other mTOR inhibitors. Clinical trial information: NCT01938846.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichi Naito ◽  
Yasutoshi Kuboki ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Kenichi Harano ◽  
Nobuaki Matsubara ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Talazoparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase enzyme inhibitor. This open-label, non-randomized, phase 1 study of talazoparib investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity in Japanese patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, regardless of mutations in DNA damage repair-related genes, who are resistant to/ineligible for standard therapies.Methods: Patients received talazoparib dosed orally at 0.75 or 1 mg once daily using a modified 3+3 dose-escalation scheme. Primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicities during the first cycle of talazoparib.Results: Nine patients (median age 62.0 years) were included: 3 and 6 patients at the 0.75 and 1.0 mg once-daily dose level, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events (≥2 patients) were anemia, stomatitis, maculopapular rash, platelet count decreased, neutrophil count decreased, and alanine aminotransferase increased. Three patients had grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (anemia, brain metastases [1 patient each], and neutrophil and white blood cell count decreased [same patient]). Two patients temporarily discontinued treatment due to a treatment-emergent adverse event, and 1 patient required a dose reduction for neutrophil count decreased (all at 1 mg once daily). Talazoparib exposure (Cmax and AUC) after single and multiple dosing was slightly higher proportionally with talazoparib 1 mg than talazoparib 0.75 mg. The overall disease control rate was 44.4%, including 2 patients with stable disease. The recommended phase 2 dose of talazoparib was established as 1 mg once daily.Conclusions: Single-agent talazoparib was well tolerated and had preliminary antitumor activity in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. Clinical Trial Register: clinicalTrials.govClinical Registration Number: NCT03343054 (November 17, 2017)


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10062-10062 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. W. Saif ◽  
C. Erlichman ◽  
T. Dragovich ◽  
D. Mendelson ◽  
D. Toft ◽  
...  

10062 Background: 17-AAG is a benzoquinone ansamycin that binds to and inhibits the HSP90 family of molecular chaperones leading to the proteasomal degradation of client proteins critical in malignant cell proliferation and survival. We have undertaken a Phase 1 trial of CNF1010, an oil-in-water nanoemulsion of 17-AAG. Methods: Patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, ECOG PS 0–2, and adequate hematologic, hepatic, renal and cardiac functions received CNF1010 by 1 h intravenous infusion, twice-a-week, three weeks out of four, starting at 6 mg/m2 per dose. Doses were escalated sequentially in single pts (6 and 12 mg/m2) and 3–6 pts (≥ 25 mg/m2) cohorts according to a modified Fibonacci’s schema. Plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles were obtained on days 1 and 18. Biomarkers were measured in PBMC’s (HSP70) and plasma (HER-2 ectodomain (HER-2 ECD)). Results: 30 pts (M/F: 14/16; median age 63, range 48–78) with colorectal cancer (11), pancreatic cancer (5), melanoma (5), ovarian (2), others (7) were treated with a median of 2 courses (range: 1–10). There was no dose-limiting toxicity up to 175 mg/m2. One pt at 175 mg/m2 died on study, but drug relation was unclear. Grade 1–2 gastrointestinal toxicities (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea) and serum creatinine elevation were observed. Severe toxicities (grade 3 but no grade 4) consisted of reversible hepatic enzyme elevation, hyperbilirubinemia, fatigue, anemia and hyperglycemia. There were no hematological toxicities. Plasma 17-AAG PK appeared dose-proportional (AUC, Cmax); CL (17 L/h/m2) and t1/2 (5.2 h) were dose independent and unchanged after repeated dosing (day 18). Post-treatment increases in HSP70 were observed in PBMCs and decreases in plasma HER-2 ECD were observed at doses ≥ 83 mg/m2. Minor tumor regressions were seen in 1 pt with duodenal cancer (83 mg/m2), 1 pt with gastric carcinoid (175 mg/m2) and 1 pt with melanoma (175 mg/m2). Conclusion: The threshold of biologic activity for CNF1010 administered by a twice a week schedule appears to be 83 mg/m2. This dosing regimen appears to be optimal and supported by the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data. The MTD has not yet been determined. Dose escalation of CNF1010 continues at 225 mg/m2. [Table: see text]


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4074-4074 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean-Charles Soria ◽  
John H. Strickler ◽  
Ramaswamy Govindan ◽  
Seungjean Chai ◽  
Nancy Chan ◽  
...  

4074 Background: Erdafitinib (JNJ-42756493) is a potent, oral pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor that demonstrated encouraging preliminary clinical activity and manageable adverse events (AEs) in its first-in-human phase 1 study in advanced solid tumors (NCT01703481). Here we report results from pts with CCA from this study. Methods: This 4-part study enrolled pts age ≥ 18 years (y) with advanced solid tumors. Dose escalation (part 1) followed a 3+3 design, with pts receiving ascending doses of erdafitinib continuously or intermittently (7 days on/7 days off). Subsequent parts required FGFR gene alterations in the tumor, including activating mutations and translocations or other FGFR-activating aberrations. Part 2 was a pharmacodynamics cohort. Parts 3 and 4 were dose-expansion cohorts for recommended phase 2 doses of 9 mg once daily (QD) and 10 mg intermittently, respectively. Results: Eleven pts with FGFR-aberrant CCA were treated at 9 mg QD (n = 1) or 10 mg intermittent (n = 10). Median age was 60 y; 7 of 11 pts were female (64%). 73% of pts had ECOG performance status 1. All had prior systemic therapy. Median treatment duration with erdafitinib was 5.3 months (mo). Systemic erdafitinib exposure, per Cmax and AUC, in CCA pts was similar to other indications. The most common AEs were stomatitis (82%), hyperphosphatemia (64%), dry mouth (55%), dysgeusia (45%), dry skin (45%), and asthenia (45%), mostly grade 1/2 severity. No drug-related grade ≥3 AEs were reported in > 1 pt except grade 3 stomatitis (n = 2; 18%). The objective response rate, all confirmed partial responses (PRs) per RECIST 1.1, was 27.3% (3/11; 95% CI 6, 61); an additional 27.3% (3/11) had stable disease as their best response. Overall disease control rate was 55%. All 3 PRs were at the 10 mg intermittent dosage, and the median duration of response was 12.9 mo. With a median follow-up of 5.1 mo, median progression-free survival was 5.1 mo (95% CI 1.6, 16.4). As of the cutoff date, 2 pts continue on study treatment. Conclusions: Erdafitinib showed encouraging clinical activity and minimal toxicity in pts with advanced CCA and FGFR alterations. These results warrant further study. Clinical trial information: NCT01703481.


Author(s):  
Yoichi Naito ◽  
Yasutoshi Kuboki ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Kenichi Harano ◽  
Nobuaki Matsubara ◽  
...  

SummaryBackground: Talazoparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase enzyme inhibitor. This open-label, non-randomized, phase 1 study of talazoparib investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and preliminary antitumor activity in Japanese patients with locally advanced or metastatic solid tumors, regardless of mutations in DNA damage repair-related genes, who are resistant to/ineligible for standard therapies. Methods: Patients received talazoparib dosed orally at 0.75 or 1 mg once daily using a modified 3 + 3 dose-escalation scheme. Primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicities during the first cycle of talazoparib. Results: Nine patients (median age 62.0 years) were included: 3 and 6 patients at the 0.75 and 1.0 mg once-daily dose levels, respectively. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events (≥2 patients) were anemia, stomatitis, maculopapular rash, platelet count decreased, neutrophil count decreased, and alanine aminotransferase increased. Three patients had grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (anemia, brain metastases [1 patient each], and neutrophil and white blood cell count decreased [same patient]). Two patients temporarily discontinued treatment due to a treatment-emergent adverse event, and 1 patient required a dose reduction for neutrophil count decreased (all at 1 mg once daily). Talazoparib exposure (Cmax and AUC) after single and multiple dosing was slightly higher proportionally with talazoparib 1 mg than talazoparib 0.75 mg. The overall disease control rate was 44.4%, including 2 patients with stable disease. The recommended phase 2 dose of talazoparib was established as 1 mg once daily. Conclusions: Single-agent talazoparib was well tolerated and had preliminary antitumor activity in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03343054 (November 17, 2017).


2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A313-A314
Author(s):  
Solmaz Sahebjam ◽  
Jameel Muzaffar ◽  
Timothy Yap ◽  
David Hong ◽  
Olivier Rixe ◽  
...  

BackgroundIDO-1 inhibitors have shown antitumor activity in combination with immunotherapeutic agents in multiple cancers. KHK2455 is a novel and selective oral IDO-1 inhibitor. KHK2455 inhibits IDO-1 apo-enzyme, with long-lasting and potent activity. Mogamulizumab is an anti-C-C chemokine receptor 4 (CCR4) monoclonal antibody that has shown synergy with KHK2455 in preclinical models. Mogamulizumab is approved in the US and EU for treatment of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome.MethodsIn this first-in-human study, patients with advanced solid tumors received escalating oral doses of KHK2455 alone (0.3, 1, 3, 10, 30 and 100 mg once daily) for 4 weeks (Cycle 0), followed by combination with 1 mg/kg weekly of IV mogamulizumab for 4 weeks (Cycle 1), and then on Days 1 and 15 (from Cycle 2 onward) in a standard 3+3 Phase I design. Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and IDO activity (kynurenine [Kyn] and tryptophan [Trp] levels and ex vivo Kyn production) were evaluated.ResultsThirty-six patients were enrolled across all cohorts. One patient with lower esophageal cancer in the 100 mg cohort exhibited dose-limiting toxicity (Grade 3 gastrointestinal necrosis). The most frequent (≥10%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) are presented in table 1. Overall numbers of TEAEs, ≥Grade 3 TEAEs, and serious TEAEs related to KHK2455 and mogamulizumab are presented in table 2. Serious KHK2455-related TEAEs included gastrointestinal necrosis (KHK2455 monotherapy), and nausea and drug eruption (combination therapy). In addition, five drug-related TEAEs in combination therapy led to discontinuation; there were no fatal outcomes related to either study drug. Plasma KHK2455 concentrations reached steady state by Day 8 (Cycle 0) and increased dose-dependently. Potent dose-dependent inhibition of IDO activity was demonstrated by plasma Kyn concentration and Kyn/Trp ratio (median inhibition 70.5% and 70.8%, respectively, at 100 mg dose on Day 15, compared to baseline) and ex vivo Kyn production (>95% inhibition at ≥10 mg KHK2455), confirming target modulation. Six of 26 evaluable patients from all dosing groups achieved durable disease stabilization (≥6 months, RECIST 1.1), and one patient with bevacizumab-resistant glioblastoma demonstrated confirmed partial response (43.5% tumor reduction over a 2-year observation period). Median overall survival was 13.4 months, with 30% of subjects surviving for 2 years or longer (figure 1).Abstract 287 Table 1Study 2455-001: Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (≥10% by Preferred Term)Abstract 287 Table 2Abstract 287 Figure 1Study 2455-001: Overall SurvivalConclusionsKHK2455 in combination with mogamulizumab was well-tolerated and manageable at all doses tested, suppressed Kyn production in a dose-dependent and sustained manner, and demonstrated signals of antitumor activity. These data support the continued development of this combination.AcknowledgementsMedical writing assistance was provided by Susan E. Johnson, PhD, S.E. Johnson Consulting, LLC, New Hope, PA, USA.Trial RegistrationNCT02867007 (www.clinicaltrials.gov)Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by Ethics Committees at all participating study institutions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document