Evolving development of PD-1 therapy: Cetrelimab (JNJ-63723283) from monotherapy to combination with erdafitinib.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3055-3055
Author(s):  
Victor Moreno ◽  
Yohann Loriot ◽  
Piotr Rutkowski ◽  
Carmen Beato ◽  
Enriqueta Felip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
San Francisco ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Grade 3

3055 Background: Cetrelimab (CET) is an investigational checkpoint inhibitor (CI). In part 1 of a first-in-human (FIH) trial (LUC1001; NCT02908906), pts with advanced solid tumors with ≥1 prior treatment received CET 80–800 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W. Response rates and safety profiles were similar to other CIs. Based on preclinical and clinical data, a phase 1/2 study (NORSE; NCT03473743) of CET + erdafitinib (ERD) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) + FGFR alterations (alt) was initiated and is ongoing. Methods: In LUC1001 Part 2, pts with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), melanoma (MEL), or MSI-H/dMMR colorectal cancer (CRC) received CET IV 240 q2w. Overall response rates (ORR = % complete response + partial response [PR] confirmed) were assessed as per RECIST v1.1. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed for all patients receiving CET IV 240 q2w in parts 1 and 2. Results: As of July 1, 2019, 122 pts with NSCLC (n=30); MEL (n=50); or CRC (n= 42) had been treated in Part 2. Median age ranged from 58 to 64 yrs (overall range, 23–86 yrs). Duration of treatment was 8.1 mos (range, 0.0-24.7) for NSCLC; 5.5 mos (range, 0.0-25.0) for MEL; and for 3.0 mos (0.0-16.1) for CRC. ORR was 37% in NSCLC; 53% in PD-L1+ NSCLC (≥50% by IHC), 28% in MEL; 32% in non-uveal MEL, 14% in CRC and 24% in centrally confirmed MSI-high CRC. In all CET IV 240 q2w treated pts in the FIH study (N= 162), treatment-related grade ≥3 and serious AEs were reported in 15% and 12% of pts, respectively. All grade and grade ≥3 immune-related (ir) AEs were reported in 41% and 8% of pts, respectively Most common ir AE: hypothyroidism (8%), asthenia (6%), diarrhea (4%), rash (4%), hyperthyroidism (4%), dyspnea (3%), pruritis (3%) and pneumonitis (3%). There was 1 treatment-related death due to myasthenia gravis. In the phase 1 combination study (NORSE), pts with mUC + FGFR alt (n=17) received fixed-dose CET IV 240 q2w + ERD 6mg, 8 mg or 8mg + up titration (UpT) to 9 mg to establish the RP2D for the combination as CET + ERD 8mg + UpT. In the RP2D group (n=10), 60% had treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs. ORR (all confirmed PR) was 50% in the all treated response-evaluable group (n=16). Conclusions: CET is a CI with efficacy and safety profiles in advanced solid tumors similar to approved CIs. In NORSE phase 1, CET+ ERD demonstrated antitumor activity in mUC with an acceptable safety profile. NORSE phase 2 is evaluating this combination as first-line therapy in pts with mUC with FGFR alt. References: Rutkowski, et al J Clin Oncol.2019; 37 (8 suppl): 31-31. Moreno, et al. ASCO-GU Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. February 13-15, 2020. San Francisco, CA. Clinical trial information: NCT02908906 and NCT03473743 .

A dose escalation pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study of mTORC1/2 inhibitor XP-105 (BI 860585) as monotherapy and in combination with exemestane or paclitaxel in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3127-3127
Author(s):  
Filippo G. De Braud ◽  
Wentao Jason Wu
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Mtor Inhibitors ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Sustained Reduction ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Combination Regimens

3127 Background: Resistance to mTORC1 inhibition may develop through feedback loop leading to upregulation of mTORC2. XP-105, also known as BI 860585, is a potent dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor designed to overcome such resistance. This Phase 1 trial (NCT01938846) was performed to determine the MTD and activity of XP-105 alone or in combination with exemestane or paclitaxel in pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: A 3+3 escalation design was used; Pts received XP-105 (5–300 mg/day) monotherapy or (40–220 mg/day) combined with fixed-dose exemestane 25 mg/day, or 80–160 mg/day combined with paclitaxel 60 or 80 mg/m2/week. A reduction of pAKT/total AKT ratio was used as a PD marker of target inhibition. Results: 90 pts were treated (41 with monotherapy, 25 and 24 in combination with exemestane, or paclitaxel respectively). XP-105 MTD was defined as 220 mg daily for monotherapy, and 160mg daily with exemestane 25 mg/d or paclitaxel 80 mg/m2/week. In the monotherapy arm, stable disease (SD) was reported in 8 pts (20%), with a median duration of 11 months. In the exemestane combination arm, 4 (16%) partial responses (PR) were reported. In the paclitaxel combination arm, 1 complete response (CR) and 4 PRs were reported (OR rate 21%). Disease control rate (CR/PR/SD) was 20%, 28%, and 58% in the monotherapy, XP-105/exemestane, and XP-105/paclitaxel arms, respectively. A sustained reduction in pAKT/total AKT to < 50% of baseline levels was observed with XP-105 ≥120mg daily. Overall, XP-105 was well tolerated; in the XP-105/paclitaxel combination the most frequent drug-related AEs were diarrhea and fatigue (58.3% each), hyperglycaemia (54.2%), anaemia (50%). Grade ≥3 AEs were hyperglycaemia, fatigue, diarrhea, anaemia, leukopenia. No PK interaction was observed. Conclusions: The MTD for XP-105 monotherapy and in combination with exemestane or paclitaxel was defined as 220 mg and 160mg once daily, respectively. Combination regimens showed higher activity as compared to monotherapy with durable OR in about 20% of pts. The observed safety profile of XP-105 compared favorably to those reported from other mTOR inhibitors. Clinical trial information: NCT01938846.

scholarly journals Surufatinib Plus Toripalimab in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors: A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 1 Trial

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanshuo Cao ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Yu Sun ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jie Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 1 Trial ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BackgroundPreclinical studies have supported a potential synergistic antitumor activity between surufatinib and anti-programed death ligand-1 (PD-L1). We describe here the results of a single-arm, open-label phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety, preliminary efficacy, and pharmacokinetics (PK) in patients with advanced solid tumors treated with surufatinib combined with toripalimab, an inhibitor of PD-L1.MethodsThis is an open-label, dose escalation and expansion study in patients with solid tumors who had failed standard therapies or had no effective treatment. In the dose escalation stage, 3 cohorts of patients were treated with surufatinib, at dose levels of 200, 250, or 300 mg once daily (QD) in combination with a fixed dose of toripalimab 240 mg, every 3 weeks (Q3W), to evaluate maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Additional patients were enrolled in the dose expansion phase to further assess the efficacy, safety, and PK profile.ResultsFrom April 1, 2019 to July 10, 2020, 31 patients were screened, of which 28 patients were enrolled. One patient in the 300 mg cohort experienced dose limited toxicity (DLT), a grade 3 hyperthyroidism. The top 3 most common treatment-related adverse events of ≥ grade 3 were transaminases increased (17.9%), hypertension (14.3%) and blood bilirubin increased (10.7%). No treatment-related death or treatment discontinuation was identified. The RP2D was determined to be surufatinib 250 mg QD plus toripalimab 240 mg Q3W. Overall objective response rate was 22.2% [95% confidential interval (CI) 8.6‒42.3], and disease control rate reached 81.5% (95% CI 61.9‒93.7). ConclusionsSurufatinib plus toripalimab was well-tolerated, with no unexpected safety signals, and showed promising antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov, NCT03879057; Registered March 18, 2019, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03879057

scholarly journals O83 Phase 1 study of an anti-CD27 agonist as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A2.1-A2
Author(s):  
Ronnie Shapira-Frommer ◽  
Marloes GJ van Dongen ◽  
Konstantin Dobrenkov ◽  
Elliot Chartash ◽  
Fang Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 Study ◽  
Grade 5 ◽  
Crossover Phase ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps

BackgroundMK-5890 is a humanized agonist monoclonal antibody that binds to CD27 to provide a costimulatory signal that enhances T-cell–mediated responses. This first-in-human phase 1 study of MK-5890 evaluated the safety and efficacy of escalating doses of MK-5890 as monotherapy and in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsKey eligibility criteria included histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced solid tumor, measurable disease by RECIST v1.1, and ECOG PS ≤1. MK-5890 was tested alone (dose range, 2-700 mg) or with pembrolizumab (fixed dose, 200 mg). Patients with disease progression following MK-5890 monotherapy were eligible to cross over to combination treatment. The primary objective was safety and tolerability. Objective response rate by investigator per RECIST v1.1 was also evaluated. The database cutoff for this analysis was May 30, 2019.ResultsOf 44 patients enrolled, 25 received MK-5890 and 19 received MK-5890 plus pembrolizumab; their median age was 59.0 years, 61.4% were female, 47.7% had ECOG PS 1, and 13.6% previously received immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. In the initial phase, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were reported in 3 patients receiving MK-5890 and 1 patient receiving MK-5890 plus pembrolizumab; all DLTs were associated with infusion-related adverse events. Maximum tolerated dose was defined. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 40 patients (90.9%): 22 patients (88.0%) receiving MK-5890 and 18 patients (94.7%) receiving MK-5890 plus pembrolizumab. The most common TRAEs were fatigue (28.0%) and infusion-related reactions (28.0%) with MK-5890 and fatigue (36.8%) and pruritus (31.6%) with MK-5809 plus pembrolizumab. Grade 3-4 TRAEs were reported in 10 patients (22.7%): 6 patients (24.0%) receiving MK-5890 and 4 patients (21.1%) receiving MK-5890 plus pembrolizumab; no grade 5 events were observed. One patient (4.0%) achieved a partial response (PR) with MK-5890 and 1 patient (5.3%) achieved a PR with MK-5890 plus pembrolizumab. Fourteen patients entered the crossover phase to receive MK-5890 plus pembrolizumab. In the crossover phase, no DLTs were reported. TRAEs were reported in 12 patients (85.7%); the most common were pruritus (21.4%), rash (21.4%), and headache (14.3%). One patient (7.1%) reported grade 3-4 TRAEs of increased amylase and increased lipase; no grade 5 events were observed. Two patients (14.3%) achieved a complete response and 2 patients (14.3%) achieved a PR.ConclusionsTreatment with MK-5890, alone and in combination with pembrolizumab, demonstrated an acceptable safety profile. Early antitumor activity was observed in patients with advanced solid tumors in both monotherapy and combination therapy arms.

scholarly journals Safety and clinical activity of intratumoral MEDI9197 alone and in combination with durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e001095 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lillian Siu ◽  
Joshua Brody ◽  
Shilpa Gupta ◽  
Aurélien Marabelle ◽  
Antonio Jimeno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Palliative Radiation ◽  
Cell Counts ◽  
Palliative Radiation Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

BackgroundMEDI9197 is an intratumorally administered toll-like receptor 7 and 8 agonist. In mice, MEDI9197 modulated antitumor immune responses, inhibited tumor growth and increased survival. This first-time-in-human, phase 1 study evaluated MEDI9197 with or without the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitor durvalumab and/or palliative radiation therapy (RT) for advanced solid tumors.Patients and methodsEligible patients had at least one cutaneous, subcutaneous, or deep-seated lesion suitable for intratumoral (IT) injection. Dose escalation used a standard 3+3 design. Patients received IT MEDI9197 0.005–0.055 mg with or without RT (part 1), or IT MEDI9197 0.005 or 0.012 mg plus durvalumab 1500 mg intravenous with or without RT (part 3), in 4-week cycles. Primary endpoints were safety and tolerability. Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and objective response based on Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors version 1.1. Exploratory endpoints included tumor and peripheral biomarkers that correlate with biological activity or predict response.ResultsFrom November 2015 to March 2018, part 1 enrolled 35 patients and part 3 enrolled 17 patients; five in part 1 and 2 in part 3 received RT. The maximum tolerated dose of MEDI9197 monotherapy was 0.037 mg, with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of cytokine release syndrome in two patients (one grade 3, one grade 4) and 0.012 mg in combination with durvalumab 1500 mg with DLT of MEDI9197-related hemorrhagic shock in one patient (grade 5) following liver metastasis rupture after two cycles of MEDI9197. Across parts 1 and 3, the most frequent MEDI9197-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade were fever (56%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (21%). The most frequent MEDI9197-related grade ≥3 events were decreased lymphocytes (15%), neutrophils (10%), and white cell counts (10%). MEDI9197 increased tumoral CD8+ and PD-L1+ cells, inducing type 1 and 2 interferons and Th1 response. There were no objective clinical responses; 10 patients in part 1 and 3 patients in part 3 had stable disease ≥8 weeks.ConclusionIT MEDI9197 was feasible for subcutaneous/cutaneous lesions but AEs precluded its use in deep-seated lesions. Although no patients responded, MEDI9197 induced systemic and intratumoral immune activation, indicating potential value in combination regimens in other patient populations.Trial registration numberNCT02556463.

Phase I trial of chloroquine (CQ)/hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in combination with carboplatin-gemcitabine (CG) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3027-3027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nagla Fawzy Abdel Karim ◽  
Imran Ahmad ◽  
Ola Gaber ◽  
Ihab Eldessouki ◽  
Olugbenga Olanrele Olowokure ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Therapeutic Option ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Late Phase ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Grade 3

3027 Background: Autophagy is a catabolic process triggered in cells during periods of stress to enable their survival. Established tumors utilize autophagy to survive periods of metabolic or hypoxic stress. Inhibition of early stage autophagy can rescue cancer cells, while inhibition of late stage autophagy will lead to cell death due to accumulation of damaged organelles. The antimalarial drugs CQ and HCQ inhibit late phase autophagy. The goal of our study is to assess the safety, tolerability and activity of combining CQ/HCQ with CG in advanced solid tumor patients who either progressed on other therapies or in whom CG is a therapeutic option. Methods: This single institution phase 1 dose-escalation study was designed to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CQ, later substituted with HCQ, in combination with CG in patients with previously treated advanced solid tumors. Secondary objectives were to determine ORR, PFS and OS. A starting dose of 50 mg of CQ/HCQ was used in conjunction with CG, and increased in increments of 50 mg in each dose cohort. Grade 3 or greater toxicity that is treatment-related, and was not self-limited, or controlled in less than 7 days was considered dose limiting toxicity (DLT). Results: Twenty-three patients were enrolled with a median follow up of 6 months. HCQ 100 mg was found to be the MTD in combination with CG with ≥Grade 3 thrombocytopenia and/or neutropenia as dose-limiting. Median OS was 11 months, and the 1- and 3- year overall survival rates were 30% and 7%, respectively. Median progression free survival was 5 months and the 6-, 12-, and 18-months progression-free survivals were 48%, 21% and 14%, respectively (Table). Conclusions: The MTD identified for CQ/HCQ was lower than previously reported with concomitant use of chemotherapeutic regimes, likely due to the myelosuppressive nature of CG. Clinical trial information: NCT02071537. [Table: see text]

Phase I study of oral LBH589, a novel deacetylase (DAC) inhibitor in advanced solid tumors and non-hodgkin’s lymphoma

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3500-3500 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. M. Prince ◽  
D. George ◽  
A. Patnaik ◽  
M. Mita ◽  
M. Dugan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parotid Gland ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Post Dose ◽  
Western Blots

3500 Background: LBH589 is a novel deacetylase inhibitor (DACi) which induces apoptosis of tumor cells at nanomolar levels. In this phase 1 study, we evaluated the safety and tolerability of LBH589 in pts with advanced solid tumors or non-hodgkins lymphoma. Methods: LBH589 was administered orally on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday (MWF) weekly. Western blots on peripheral blood lymphocytes were used to study histone acetylation (HA). Plasma PK profiles were analyzed on Days 1 and 15. Results: Thirty two pts have been treated (Median age 63 years; 18 M, 14 F). Pts received 15 mg (3), 30 mg (10), the dose-limiting toxicity level (DLT), or 20 mg (19), the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Tumor types included: CTCL (10), renal cell (6), melanoma (6), prostate (4), hepatic (1), rhabodomyosarcoma (1), mesothelioma (1), colon (1), bladder (1), and parotid gland (1). Three DLTs were reported; G3 diarrhea and transient G4 thrombocytopenia at 30 mg and G3 fatigue at 20 mg. The most common adverse events were anorexia, nausea, fatigue, diarrhea and transient thrombocytopenia. Of the 1,057 ECGs, 1 pt (20 mg) had a QTcF of 503 msec, an isolated event after the first dose with no recurrence on continued therapy. The mean change in QTcF from baseline was < 10 msec during the first cycle in all cohorts. No increase in HA was seen at 15 mg, but did increase in 50% of pts at 72 hrs post dose in both the 20 mg and 30 mg cohorts. LBH589 was rapidly absorbed in plasma (Tmax 1.5 hr), then declined with a mean terminal half-life of 16 hrs. Cmax and AUC increased linearly with doses between 15–30 mg. Two cutaneous T- cell lymphoma (CTCL) pts achieved a complete response (5 and 7 months) and 4 CTCL pts attained a partial response (6.5, 8, 9 and 18+ months). Stable disease was achieved in 7 pts: CTCL-2 pts (2 and 3 months); RCC-2 pts (3.5 and 7 months); melanoma-1 pt (4 months), mesothelioma-1 pt (2.5 months) and parotid gland-1 pt (5 months). Fifteen pts progressed on treatment and 4 pts were not evaluable for response. Conclusions: At 20 mg MWF every week, LBH589 oral produced a sustained pharmacodynamic effect on HA for ≥72 hours post dose in 50% of pts. Cardiac data indicates no clinically-significant effect on QTcF. Preliminary evidence of tumor response was observed at this dose and schedule in CTCL pts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

SWOG S1221: A phase 1 dose escalation study co-targeting MAPK-dependent and MAPK-independent BRAF inhibitor resistance in BRAF mutant advanced solid tumors with dabrafenib, trametinib, and GSK2141795 (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01902173).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2578-2578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Patrick Algazi ◽  
James Moon ◽  
Bartosz Chmielowski ◽  
Roger Lo ◽  
Kari Lynn Kendra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Braf Inhibitor ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Braf Mutant

2578 Background: Aberrant PI3K/AKT signaling in BRAF mutant cancers contributes to resistance to MAPK pathway blockade. We conducted parallel phase 1 dose escalation studies of the doublet of the BRAFi dabrafenib with the AKT inhibitor GSK2141795 and of the triplet of dabrafenib, the MEKi trametinib, and GSK2141795. Methods: Patients (pts) with BRAF-V600E/K mutant advanced solid tumors with adequate end-organ function were eligible regardless of prior BRAFi and MEKi exposure. All pts received dabrafenib at 150 mg twice daily (bid), in the doublet cohorts together with dose escalation (3 + 3 scheme) of GSK2141795 started at 50 mg daily (qd), and in the triplet cohorts with dose escalation of both trametinib starting at 1.5 mg qd and GSK2141795 starting at 25 mg qd. DLTs included significant grade 3 and 4 adverse events (CTCAE v4) within the first 56 days of treatment. Radiographic responses were assessed at 8-week intervals. Results: No DLTs were observed in the doublet cohorts (N = 8) up to dabrafenib 150 mg bid and GSK2141795 75 mg qd. In the triplet cohorts (N = 11), no DLTs were observed at doses of up to trametinib 1.5 mg daily with GSK2141795 75 mg daily. At the highest triplet dose with dabrafenib 150 mg bid, trametinib 2 mg qd with GSK2141795 75 mg qd, 1 of 2 evaluable pts had a DLT of grade 3 febrile neutropenia and grade 3 maculo-papular rash. 2/2 treatment-naïve in the doublet cohorts had PRs (1 melanoma and 1 thyroid) the latter lasting over 1 year. 1/6 BRAF inhibitor-refractory (melanoma) pts also had an objective response. In the triplet cohorts, 3 of 6 treatment-naïve pts had a PR (1 melanoma, 2 lung). One lung pt remains in PR at 2 months and the otherhas an uPR at 1.2 months. Conclusions: Inhibition of both MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways was well tolerated, leading to durable objective responses in pts with metastatic melanoma, thyroid cancer, and lung cancer. Further study of dual pathway inhibition is warranted. Funding: Supported in part by NIH/NCI grants CA180888, CA180819; and in part by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and GlaxoSmithKline, LLC. Clinical trial information: NCT01902173.

Updated safety and efficacy of MSB2311 (an anti-programmed death-ligand 1 antibody) in Chinese patients with advanced solid tumors and hematological malignancies from a phase 1 study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14547-e14547
Author(s):  
Lin Shen ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jian Zhang ◽  
Dongmei Ji ◽  
Haijun Zhong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Binding Property ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Patients ◽  
Durable Response ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Grade 3

e14547 Background: MSB2311 is a novel humanized PD-L1 antibody with a unique pH-dependent antigen binding property that enables intra-tumor recycling and potentiates tumor penetration. Methods: Patients with metastatic solid tumors or selected lymphoma progressed on or after standard treatments were enrolled in this phase I study. In dose escalation part, MSB2311 was given at dose levels of 3, 10, and 20 mg/kg intravenously every 3 weeks. At the dose expansion part, patients with enriched biomarker expression, including EBV+, PD-L1+ (TPS≥50%), MSI-High or TMB-High (≥10muts/Mb), were dosed at 20mg/kg Q3W or 10mg/kg Q2W. Primary objectives are to evaluate the safety and tolerability and to identify MTD and RP2D. Secondary objectives include the assessment of pharmacokinetic parameter, immunogenicity, and preliminary anti-cancer activity per RECIST1.1. Results: As of data cutoff by Aug 31, 2020, 33 Chinese patients had been treated, including 27 heavily pre-treated solid tumor patients and 6 lymphoma patients. No dose limiting toxicity was reported and MTD has not been reached. The most common AEs (>20%) included: anemia, hypothyroidism, aspartate aminotransferase elevated, proteinuria, weight loss. 13 patients (39.4%) experienced grade 3 AEs, and 6 patients (18.2%) experienced SAEs. No treatment related grade 4 or 5 event was reported. Of the 17 efficacy evaluable solid tumor patients with biomarker selection, 6 achieved confirmed partial response with 35% ORR: 2/8 (25%) at 10 mg/kg Q2W and 4/9 (44%) at 20 mg/kg Q3W. Additionally, one patient achieved sustained iPR via iRECIST. 4 out of 7 responding patients (including one iPR) achieved tumor shrinkage of more than 50%, 3 of them got durable response (≥24 weeks).1 out of 6 lymphoma patients achieved PR. Conclusions: MSB2311 demonstrated a manageable safety profile and promising preliminary antitumor activity in patients with advanced solid tumors and selected lymphomas. Clinical trial information: NCT04272944.

scholarly journals 506 IGNYTE: an open-label, multicenter, phase 1/2 (Ph 1/2) clinical trial of RP1 ± nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (Suppl 3) ◽  
pp. A538-A538
Author(s):  
Mark Middleton ◽  
Mohammed Milhem ◽  
Francesca Aroldi ◽  
Joseph Sacco ◽  
Ari VanderWalde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
List Type ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Simplex Virus

BackgroundRP1 is an enhanced potency oncolytic HSV-1 which expresses a fusogenic glycoprotein (GALV-GP R-) and granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF).1 In pre-clinical studies, RP1 demonstrated potent GALV-GP R-enhanced anti-tumor activity and immunogenic cell death. This Phase 1/2 (Ph 1/2) study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of RP1 ± nivolumab (nivo) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, including pts whose disease failed prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy and has reported promising interim data in a number of tumor types including cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) and anti-PD1 failed melanoma to date.2MethodsThis is a multi-center, first-in-human, open label, multi-cohort, non-randomized Ph1 study of RP1 alone and combined with nivo followed by Ph2 in combination with nivo in pts with recurrent advanced solid tumors including those that progressed after prior anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. The Ph 1 monotherapy dose escalation (n=14) and RP-1 combination expansion (n=22) cohorts are fully enrolled. Approximately 260 pts are expected to be enrolled in the ongoing Ph 2 portion across five cohorts; melanoma (n=30, enrollment complete), non-melanoma skin cancer (n=45, to include 15 pts with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 failed disease), anti-PD-1 failed MSI-H/dMMR tumors (n=30), anti-PD-1/PD-L1-failed non-small-cell lung cancer (n=30) and a registration-directed cohort in anti-PD-1 failed cutaneous melanoma (n=125). Pts in the Ph 2 portion receive up to 10 mL of RP1 intratumorally into one or more superficial or deep seated/visceral lesions at the recommended Ph 2 dose (1x10^6 PFU/mL × 1 followed by 1x10^7 PFU/mL × 7, Q2W). Following the first dose of RP1, nivo (240 mg IV Q2W for 4 months then 480 mg IV Q4W for up to 2 years) is subsequently administered in combination. Pts may receive up to 8 additional doses of RP1 if they meet protocol-specified criteria. Tumor assessments are performed Q8W. The primary objectives of the Ph 2 part of the study are to assess the safety, tolerability, and overall response rate (ORR) of RP1 in combination with nivo, by independent review for the anti-PD1 failed melanoma cohort. Secondary objectives include duration of response, complete response rate, disease control rate, PFS, 1-year and 2-year survival rates. Exploratory objectives include biodistribution and shedding analysis of RP1 and biomarker studies, including analyses of tumor biopsies and blood samples. Enrollment is currently ongoing in the UK and US, with additional sites in the EU (including France and Spain) are expected to open in 2021.Trial RegistrationNCT03767348ReferencesThomas S, Kuncheria L, Roulstone V, Kyula JN, Mansfield D, Bommareddy PK, Smith H, Kaufman HL, Harrington KJ, Coffin RS. Development of a new fusion-enhanced oncolytic immunotherapy platform based on herpes simplex virus type 1. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7(1):214.Coffin R, Astley-Sparke P, and Middleton M (2021, June 3rd). Retrieved from https://ir.replimune.com/static-files/f4fe3349-e082-4d41-94a1-106ce7e78a23Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by institutional review board or the local ethics committee at each site. Informed consent was obtained from patients prior to enrollment.

A phase 1/2 trial of ORIN1001, a first-in-class IRE1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3080-3080
Author(s):  
Nashat Y. Gabrail ◽  
Erika P. Hamilton ◽  
Anthony D. Elias ◽  
Mothaffar F. Rimawi ◽  
Chao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Analysis ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label

3080 Background: ORIN1001 is a first-in-class small molecule with a novel, unique enzyme and mode of inhibition that selectively inhibits Inositol Requiring Enzyme 1α (IRE1) RNAse and blocks X-Box Binding Protein 1 (XBP1) activation in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). IRE1α/XBP1 has been implicated in a host of pathologies, and molecules that modulate it are under intense investigation for the treatment of oncologic, metabolic, neurodegenerative and other diseases. ORIN1001 has demonstrated preclinical anti-tumor activity alone and in combination with standard of care across multiple animal models including breast, prostate, lung, liver, pancreatic, brain, colon, ovarian, esophageal, and hematologic cancers and is now undergoing first-in-human testing. Methods: A phase 1, open label, 3+3 dose escalation trial is testing ORIN1001 administered PO daily to patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors (single agent) or relapsed refractory breast cancer (in combination with Abraxane). The phase 1 dose escalation part of the trial evaluates the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and preliminary efficacy of ORIN1001. After identification of the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) for the single agent, the dose expansion part of the trial will test ORIN1001 in combination with Abraxane. Results: As of Jan 25, 2021, 22 patients with advanced cancer have received ORIN1001 dosed at 100mg, 200mg or 300mg per day in 21-day continuous cycles with a median age of 61 (range 42-77). The pts had received a median of 4 prior line of treatments. Two DLTs were observed at 200 mg with thrombocytopenia and rash. MTD has not been reached. Common (>15%) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included nausea, vomiting, rash, fatigue, and hypokalaemia. The vast majority of these events were Grade 1-2 in severity. Seven (32%) pts had at least 1 TRAE grade≥ 3, the most frequent of which were thrombocytopenia (N=3) and rash (N=3). Preliminary pharmacokinetic analysis showed ORIN1001 exposure to increase in a dose proportional manner. Mean t1/2 at steady state was 18 hrs. Thirteen pts were evaluated for preliminary efficacy. Best response, per RECIST 1.1, was stable disease (SD) in 8 pts while 5 pts had progressive disease (PD). For 2 ongoing patients with advanced liver or colorectal cancer, duration of treatment has exceeded 300 days and 570 days, respectively. Conclusions: To date, the phase 1 part of the first-in-human trial has demonstrated a reasonable safety and pharmacokinetic profile for ORIN1001 at 100mg and 200mg dose levels. While efficacy data have yet to mature, chronic dosing achieved in pts with heavily treated advanced solid tumors, suggests clinical potential for in the setting of advanced solid cancers. The phase 2 part of the trial testing ORIN1001 in combination with Abraxane is currently enrolling pts with advanced breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT03950570.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document