Increased incidence and treatment of intracranial atherosclerotic disease during mechanical thrombectomy is safe, even with an increased number of passes

2021 ◽  
pp. neurintsurg-2020-017114
Author(s):  
Marlon Carl Monayao ◽  
Ahmed A Malik ◽  
Laurie Preston ◽  
Marlon Carl Monayao Sr ◽  
Wondwossen Tekle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Atherosclerotic Disease ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
Angioplasty And Stenting ◽  
Number Of Passes

BackgroundThe incidence of intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD) in acute ischemic stroke treated with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is not well defined, and its description may lead to improved stroke devices and rates of first pass success.MethodsA retrospective study was performed on MT patients from 2012 to 2019 at a comprehensive stroke center using chart review and angiogram analysis. Angiograms at the time of MT were reviewed for ICAD, and location and severity were recorded. Patients with ICAD were divided according to ICAD location relative to the large vessel occlusion (LVO) site. Statistical analyses were performed on baseline demographics, comorbidities, MT procedure variables, outcome variables, and their association with ICAD.ResultsOf the 533 patients (mean age 70.4 (SD 13.20) years, 43.5% women), 131 (24.6%) had ICAD. There was no significant difference in favorable discharge outcomes (modified Rankin Scale score of 0–2; 23.8% ICAD vs 27.0% non-ICAD; p=0.82) or groin puncture to recanalization times (average 43.5 (range 8–181) min for ICAD vs 40.2 (4–204) min for non-ICAD; p=0.42). Patients with ICAD experienced a significantly higher number of passes (average 1.8 (range 1–7) passes for ICAD vs 1.6 (1–5) passes for non-ICAD; p=0.0059). Adjusting for age, ≥3 device passes, baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, rates of angioplasty only, rates of concurrent angioplasty and stenting, coronary artery disease and atrial fibrillation incidences, and time from emergency department arrival to recanalization, yielded no significant difference in rates of favorable outcomes between the two groups.ConclusionPatients who underwent MT with underlying ICAD had similar rates of favorable outcomes as those without, but required a higher number of device passes.

Abstract WMP9: Procedural Parameters Predicting Reduced MRI Infarct Growth in Mechanical Thrombectomy

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nirmal Andrapalliyal ◽  
Bhageeradh Mulpur ◽  
Lacy Samuel Handshoe ◽  
Ken Uchino ◽  
M. Shazam Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Infarct Volume ◽  
Region Of Interest ◽  
Mri Imaging ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
Procedural Outcomes ◽  
Number Of Passes

Background: Successful recanalization after a single pass and shorter procedural duration during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in emergent large vessel occlusion (ELVO) have been associated with both rapid neurologic improvement and long-term clinical outcome, although conflicting data exists regarding their direct effect on infarct growth. We aimed to determine whether less device passes or shorter procedural times are associated with decreased infarct growth. Methods: We reviewed consecutive patients presenting to a comprehensive stroke center from January 2016 to December 2018 with (ELVO). Standard protocol included pre-procedural MRI imaging and only those with post-procedural MRI were included in this study. Number of passes attempted and procedural times were recorded. Infarct volume on MRI was measured using region of interest analysis blinded to procedural outcomes. MRI infarct growth was analyzed using linear regression as a function of procedural times and number of passes. Results: Of 173 patients undergoing MT after MRI, 118 patients had MRI imaging post-procedure. Successful recanalization (TICI >2b) was achieved in 106/118 patients. For each additional minute of procedural duration, MRI infarct growth increased by 0.23 mL (p=.04). Average MRI infarct growth was different amongst the passes (p=0.001): 14.65 mL in cases with only one pass (n=67), 25.67 mL with two passes (n=26), 28.68 mL with three passes (n=17), and 98.42 mL with four or greater passes (n=8). Conclusion: Longer procedural duration and increased number of passes are associated with increased MRI infarct growth.

Abstract P545: First Pass TICI 2b versus Multiple Passes TICI 3 for Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients: Is First Pass TICI 2b Enough?

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ameer E Hassan ◽  
Mahmoud Dibas ◽  
Sherief Ghozy ◽  
Amr Ehab El-Qushayri ◽  
Adam A Dmytriw ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Single Pass ◽  
First Pass Effect ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
P 16 ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background and Objective: Prompt and complete reperfusion with mechanical thrombectomy (MT) is essential to improve outcome in acute ischemic strokes (AIS) with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Recently, first-pass effect (FPE), defined as achieving complete reperfusion with a single pass, has been emphasized as a potentially important MT target. We aimed to compare outcomes between patients who achieve mTICI 2b with first pass to those with multiple devise passes (MDP) mTICI 3. Methods: From a single comprehensive stroke center database, we retrospectively grouped LVO pts treated with MT into those who achieved mTICI 2b after a single pass and mTICI 3 after MDP. Clinical outcome (discharge and 90-day mRS), discharge NIHSS and safety (sICH, neurological worsening, mortality) were compared between the two groups. Results: Of 186 pts included, 153 (82%) achieved mTICI 3 with MDP, and 33 (18%) had mTICI 2b after a single pass. Mean age (71 vs 69), NIHSS (17 vs 16, p=0.2) were similar between the two groups. Patients with a single pass mTICI 2b had numerically higher IV tPA administration (33% vs 46%, p=.16). There was no difference in other baseline characteristics. There was no significant difference in discharge (21% vs 24.2%, p=0.65) and 90-day mRS 0-2 (24% vs 24%, p=0.5), MDP mTICI 3 and single pass mTICI 2b, respectively. Also, there was no difference in discharge NIHSS score (13.6 vs 16.7, p=0.26), mortality (16.3% vs 18.2%, p=0.8) and sICH rates (7.8% vs 18.2%, p=0.095) or neurological worsening (76.5% vs 69.7%, p=1). Conclusion: Our results did not show a significant difference between mTICI 3 with multiple passes and mTICI 2b after a single pass. Future large studies are warranted to explore the possibility of extending the first pass effect to patients who achieve mTICI 2b with a single pass.

Endovascular treatment for AIS with underlying ICAD

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 948-951 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sami Al Kasab ◽  
Zayed Almadidy ◽  
Alejandro M Spiotta ◽  
Aquilla S Turk ◽  
M Imran Chaudry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
National Institutes Of Health ◽  
Large Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Intracranial Atherosclerotic Disease ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Procedural Complications ◽  
Angioplasty And Stenting

BackgroundAcute large vessel occlusion (LVO) can result from thromboemboli or underlying intracranial atherosclerotic disease (ICAD). Although the technique for revascularization differs significantly for these two lesions (simple thrombectomy for thromboemboli and balloon angioplasty and stenting for ICAD), the underlying etiology is often unknown in acute ischemic stroke (AIS).ObjectiveTo evaluate whether procedural complications, revascularization rates, and functional outcomes differ among patients with LVO from ICAD or thromboembolism.MethodsA retrospective review of thrombectomy cases from 2008 to 2015 was carried out for cases of AIS due to underlying ICAD. Thirty-six patients were identified. A chart and imaging review was performed to determine revascularization rates, periprocedural complications, and functional outcomes. Patients with ICAD and acute LVO were compared with those with underlying thromboemboli.ResultsAmong patients with ICAD and LVO, mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission was 12.9±8.5, revascularization (Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction, TICI ≥2b) was achieved in 22/34 (64.7%) patients, 11% had postprocedural intracerebral hemorrhage (PH2), and 14/33 (42.4%) had achieved a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0–2 at the 3-month follow-up. Compared with patients without underlying ICAD, there was no difference in NIHSS on presentation, or in the postprocedural complication rate. However, procedure times for ICAD were longer (98.5±59.8 vs 37.1±34.2 min), there was significant difference in successful revascularization rate between the groups (p=0.001), and a trend towards difference in functional outcome at 3 months (p=0.07).ConclusionsDespite AIS with underlying ICAD requiring a more complex, technically demanding recanalization strategy than traditional thromboembolic AIS, it appears safe, and good outcomes are obtainable.

Abstract 1122‐000091: Predictors of Symptomatic Hemorrhagic Transformation After Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anqi Luo ◽  
Agnelio Cardenas ◽  
Lee A Birnbaum
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Hemorrhagic Transformation ◽  
Current Standard ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
Iv Tpa

Introduction : Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the current standard of care for large vessel occlusion stroke but is associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Although several studies have investigated the risk factors, there is still limited, not well‐established data. This study aims to evaluate the risk factors of HT after MT. Methods : We retrospectively reviewed all MT patients who were treated at a single comprehensive stroke center from 12/2016 to 7/2019. Variables included initial NIHSS, blood glucose, initial systolic blood pressure, age, gender, IV tPA, time from door to recanalization, and TICI score. Outcome measures were HT on post‐procedure or 24‐hour post‐tPA head CT/MRI as well as modified Rankin scale (mRS) upon discharge. Results : Among 74 patients (68.8 ± 14 years, men 47.3%), 9 (12.2%) experienced hemorrhagic transformation after thrombectomy. Average admitting NIHSS was significantly higher in the HT group (22 vs 16.8, p = 0.041). TICI 3 after MT was protective for HT (OR 0.078, 95% CI 0.009‐0.663). IV tPA (OR 3.86, 95% CI 1.448‐10.326) was associated with good neurological outcome at discharge (mRS < = 2), but HT was not (OR 0.114, 95% CI 0.013‐0.964). Patients with mRS < = 2 upon discharge were younger (65.2±12 vs 71.9±15, p = 0.04) and had lower initial BG (124±45.8 vs 157±69.6, P = 0.02). Conclusions : TICI 3 score, decreased NIHSS, and lower BG were associated with less HT and better outcomes in our MT cohort. Admitting NIHSS > = 20 may be a reasonable threshold to predict HT after MT. Our findings are consistent with the TICI‐ASPECTS‐glucose (TAG) score to predict sICH; however, we used initial NIHSS as a surrogate for ASPECTS. Further studies may utilize additional quantitative measures such as CTP data to predict HT.

Abstract 1122‐000175: Comparison of Transradial Artery Versus Transfemoral Artery Access Mechanical Thrombectomy at a Comprehensive Stroke Center

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Taha Nisar ◽  
Jimmy Patel ◽  
Amit Singla ◽  
Priyank Khandelwal
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Functional Independence ◽  
Binary Logistic Regression Analysis ◽  
Transfemoral Approach ◽  
Outcome Parameters ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
First Pass ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Introduction : The transradial approach (TRA) is being increasingly adopted by neuro‐interventionists and has emerged as an alternative to the traditional transfemoral approach (TFA) for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). We aim to compare various time, technical and outcome parameters in patients who undergo MT via TRF vs. TRA approach. Methods : We performed a retrospective chart review of patients who underwent MT at a comprehensive stroke center from 7/2016 to 12/2020. We compared patients who underwent MT via TRA vs. TRF with respect to time from angio suite arrival to puncture, first pass, second pass and recanalization; time from puncture to first pass, second pass and recanalization; time from arrival to the emergency department (ED) to puncture, first pass, second pass and recanalization; the number of passes, rate of switching, achievement of TICI≥2b score, functional independence (3‐month mRS≤2), 3‐month mortality and neurological improvement (improvement in NIHSS by ≥4 points) on day 1 and 3. A binary logistic regression analysis was performed, controlling for age, sex, NIHSS, type of anesthesia (general vs. moderate), laterality, and location of clot (internal carotid or middle cerebral artery), ASPECTS≥6, presenting mean arterial pressure, blood glucose, Hb A1C, LDL, intravenous alteplase. Results : 217 patients met our inclusion criteria. The mean age was 64.09±14.4 years. 42 (19.35%) patients underwent MT through the TRA approach. There was a significantly higher rate of conversion from TRA approach to TRF approach (11.90% vs.2.28%; OR, 105.59; 95% CI,5.71‐1954.67; P 0.002), but no difference in various time, technical and outcome parameters, as shown in the table. Conclusions : Our study demonstrates no significant difference between TRA and TRF approaches with respect to various time, technical and outcome parameters, with a notable exception of a significantly higher rate of conversion from TRA to TRF approach.

Abstract P562: The Safety Of Mechanical Thrombectomy In Nonagenarians In A Majority Hispanic Population

Stroke ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nura Salhadar ◽  
WONDWOSSEN TEKLE ◽  
Amrou Sarraj ◽  
Ameer E Hassan
Keyword(s):  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Hispanic Population ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Border Communities ◽  
Baseline Characteristics ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
The Impact

Background and objective: Elderly patients were underrepresented in RCTs that proved the efficacy and safety of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in acute ischemic strokes (AIS) due to large vessel occlusion (LVO). Additionally, the impact of race and socio-economics in AIS outcomes is well-reported. We sought to assess MT clinical outcomes in Hispanic Octogenarians and Nonagenarians that reside in underserved border communities. Methods: A retrospective cohort study from a prospectively collected comprehensive stroke center database was conducted. The primary outcome was discharge (mRS 0-2). Secondary outcomes were NIHSS improvement ≥4 points at discharge, sICH, mortality and length of stay (LOS). A two-tailed t-test assessed statistical significance between the two groups. Results: Of 202 included patients, 172 (85%) were octogenarians and 30 nonagenarians (17%). Nonagenarians had higher rates of females (80% vs 59%; p<0.05), similar rates of Hispanics (57% vs. 63%, p-xx) and a trend towards higher NIHS (20 vs. 17, P=0.09). Other baseline characteristics were similar (Table 1). Time last known well to arrival to MT center and to recanalization were longer in octogenarians, all other time metrics did not differ. Nonagenarians had numerically lower favorable outcomes at discharge (7% vs. 16%, p=0.11) as compared to octogenarians. Rates of clinical improvement on NIHSS were similar (27% vs. 23%, p=0.74). Mortality (23% vs. 28%, p=0.63) and sICH (7% vs 4%, p=0.46), octogenarians and nonagenarians, respectively. Octogenarians trended towards longer LOS (10 vs 6 days, p=0.05). Conclusions: Both groups had lower favorable good outcome rates than MT outcomes reported in RCTs. Nonagenarians had numerically lower favorable outcomes but mortality and sICH were similar. Further studies are warranted to further assess the impact of age and socioeconomics on MT outcomes.

Abstract 1122‐000179: Very Low Rates of Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Patients Transferred for Mechanical Thrombectomy

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yazan Radaideh
Keyword(s):  
Intracerebral Hemorrhage ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Intravenous Thrombolysis ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Single Center Experience ◽  
True Value ◽  
Intravenous Alteplase ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center ◽  
Repeat Imaging

Introduction : Background: A common convention among stroke patients being transferred for mechanical thrombectomy, particularly if intravenous thrombolysis has been given, is to undergo a repeat plain brain CT at the treating stroke center. The most concerning among several concerns is the discovery of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) which would obviate the value of thrombectomy. This practice has been shown in a previous series to result in a median treatment delay of 20 minutes[1]. By determining the actual incidence of any ICH seen on neuroimaging in patients who undergo repeat imaging on arrival to comprehensive stroke center prior to intervention, we can better determine the true value of this convention of repeat imaging. Methods : Retrospective review of all patients transferred to a single academic comprehensive stroke center for mechanical thrombectomy. We evaluated for the frequency of repeat imaging, the rate of ICH and the rate of undergoing mechanical thrombectomy. Results : There were 682 patients transferred directly for mechanical thrombectomy evaluation over the study period. Intravenous Alteplase was administered to 391 patients prior to arrival and 2 had it on arrival to destination hospital. Plain head CT was repeated at the hub hospital in 590/682 patients (86.5%) (348 with thrombolytics and 242 without. A new intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) was detected in 9 patients. In only 3 of the 9 patients was mechanical thrombectomy deferred solely due to the ICH (other 6 had no evidence of LVO (4), low ASPECTS (1) or exam improvement (1)). Conclusions : In patients being transferred for mechanical thrombectomy, the rate of ICH on arrival to site hospital was 1.5%. In only one third of those patients (0.5%) was the decision to not proceed with mechanical thrombectomy related to the new ICH. Given the delays in door to puncture times associated with repeat imaging indicated in literature and the low yield in detecting ICH in transfer patients, repeating neuroimaging at comprehensive stroke center obtained for the purpose of ruling out ICH on patients transferred for MT should be reconsidered. Limitations: Our study reflects a single center experience. Other indications for repeat imaging at comprehensive stroke center such as assessment of infarcted core, and presence of large vessel occlusion might still warrant repeat imaging at comprehensive stroke center.

Abstract WMP89: Outcomes No Different in Real World Including Direct vs Drip-and-Ship Patients: Power of Reperfusion From Mechanical Thrombectomy

Stroke ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 51 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Darshan G Shah ◽  
Aravi Loganathan ◽  
Dan Truong ◽  
Fiona Chan ◽  
Bruce Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Functional Outcome ◽  
Real World ◽  
Functional Outcomes ◽  
Mechanical Thrombectomy ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Excellent Functional Outcome ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Background: Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) became standard care in 2015 after positive trials in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) 0-6h and in 2018 for selected patients up to 24h from symptom onset. Objective: To evaluate whether patients receiving MT at our center would have comparable outcomes in patients presenting to our comprehensive stroke center (direct) vs transfer patients (drip-and-ship) Methods: This is a retrospective observational study utilising prospectively collected stroke database for patients receiving MT for LVO in anterior and posterior circulation in South Brisbane network of 7 hospitals (6 drip-and-ship centers and 1 MT-capable center), Australia which serves 1.6 million. Day 90 modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to assess functional outcomes via outpatient follow up at direct or referral center. The association of drip and ship versus mothership treatment with day 90 mRS was tested in ordinal logistic regression adjusted for age, baseline NIHSS and IV thrombolysis. Results: Of 191 patients who underwent Mechanical Thrombectomy from 2015 to June 2018 at our center, 22 patients were excluded from analysis as either their baseline mRS was >1 (13) or follow up data was missing (9). The mean age was 64.4 years. Median (inter-quartile range, IQR) NIHSS was 16 (9-21) on admission and 7 (2-18) on day 1. Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) ≥2b was achieved in 88.9%. At 90 days, 50.9% achieved excellent functional outcome (mRS 0-1), 61.4% achieved good functional outcome (mRS 0-2) and 69% achieved favorable outcome (mRS 0-3). Median mRS was 1 (IQR 0-5) in 96 patients presenting directly to the endovascular center and 1 (IQR 1-4) in 73 drip-and-ship patients (common odds ratio 1.07 (95%CI 0.62-1.83), p=0.82) Conclusion: Our 7-center network experience confirms real world reproducibility of trial results, interestingly with no difference in functional outcomes for direct vs drip-and-ship patients.

Abstract WP14: Outcomes after Endovascular Therapy in a Population with Mild Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion: Does Treatment Help?

Stroke ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Donald Frei ◽  
Alessandro Orlando ◽  
Richard Bellon ◽  
Jeffrey Wagner ◽  
Christopher V Fanale ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Therapy Group ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Large Vessel ◽  
Vessel Occlusion ◽  
Stroke Population ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Small Patient Population ◽  
Chi Squared ◽  
Comprehensive Stroke Center ◽  
Stroke Center

Introduction: Patients with mild acute ischemic strokes (NIHSS ≤7, AISs) have been excluded from intra-arterial therapy (IAT) trials, limiting our understanding of their outcomes after IAT. Mild AIS with large vessel occlusions (LVOs) represent a fragile subset of mild AISs. Despite a low NIHSS, these patients can have a sudden failure of collateral circulation and deteriorate rapidly, resulting in significant disability. The objective of this study was to compare patient outcomes between those with mild AIS and LVO who did and did not received IAT. Methods: We included all adults (≥18) with a mild AIS due to an LVO admitted over 6.5 years to a high-volume comprehensive stroke center. Patients were excluded for any contraindication to IAT (n=240). Comparison groups were IAT vs. no therapy. Outcomes were sICH, in-hospital mortality, discharge mRS ≤2, and an improvement in NIHSS at discharge (>2 vs ≤2). Fisher’s, chi-squared, and logistic regression compared outcomes between groups. Results: There were 75 patients included in the study (Table 1). Overall 21% received treatment, and a majority of patients were 55-79 years, presented with hypertension and hyperlipidemia, and arrived within 4.5h from symptom onset. 7 patients also received IV-tPA. The IAT group had a significantly larger proportion of males, and hypo-mild strokes (NIHSS 4-7). There was one sICH in the no therapy group, and overall few deaths (Table 1). There was no significant difference between groups in improvement in NIHSS, and after adjusting for admission NIHSS, there was no significant difference in favorable discharge mRS. There were no IAT procedure complications. Conclusions: It remains to be seen whether IAT is beneficial in patients with mild AIS and LVO. Future, interventional, multi-center studies are needed to definitively determine the efficacy of IAT. Though these data come from a small patient population, they offer an insight into the potential safety of IAT in a fragile stroke population.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document