An occupational health intervention programme for workers at risk for early retirement; a randomised controlled trial

The nurse’s role has long been regarded as stress filled based on the physical labour human suffering, work hours, staffing and interpersonal relationships that are central to the work nurses do. Occupational stress is thus, a recognized problem among health care workers in general. Nursing has therefore been identified as an occupation that has high level of risks and stress in the work place environment. Therefore the study investigated the effects of occupational health intervention programme on environmental risks and stress management of staff nurses in South-west Nigeria. A pretest, posttest, control group, quasi-experimental research design was adopted. Two hundred and twenty five (225) respondents were selected for the study. One hundred and twelve (112) respondents were used as experimental group while one hundred and thirteen (113) respondents were used as control group. Fish bowl method was used for grouping the participants into experimental and control groups respectively. A self-developed questionnaire tagged ‘Occupational Health Intervention Programme, Environmental Risks and Stress Management Questionnaire OHIPERSMQ’ with a reliability coefficient of 0.88 was used. The experimentation lasted 8 weeks. Analysis was done using ANCOVA and Multiple Classification Analysis. Hypotheses were tested at 0.05 alpha level. Findings revealed that occupational health intervention programme has significant effect on risk management knowledge of staff nurses. The experimental group had mean = 4.44, better than the control group that had mean = 2.92. Also, occupational health intervention programme had significant effect on stress management knowledge of nurses with experimental group mean = 7.78, better than the control group mean = 2.36. Based on these findings, it was recommended that medical social workers should ensure that nurses participate in educational training in skills associated with risk reduction, stress reduction and safety promotion so as to guarantee their wellbeing and good job performance.

Download Full-text

Protocol for a partially nested randomised controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of the scleroderma patient-centered intervention network COVID-19 home-isolation activities together (SPIN-CHAT) program to reduce anxiety among at-risk scleroderma patients

Journal of Psychosomatic Research ◽

10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110132 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 135 ◽

pp. 110132 ◽

Cited By ~ 6

Author(s):

Brett D. Thombs ◽

Linda Kwakkenbos ◽

Marie-Eve Carrier ◽

Angelica Bourgeault ◽

Lydia Tao ◽

...

Keyword(s):

At Risk ◽

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Patient Centered ◽

Scleroderma Patient ◽

Randomised Controlled

Download Full-text

A Randomised Controlled Trial of Strategies to Prompt Attendance for a Pap Smear

Journal of Medical Screening ◽

10.1177/096914139500200408 ◽

1995 ◽

Vol 2 (4) ◽

pp. 211-218 ◽

Cited By ~ 23

Author(s):

Jenny Bowman ◽

Rob Sanson-Fisher ◽

Catherine Boyle ◽

Stephanie Pope ◽

Sally Redman

Keyword(s):

At Risk ◽

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Pap Smear ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Self Report ◽

Health Clinic ◽

Control Group ◽

Screening Attendance ◽

Randomised Controlled

Objective – To assess the comparative efficacy, by randomised controlled trial, of three interventions designed to encourage “at risk” women to have a Pap smear: an educational pamphlet; letters inviting attendance at a women's health clinic; and letters from physicians. Methods – Subjects at risk for cervical cancer who had not been adequately screened were identified by a random community survey and randomly allocated to one of the intervention groups or a control group. Six months after intervention implementation, a follow up survey assessed subsequent screening attendance. Self report was validated by comparison with a national screening data base. Results – A significantly greater proportion of women (36.9%) within the group receiving a physician letter reported screening at follow up than in any other group (P =0.012). The variables most strongly predicting screening attendance were: age, perceived frequency of screening required, use of oral contraceptives, and allocation to receive the physician letter intervention. Conclusions – The relative efficacy of the GP letter in prompting screening attendance shows that this strategy is worthy of further investigation. There remains a need to examine the barriers to screening for older women, and to develop tailored strategies for this population.

Download Full-text