scholarly journals Breast cancer recurrence: follow up after treatment for primary breast cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 80 (941) ◽  
pp. 172-176 ◽  
Author(s):  
N Hiramanek
2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (20) ◽  
pp. 3487-3494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaija Holli ◽  
Ritva Valavaara ◽  
Guillermo Blanco ◽  
Vesa Kataja ◽  
Päivi Hietanen ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: In this multicenter trial, toremifene 40 mg/d was compared with tamoxifen 20 mg/d, both given orally for 3 years to postmenopausal, axillary node–positive women after breast surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The first 899 patients (toremifene, n = 459; tamoxifen, n = 440) of the total of 1,480 patients accrued to the trial were included in this scheduled safety analysis. The mean follow-up time was 3.4 years. RESULTS: The two treatment groups were well balanced with respect to patient and disease characteristics. The subjective side-effect profile was similar in both treatment groups. Slightly more vascular complications (deep vein thromboses, cerebrovascular events, and pulmonary embolisms) were seen among tamoxifen-treated patients (5.9%) as compared with toremifene-treated patients (3.5%) (P = .11), whereas bone fractures (P = .09) and vaginal leukorrhea (P = .05) were more common in the toremifene group. The number of subsequent second cancers was similar. The breast cancer recurrence rate was 23.1% (n = 106) in the toremifene group and 26.1% (n = 115) in the tamoxifen group (P = .31). When only patients with estrogen receptor (ER)–positive cancer were considered (n = 556), the risk for breast cancer recurrence was nonsignificantly lower among the toremifene-treated women, with a hazards ratio of 0.74 (90% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.04; P = .14). The mean time to breast cancer recurrence and overall survival were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: The side-effect profile of toremifene resembles that of tamoxifen. The efficacy of toremifene seems to be no less than that of tamoxifen. The trend for fewer breast cancer recurrences in the ER-positive subgroup is encouraging, but a longer follow-up is needed to confirm this.


Nutrients ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 578 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tianying Wu ◽  
Fang-Chi Hsu ◽  
Shunran Wang ◽  
David Luong ◽  
John P. Pierce

Background: Metabolic acidosis promotes cancer metastasis. No prospective studies have examined the association between dietary acid load and breast cancer recurrence among breast cancer survivors, who are susceptible to metabolic acidosis. Hyperglycemia promotes cancer progression and acid formation; however, researchers have not examined whether hyperglycemia can modify the association between dietary acid load and breast cancer recurrence. Methods: We studied 3081 early-stage breast cancer survivors enrolled in the Women’s Healthy Eating and Living study who provided dietary information through 24-h recalls at baseline and during follow-up and had measurements of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at baseline. We assessed dietary acid load using two common dietary acid load scores, potential renal acid load (PRAL) score and net endogenous acid production (NEAP) score. Results: After an average of 7.3 years of follow-up, dietary acid load was positively associated with recurrence when baseline HbA1c levels were ≥ 5.6% (median level) and ≥5.7% (pre-diabetic cut-point). In the stratum with HbA1c ≥ 5.6%, comparing the highest to the lowest quartile of dietary acid load, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratio was 2.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-3.48) for PRAL and was 2.31 (95% CI 1.42-3.74) for NEAP. No associations were observed in the stratum with HbA1c levels were <5.6%. P-values for interactions were 0.01 for PRAL and 0.05 for NEAP. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated for the first time that even at or above normal to high HbA1c levels, dietary acid load was associated with increased risk of breast cancer recurrence among breast cancer survivors. Impacts: Our study provides strong evidence for developing specific dietary acid load guidelines based on HbA1c levels.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (22) ◽  
pp. 5452
Author(s):  
Grażyna E. Będkowska ◽  
Ewa Gacuta ◽  
Monika Zbucka-Krętowska ◽  
Paweł Ławicki ◽  
Maciej Szmitkowski ◽  
...  

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women globally. The increasing worldwide incidence of this type of cancer illustrates the challenge it represents for healthcare providers. Therefore, new tumor markers are constantly being sought. The aim of this study was to assess plasma concentrations and the diagnostic power of VEGF in 100 patients with early-stage breast cancer, both before and after surgical treatment and during a three-year follow-up. The control groups included 50 subjects with benign breast tumors (fibroadenoma) and 50 healthy women. The VEGF concentration was determined using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and the CA 15-3 concentration was determined by chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay (CMIA). We observed significantly higher preoperative plasma concentrations of VEGF and CA 15-3 in patients with breast cancer. VEGF, similar to CA 15-3, demonstrated high diagnostic utility in the assessment of the long-term efficacy of surgical removal of the tumor. Determinations of VEGF had the highest diagnostic usefulness in the detection of breast cancer recurrence (SE 40%, SP 92%, PPV 67%, NPV 79%). Additionally, the highest values of SE, NPV and AUC were observed during the combined analysis with CA 15-3 (60%; 84%; 0.7074, respectively). Our study suggests a promising diagnostic utility of VEGF in the early stages of breast cancer and in the evaluation of the efficacy of the surgical treatment of breast cancer as well as the detection of breast cancer recurrence, particularly in a combined analysis with CA 15-3 as a new diagnostic panel.


2013 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. A150
Author(s):  
J. Kraeima ◽  
I. Vliegen ◽  
S. Siesling ◽  
J. Klaase ◽  
M.J. Jzerman

Author(s):  
David Preen ◽  
Anna Kemp-Casey ◽  
Elizabeth Roughead ◽  
Derrick Lopez ◽  
Max Bulsara ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTObjectivesAlthough outcomes for the majority of women diagnosed with primary breast cancer are good, with five-year survival exceeding 90%, some women will experience cancer recurrence and ultimately die from the disease. It is important for patients, clinicians and health service planners to know the risk of recurrence once initial treatment for primary breast cancer is completed. However, none of Australia’s State or Territory cancer registries routinely report on cancer recurrence which could be used to evaluate this issue. To address this absence of direct reporting, we aimed to determine the incidence of cancer recurrence in Australian clinical practice after completion of treatment for primary breast cancer, using a range of linked health data sources. ApproachWe performed a retrospective cohort study using linked health data from New South Wales (NSW), Australia. Data were linked from six data collections: i) Cancer Registry, ii) Admitted Patient Data Collection, iii) Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme claims, iv) Medicare (outpatient) claims, v) Death Registry; and the vi) NSW 45 and Up Study. We identified 2416 women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer during 2003-2008 in NSW who had not had a recurrence by 18 months post-diagnosis. Unit-level hospital, pharmacy and outpatient claims were used to identify services indicative of recurrence. Incidence of recurrence was calculated and multivariate Cox regression used to identify baseline and active treatment characteristics predictive of cancer recurrence up to six years post-diagnosis. ResultsA total of 217 women (9.0%) had a hospital, pharmacy or outpatient claim indicating breast cancer recurrence between 18 months and six years post-diagnosis. Overall annual cumulative incidence of recurrence was 3.3%. Recurrence was significantly higher for women with node-positive (4.8% vs. 2.5% annually, adjHR=1.7, 95%CI=1.3-2.3) or hormone receptor-negative (3.8% vs. 3.1% annually, adjHR=1.3, 95%CI=1.0-1.7) tumours. Women with tumours >2cm at diagnosis were more likely to experience recurrence within six years compared with those with a smaller initial tumour (4.8% vs. 2.7 annually, adjHR=1.5; 95%CI=1.1-2.0). ConclusionsWomen with breast cancer in this Australian cohort experienced recurrence at 3.3%pa in the years following completion of treatment. Those at greatest risk of recurrence were women with node-positive or hormone-receptor negative tumours, or tumours >2cm at initial diagnosis, consistent with international findings. This method for ascertaining breast cancer recurrence can be used to assess population-level changes over time and to investigate the impact of specific treatments on outcomes in the absence of available Cancer Registry data.


2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Polak ◽  
Declan Beattie ◽  
Colin McIlmunn ◽  
Stephen Kirk

Abstract Aim This paper aims to review the outcome from yearly mammography in detecting breast cancer recurrence and new primary tumours in patients with a history of breast cancer. Methods From 2014, following treatment for breast cancer, patients were enrolled in a program of self-directed aftercare (SDA). They were given open access to the Breast service. Regular planned appointments were not offered. All patients underwent annual mammography for 5 years. Retrospective analysis of the SDA database from 2014 to 2016 was undertaken, time to and mechanism of detection of breast cancer recurrence in this population was determined. Results 352 patient records were analysed (1760 mammograms), 29 recurrences were identified. 12 locoregional, 12 systemic, 5 locoregional and systemic. Median time to diagnosis of recurrence was 30 months. Locoregional recurrence was detected by surveillance mammography (4 patients), clinical examination following patient request (7 patients), non-breast radiological investigation (5), by non-breast cancer care Doctors (1). No contralateral cancers were detected in patients who had mastectomy or WLE. Conclusion Despite limited evidence for regular clinical assessment post breast cancer treatment, the practice remains recommended. In this study regular clinical review was replaced by open access. Annual mammography was retained. Mammographic value out-with detection of malignancy (new/recurrent) was not assessed. The number of tumours detected (4 out of 1760 mammograms) would suggest that non-stratified routine mammography is of limited value for most patients. Further study is required to determine the risk or value and the cost/benefit analysis of mammographic follow up of breast cancer.


The Breast ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 34 ◽  
pp. 53-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julien Viot ◽  
Martin Bachour ◽  
Aurélia Meurisse ◽  
Xavier Pivot ◽  
Frédéric Fiteni

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document