CYTOGENETICS OF SOLID STEM IN COMMON WHEAT: III. CULM MEASUREMENTS AND THEIR RELATION TO STEM SOLIDNESS IN MONOSOMIC LINES OF THE VARIETY S-615

1959 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-391 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruby I. Larson ◽  
M. D. MacDonald
Keyword(s):  
Common Wheat ◽  
Chinese Spring ◽  
Monosomic Analysis ◽  
Secondary Effects ◽  
Stem Solidness ◽  
Solid Stem ◽  
Homoeologous Chromosomes

Most monosomics of the solid-stemmed variety of common wheat, S-61S, were shorter than normal. Many had thinner culms, but monosomics XIII and XVI had thicker culms. Although the effect of loss of homoeologous chromosomes on culm dimensions was generally similar in S-615 monosomics and Chinese Spring nullisomics, the most extreme member of each group was not always the same in the two varieties. The differences between solid stem in monosomics and normal lines of S-615 were due to loss of the chromosome affecting pith production and not to secondary effects caused by changes in culm dimensions. Nevertheless, within lines of genetically similar plants there was a small but consistent association between short culm and solidness, between thin culm at the tops of internodes I, III, and IV and hollowness, and between thin culm in the center and lower parts of internode I and solidness. This has a bearing on interpretation of data in monosomic analysis of solid stem.

CYTOGENETICS OF SOLID STEM IN COMMON WHEAT: II. STEM SOLIDNESS OF MONOSOMIC LINES OF THE VARIETY S-615

1959 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 365-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruby I. Larson ◽  
M. D. MacDonald
Keyword(s):  
Common Wheat ◽  
Chinese Spring ◽  
Homoeologous Group ◽  
D Genome ◽  
Stem Solidness ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Solid Stem ◽  
Group 5

Lines of a variety of common wheat, S-615, monosomic for chromosomes III and XVI of homoeologous group 3 had culms less solid in the top internode than normal S-615. Monosomics of homoeologous group 5, namely, V, IX, and XVIII, were less solid in the bottom four internodes than S-615. These five chromosomes carry genes for solid stem in this variety. Monosomics XIX, XX, and XXI, the D-genome chromosomes of homoeologous groups 6, 2, and 7 respectively, were more solid than the normal check in both top and lower internodes, indicating that the missing chromosomes carry genes for hollow stem. Chromosome XIII, a homoeologue of XX, which in Chinese Spring has a gene for hollow stem, does not affect the amount of pith in the culm of S-615.The concept of the culm phenotype in a given environment resulting from an interaction of genes promoting pith development and those opposing it makes it possible to reconcile results of genetic experiments on solid stem in wheat that previously appeared contradictory.

Effect of different doses of group-2 chromosomes on homoeologous pairing in intergeneric wheat hybrids

1986 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Ceoloni ◽  
I. Strauss ◽  
M. Feldman
Keyword(s):  
Common Wheat ◽  
Chinese Spring ◽  
Intergeneric Hybrid ◽  
Homoeologous Pairing ◽  
Aegilops Variabilis ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Wheat Hybrids ◽  
A Minor ◽  
Homoeologous Chromosomes ◽  
Different Doses

While an extra dose of chromosome 2A of common wheat, previously reported to carry a pairing promoter on its short arm, did not increase pairing between homoeologous chromosomes in F1 hybrids between common wheat cv. Chinese Spring (CS) and Aegilops variabilis, two doses of chromosome 2D or 2B caused a significant increase in homoeologous pairing. Evidently, chromosomes 2D and 2B carry a pairing promoter(s). Studies of F1 hybrids between aneuploids of CS, either deficient for chromosome 2D or having it in an extra dose, and Ae. variabilis, Ae. longissima, and Secale cereale supported the finding that this chromosome carries a pairing promoter. Using ditelosomic lines, the promoter was found to be located on the short arm of 2D (2DS). It was deduced that the promoter of 2B is also located on the homoeologous short arm, i.e., on 2BS. Evidence was obtained that the long arm of 2D may carry a suppressor(s) of pairing. Thus, the short arm of 2A, 2D, and 2B carries a pairing promoter(s), while the long arm of 2D and possibly of 2A and 2B carry a minor suppressor(s). The promoters are more potent than the suppressors and the overall effect of group-2 chromosomes is pairing promotion.Key words: wheat, homoeologous pairing, pairing promoter, pairing suppressor, intergeneric hybrid, meiosis.

CYTOGENETICS OF SOLID STEM IN COMMON WHEAT: I. MONOSOMIC F2 ANALYSIS OF THE VARIETY S-615

1959 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
pp. 135-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruby I. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sections ◽  
Chinese Spring ◽  
Continuous Distribution ◽  
Homoeologous Group ◽  
D Genome ◽  
Index Numbers ◽  
Stem Solidness ◽  
Thin Walled ◽  
Solid Stem ◽  
Group 2

The F2 lines of monosomics of Chinese Spring by S-615 were compared with normal F2 lines for stem solidness. The solid stem index of each plant was determined by totalling index numbers (ranging from 1 for thin-walled, hollow, to 5 for completely solid) assigned to cross sections of the culm at seven designated points. As both the normal and monosomic lines showed a continuous distribution of this index, the factorial analysis was not too reliable. The normal F2 gave an estimated difference between the parents of at least four genes; the monosomic XIII F2, which was more solid than the normal, gave a difference of three genes.Quantitative differences between monosomic F2 lines and the normal indicated that chromosomes II, XIII, and XX, comprising homoeologous group 2, tend to make the culm hollow. Chromosomes XIX and XXI also inhibit pith development. Of these five chromosomes, XIII has a gene for hollow culm in Chinese Spring only; XIX, XX, and XXI, which are in the D genome, are effective in both S-615 and Chinese Spring, and II is inconclusive. Chromosome VIII in Chinese Spring promotes pith production. The chromosomes of S-615 bearing genes for solid stem were not identified by this method, as a monosomic F2 analysis does not reveal recessives present only in the variety being tested.

NONSTRUCTURAL CHROMOSOME DIFFERENTIATION AMONG WHEAT CULTIVARS, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO DIFFERENTIATION OF CHROMOSOMES IN RELATED SPECIES

Genetics ◽  
1981 ◽  
Vol 97 (2) ◽  
pp. 391-414
Author(s):  
Jan Dvořák ◽  
Patrick E McGuire
Keyword(s):  
Chinese Spring ◽  
Structural Changes ◽  
Wheat Cultivar ◽  
Chromosome Complement ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Substitution Lines ◽  
Structural Differentiation ◽  
Chromosome Differentiation ◽  
Mother Cells ◽  
Homoeologous Chromosomes

ABSTRACT Wheat cultivar Chinese Spring (Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell.) was crossed with cultivars Hope, Cheyenne and Timstein. In all three hybrids, the frequencies of pollen mother cells (PMCs) with univalents at metaphase I (MI) were higher than those in the parental cultivars. No multivalents were observed in the hybrids, indicating that the cultivars do not differ by translocations. Thirty-one Chinese Spring telosomic lines were then crossed with substitution lines in which single chromosomes of the three cultivars were substituted for their Chinese Spring homologues. The telosomic lines were also crossed with Chinese Spring. Data were collected on the frequencies (% of PMCs) of pairing of the telesomes with their homologues at MI and the regularity of pairing of the remaining 20 pairs of Chinese Spring chromosomes in the monotelodisomics obtained from these crosses. The reduced MI pairing in the intercultivar hybrids was caused primarily by chromosome differentiation, rather than by specific genes. Because the differentiation involved a large part of the chromosome complement in each hybrid, it was concluded that it could not be caused by structural changes such as inversions or translocations. In each case, the differentiation appeared to be unevenly distributed among the three wheat genomes. It is proposed that the same kind of differentiation, although of greater magnitude, differentiates homoeologous chromosomes and is responsible, together with structural differentiation, for poor chromosome pairing in interspecific hybrids.

Chilling injury and chlorotic reactions of euploids and aneuploids of the group 6 homoeologues of common wheat

Genome ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 468-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ernest D. P. Whelan ◽  
G. B. Schaalje
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Common Wheat ◽  
Chinese Spring ◽  
Prolonged Exposure ◽  
Chilling Injury ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Recessive Trait ◽  
Cytoplasmic Effects ◽  
Group 6 ◽  
Winter Wheat Cultivars

Aneuploid seedlings of the common wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cv. Chinese Spring (CS) that are nullisomic or telosomic for the long arm of chromosome 6D are susceptible to chilling injury under prolonged exposure to 6 °C; normal euploids or telosomics for the short arm are not. Studies of seedling grown for various durations at 20 °C prior to growth at 6 °C showed that chilling injury was a juvenile phenomenon and that the extent of injury was inversely proportional to the duration of growth at 20 °C to a maximum of about 14 days. When reciprocal crosses were made between susceptible 6D nullisomics or long-arm ditelocentrics of CS and resistant 6D nullisomics of three spring and one winter wheat cultivars, progenies from aneuploid F1 hybrids all segregated for susceptibility as a recessive trait and at a frequency approximating a dihybrid ratio; no cytoplasmic effects were detected. Aneuploids of the group 6 homoeologues of the spring wheat cvs. Cadet and Rescue were resistant, as were group 6 whole-chromosome substitutions of eight different donor wheats in the recipient parent CS and 56 other euploids tested. Genes for resistance to chilling injury appear to involve the group 6 chromosomes and the short arm of 6D in Chinese Spring. In contrast with chilling injury, all aneuploid lines with only four doses of the "corroded" loci on group 6 chromosomes exhibited chlorotic symptoms.Key words: Triticum aestivum, chilling injury.

STUDIES ON THE HYPOANEUPLOIDS OF COMMON WHEAT. III. PRODUCTION OF SEXTUPLE MONOSOMICS

1976 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 255-261
Author(s):  
Shoji Shigenaga
Keyword(s):  
Common Wheat ◽  
Chinese Spring ◽  
The Other ◽  
Chromosome Behavior ◽  
A Genome

Two kinds of sextuple monosomics for A-genome chromosomes, namely, one plant simultaneously deficient for chromosomes 1A, 2A, 4A, 5A, 6A and 7A and the other deficient for 1A, 2A, 3A, 4A, 5A and 6A, were produced in a systematic way in the variety Chinese Spring. Sextuple monosomics (15″ + 6′) were selected in the progenies of crosses between quintuple monosomics (16″ + 5′) and nullisomics (20″) which lacked the sixth pair of chromosomes. The sextuple monosomics were smaller, with reduced vigor and later maturity, compared with normal plants. They showed stable chromosome behavior in meiosis and retained fertility in both sexes. Female gametes with n = 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 or 21 produced from the quintuple monosomics functioned well in fertilization.

scholarly journals MONOSOMIC ANALYSIS OF A CHLOROSIS GENE Ch1 IN COMMON WHEAT

1975 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
KOICHIRO TSUNEWAKI
Keyword(s):  
Common Wheat ◽  
Monosomic Analysis

FREQUENCY OF MICRONUCLEI IN POLLEN QUARTETS OF COMMON WHEAT MONOSOMICS

1952 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 371-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. W. Morrison ◽  
John Unrau
Keyword(s):  
Cell Wall ◽  
Common Wheat ◽  
Chinese Spring ◽  
Wheat Variety ◽  
Early Developmental Stage ◽  
D Genome ◽  
Distinct Cell ◽  
The Common ◽  
Early Developmental ◽  
Common Wheat Variety

The frequency with which 20 different monosomes of the common wheat variety, Chinese Spring, formed micronuclei in pollen quartets was determined. It was found that unless the study was made at an early developmental stage characterized by a distinct cell wall surrounding the quartets, the counts were unreliable, because some micronuclei were lost. The frequency of micronucleus formation was similar for anthers of a floret, florets of a spike, and plants of a monosome. Among the monosomes studied, there were three groups of three and four of two in which the total frequency of quartets with micronuclei, and the distribution of numbers of micronuclei per quartet, were strikingly similar. In the case of the groups of three, two monosomes were from the A and B genomes while one was from the D genome. This is interpreted as evidence of homoeology of chromosomes of a group and also that such chromosomes have undergone less change than those that do not form such series.

INHERITANCE OF THE TYPE OF SOLID STEM IN GOLDEN BALL (TRITICUM DURUM): II. CYTOGENETICS OF THE RELATION BETWEEN SOLID STEM AND OTHER MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS IN HEXAPLOID F5 LINES OF A HYBRID WITH RESCUE (T. AESTIVUM)

1959 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1207-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruby I. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Triticum Durum ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Morphological Characters ◽  
Genome Chromosome ◽  
D Genome ◽  
Stem Solidness ◽  
Pentaploid Hybrid ◽  
Golden Ball ◽  
Solid Stem

Cytogenetic analysis of selected F5 lines of the pentaploid hybrid, Rescue (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) × Golden Ball (T. durum Desf.) showed that chromosome XVI is the member of the D genome of Rescue that prevents transfer of the more solid top culm internode of Golden Ball to hexaploid segregates. It also produces a lax spike. Chromosome XX, which is the D-genome chromosome mainly responsible for the hollowness of hollow-stemmed hexaploids, probably has little effect in Rescue. Long awns were associated with low chromosome number but not with stem solidness or dense spike; therefore, the chromosome that suppresses awn development is probably not XVI.Three 42-chromosome segregates from the cross were more solid in the top internode than Rescue, presumably because of segregation of genes in the A and B genomes. It is unlikely, however, that a fully hexaploid segregate with a top internode as solid as that of Golden Ball can be selected from this hybrid.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document