INHERITANCE OF THE TYPE OF SOLID STEM IN GOLDEN BALL (TRITICUM DURUM): II. CYTOGENETICS OF THE RELATION BETWEEN SOLID STEM AND OTHER MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERS IN HEXAPLOID F5 LINES OF A HYBRID WITH RESCUE (T. AESTIVUM)

1959 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 1207-1216 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruby I. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Triticum Durum ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Morphological Characters ◽  
Genome Chromosome ◽  
D Genome ◽  
Stem Solidness ◽  
Pentaploid Hybrid ◽  
Golden Ball ◽  
Solid Stem

Cytogenetic analysis of selected F5 lines of the pentaploid hybrid, Rescue (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) × Golden Ball (T. durum Desf.) showed that chromosome XVI is the member of the D genome of Rescue that prevents transfer of the more solid top culm internode of Golden Ball to hexaploid segregates. It also produces a lax spike. Chromosome XX, which is the D-genome chromosome mainly responsible for the hollowness of hollow-stemmed hexaploids, probably has little effect in Rescue. Long awns were associated with low chromosome number but not with stem solidness or dense spike; therefore, the chromosome that suppresses awn development is probably not XVI.Three 42-chromosome segregates from the cross were more solid in the top internode than Rescue, presumably because of segregation of genes in the A and B genomes. It is unlikely, however, that a fully hexaploid segregate with a top internode as solid as that of Golden Ball can be selected from this hybrid.

INHERITANCE OF THE TYPE OF SOLID STEM IN GOLDEN BALL (TRITICUM DURUM): I. EARLY GENERATIONS OF A HYBRID WITH RESCUE (T. AESTIVUM)

1959 ◽  
Vol 37 (5) ◽  
pp. 889-896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruby I. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Triticum Durum ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Morphological Characters ◽  
D Genome ◽  
Golden Ball ◽  
Solid Stem

In a population of one thousand F2 plants of the hybrid between Rescue, a solid-stemmed variety of Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell., and Golden Ball, a solid-stemmed variety of T. durum Desf., the more solid top internode of Golden Ball was associated with a dense spike and with durum-like morphology. Rigid selection failed to produce an F1 line with a top internode as solid as that of Golden Ball combined with the morphological characters of T. aestivum. This was probably because the D genome present in Rescue but absent from Golden Ball tends to inhibit pith production in the top internode. Some increase in solidness was attained in two F1 lines, and some lines had pith patterns different from that of either parent. This was probably due to segregation of genes in the A and B genomes.Segregates with stems less solid than those of either parent appeared in the F2 generation and some fairly hollow, dwarf F1 lines were established. Hollowness was probably caused by a combination of aneuploidy for chromosomes of the D genome and segregation of genes in the A and B genomes. These less solid lines varied more in pith content from plant to plant than did Rescue and the more solid F4 lines; Golden Ball varied least.

EFFECTS OF THE D GENOME ON MILLING AND BAKING PROPERTIES OF WHEAT

1969 ◽  
Vol 49 (3) ◽  
pp. 255-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. R. Kerber ◽  
K. H. Tipples
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Triticum Durum ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
High Quality ◽  
D Genome ◽  
Aegilops Squarrosa ◽  
The Common ◽  
Triticum Durum Desf ◽  
Synthetic Hexaploids ◽  
Baking Performance

The common hexaploid wheat Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell. ssp. vulgare MacKey cv. Canthatch (2n = 42 = AABBDD), the tetraploid component (2n = 28 = AABB) extracted from it, Triticum durum Desf., cv. Stewart 63 (2n = 28 = AABB) and five synthetic hexaploids (2n = 42 = AABBDD) produced by combining the extracted tetraploid with Aegilops squarrosa (2n = 14 = DD) were tested for several milling and baking properties. Compared with Canthatch, a bread wheat of high quality, the extracted tetraploid had extremely poor baking characteristics; it was very similar to Stewart 63. The baking performance of the synthetic hexaploids was much superior to that of the extracted tetraploid but considerably inferior to that of Canthatch. The results substantiated the supposition that the D genome derived from Ae. squarrosa has contributed the desirable milling and baking properties which distinguish hexaploid bread wheats from those of the tetraploid group.

A cytological and molecular analysis of D-genome chromosome retention following F2–F6 generations of hexaploid×tetraploid wheat crosses

2018 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sriram Padmanaban ◽  
Peng Zhang ◽  
Mark W. Sutherland ◽  
Noel L. Knight ◽  
Anke Martin
Keyword(s):  
Durum Wheat ◽  
Tetraploid Wheat ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Food Crops ◽  
Cytological Analysis ◽  
Genome Chromosome ◽  
D Genome ◽  
Ploidy Levels ◽  
F2 Generation ◽  
Global Food

Both hexaploid bread wheat (AABBDD) (Triticum aestivum L.) and tetraploid durum wheat (AABB) (T. turgidum spp. durum) are highly significant global food crops. Crossing these two wheats with different ploidy levels results in pentaploid (AABBD) F1 lines. This study investigated the differences in the retention of D chromosomes between different hexaploid × tetraploid crosses in subsequent generations by using molecular and cytological techniques. Significant differences (P < 0.05) were observed in the retention of D chromosomes in the F2 generation depending on the parents of the original cross. One of the crosses, 2WE25 × 950329, retained at least one copy of each D chromosome in 48% of its F2 lines. For this cross, the retention or elimination of D chromosomes was determined through several subsequent self-fertilised generations. Cytological analysis indicated that D chromosomes were still being eliminated at the F5 generation, suggesting that in some hexaploid × tetraploid crosses, D chromosomes are unstable for many generations. This study provides information on the variation in D chromosome retention in different hexaploid × tetraploid wheat crosses and suggests efficient strategies for utilising D genome retention or elimination to improve bread and durum wheat, respectively.

scholarly journals Tolerância de cultivares de trigo, triticale e centeio em diferentes níveis de alumínio em solução nutritiva

Bragantia ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira Camargo ◽  
João Carlos Fenício
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Secale Cereale ◽  
Triticum Durum ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Secale Cereale L

Foram estudados sete cultivares de trigo (Triticum aestivum L. ), um de trigo duro (Triticum durum L.), sete de triticale e dois de centeio (Secale cereale L.), em soluções nutritivas contendo quatro níveis de alumínio tóxico. A tolerância foi medida pela capacidade de as raízes primárias continuarem a crescer em soluçâo sem alumínio após um período de 48 horas em solução contendo uma concentração conhecida de alumínio. A temperatura de 28 ± 1 °C foi mantida constante nas soluções durante o experimento. Os cultivares de centeio, Goyarowo e Branco, foram tolerantes a 20mg/ litro de Al3+; os de trigo, Siete Cerros, Tobari-66 e Cocorit, foram sensíveis a 5mg/lítro de alumínio, porém BH-1146, IAC-5, BR-1 e IAC-18 foram tolerantes e, IAC-17, moderadamente tolerante a essa concentração de alumínio; os cultivares de triticale, PFT-763, TCEP-77142, PFT-764, TCEP-75709, Cynamon, TCEP-77138 e TCEP-77136, foram tolerantes a 5mg/litro de Al3+. Todos os cultivares de trigo e triticale foram sensíveis a 10mg/litro de Al3+.

scholarly journals Albumin content in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) and durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) as affected by the environment

2015 ◽  
Vol 102 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-288 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gordana Branković ◽  
Vesna Dragičević ◽  
Dejan Dodig ◽  
Desimir Knežević ◽  
Borislav Kobiljski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Durum Wheat ◽  
Bread Wheat ◽  
Triticum Durum ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Albumin Content ◽  
Triticum Durum Desf

scholarly journals Tolerância de genótipos de trigo comum, trigo duro e triticale à toxicidade de alumínio em soluções nutritivas

Bragantia ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 65 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Eduardo de Oliveira Camargo ◽  
João Carlos Felicio ◽  
Antonio Wilson Penteado Ferreira Filho ◽  
Mary Túlia Vargas Lobato
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Triticum Durum ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L

Foi estudado o comportamento diferencial de 12 genótipos de trigo comum (Triticum aestivum L.), um genótipo de trigo duro (Triticum durum L.), e um de triticale (Triticosecale sp) em soluções nutritivas de tratamento contendo duas concentrações salinas (1/5 e 1/10 da completa) e seis concentrações de alumínio ( 0, 2, 4, 6, 8 e 10 mg L-1), à temperatura de 25 ± 1ºC e pH 4,0. Foram utilizadas dez plântulas por parcela e quatro repetições. A tolerância foi medida pela capacidade de as raízes primárias continuarem a crescer em solução sem alumínio, após permanecer 48 horas em solução nutritiva completa, contendo uma concentração conhecida de alumínio combinada com cada uma das concentrações salinas. Os genótipos de trigo comum IAC-289, IAC-350 e IAC-370 e a cultivar controle Anahuac, e os genótipos de trigo duro IAC-1003 e de triticale IAC-5 foram os mais sensíveis a níveis crescentes de Al3+nas soluções nutritivas de tratamento e, portanto, somente seriam indicados para cultivo em solos corrigidos. Os genótipos de trigo comum IAC-24 e IAC-378 e a cultivar controle BH-1146 destacaram-se pela tolerância à toxicidade de Al3+, com potencial para uso em solos ácidos e como fontes genéticas de tolerância nos futuros cruzamentos. Os sintomas de toxicidade de alumínio foram maiores com a elevação da concentração de alumínio e da diminuição das concentrações de sais da solução nutritiva para todos os genótipos estudados.

INHERITANCE OF SAWFLY REACTION AND STEM SOLIDNESS IN SPRING WHEAT CROSSES: STEM SOLIDNESS

1965 ◽  
Vol 45 (6) ◽  
pp. 591-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hugh McKenzie
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Close Association ◽  
Heading Date ◽  
Correlation Coefficients ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
The Other ◽  
Major Influence ◽  
Homozygous Condition ◽  
Stem Solidness ◽  
Weak Negative Correlation

Inheritance of stem solidness was studied in populations of F3 and B2 lines from the Red Bobs × C.T. 715 and Redman × S-615 (Triticum aestivum L.) crosses and backcrosses. The data supported the hypothesis that the varieties in each cross differed by four genes for stem solidness. In both crosses, one gene exerted a major influence in that its allele for hollowness in the homozygous condition was epistatic to the other three genes. The other three genes within each cross were similar in their influence on solidness. Between the two crosses, corresponding genes differed in some degree.Genetic analyses and correlation coefficients both revealed a close association between sawfly resistance and stem solidness in the Red Bobs × C.T. 715 cross indicating that the stem solidness character was largely responsible for conditioning the degree of sawfly reaction in a plant.In both crosses, a weak negative correlation was found between stem solidness and height. Stem solidness was not associated with bunt (race T-2) reaction, glume color, awn type, or heading date.

GENETIC REGULATION OF HETEROGENETIC CHROMOSOME PAIRING IN POLYPLOID SPECIES OF THE GENUS TRITICUM sensu lato

1982 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patrick E. McGuire ◽  
Jan Dvořák
Keyword(s):  
Triticum Aestivum ◽  
Chromosome Pairing ◽  
Chinese Spring ◽  
Genetic Regulation ◽  
Triticum Aestivum L ◽  
Polyploid Species ◽  
D Genome ◽  
Chromosome 5B ◽  
A Genome

Polyploid species of Triticum sensu lato were crossed with Triticum aestivum L. em. Thell. cv. Chinese Spring monotelodisomics or ditelosomics that were monosomic for chromosome 5B. Progeny from these crosses were either euploid, nullisomic for 5B, monotelosomic for a given Chinese Spring chromosome, or nullisomic for 5B and monotelosomic simultaneously. The Chinese Spring telosome in the hybrids permitted the evaluation of autosyndesis of chromosomes of the tested species. In addition, several Chinese Spring eu- and aneuhaploids were produced. Genotypes of T. cylindricum Ces., T. juvenale Thell., T. triunciale (L.) Raspail, T. ovatum (L.) Raspail, T. columnare (Zhuk.) Morris et Sears, T. triaristatum (Willd.) Godr. et Gren., and T. rectum (Zhuk.) comb. nov. were all shown to have suppressive effects on heterogenetic pairing in hybrids lacking 5B or 3AS, whereas T. kotschyi (Boiss.) Bowden had no effect. It was concluded that diploid-like meiosis in these species is due to genetic regulation. A number of these genotypes promoted heterogenetic pairing in the presence of 5B. A model is presented to explain this dichotomous behavior of the tested genotypes. Monotelosomic-3AL haploids had a greater amount of pairing than did euhaploid Chinese Spring, which substantiated the presence of a pairing suppressor(s) on the 3AS arm. Evidence is presented that shows that T. juvenale does not have a genome homologous with the D genome of T. aestivum.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document