Achievement of Peak During a 90-s Maximal Intensity Cycle Sprint in Adolescents
The aim of this study was to determine whether peak oxygen uptake [Formula: see text] attained in a 90-s maximal intensity cycle sprint is comparable to that from a conventional ramp test. Sixteen participants (13 boys and 3 girls, 14.6 ± 0.4 yr) volunteered for the study. On Day 1 they completed a [Formula: see text] test to exhaustion using a 25 W∙min−1 ramp protocol beginning at 50 W. Peak [Formula: see text] was defined as the highest [Formula: see text] value achieved, and aerobic power [Formula: see text] as the power output of the final 30 s. On Day 2 the participants completed two 90-s maximal sprints (S1 and S2). A 45-min recovery period separated each sprint. Mean oxygen uptake over the last 10 s of each sprint was determined as [Formula: see text] and minimum power (MinP-30 s) as the mechanical power attained in the final 30 s. A one-way ANOVA was used to analyse differences between S1, S2, and the ramp test for [Formula: see text] and MinP-30 s. Peak [Formula: see text] was not significantly different between the ramp, S1, or S2 (2.64 ± 0.5, 2.49 ± 0.5, and 2.53 ± 0.5 L∙min−1, respectively, p > 0.68). The S1 and S2 [Formula: see text] scores represented 91 ± 10% and 92 ± 10% of the ramp aerobic test. The MinP-30 s for S1 and S2 were significantly lower than the [Formula: see text] of the ramp test, p < 0.05. Hence, for researchers solely interested in [Formula: see text] values, a shorter but more intensive protocol provides an alternative method to the traditional ramp aerobic test. Key words: aerobic, anaerobic, mechanical power, pedaling