Structural modeling identified the tRNA-binding domain of Utp8p, an essential nucleolar component of the nuclear tRNA export machinery of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2009 ◽  
Vol 87 (2) ◽  
pp. 431-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew T. McGuire ◽  
Robert A.B. Keates ◽  
Stephanie Cook ◽  
Dev Mangroo

Utp8p is an essential 80 kDa intranuclear tRNA chaperone that transports tRNAs from the nucleolus to the nuclear tRNA export receptors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . To help understand the mechanism of Utp8p function, predictive tools were used to derive a partial model of the tertiary structure of Utp8p. Secondary structure prediction, supported by circular dichroism measurements, indicated that Utp8p is divided into 2 domains: the N-terminal beta sheet and the C-terminal alpha helical domain. Tertiary structure prediction was more challenging, because the amino acid sequence of Utp8p is not directly homologous to any known protein structure. The tertiary structures predicted by threading and fold recognition had generally modest scores, but for the C-terminal domain, threading and fold recognition consistently pointed to an alpha–alpha superhelix. Because of the sequence diversity of this fold type, no single structural template was an ideal fit to the Utp8p sequence. Instead, a composite template was constructed from 3 different alpha–alpha superhelix structures that gave the best matches to different portions of the C-terminal domain sequence. In the resulting model, the most conserved sequences grouped in a tight cluster of positive charges on a protein that is otherwise predominantly negative, suggesting that the positive-charge cleft may be the tRNA-binding site. Mutations of conserved positive residues in the proposed binding site resulted in a reduction in the affinity of Utp8p for tRNA both in vivo and in vitro. Models were also derived for the 10 fungal homologues of Utp8p, and the localization of the positive charges on the conserved surface was found in all cases. Taken together, these data suggest that the positive-charge cleft of the C-terminal domain of Utp8p is involved in tRNA-binding.

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 39
Author(s):  
Juan P. Sánchez-Hernández ◽  
Juan Frausto-Solís ◽  
Juan J. González-Barbosa ◽  
Diego A. Soto-Monterrubio ◽  
Fanny G. Maldonado-Nava ◽  
...  

The Protein Folding Problem (PFP) is a big challenge that has remained unsolved for more than fifty years. This problem consists of obtaining the tertiary structure or Native Structure (NS) of a protein knowing its amino acid sequence. The computational methodologies applied to this problem are classified into two groups, known as Template-Based Modeling (TBM) and ab initio models. In the latter methodology, only information from the primary structure of the target protein is used. In the literature, Hybrid Simulated Annealing (HSA) algorithms are among the best ab initio algorithms for PFP; Golden Ratio Simulated Annealing (GRSA) is a PFP family of these algorithms designed for peptides. Moreover, for the algorithms designed with TBM, they use information from a target protein’s primary structure and information from similar or analog proteins. This paper presents GRSA-SSP methodology that implements a secondary structure prediction to build an initial model and refine it with HSA algorithms. Additionally, we compare the performance of the GRSAX-SSP algorithms versus its corresponding GRSAX. Finally, our best algorithm GRSAX-SSP is compared with PEP-FOLD3, I-TASSER, QUARK, and Rosetta, showing that it competes in small peptides except when predicting the largest peptides.


Author(s):  
Roma Chandra

Protein structure prediction is one of the important goals in the area of bioinformatics and biotechnology. Prediction methods include structure prediction of both secondary and tertiary structures of protein. Protein secondary structure prediction infers knowledge related to presence of helixes, sheets and coils in a polypeptide chain whereas protein tertiary structure prediction infers knowledge related to three dimensional structures of proteins. Protein secondary structures represent the possible motifs or regular expressions represented as patterns that are predicted from primary protein sequence in the form of alpha helix, betastr and and coils. The secondary structure prediction is useful as it infers information related to the structure and function of unknown protein sequence. There are various secondary structure prediction methods used to predict about helixes, sheets and coils. Based on these methods there are various prediction tools under study. This study includes prediction of hemoglobin using various tools. The results produced inferred knowledge with reference to percentage of amino acids participating to produce helices, sheets and coils. PHD and DSC produced the best of the results out of all the tools used.


2010 ◽  
Vol 08 (05) ◽  
pp. 867-884 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUZHONG ZHAO ◽  
BABAK ALIPANAHI ◽  
SHUAI CHENG LI ◽  
MING LI

Accurate determination of protein secondary structure from the chemical shift information is a key step for NMR tertiary structure determination. Relatively few work has been done on this subject. There needs to be a systematic investigation of algorithms that are (a) robust for large datasets; (b) easily extendable to (the dynamic) new databases; and (c) approaching to the limit of accuracy. We introduce new approaches using k-nearest neighbor algorithm to do the basic prediction and use the BCJR algorithm to smooth the predictions and combine different predictions from chemical shifts and based on sequence information only. Our new system, SUCCES, improves the accuracy of all existing methods on a large dataset of 805 proteins (at 86% Q3 accuracy and at 92.6% accuracy when the boundary residues are ignored), and it is easily extendable to any new dataset without requiring any new training. The software is publicly available at .


Proteins are made up of basic units called amino acids which are held together by bonds namely hydrogen and ionic bond. The way in which the amino acids are sequenced has been categorized into two dimensional and three dimensional structures. The main advantage of predicting secondary structure is to produce tertiary structure likelihoods that are in great demand for continuous detection of proteins. This paper reviews the different methods adopted for predicting the protein secondary structure and provides a comparative analysis of accuracies obtained from various input datasets [1].


2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 14-17
Author(s):  
Nur Aini Zakaria ◽  
Zuraini Ali Shah ◽  
Shahreen Kasim

Existence of bioinformatics is to increase the further understanding of biological process. Proteins structure is one of the major challenges in structural bioinformatics. With former knowledge of the structure, the quality of secondary structure, prediction of tertiary structure, and prediction function of amino acid from its sequence increase significantly. Recently, the gap between sequence known and structure known proteins had increase dramatically. So it is compulsory to understand on proteins structure to overcome this problem so further functional analysis could be easier. The research applying RPCA algorithm to extract the essential features from the original high-dimensional input vectors. Then the process followed by experimenting SVM with RBF kernel. The proposed method obtains accuracy by 84.41% for training dataset and 89.09% for testing dataset. The result then compared with the same method but PCA was applied as the feature extraction. The prediction assessment is conducted by analyzing the accuracy and number of principal component selected. It shows that combination of RPCA and SVM produce a high quality classification of protein structure


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document