scholarly journals THERMODYNAMICS OF EVOLVING LORENTZIAN WORMHOLES AT APPARENT HORIZON IN f(R) THEORY OF GRAVITY

2012 ◽  
Vol 27 (38) ◽  
pp. 1250220 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. SAIEDI

In the context of modified f(R) gravity, we attempt to study the thermodynamic properties of the evolving Lorentzian wormholes at the apparent horizon. It is shown that the wormhole can be derived from a particular f(R) model in the radiation background. Moreover, it has been shown that the field equations can be cast to a similar form [Formula: see text] at the apparent horizon for the evolving Lorentzian wormhole. Compared to the case of Einstein's general relativity, an additional term [Formula: see text] appears here.

Author(s):  
Nils Andersson

This chapter provides an overview of Einstein’s geometric theory of gravity – general relativity. It introduces the mathematics required to model the motion of objects in a curved spacetime and provides an intuitive derivation of Einstein’s field equations.


2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Vedad Pasic ◽  
Elvis Barakovic

The approach of metric-affine gravity initially distinguishes it from Einstein’s general relativity. Using an independent affine connection produces a theory with 10 + 64 unknowns. We write down the Yang-Mills action for the affine connection and produce the Yang-Mills equation and the so-called complementary Yang-Mills equation by independently varying with respect to the connection and the metric, respectively. We call this theory the Yang-Mielke theory of gravity. We construct explicit spacetimes with pp-metric and purely axial torsion and show that they represent a solution of Yang-Mills theory. Finally we compare these spacetimes to existing solutions of metric-affine gravity and present future research possibilities.


Author(s):  
Kirill Krasnov

Einstein's general relativity (GR) is a dynamical theory of the space–time metric. We describe an approach in which GR becomes an SU(2) gauge theory. We start at the linearized level and show how a gauge-theoretic Lagrangian for non-interacting massless spin two particles (gravitons) takes a much more simple and compact form than in the standard metric description. Moreover, in contrast to the GR situation, the gauge theory Lagrangian is convex. We then proceed with a formulation of the full nonlinear theory. The equivalence to the metric-based GR holds only at the level of solutions of the field equations, that is, on-shell. The gauge-theoretic approach also makes it clear that GR is not the only interacting theory of massless spin two particles, in spite of the GR uniqueness theorems available in the metric description. Thus, there is an infinite-parameter class of gravity theories all describing just two propagating polarizations of the graviton. We describe how matter can be coupled to gravity in this formulation and, in particular, how both the gravity and Yang–Mills arise as sectors of a general diffeomorphism-invariant gauge theory. We finish by outlining a possible scenario of the ultraviolet completion of quantum gravity within this approach.


2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (7) ◽  
pp. 617-633 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tejinder P. Singh

AbstractWe recall a classical theory of torsion gravity with an asymmetric metric, sourced by a Nambu–Goto + Kalb–Ramond string [R. T. Hammond, Rep. Prog. Phys. 65, 599 (2002)]. We explain why this is a significant gravitational theory and in what sense classical general relativity is an approximation to it. We propose that a noncommutative generalisation of this theory (in the sense of Connes’ noncommutative geometry and Adler’s trace dynamics) is a “quantum theory of gravity.” The theory is in fact a classical matrix dynamics with only two fundamental constants – the square of the Planck length and the speed of light, along with the two string tensions as parameters. The guiding symmetry principle is that the theory should be covariant under general coordinate transformations of noncommuting coordinates. The action for this noncommutative torsion gravity can be elegantly expressed as an invariant area integral and represents an atom of space–time–matter. The statistical thermodynamics of a large number of such atoms yields the laws of quantum gravity and quantum field theory, at thermodynamic equilibrium. Spontaneous localisation caused by large fluctuations away from equilibrium is responsible for the emergence of classical space–time and the field equations of classical general relativity. The resolution of the quantum measurement problem by spontaneous collapse is an inevitable consequence of this process. Quantum theory and general relativity are both seen as emergent phenomena, resulting from coarse graining of the underlying noncommutative geometry. We explain the profound role played by entanglement in this theory: entanglement describes interaction between the atoms of space–time–matter, and indeed entanglement appears to be more fundamental than quantum theory or space–time. We also comment on possible implications for black hole entropy and evaporation and for cosmology. We list the intermediate mathematical analysis that remains to be done to complete this programme.


1999 ◽  
Vol 14 (02) ◽  
pp. 93-97 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. C. GARCIA DE ANDRADE

The theory considered here is not Einstein general relativity, but is a Poincaré type gauge theory of gravity, therefore the Birkhoff theorem is not applied and the external solution is not vacuum spherically symmetric and tachyons may exist outside the core defect.


Author(s):  
Steven Carlip

This work is a short textbook on general relativity and gravitation, aimed at readers with a broad range of interests in physics, from cosmology to gravitational radiation to high energy physics to condensed matter theory. It is an introductory text, but it has also been written as a jumping-off point for readers who plan to study more specialized topics. As a textbook, it is designed to be usable in a one-quarter course (about 25 hours of instruction), and should be suitable for both graduate students and advanced undergraduates. The pedagogical approach is “physics first”: readers move very quickly to the calculation of observational predictions, and only return to the mathematical foundations after the physics is established. The book is mathematically correct—even nonspecialists need to know some differential geometry to be able to read papers—but informal. In addition to the “standard” topics covered by most introductory textbooks, it contains short introductions to more advanced topics: for instance, why field equations are second order, how to treat gravitational energy, what is required for a Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity. A concluding chapter discusses directions for further study, from mathematical relativity to experimental tests to quantum gravity.


Author(s):  
Lawrence H. Starkey

For two centuries Kant's first Critique has nourished various turns against transcendent metaphysics and realism. Kant was scandalized by reason's impotence in confronting infinity (or finitude) as seen in the divisibility of particles and in spatial extension and time. Therefore, he had to regard the latter as subjective and reality as imponderable. In what follows, I review various efforts to rationalize Kant's antinomies-efforts that could only flounder before the rise of Einstein's general relativity and Hawking's blackhole cosmology. Both have undercut the entire Kantian tradition by spawning highly probable theories for suppressing infinities and actually resolving these perplexities on a purely physical basis by positing curvatures of space and even of time that make them reëntrant to themselves. Heavily documented from primary sources in physics, this paper displays time’s curvature as its slowing down near very massive bodies and even freezing in a black hole from which it can reëmerge on the far side, where a new universe can open up. I argue that space curves into a double Möbius strip until it loses one dimension in exchange for another in the twin universe. It shows how 10-dimensional GUTs and the triple Universe, time/charge/parity conservation, and strange and bottom particle families and antiparticle universes, all fit together.


Synthese ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Vassallo

AbstractThe dynamics of general relativity is encoded in a set of ten differential equations, the so-called Einstein field equations. It is usually believed that Einstein’s equations represent a physical law describing the coupling of spacetime with material fields. However, just six of these equations actually describe the coupling mechanism: the remaining four represent a set of differential relations known as Bianchi identities. The paper discusses the physical role that the Bianchi identities play in general relativity, and investigates whether these identities—qua part of a physical law—highlight some kind of a posteriori necessity in a Kripkean sense. The inquiry shows that general relativistic physics has an interesting bearing on the debate about the metaphysics of the laws of nature.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document