THE BACTERIAL COLONISATION OF SILICONE OIL USED IN THE MANAGEMENT OF WOUNDS OF THE HANDS — A SOURCE OF NOSOCOMIAL INFECTION?

Hand Surgery ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 07 (01) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
A. J. Thurston ◽  
A. McChesney

For 30 years, silicone oil has been used for the management and rehabilitation of the injured hand. Its benefits accrue from its providing a non-irritant, bland, air-free medium in which the hand can undergo early movement, which prevents drying out of the tissues and helps in the separation of necrotic and infected tissue. It has been reported, however, that the silicone oil might act as a reservoir for nosocomial infection after two patients developed epidemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (EMRSA) infections. Since no firm guidelines exist with regard to open and/or infected wounds and the continued use of the same oil, a prospective study was set up to study the bacterial colonisation of the silicone oil. Thirty-five consecutive patients were entered into the study. The oil for each patient was changed each week but if any wound became clinically infected the oil was changed earlier. Treatment was continued until the wound was healed or until the treatment was stopped by the referring doctor. Bacteriology swabs taken from the wound and the oil before each treatment and from the oil after each treatment were analysed for bacterial colonisation. The results indicated that while bacteria were transferred into the oil from the wound, the inoculum was small and had no effect on wound healing. There was no evidence that wounds were being re-infected from the oil. The conclusion was that silicone oil remains a safe medium in which to exercise injured hands.

Author(s):  
Jona Gjevori ◽  
Kahina Abdesselam

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is among the most prevalent nosocomial pathogens globally, causing significant morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. MRSA bloodstream infection (BSI) incidence rates in Canadian hospitals have significantly risen by almost 60% and have a mortality of over 20% upon Intensive Care Unit admission. MRSA is believed to be spread through healthcare workers; thus, high hand hygiene compliancy in addition to environmental cleaning are the cornerstone countermeasures to disrupting its transmission. The Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC), in collaboration with the Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP), conducts national, sentinel surveillance on healthcare-associated infections like MRSA. As a Student Epidemiologist, I developed a research proposal detailing two study objectives: 1) develop a regression model to predict all incident MRSA BSI rates among acute-care hospitals in Canada using CNISP MRSA BSI incident cases from 2000 to 2019, and 2) create a compartmental (Susceptible-Infected-Recovered-Deceased) model to determine the impact of various Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) measures on the risk of healthcare-associated MRSA BSI transmission specifically. This study hopes to demonstrate that proper IPC compliance is associated with lower incident MRSA BSI rates with the goal being to produce a manuscript draft by 2021. MRSA poses a serious threat to patient safety globally and is becoming a growing national public health concern in Canada; determining which IPC strategy is most effective at disrupting MRSA transmission is essential to reducing incidence and mortality rates.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document