COMPARISON OF SPINAL AND PELVIC POSTURE AND MUSCLE FLEXIBILITY IN THOSE WITH SPONDOLYTIC AND NON-SPONDOLYTIC LOW BACK PAIN

2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (03) ◽  
pp. 1650011
Author(s):  
Julie A. Young ◽  
Steven C. Cuff ◽  
Jingzhen Yang ◽  
Thomas L. Pommering
Keyword(s):  
Back Pain ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Recovery Process ◽  
Bony Union ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Normal Populations ◽  
Hamstring Flexibility ◽  
Pelvic Posture ◽  
Hip Flexor

Purpose: The rate of spondylolysis in adolescent athletes ranges from 11–47%. Due to the long recovery process associated with a spondylolysis and the fact that bony union only occurs in 25–37% of patients necessitates that risk factors for this condition are identified so that prevention techniques can be developed. Research has shown that those with spondylolysis have different sagittal alignment than normal populations. The purpose of this study was to compare hip flexibility and sagittal plane alignment of subjects with NSLBP and SLBP. Methods: A total of 61 subjects between the ages of 12–21 with back pain for at least 2 weeks were enrolled. All subjects had radiographs and advanced imaging to evaluate for spondylolysis. A Thomas test and 90-90 test were used to assess hip flexor and hamstring flexibility, respectively. Pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, and lumbar lordosis were measured on a standing lateral radiograph. Results: After adjusting for age, gender, and sport, those with SLBP had greater pelvic incidence ([Formula: see text]), sacral slope ([Formula: see text]) and tighter hamstrings ([Formula: see text]) Conclusions: Athletes with SLBP have tighter hamstrings and increased sacral slope and pelvic incidence when compared with athletes with NSLBP.

scholarly journals Spinopelvic Parameters Do Not Predict the Sagittal Orientation of the Acetabulum

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 232596712095742
Author(s):  
Munif Hatem ◽  
Scott J. Nimmons ◽  
Anthony Nicholas Khoury ◽  
Hal David Martin
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Spinopelvic Parameters ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Spinopelvic Parameter ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Arthrogram ◽  
Sagittal Orientation

Background: The orientation of the acetabulum has a fundamental role in impingement and instability of the hip, and the spinopelvic parameters are thought to predict the sagittal orientation of the acetabulum (SOA). However, similar to the acetabular version (axial orientation) and inclination (coronal orientation), the cephalic or caudal orientation of the acetabulum in the sagittal plane, or SOA, may primarily be an intrinsic feature of the acetabulum itself. Purpose: To determine whether the spinopelvic parameters predict the sagittal orientation of the acetabulum in individuals without lumbar deformity. Study Design: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed in 89 patients (94 hips; 62 female, 27 male; mean ± SD age, 45.9 ± 15.4 years) without lumbosacral deformity who underwent magnetic resonance arthrogram (MRA) for assessment of hip pain. The SOA was determined in the sagittal cut MRA. A line was drawn at the distal limit of the anterior and posterior acetabular horns longitudinally to the transverse ligament, and the angle between this line and the axial plane represented the SOA. The sacral slope, pelvic incidence, and spinopelvic tilt were determined using a 3-dimensional cursor and the axial, sagittal, and coronal cuts. All MRA studies were performed with the patient in the supine position. Results: The SOA had a mean ± SD cephalic orientation of 18° ± 6.6°. No significant correlation was observed between the SOA and the sacral slope ( r = –0.03; P = .77). A weak correlation was observed between the SOA and the pelvic incidence ( r = 0.22; P = .03) and between the SOA and the spinopelvic tilt ( r = 0.41; P < .01). Conclusion: The SOA cannot be presumed based on the spinopelvic parameter. Similar to the well-known parameters to assess the axial and coronal orientation of the acetabulum, the assessment of the SOA demands acetabular-specific parameters. Additional studies are necessary to assess the SOA in asymptomatic hips, including disparities between genders. Clinically significant values for abnormal SOA of the acetabulum remain to be defined.

scholarly journals Sagittal alignment based on inflection point and its differences according to age groups

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 230949902090461
Author(s):  
Moon Soo Park ◽  
Seong-Hwan Moon ◽  
Tae-Hwan Kim ◽  
Jae Keun Oh ◽  
Seung Jin Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Sagittal Alignment ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Vertical Axis ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Sagittal Vertical Axis ◽  
Inflection Points ◽  
Lumbar Segment ◽  
Cervical Segment

Purpose: We have always used the standard anatomical landmark vertebrae to measure the sagittal alignment. Instead, scoliosis has been evaluated by the end vertebrae in the coronal plane. There have been clinical studies to investigate sagittal alignment on the end vertebrae of inflection points (IPs). The purpose is to determine sagittal alignment based on IPs and to elucidate the changes while considering age groups. Methods: We identified the most titled vertebrae in the sagittal plane to define the end vertebrae of S1, thoracolumbar and cervicothoracic IPs and to measure the Cobb angles of sacral slope, functional lumbar, thoracic, cervical segment between them, and the McGregor’s line, and the IP distances from the C2 plumb line to the point bisecting the upper end plate of the IPs, in addition to S1. Results: The most common thoracolumbar and cervicothoracic IPs were L2 and T1, respectively. However, the next most common cervicothoracic IP changed from T2 in the youngest to C7 in the oldest age group. The sagittal angles decreased at the sacral slope and functional lumbar segment but not the functional thoracic segment and functional cervical segment. Similarly, the distance increased at the C2 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) distance to S1 and thoracolumbar IP distance but not at the cervicothoracic IP distance. There was no difference in the pelvic incidence among age groups. Conclusion: The sagittal Cobb angles based on the IPs decreased at the sacral slope and functional lumbar segment in the older adults. Consequently, the C2 SVA distance to S1 and thoracolumbar IP distance increased.

Movement of the sacroiliac joint: Anatomy, systematic review, and biomechanical considerations

2020 ◽  
pp. 095441192097802
Author(s):  
Ho-Jung Cho ◽  
Dai-Soon Kwak
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Anatomical Structure ◽  
Spinopelvic Parameters ◽  
Rotational Angle ◽  
Lower Back ◽  
The Relationship

Several researchers investigated the anatomy and biomechanics of the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) to understand the relationship between lower back pain and the SIJ. Many studies concluded that the SIJ has little movement; however, some studies using spinopelvic parameters mentioned high change in pelvic incidence (PI). In this study, SIJ movement and PI change reported in previous studies were reviewed according to position and posture changes. Literature on SIJ movement was reviewed by searching through the publication databases. In biomechanical studies, the result of the rotational angle in the sagittal plane was mainly investigated to compare with the results of PI change. From the results of SIJ movement studies, the minimum movement of nutation and count-nutation was 0.01°, and maximum movement was 2.27°. From the results of PI change studies with different positions and movements, the highest change was 9°, and the lowest change was 0°. Movement of the SIJ was limited by its anatomical structure; maximum movement of the SIJ was 9° in a previous study. Therefore, SIJ movement should be studied more intensely as biomechanical perspective to understand its movement.

Correction of Posture Deviations in the Sagittal Plane Using the Pilates Method

2019 ◽  
pp. 3-13
Author(s):  
Alexandru Cîtea ◽  
George-Sebastian Iacob
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Postural Control ◽  
Human Body ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
The Body ◽  
Lower Limbs ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Pilates Method ◽  
The Relationship

Posture is commonly perceived as the relationship between the segments of the human body upright. Certain parts of the body such as the cephalic extremity, neck, torso, upper and lower limbs are involved in the final posture of the body. Musculoskeletal instabilities and reduced postural control lead to the installation of nonstructural posture deviations in all 3 anatomical planes. When we talk about the sagittal plane, it was concluded that there are 4 main types of posture deviation: hyperlordotic posture, kyphotic posture, rectitude and "sway-back" posture.Pilates method has become in the last decade a much more popular formof exercise used in rehabilitation. The Pilates method is frequently prescribed to people with low back pain due to their orientation on the stabilizing muscles of the pelvis. Pilates exercise is thus theorized to help reactivate the muscles and, by doingso, increases lumbar support, reduces pain, and improves body alignment.

Spinal Balance/Alignment—Clinical Relevance and Biomechanics

2019 ◽  
Vol 141 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anoli Shah ◽  
Justin V. C. Lemans ◽  
Joseph Zavatsky ◽  
Aakash Agarwal ◽  
Moyo C. Kruyt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Social Interaction ◽  
Sagittal Balance ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
The Body ◽  
Optimal Configuration ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Sagittal Imbalance ◽  
Compensatory Mechanisms ◽  
Spinal Balance ◽  
Spinal Imbalance

In the anatomy of a normal spine, due to the curvatures in various regions, the C7 plumb line (C7PL) passes through the sacrum so that the head is centered over the pelvic-ball and socket hip and ankle joints. A failure to recognize malalignment in the sagittal plane can affect the patient's activity as well as social interaction due to deficient forward gaze. The sagittal balance configuration leads to the body undertaking the least muscular activities as possible necessary to maintain spinal balance. Global sagittal imbalance is energy consuming and often results in painful compensatory mechanisms that in turn negatively influence the patient's quality of life, self-image, and social interaction due to inability to maintain a horizontal gaze. Deformity, scoliosis, kyphosis, trauma, and/or surgery are some ways that this optimal configuration can be disturbed, thus requiring higher muscular activity to maintain posture and balance. Several parameters such as the thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), and hip and leg positions influence the sagittal balance and thus the optimal configuration of spinal alignment. This review examines the clinical and biomechanical aspects of spinal imbalance, and the biomechanics of spinal balance as dictated by deformities—ankylosing spondylitis (AS), scoliosis and kyphosis; surgical corrections—pedicle subtraction osteotomies (PSO), long segment stabilizations, and consequent postural complications like proximal and distal junctional kyphosis. The study of the biomechanics involved in spinal imbalance is relatively new and thus the literature is rather sparse. This review suggests several potential research topics in the area of spinal biomechanics.

scholarly journals Characteristics of the spinopelvic parameters of patients with sacroiliac joint pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juichi Tonosu ◽  
Hiroyuki Oka ◽  
Kenichi Watanabe ◽  
Hiroaki Abe ◽  
Akiro Higashikawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sacroiliac Joint ◽  
Joint Pain ◽  
Pelvic Incidence ◽  
Demographic Characteristics ◽  
Sacral Slope ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Spinopelvic Parameters ◽  
Sacroiliac Joint Pain ◽  
Physical Findings ◽  
Univariate Analyses

AbstractTo evaluate the characteristics of the spinopelvic parameters on radiography in patients with sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP). Two hundred fifty patients were included and divided into the SIJP group (those diagnosed with SIJP based on physical findings and response to analgesic periarticular injections; n = 53) and the non-SIJP group (those with low back pain [LBP] because of other reasons; n = 197). We compared their demographic characteristics and spinopelvic parameters using radiography. All differences found in the patients’ demographic characteristics and spinopelvic parameters were analyzed. More female participants experienced SIJP than male participants (P = 0.0179). Univariate analyses revealed significant differences in pelvic incidence (PI) (P = 0.0122), sacral slope (SS) (P = 0.0034), and lumbar lordosis (LL) (P = 0.0078) between the groups. The detection powers for PI, SS, and LL were 0.71, 0.84, and 0.66, respectively. Logistic regression analyses, after adjustment for age and sex, revealed significant differences in PI (P = 0.0308) and SS (P = 0.0153) between the groups, with odds ratios of 1.03 and 1.05, respectively. More female participants experienced SIJP than male participants. Higher PI and SS values were related to SIJP among LBP patients.

Self-Myofascial Release of the Superficial Back Line Improves Sit-and-Reach Distance

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 400-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
Whitney Williams ◽  
Noelle M. Selkow
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Lower Extremity ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Myofascial Release ◽  
Plantar Surface ◽  
The Past ◽  
Plantar Aspect ◽  
History Of ◽  
Hamstring Flexibility

Context: Decreased hamstring flexibility can lead to a plethora of musculoskeletal injuries, including low back pain, hamstring strains, and patellofemoral pain. Lack of flexibility may be the result of myofascial adhesions. The fascia connected to the hamstrings is part of the superficial back line that runs from the cranium to the plantar aspect of the foot. Any disruption along this chain may limit the flexibility of the hamstring. Objective: To investigate if self-myofascial release (SMR) of the plantar surface of the foot in addition to the hamstring group was more effective at improving the flexibility of the hamstrings when compared with either intervention alone. Design: Cross-over study. Setting: Athletic training facility. Participants: Fifteen college students (5 males and 10 females; age: 20.9 [1.4] y, height: 173.1 [10.3] cm, mass: 80.0 [24.9] kg) who were not older than 30, with no history of low back pain or injury within the past 6 months, no history of leg pain or injury within the past 6 months, no current signs or symptoms of cervical or lumbar radicular pain, no current complaint of numbness or tingling in the lower-extremity, and no history of surgery in the lower-extremity or legs. Interventions: Each participant received each intervention separated by at least 96 hours in a randomized order: hamstring foam rolling, lacrosse ball on the plantar surface of the foot, and a combination of both. Main Outcome Measures: The sit-and-reach test evaluated hamstring flexibility of each participant before and immediately after each intervention. Results: There were no significant differences found among the SMR techniques on sit-and-reach distance (F2,41 = 2.7, P = .08, ). However, at least 20% of participants in each intervention improved sit-and-reach distance by 2.5 cm. Conclusions: SMR may improve sit-and-reach distance, but one technique of SMR does not seem to be superior to another.

scholarly journals Effect of Medicinal Cannabis Therapy (Mct) On Severity of Chronic Low Back Pain, Sciatica and Lumbar Range of Motion

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Chronic Low Back Pain ◽  
Sagittal Plane ◽  
Treatment Protocol ◽  
Adjunctive Treatment ◽  
Low Back ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Medicinal Cannabis

Background: Anecdotal evidence indicates the possible efficacy of cannabis use as an adjunctive treatment in chronic low back pain. The purpose of the current study was to assess the results of treatment of patients suffering from chronic low back pain by medicinal cannabis (MCT). Methods: A cohort of 46 patients was followed for a minimum of twelve months. They were evaluated at baseline prior to MCT, 3 months later when MCT was begun and up to 12 months of MCT by patient reported outcome questionnaire (SF-12), visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), back specific function was assessed using the Oswestry score, range of motion was measured using the Saunders digital inclinometer. Opiate use was assessed using pharmacy dispensation records at baseline and after 12 months of MCT. Inclusion criteria included: age over 25 years, sciatica with documented treatment for at least 12 months, evidence on CT or MRI scan of disc herniation or spinal stenosis, failure of at least two narcotic drugs, and consent to use medicinal cannabis. Exclusion criteria included evidence of bone cancer, evidence of diabetic neuropathy, and evidence of prior psychotic reactions. Treatment protocol: Cannabis usage was at a fixed dosage of 20 grams per month, dose increase was considered at least after 6 months of treatment. The cannabis was smoked at a recommended rate of 4 dosages per day. Results: After 12 months of MCT BPI VAS decreased from 8.4 ± 1.4 to 2.0 ± 2.0; SF12-PCS improved from 47 ± 14 to 55 ± 12; SF12-MCS improved from 44 ± 6 to 50 ± 10; and sagittal plane active range of motion improved from 34º ± 8º degrees to 48º ± 8º, In conclusion, short term usage of smoked medicinal cannabis appear to improve both physical and mental function while decreasing pain levels of chronic low back pain sufferers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document