INTERSEGMENTAL COORDINATION IN LOWER EXTREMITIES AND MULTI-SEGMENTAL SPINE DURING DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING
Background: Human movement consists of numerous degrees of freedom (DOF). How the nervous system (NS) computes the appropriate command to coordinate these DOFs to finish specific tasks is still hotly debated. One common way to simplify the redundant DOFs is to coordinate multiple DOFs by combining them into units or synergies. The present study aimed to investigate the kinematic complexity of five activities of daily living (ADLs) and to detect the amount of kinematic synergy during every ADL and the relationship of the motion pattern between these ADLs. Method: Twenty-six able-bodied male individuals performed level walking, stair climbing, trunk bending, ipsilateral pick-up and contralateral pick-up in sequence. The segmental excursion of the thorax, upper lumbar, lower lumbar, pelvis, thigh and shank was calculated. Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to determine the motion pattern of every ADL. Result: In the sagittal plane, trunk bending, ipsilateral pick-up and contralateral pick-up could be simplified by using one principal component (PC) with more than 95% variance accounted for (VAF). In addition, the motion pattern of every PC was similar among the three ADLs. Moreover, the angles between the vectors representing the first PC of the three ADLs were all less than 10[Formula: see text]. Level walking and stair climbing needed at least two PCs to reach 95% VAF. In addition, the motion pattern was different between the two ADLs. Moreover, the angle between the first PC of the two ADLs was around 90[Formula: see text]. In the coronal plane, the five ADLs except contralateral pick-up arrived at 90% VAF with two PCs. The motion pattern and the angle between the first PC both demonstrated larger differences among the five ADLs. Conclusion: Two PCs were essential to represent level walking and stair climbing, indicating a complex control strategy used by the NS. Trunk bending, ipsilateral pick-up and contralateral pick-up could be described with one PC in the sagittal plane, showing a strong coupling and simple motion pattern. In addition, the motion pattern varied considerably among these ADLs. The outcomes of this study can help clinicians to select suitable ADLs for the patients with various joint or disc diseases and to conduct corresponding functional test and rehabilitation.