scholarly journals Finsler spacetime geometry in physics

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (supp02) ◽  
pp. 1941004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Pfeifer

Finsler geometry naturally appears in the description of various physical systems. In this review, I divide the emergence of Finsler geometry in physics into three categories: dual description of dispersion relations, most general geometric clock and geometry being compatible with the relevant Ehlers–Pirani–Schild axioms. As Finsler geometry is a straightforward generalization of Riemannian geometry there are many attempts to use it as generalized geometry of spacetime in physics. However, this generalization is subtle due to the existence of non-trivial null directions. I review how a pseudo-Finsler spacetime geometry can be defined such that it provides a precise notion of causal curves, observers and their measurements as well as a gravitational field equation determining the Finslerian spacetime geometry dynamically. The construction of such Finsler spacetimes lays the foundation for comparing their predictions with observations, in astrophysics as well as in laboratory experiments.

2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (08n09) ◽  
pp. 1678-1685 ◽  
Author(s):  
REZA TAVAKOL

A central assumption in general relativity is that the underlying geometry of spacetime is pseudo-Riemannian. Given the recent attempts at generalizations of general relativity, motivated both by theoretical and observational considerations, an important question is whether the spacetime geometry can also be made more general and yet still remain compatible with observations? Here I briefly summarize some earlier results which demonstrate that there are special classes of Finsler geometry, which is a natural metrical generalization of the Riemannian geometry, that are strictly compatible with the observations regarding the motion of idealised test particles and light rays. I also briefly summarize some recent attempts at employing Finsler geometries motivated by more recent developments such as those in String theory, whereby Lorentz invariance is partially broken.


2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 265-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES A. ISENBERG

The analysis of a general multibody physical system governed by Einstein's equations is quite difficult, even if numerical methods (on a computer) are used. Some of the difficulties — many coupled degrees of freedom, dynamic instability — are associated with the presence of gravitational waves. We have developed a number of "waveless approximation theories" (WAT's) which repress the gravitational radiation and thereby simplify the analysis. The matter, according to these theories, evolves dynamically. The gravitational field, however, is determined at each time step by a set of elliptic equations with matter sources. There is reason to believe that for many physical systems, the WAT-generated system evolution is a very accurate approximation to that generated by the full Einstein theory.


2020 ◽  
Vol 80 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Andronikos Paliathanasis ◽  
Genly Leon ◽  
John D. Barrow

AbstractWe study the Einstein-aether theory in Weyl integrable geometry. The scalar field which defines the Weyl affine connection is introduced in the gravitational field equation. We end up with an Einstein-aether scalar field model where the interaction between the scalar field and the aether field has a geometric origin. The scalar field plays a significant role in the evolution of the gravitational field equations. We focus our study on the case of homogeneous and isotropic background spacetimes and study their dynamical evolution for various cosmological models.


1962 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 87-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. R. Vanstone

Modern differential geometry may be said to date from Riemann's famous lecture of 1854 (9), in which a distance function of the form F(xi, dxi) = (γij(x)dxidxj½ was proposed. The applications of the consequent geometry were many and varied. Examples are Synge's geometrization of mechanics (15), Riesz’ approach to linear elliptic partial differential equations (10), and the well-known general theory of relativity of Einstein.Meanwhile the results of Caratheodory (4) in the calculus of variations led Finsler in 1918 to introduce a generalization of the Riemannian metric function (6). The geometry which arose was more fully developed by Berwald (2) and Synge (14) about 1925 and later by Cartan (5), Busemann, and Rund. It was then possible to extend the applications of Riemannian geometry.


2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (14) ◽  
pp. 2817-2822 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. PADMANABHAN

There is considerable evidence to suggest that field equations of gravity have the same conceptual status as the equations of hydrodynamics or elasticity. We add further support to this paradigm by showing that Einstein"s field equations are identical in form to Navier–Stokes equations of hydrodynamics, when projected on to any null surface. In fact, these equations can be obtained directly by extremizing of entropy associated with the deformations of null surfaces thereby providing a completely thermodynamic route to gravitational field equations. Several curious features of this remarkable connection (including a phenomenon of "dissipation without dissipation") are described and the implications for the emergent paradigm of gravity is highlighted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sunil D. Maharaj ◽  
Sudan Hansraj ◽  
Parbati Sahoo

AbstractThe static isotropic gravitational field equation, governing the geometry and dynamics of stellar structure, is considered in Einstein–Gauss–Bonnet (EGB) gravity. This is a nonlinear Abelian differential equation which generalizes the simpler general relativistic pressure isotropy condition. A gravitational potential decomposition is postulated in order to generate new exact solutions from known solutions. The conditions for a successful integration are examined. Remarkably we generate a new exact solution to the Abelian equation from the well known Schwarzschild interior seed metric. The metric potentials are given in terms of elementary functions. A physical analysis of the model is performed in five and six spacetime dimensions. It is shown that the six-dimensional case is physically more reasonable and is consistent with the conditions restricting the physics of realistic stars.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document