scholarly journals Comparison of arterial pressure and plasma ANG II responses to three methods of subcutaneous ANG II administration

2014 ◽  
Vol 307 (5) ◽  
pp. H670-H679 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcos T. Kuroki ◽  
Gregory D. Fink ◽  
John W. Osborn
Keyword(s):  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Pressor Response ◽  
Infusion Pump ◽  
Pressure Profile ◽  
Experimental Hypertension ◽  
Ang Ii ◽  
Gradual Decline ◽  
Induced Hypertension

Angiotensin II (ANG II)-induced hypertension is a commonly studied model of experimental hypertension, particularly in rodents, and is often generated by subcutaneous delivery of ANG II using Alzet osmotic minipumps chronically implanted under the skin. We have observed that, in a subset of animals subjected to this protocol, mean arterial pressure (MAP) begins to decline gradually starting the second week of ANG II infusion, resulting in a blunting of the slow pressor response and reduced final MAP. We hypothesized that this variability in the slow pressor response to ANG II was mainly due to factors unique to Alzet pumps. To test this, we compared the pressure profile and changes in plasma ANG II levels during subcutaneous ANG II administration (150 ng·kg−1·min−1) using either Alzet minipumps, iPrecio implantable pumps, or a Harvard external infusion pump. At the end of 14 days of ANG II, MAP was highest in the iPrecio group (156 ± 3 mmHg) followed by Harvard (140 ± 3 mmHg) and Alzet (122 ± 3 mmHg) groups. The rate of the slow pressor response, measured as daily increases in pressure averaged over days 2–14 of ANG II, was similar between iPrecio and Harvard groups (2.7 ± 0.4 and 2.2 ± 0.4 mmHg/day) but was significantly blunted in the Alzet group (0.4 ± 0.4 mmHg/day) due to a gradual decline in MAP in a subset of rats. We also found differences in the temporal profile of plasma ANG II between infusion groups. We conclude that the gradual decline in MAP observed in a subset of rats during ANG II infusion using Alzet pumps is mainly due to pump-dependent factors when applied in this particular context.

Median preoptic nucleus ablation does not affect angiotensin II-induced hypertension

1986 ◽  
Vol 251 (1) ◽  
pp. H148-H152
Author(s):  
G. D. Fink ◽  
C. A. Bruner ◽  
M. L. Mangiapane
Keyword(s):  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Cardiovascular Responses ◽  
Base Line ◽  
Ang Ii ◽  
Preoptic Nucleus ◽  
Water Excretion ◽  
Median Preoptic Nucleus ◽  
Induced Hypertension

Previous studies implicated the ventral median preoptic nucleus (MNPOv) in cardiovascular responses to circulating and intracerebroventricular angiotensin II (ANG II) and in normal cardiovascular and fluid homoeostasis. In the present experiments, chronically catheterized rats received continuous (24 h/day) intravenous infusions of ANG II (10 ng/min) for 5 days, and changes in mean arterial pressure, heart rate, water intake and urinary electrolyte and water excretion were determined daily. Three groups of rats were compared as follows: 1) sham-operated control rats (n = 12), 2) rats with 20-70% of the MNPOv ablated electrolytically (n = 6), and 3) rats with over 90% of the MNPOv ablated (n = 5). The organum vasculosum of the lamina terminalis was intact in all three groups. Base-line values of all measured variables were identical in the three groups on two control days preceding ANG II infusion and on two recovery days after infusion. During the administration of ANG II for 5 days, mean arterial pressure rose significantly (and similarly) in all three groups of rats; no other variable was significantly affected by ANG II infusion. These results suggest that neural pathways originating in, or passing through, the MNPOv region are not critical in the pathogenesis of ANG II-induced hypertension in the rat.

Angiotensin II induces insulin resistance independent of changes in interstitial insulin

1999 ◽  
Vol 277 (5) ◽  
pp. E920-E926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce M. Richey ◽  
Marilyn Ader ◽  
Donna Moore ◽  
Richard N. Bergman
Keyword(s):  
Insulin Resistance ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Blood Flow ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Glucose Uptake ◽  
Peripheral Resistance ◽  
Glucose Turnover ◽  
Ang Ii

We set out to examine whether angiotensin-driven hypertension can alter insulin action and whether these changes are reflected as changes in interstitial insulin (the signal to which insulin-sensitive cells respond to increase glucose uptake). To this end, we measured hemodynamic parameters, glucose turnover, and insulin dynamics in both plasma and interstitial fluid (lymph) during hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamps in anesthetized dogs, with or without simultaneous infusions of angiotensin II (ANG II). Hyperinsulinemia per se failed to alter mean arterial pressure, heart rate, or femoral blood flow. ANG II infusion resulted in increased mean arterial pressure (68 ± 16 to 94 ± 14 mmHg, P < 0.001) with a compensatory decrease in heart rate (110 ± 7 vs. 86 ± 4 mmHg, P < 0.05). Peripheral resistance was significantly increased by ANG II from 0.434 to 0.507 mmHg ⋅ ml−1⋅ min ( P < 0.05). ANG II infusion increased femoral artery blood flow (176 ± 4 to 187 ± 5 ml/min, P < 0.05) and resulted in additional increases in both plasma and lymph insulin (93 ± 20 to 122 ± 13 μU/ml and 30 ± 4 to 45 ± 8 μU/ml, P < 0.05). However, glucose uptake was not significantly altered and actually had a tendency to be lower (5.9 ± 1.2 vs. 5.4 ± 0.7 mg ⋅ kg−1⋅ min−1, P > 0.10). Mimicking of the ANG II-induced hyperinsulinemia resulted in an additional increase in glucose uptake. These data imply that ANG II induces insulin resistance by an effect independent of a reduction in interstitial insulin.

Abstract P041: Proximal Tubule-specific Deletion Of Angiotensin Ii Type 1a Receptors In The Kidney Lowers Basal Blood Pressure And Attenuates Angiotensin Ii-induced Hypertension By Increasing Glomerular Filtration And The Pressure-natriuresis Response

Hypertension ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (Suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao C Li ◽  
Ana P Leite ◽  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Jia L Zhuo
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Proximal Tubule ◽  
Pressor Response ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Ang Ii ◽  
Induced Hypertension ◽  
Basal Blood Pressure ◽  
Pressure Natriuresis ◽  
Specific Deletion

The present study tested the hypothesis that intratubular angiotensin II (Ang II) and AT 1a receptors in the proximal tubules of the kidney plays an important role in basal blood pressure control and in the development of Ang II-induced hypertension. Mutant mice with proximal tubule-specific deletion of AT 1a receptors in the kidney, PT- Agtr1a -/- , were generated to test the hypothesis. Eight groups (n=7-12 per group) of adult male wild-type (WT) and PT- Agtr1a -/- mice were infused with or without Ang II for 2 weeks (1.5 mg/kg, i.p.). Basal systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures were ~13 ± 3 mmHg lower in PT- Agtr1a -/- than WT mice ( P <0.01). Basal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as measured using transdermal FITC-sinistrin, was significantly higher in PT- Agtr1a -/- mice (WT: 160.4 ± 7.0 μl/min vs. PT- Agtr1a -/- : 186.0 ± 6.0 μl/min, P <0.05). Basal 24 h urinary Na + excretion (U Na V) was significantly higher in PT- Agtr1a -/- than WT mice ( P <0.01). In response to Ang II infusion, both WT and PT- Agtr1a -/- mice developed hypertension, and the magnitude of the pressor response to Ang II was similar in WT (Δ43 ± 3 mmHg, P <0.01) and PT- Agtr1a -/- mice (Δ39 ± 5 mmHg, P <0.01). However, the absolute blood pressure level was still 16 ± 3 mmHg lower in PT- Agtr1a -/- mice ( P <0.01). Ang II significantly decreased GFR to 132.2 ± 7.0 μl/min in WT mice ( P <0.01), and to 129.4 ± 18.6 μl/min in PT- Agtr1a -/- mice ( P <0.01), respectively. In WT mice, U Na V increased from 139.3 ± 22.3 μmol/24 h in the control group to 196.4 ± 29.6 μmol/24 h in the Ang II-infused group ( P <0.01). In PT- Agtr1a -/- mice, U Na V increased from 172.0 ± 10.2 μmol/24 h in the control group to 264.7 ± 35.4 μmol/24 h in the Ang II-infused group ( P <0.01). The pressor response to Ang II was attenuated, while the natriuretic response was augmented by losartan in WT and PT- Agtr1a -/- mice ( P <0.01). Finally, proximal tubule-specific deletion of AT 1a receptors significantly augmented the pressure-natriuresis response and natriuretic responses to acute saline infusion ( P <0.01) or a 2% high salt diet ( P <0.01). We concluded that deletion of AT 1a receptors selectively in the proximal tubules lowers basal blood pressure and attenuates Ang II-induced hypertension by increasing GFR and promoting the natriuretic response in PT- Agtr1a -/- mice.

scholarly journals Brain Prostaglandin D2 Increases Neurogenic Pressor Activity and Mean Arterial Pressure in Angiotensin II-Salt Hypertensive Rats

Hypertension ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (6) ◽  
pp. 1499-1506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ninitha Asirvatham-Jeyaraj ◽  
A. Daniel Jones ◽  
Robert Burnett ◽  
Gregory D. Fink
Keyword(s):  
Cerebrospinal Fluid ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Developmental Stage ◽  
Rostral Ventrolateral Medulla ◽  
Ventrolateral Medulla ◽  
Ang Ii ◽  
Salt Hypertension ◽  
Pressor Activity

This study tested whether brain L-PGDS (lipocalin-type prostaglandin [PG] D synthase), through prostanoid signaling, might increase neurogenic pressor activity and thereby cause hypertension. Sprague Dawley rats on high-salt diet received either vehicle or Ang II (angiotensin II) infusion. On day 4, the developmental stage of hypertension, brains from different sets of control and Ang II–treated rats were collected for measuring L-PGDS expression, PGD2 levels, and DP1R (type 1 PGD2 receptor) expression. In a different set of 14-day Ang II-salt–treated rats, mini-osmotic pumps were used to infuse either a nonselective COX (cyclooxygenase) inhibitor ketorolac, L-PGDS inhibitor AT56, or DP1R inhibitor BWA868C to test the role of brain COX-PGD2-DP1R signaling in Ang II-salt hypertension. The acute depressor response to ganglion blockade with hexamethonium was used to quantify neurogenic pressor activity. During the developmental stage of Ang II-salt hypertension, L-PGDS expression was higher in cerebrospinal fluid, and PGD2 levels were increased in the choroid plexus, cerebrospinal fluid, and the cardioregulatory brain region rostral ventrolateral medulla. DP1R expression was decreased in rostral ventrolateral medulla. Both brain COX inhibition with ketorolac and L-PGDS inhibition with AT56 lowered mean arterial pressure by altering neurogenic pressor activity compared with vehicle controls. Blockade of DP1R with BWA868C, however, increased the magnitude of Ang II-salt hypertension and significantly increased neurogenic pressor activity. In summary, we establish that the development of Ang II-salt hypertension requires increased COX- and L-PGDS–derived PGD2 production in the brain, making L-PGDS a possible target for treating neurogenic hypertension.

Control of blood pressure and hindlimb conductance during hemorrhage in conscious renal hypertensive rabbits

1995 ◽  
Vol 268 (6) ◽  
pp. H2302-H2310 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Weichert ◽  
C. A. Courneya
Keyword(s):  
Blood Pressure ◽  
Heart Rate ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Autonomic Nervous System ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Similar Pattern ◽  
Ang Ii ◽  
Autonomic Nervous

We examined the response to hemorrhage in conscious normotensive and hypertensive rabbits under control conditions and during efferent blockade of 1) the hormones vasopressin (AVP) and angiotensin II (ANG II), 2) the autonomic nervous system, and 3) autonomic and hormonal inputs. We recorded mean arterial pressure, heart rate, and hindlimb conductance. The response to hemorrhage was unchanged with hormonal blockade alone. Blockade of the autonomic nervous system caused a faster rate of blood pressure decline, but the rate of decrease in hindlimb conductance was maintained at control levels. Blocking the autonomic nervous system and the hormones resulted in rapid blood pressure decline and an increase in hindlimb conductance. Although the three types of efferent blockade had a similar pattern of effects in normotensive and hypertensive rabbits, hypertensive rabbits exhibited less cardiovascular support during hemorrhage than normotensive rabbits. During hemorrhage, hypertensive rabbits had an attenuation of hindlimb vasoconstriction, a reduction in the heart rate-mean arterial pressure relationship, and reduced ability to maintain blood pressure compared with normotensive rabbits.

Cardiovascular responses to intrathecal vasopressin in conscious and anesthesized rats

1989 ◽  
Vol 256 (1) ◽  
pp. R193-R200 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Martinez-Arizala ◽  
J. W. Holaday ◽  
J. B. Long
Keyword(s):  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Pressor Response ◽  
Cardiovascular Responses ◽  
Intrathecal Administration ◽  
Motor Dysfunction ◽  
Sprague Dawley ◽  
Cardiovascular Changes ◽  
Conscious Rats

Increases in mean arterial pressure and heart rate have been documented after the intrathecal administration of [Arg8]vasopressin (AVP) in rats. Prior studies in our laboratories with conscious rats indicated that these cardiovascular changes were associated with a marked hindlimb sensorimotor dysfunction. In this study, which represents the first systematic comparison of the effects of intrathecal AVP in conscious and anesthesized rats, we demonstrate that in conscious male Sprague-Dawley rats 1) the motor dysfunction induced by intrathecal AVP is accompanied by a rise in mean arterial pressure that is significantly greater than that produced by an equal intravenous dose of AVP, and 2) both paralytic and pressor effects of intrathecal but not intravenous AVP are blocked by the intrathecal administration of the V1-receptor antagonist d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP (V1-ANT) but are not blocked by intravenous phenoxybenzamine, hexamethonium, or [Sar1, Thr8]angiotensin II, an angiotensin II antagonist. In contrast, in anesthesized rats the arterial pressor response to intrathecal AVP was blocked by intrathecal V1-ANT, intravenous hexamethonium, and intravenous phenoxybenzamine. Furthermore, conscious but not anesthesized rats exhibited a tachyphylaxis to intrathecal AVP. These results indicate that intrathecal AVP produces both the cardiovascular changes and the sensorimotor deficits through interactions with centrally located V1-receptors. In addition, sympathetic catecholaminergic mechanisms mediate the rise in mean arterial pressure produced by intrathecal AVP in anesthesized rats, but they do not in conscious rats.

Mechanism of pressor effects by angiotensin in the nucleus tractus solitarius of rats

1984 ◽  
Vol 247 (3) ◽  
pp. R575-R581 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Casto ◽  
M. I. Phillips
Keyword(s):  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Nucleus Tractus Solitarius ◽  
Pressor Response ◽  
Dose Range ◽  
Ang Ii ◽  
Sympathetic Activation ◽  
Vasopressin Antagonist ◽  
Hypophysectomized Rats ◽  
Intact Rats

We recently reported that microinjection of angiotensin II (ANG II) into the nucleus tractus solitarius (NTS) results in an increase in mean arterial pressure (MAP) in urethan-anesthetized rats in a dose range of 50-500 ng. To investigate the mechanism of this response, hexamethonium (20 mg/kg iv) was used to inhibit sympathetic activation. There was a highly significant (P less than 0.001) reduction in the magnitude of the pressor response (4.7 +/- 1.1 mmHg) compared with preblockade ANG II (500 ng) responses (15.5 +/- 1.6 mmHg). A vasopressin antagonist and hypophysectomized rats were used to study the contribution of pituitary vasopressin. Injection of 500 ng ANG II in hypophysectomized rats produced a pressor response (14.8 +/- 3.2 mmHg) indistinguishable from that in intact controls (15.5 +/- 1.6 mmHg). Pretreatment with the vasopressin antagonist d(CH2)5Tyr(Me)AVP (1 microgram iv) in intact rats also had no effect on the magnitude of the pressor response (15.7 +/- 1.7 mmHg). Microinjection of ANG I and II produces an increase in arterial pressure. It is concluded that the angiotensin pressor response in the NTS is mediated by activation of descending sympathetic fibers and is not dependent on release of blood-borne pressor agents from the pituitary.

Effects of intravenous infusions of angiotensin II on muscle sympathetic nerve activity in humans

1991 ◽  
Vol 261 (3) ◽  
pp. R690-R696 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Matsukawa ◽  
E. Gotoh ◽  
K. Minamisawa ◽  
M. Kihara ◽  
S. Ueda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve ◽  
Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Muscle Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Sympathetic Outflow ◽  
Ang Ii ◽  
Nerve Activity ◽  
Intravenous Infusions

The effect of angiotensin II (ANG II) on the sympathetic outflow was examined in normal humans. The mean arterial pressure and muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA) were measured before and during intravenous infusions of phenylephrine (0.5 and 1.0 micrograms.kg-1.min-1) or ANG II (5, 10, and 20 ng.kg-1.min-1) for 15 min at 30-min intervals. The baroreflex slope for the relationship between the increases in mean arterial pressure and the reductions in MSNA was significantly less acute during the infusions of ANG II than during the infusions of phenylephrine. When nitroprusside was infused simultaneously to maintain central venous pressure at the basal level, MSNA significantly increased during the infusions of ANG II (5 ng.kg-1.min-1 for 15 min) but not during the infusions of phenylephrine (1.0 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 for 15 min), with accompanying attenuation of the elevation in arterial pressure induced by these pressor agents. These findings suggest that ANG II stimulates the sympathetic outflow without mediating baroreceptor reflexes in humans.

Brain angiotensin II tonically modulates sympathetic baroreflex in rabbit ventrolateral medulla

1996 ◽  
Vol 271 (3) ◽  
pp. H1015-H1021 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Saigusa ◽  
M. Iriki ◽  
J. Arita
Keyword(s):  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Inhibitory Effect ◽  
Ventrolateral Medulla ◽  
Ang Ii ◽  
Renal Sympathetic Nerve Activity ◽  
Baroreflex Function ◽  
Renal Sympathetic

The role of endogenous angiotensin II (ANG II) at the level of the rostral (RVLM) and caudal ventrolateral medulla (CVLM) in the control of sympathetic baroreflex function was investigated in urethan-anesthetized rabbits. The baroreflex relationship between mean arterial pressure and integrated renal sympathetic nerve activity (RSNA) was compared before and during microinfusion of saralasin, an ANG II receptor antagonist into RVLM or CVLM. The infusion of saralasin (20 pmol/min) into RVLM reduced the upper plateau, the range, and the range-dependent gain of the baroreflex, as well as the resting level of RSNA. The infusion of saralasin into CVLM augmented the upper plateau, the reflex range, and the range-dependent gain, whereas it did not alter the resting level of RSNA or mean arterial pressure. These results suggest that 1) the ANG II networks in RVLM are tonically active, influencing the resting level of the sympathetic outflow and facilitating the sympathetic baroreflex function, and 2) the ANG II networks in CVLM do not significantly influence the sympathetic activity in the resting state but exert an inhibitory effect on the baroreflex response when arterial pressure falls below the resting level.

Angiotensin II mediates uterine vasoconstriction through α-stimulation

2004 ◽  
Vol 287 (1) ◽  
pp. H126-H134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Blair E. Cox ◽  
Timothy A. Roy ◽  
Charles R. Rosenfeld
Keyword(s):  
Smooth Muscle ◽  
Angiotensin Ii ◽  
Mean Arterial Pressure ◽  
Arterial Pressure ◽  
Receptor Blockade ◽  
Ang Ii ◽  
Pressor Responses ◽  
Adrenergic Activation

Intravenous angiotensin II (ANG II) increases uterine vascular resistance (UVR), whereas uterine intra-arterial infusions do not. Type 2 ANG II (AT2) receptors predominate in uterine vascular smooth muscle; this may reflect involvement of systemic type 1 ANG II (AT1) receptor-mediated α-adrenergic activation. To examine this, we compared systemic pressor and UVR responses to intravenous phenylephrine and ANG II without and with systemic or uterine α-receptor blockade and in the absence or presence of AT1 receptor blockade in pregnant and nonpregnant ewes. Systemic α-receptor blockade inhibited phenylephrine-mediated increases in mean arterial pressure (MAP) and UVR, whereas uterine α-receptor blockade alone did not alter pressor responses and resulted in proportionate increases in UVR and MAP. Although neither systemic nor uterine α-receptor blockade affected ANG II-mediated pressor responses, UVR responses decreased >65% and also were proportionate to increases in MAP. Systemic AT1 receptor blockade inhibited all responses to intravenous ANG II. In contrast, uterine AT1 receptor blockade + systemic α-receptor blockade resulted in persistent proportionate increases in MAP and UVR. Uterine AT2 receptor blockade had no effects. We have shown that ANG II-mediated pressor responses reflect activation of systemic vascular AT1 receptors, whereas increases in UVR reflect AT1 receptor-mediated release of an α-agonist and uterine autoregulatory responses.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document