Tectopontine pathway in the cat: laminar distribution of cells of origin and visual properties of target cells in dorsolateral pontine nucleus

1979 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Mower ◽  
A. Gibson ◽  
M. Glickstein
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Target Cells ◽  
Pontine Nucleus ◽  
Single Spot ◽  
Visual Cells ◽  
Visual Hemifield ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Dorsolateral Pontine Nucleus

1. The superior colliculus projects to the dorsolateral nucleus of the pons. Retrograde transport of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) revealed that cells in the superior colliculus, which send their axons to the pons, lie in both superficial (III) and deep (IV--VII) layers. Superficial cells outnumbered deep cells. The inferior colliculus also projects heavily to the dorsolateral pontine nucleus. 2. Dorsolateral pontine visual cells were activated only by visual stimulation. Cells responsive to somatic or auditory stimulation were also found in the dorsolateral nucleus, and they too responded to only one sense modality. 3. Of the dorsolateral pontine visual cells, 69% were directionally selective. 4. Dorsolateral pontine visual cells were responsive to moving targets over a wide range of stimulus velocities. Velocities between 25 and 100 degrees/s were the most effective. No cells responded to a stationary stimulus. 5. Single-spot targets were the most effective stimuli. Stimulus size was a more important parameter than stimulus configuration. Many cells had inhibitory regions outside of their excitatory fields. 6. The excitatory receptive fields of dorsolateral pontine cells were very large (median, 1,100 deg2). 7. Nearly all receptive fields were centered in the contralateral visual hemifield, and 91% of the dorsolateral visual cells were activated from either eye. 8. We conclude that the visual cells in the dorsolateral nucleus have receptive-field properties that are similar to those of cells in the superior colliculus. The preference of dorsolateral cells for single-spot targets contrasts strongly with the multiple-spot preference of medial pontine cells, which receive their input from visual cortex.

Visual responses of pulvinar and collicular neurons during eye movements of awake, trained macaques

1991 ◽  
Vol 66 (2) ◽  
pp. 485-496 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Robinson ◽  
J. W. McClurkin ◽  
C. Kertzman ◽  
S. E. Petersen
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Stimulus Motion ◽  
Stimulus Movement ◽  
Pursuit Eye Movements ◽  
Extraretinal Signal ◽  
Wide Range

1. We recorded from single neurons in awake, trained rhesus monkeys in a lighted environment and compared responses to stimulus movement during periods of fixation with those to motion caused by saccadic or pursuit eye movements. Neurons in the inferior pulvinar (PI), lateral pulvinar (PL), and superior colliculus were tested. 2. Cells in PI and PL respond to stimulus movement over a wide range of speeds. Some of these cells do not respond to comparable stimulus motion, or discharge only weakly, when it is generated by saccadic or pursuit eye movements. Other neurons respond equivalently to both types of motion. Cells in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus have similar properties to those in PI and PL. 3. When tested in the dark to reduce visual stimulation from the background, cells in PI and PL still do not respond to motion generated by eye movements. Some of these cells have a suppression of activity after saccadic eye movements made in total darkness. These data suggest that an extraretinal signal suppresses responses to visual stimuli during eye movements. 4. The suppression of responses to stimuli during eye movements is not an absolute effect. Images brighter than 2.0 log units above background illumination evoke responses from cells in PI and PL. The suppression appears stronger in the superior colliculus than in PI and PL. 5. These experiments demonstrate that many cells in PI and PL have a suppression of their responses to stimuli that cross their receptive fields during eye movements. These cells are probably suppressed by an extraretinal signal. Comparable effects are present in the superficial layers of the superior colliculus. These properties in PI and PL may reflect the function of the ascending tectopulvinar system.

Fixation cells in monkey superior colliculus. I. Characteristics of cell discharge

1993 ◽  
Vol 70 (2) ◽  
pp. 559-575 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. P. Munoz ◽  
R. H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Discharge Rate ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Cells ◽  
Cell Discharge ◽  
Target Spot ◽  
Saccade Onset ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Mean Time

1. We studied the role of the superior colliculus (SC) in the control of visual fixation by recording from cells in the rostral pole of the SC in awake monkeys that were trained to perform fixation and saccade tasks. 2. We identified a subset of neurons in three monkeys that we refer to as fixation cells. These cells increased their tonic discharge rate when the monkey actively fixated a visible target spot to obtain a reward. This sustained activity persisted when the visual stimulation of the target spot was momentarily removed but the monkey was required to continue fixation. 3. The fixation cells were in the rostral pole of the SC. As the electrode descended through the SC, we encountered visual cells with foveal and parafoveal receptive fields most superficially, saccade-related burst cells with parafoveal movement fields below these visual cells, and fixation cells below the burst cells. From this sequence in depth, the fixation cells appeared to be centered in the deeper reaches of the intermediate layers, and this was confirmed by small marking lesions identified histologically. 4. During saccades, the tonically active fixation cells showed a pause in their rate of discharge. The duration of this pause was correlated to the duration of the saccade. Many cells did not decrease their discharge rate for small-amplitude contraversive saccades. 5. The saccade-related pause in fixation cell discharge always began before the onset of the saccade. The mean time from pause onset to saccade onset for contraversive saccades and ipsiversive saccades was 36.2 and 33.0 ms, respectively. Most fixation cells were reactivated before the end of contraversive saccades. The mean time from saccade terminatioN to pause end was -2.6 ms for contraversive saccades and 9.9 ms for ipsiversive saccades. The end of the saccade-related pause in fixation cell discharge was more tightly correlated to saccade termination, than pause onset was to saccade onset. 6. After the saccade-related pause in discharge, many fixation cells showed an increased discharge rate exceeding that before the pause. This increased postsaccadic discharge rate persisted for several hundred milliseconds. 7. The discharge rate of fixation cells was not consistently altered when the monkey actively fixated targets requiring different orbital positions. 8. Fixation cells discharged during smooth pursuit eye movements as they did during fixation. They maintained a steady tonic discharge during pursuit at different speeds and in different directions, provided the monkey looked at the moving target.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Context dependence of receptive field remapping in superior colliculus

2011 ◽  
Vol 106 (4) ◽  
pp. 1862-1874 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jan Churan ◽  
Daniel Guitton ◽  
Christopher C. Pack
Keyword(s):  
Receptive Field ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Spatial Location ◽  
Macaque Monkey ◽  
Visual Signals ◽  
Perceptual Stability ◽  
Visual Background ◽  
The Brain

Our perception of the positions of objects in our surroundings is surprisingly unaffected by movements of the eyes, head, and body. This suggests that the brain has a mechanism for maintaining perceptual stability, based either on the spatial relationships among visible objects or internal copies of its own motor commands. Strong evidence for the latter mechanism comes from the remapping of visual receptive fields that occurs around the time of a saccade. Remapping occurs when a single neuron responds to visual stimuli placed presaccadically in the spatial location that will be occupied by its receptive field after the completion of a saccade. Although evidence for remapping has been found in many brain areas, relatively little is known about how it interacts with sensory context. This interaction is important for understanding perceptual stability more generally, as the brain may rely on extraretinal signals or visual signals to different degrees in different contexts. Here, we have studied the interaction between visual stimulation and remapping by recording from single neurons in the superior colliculus of the macaque monkey, using several different visual stimulus conditions. We find that remapping responses are highly sensitive to low-level visual signals, with the overall luminance of the visual background exerting a particularly powerful influence. Specifically, although remapping was fairly common in complete darkness, such responses were usually decreased or abolished in the presence of modest background illumination. Thus the brain might make use of a strategy that emphasizes visual landmarks over extraretinal signals whenever the former are available.

Influence of the superior colliculus on responses of lateral geniculate neurons in the cat

1994 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 1059-1076 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jin-Tang Xue ◽  
Charlene B.Y. Kim ◽  
Rodney J. Moore ◽  
Peter D. Spear
Keyword(s):  
Spatial Frequency ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Maximal Response ◽  
Lateral Geniculate ◽  
Average Change ◽  
Area Centralis ◽  
Significant Change ◽  
Y Cells

AbstractThe superior colliculus (SC) projects to all layers of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) and thus is in a position to influence information transmission through the LGN. We investigated the function of the tecto-geniculate pathway by studying the responses of cat LGN neurons before, during, and after inactivating the SC with microinjections of lidocaine. The LGN cells were stimulated with drifting sine-wave gratings that varied in spatial frequency and contrast. Among 71 LGN neurons that were studied, 53 showed a statistically significant change in response during SC inactivation. Control experiments with mock injections indicated that some changes could be attributed to slow waxing and waning of responsiveness over time. However, this could not account for all of the effects of SC inactivation that were observed. Forty cells showed changes that were attributed to the removal of tecto-geniculate influences. About equal numbers of cells showed increases (22 cells) and decreases (18 cells) in some aspect of their response to visual stimuli during SC inactivation. The proportion of cells that showed tecto-geniculate influences was somewhat higher in the C layers (68% of the cells) than in the A layers (44% of the cells). In addition, among cells that showed a significant change in maximal response to visual stimulation, the change was larger for cells in the C layers (64% average change) than in the A layers (26% average change) and it was larger for W cells (61% average change) than for X and Y cells (29% average change). Nearly all of the X cells that showed changes had an increase in response, and nearly all of the Y cells had a decrease in response. In addition, across all cell classes, 80% of the cells with receptive fields < 15 deg from the area centralis had an increase in response, and 80% of the cells with receptive fields > 15 deg from the area centralis had a decrease in response. None of the LGN cells had significant changes in spatial resolution, and only three cells had changes in optimal spatial frequency. Ten cells had a change in contrast threshold, 25 cells had a change in contrast gain, and 29 cells had a change in the maximal response to a high-contrast stimulus. Thus, our results suggest that the tecto-geniculate pathway has little or no effect on spatial processing by LGN neurons. Rather, the major influence is on maximal response levels and the relationship between response and stimulus contrast. Several hypotheses about the role of the tecto-geniculate pathway in visual behavior are considered.

Use of an extraretinal signal by monkey superior colliculus neurons to distinguish real from self-induced stimulus movement

1976 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 852-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Robinson ◽  
R. H. Wurtz
Keyword(s):  
Eye Movements ◽  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Eye Movement ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Saccadic Eye Movement ◽  
Background Illumination ◽  
Stimulus Movement ◽  
Stationary Stimulus ◽  
Extraretinal Signal

1. In order to see whether cells in the superficial layers of the monkey superior colliculus can differentiate between real stimulus movement and self-induced stimulus movement we compared the discharge of these cells to stimulus movement in front of the stationary eye with stimulus movement generated by eye movements across a stationary stimulus. 2. Most of the cells recorded (65% of 231 cells) responded to stimulus velocities in front of the stationary eye as fast as those occurring during the peak velocity of a saccadic eye movement. Those cells that do respond usually have weak inhibitory regions and tend to have receptive fields further from fovea. 3. Move (61% of 105 cells) of the cells that did respond to rapid stimulus movement did not respond when an eye movement swept the receptive field over a stationary stimulus. 4. About half of these cells differentiated between these stimulus conditions when we used stimuli at least 1 log unit above background illumination; the remaining cells differentiated for stimuli 2 and 3 log units above background. Many cells differentiated between the two stimulus conditions over a wide range of directions of movement and the effect appears with about equal frequency in receptive fields at all distances from the fovea. 5. The differentiation is present for most cells even when the background illumination is reduced, indicating that visual factors are not the cause of the effect on these cells but may modify the response of other cells. 6. The suppression of background activity accompanying eye movements in the light is present following eye movements made in total darkness; the suppression, therefore, must result from an extraretinal signal. 4. The failure of these cells to respond to visual stimulation during eye movements is due to the same extraretinal signal that produces the suppression since a) the cells that show this suppression tend to be those that fail to respond to stimuli during eye movements, b) the time course of the suppression matches the time at which the effects of visual stimulation during an eye movement would reach the colliculus, and c) the cells which differentiate also show a decreased responsiveness to visual stimulation during the time of background suppression. While this extraretinal signal has the characteristics one would expect of a corollary discharge, proprioception as a source of the signal cannot be excluded. 8. Cells which differentiate between the two stimulus conditions usually also show an enhanced response to a visual stimulus in their receptive field when it is to be the target for a saccadic eye movement. These cells in the superior colliculus receive an extraretinal input which permits them to differentiate betweent real stimulus movements and stimulus movements resulting from the monkey's own eye movements. This differentiation would provide an uncontaminated visual movement signal and facilitate the detection of real movement in the environment...

scholarly journals Dissociation of visual and saccade-related responses in superior colliculus neurons

1980 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 207-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. E. Mays ◽  
D. L. Sparks
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Usual Sense ◽  
Eye Position ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Retinal Position ◽  
Position Information ◽  
Visual Cells ◽  
Retinal Stimulation ◽  
Saccade Onset

1. Single-unit activity was recorded from the superior colliculus (SC) of monkeys trained to look to visual targets presented on an oscilloscope screen. On one task, target localization required that information concerning the retinal position of the target be combined with information concerning current or future eye position. This task also permitted a dissociation between the site of retinal stimulation and the metrics of the saccade triggered by the stimulation. 2. Vigorous visual responses of superficial SC neurons may occur that do not result in the activation of underlying saccade-related cells. The activity of these neurons signals the occurrence of a visual stimulus, whether or not the stimulus is selected for foveal viewing. 3. Saccade-related (SR) discharges of most intermediate and deep-layer SC neurons precede saccades with particular vectors, regardless of the region of retinal activation initiating the saccade. The discharge of these neurons is tightly coupled to saccade onset, even if changes in eye position have occurred since target appearance. Thus, the discharge of these SR neurons must occur after retinal error and eye-position signals have been combined to compute the necessary saccade vector. For most SR neurons, direct retinal activation of overlying visual neurons had no effect on either the vigor or probability of a SR discharge. The discharge of overlying visual cells is neither necessary nor sufficient to activate most SR cells. 4. The discharge of some SR cells is dependent on prior activation of overlying visual cells. Of 53 SR cells, only 3 were completely dependent on visual stimulation, while another 8 discharged less vigorously if corresponding visual activation failed to occur. 5. About one-quarter of the SR cells showed long-lead preburst activity. This activation was characterized by a low level of firing, which began after the saccade signal and continued until a saccade-linked burst occurred. 6. Cells were isolated that were visually responsive yet discharged prior to saccades in the absence of appropriate retinal stimulation. No component of the discharge of these quasi-visual (QV) cells appeared to be motor in the usual sense. The activity of these neurons appears to reflect eye-position error (the difference between actual and desired eye position) and to hold this information in spatial register until a saccade occurs or is cancelled. 7. It is concluded that the presumed linkage, implied in earlier versions of the foveation hypothesis, between the superficial layers (receiving direct retinal inputs) and the deeper layers of the SC is not necessary for the activation of SR neurons. Results suggest that the SC must generate or receive a signal that combines retinal error and eye-position information. These findings are discussed in terms of current models of the saccadic-control system.

Projection from dorsal column nuclei to dorsal mesencephalon

1985 ◽  
Vol 53 (1) ◽  
pp. 183-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. L. Cooper ◽  
J. O. Dostrovsky
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Inferior Colliculus ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Dorsal Column ◽  
The Body ◽  
Projection Neurons ◽  
Dorsal Column Nuclei ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Somatosensory Input ◽  
Medial Geniculate

This study investigated the projection from the dorsal column nuclei (DCN) to the dorsal mesencephalon. Single-unit extracellular recordings were obtained from the DCN of alpha-chloralose anesthetized cats. Neurons were identified by standard antidromic stimulation criteria as projecting to the dorsal mesencephalon (M neurons), the diencephalon (D neurons), or to both regions (MD neurons). Fifty-two neurons could be antidromically activated from the dorsal mesencephalon. Of these, 31 could also be antidromically activated by stimulation in the diencephalon. An additional 34 neurons were studied that could be antidromically activated only from the diencephalon. Stimulation sites within the dorsal mesencephalon effective in antidromically activating M and MD neurons were in the caudal ventrolateral superior colliculus, the intercollicular area, and external nucleus of the inferior colliculus. Effective diencephalic stimulation sites were in the ventroposterolateral nucleus, the zona incerta, and the magnocellular division of the medial geniculate. The antidromic latencies to stimulation in the dorsal mesencephalon of M and MD neurons spanned a similar but wide range of values in contrast to the latencies to stimulation in the diencephalon of D neurons which were all short. Conduction velocities along the mesencephalic and diencephalic collaterals of MD neurons were similar. Many of the neurons projecting to the mesencephalon had receptive fields located proximally on the body. Most of the neurons had rapidly adapting responses to low-intensity mechanical stimulation of the skin. The major difference between the mesencephalic M and MD projection neurons and diencephalic projection D neurons was the larger percentage of neurons having proximal receptive fields in the former group. These findings are the first electrophysiological demonstration of a direct somatosensory input to the dorsal mesencephalon arising in the DCN. This input is probably responsible for providing some of the somatosensory input to the deeper layers of the superior colliculus, the external nucleus of the inferior colliculus, and the intercollicular area, regions known to have neurons responding to somatosensory stimuli.

Visual motion response properties of neurons in dorsolateral pontine nucleus of alert monkey

1990 ◽  
Vol 63 (1) ◽  
pp. 37-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. A. Suzuki ◽  
J. G. May ◽  
E. L. Keller ◽  
R. D. Yee
Keyword(s):  
Retinal Image ◽  
Visual Motion ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Response Amplitude ◽  
Large Field ◽  
Visual Response ◽  
Visual Responses ◽  
Pontine Nucleus ◽  
Motion Responses ◽  
Dorsolateral Pontine Nucleus

1. In this study we sought to characterize the visual motion processing that exists in the dorsolateral pontine nucleus (DLPN) and make a comparison with the reported visual responses of the middle temporal (MT) and medial superior temporal (MST) areas of the monkey cerebral cortex. The DLPN is implicated as a component of the visuomotor interface involved with the regulation of smooth-pursuit eye movements, because it is a major terminus for afferents from MT and MST and also the source of efferents to cerebellar regions involved with eye-movement control. 2. Some DLPN cells were preferentially responsive to discrete (spot and bar) visual stimuli, or to large-field, random-dot pattern motion, or to both discrete and large-field visual motion. The results suggest differential input from localized regions of MT and MST. 3. The visual-motion responses of DLPN neurons were direction selective for 86% of the discrete visual responses and 95% of the large-field responses. Direction tuning bandwidths (full-width at 50% maximum response amplitude) averaged 107 degrees and 120 degrees for discrete and large-field visual motion responses, respectively. For the two visual response types, the direction index averaged 0.95 and 1.02, indicating that responses to stimuli moving in preferred directions were, on average, 20 and 50 times greater than responses to discrete or large-field stimulus movement in the opposite directions, respectively. 4. Most of the DLPN visual responses to movements of discrete visual stimuli exhibited increases in amplitude up to preferred retinal image speeds between 20 and 80 degrees/s, with an average preferred speed of 39 degrees/s. At higher speeds, the response amplitude of most units decreased, although a few units exhibited a broad saturation in response amplitude that was maintained up to at least 150 degrees/s before the response decreased. Over the range of speeds up to the preferred speeds, the sensitivity of DLPN neurons to discrete stimulus-related, retinal-image speed averaged 3.0 spikes/s per deg/s. The responses to large-field visual motion were less sensitive to retinal image speed and exhibited an average sensitivity of 1.4 spikes/s per deg/s before the visual response saturated. 5. DLPN and MT were quantitatively comparable with respect to degree of direction selectivity, retinal image speed tuning, and distribution of preferred speeds. Many DLPN receptive fields contained the fovea and were larger than those of MT and more like MST receptive fields in size.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

scholarly journals Mobile steady-state evoked potential recording: dissociable neural effects of real-world navigation and visual stimulation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
James Dowsett ◽  
Marianne Dieterich ◽  
Paul C.J. Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Real World ◽  
Right Hemisphere ◽  
Visual Stimulation ◽  
Signal To Noise Ratio ◽  
Brain Activity ◽  
Neural Responses ◽  
Visual Hemifield ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
The Right

AbstractBackgroundThe ability to record brain activity in humans during movement, and in real world environments, is an important step towards understanding cognition. Electroencephalography (EEG) is well suited to mobile applications but suffers from the problem of artefacts introduced into the signal during movement. Steady state visually evoked potentials (SSVEPs) give an excellent signal-to-noise ratio and averaging a sufficient number of trials will eventually remove any noise not phase locked to the visual flicker.New MethodHere we present a method for producing SSVEPs of real world environments using modified LCD shutter glasses, which are commonly used for 3D TV, by adapting the lens to flicker at neurophysiologically relevant frequencies, in this case the alpha band. Participants viewed a room whilst standing and walking. Either the left or right side of the room was illuminated, to test if it is possible to recover the resulting SSVEPs when walking, as well as to probe the effect of walking on neural activity. Additionally, by using a signal generator to produce “simulated SSVEPs” on the scalp we can demonstrate that this method is able to accurately recover evoked neural responses during walking.ResultsThe amplitude of SSVEPs over right parietal cortex was reduced by walking. This finding is in line with converging evidence that visual-vestibular integration involves cortical lateralization with the right hemisphere being dominant in right handers. Furthermore, the waveform and phase of the SSVEPs is highly preserved between walking and standing, but was nevertheless sensitive to whether visual stimulation was presented to the left or right visual hemifield.ConclusionsThis method allows probing neural responses at a wide range of frequencies, during natural movements within real environments.

Ultrastructure of developing visual cortical synapses in the cat superior colliculus

1991 ◽  
Vol 49 ◽  
pp. 156-157
Author(s):  
Caroline A. Miller ◽  
Laura L. Bruce
Keyword(s):  
Superior Colliculus ◽  
Phosphate Buffer ◽  
Receptive Fields ◽  
Visual Cortical Area ◽  
Cortical Synapses ◽  
Visual Cortical ◽  
And Function ◽  
Phosphate Buffered Saline ◽  
The Brain ◽  
Cat Superior Colliculus

The first visual cortical axons arrive in the cat superior colliculus by the time of birth. Adultlike receptive fields develop slowly over several weeks following birth. The developing cortical axons go through a sequence of changes before acquiring their adultlike morphology and function. To determine how these axons interact with neurons in the colliculus, cortico-collicular axons were labeled with biocytin (an anterograde neuronal tracer) and studied with electron microscopy.Deeply anesthetized animals received 200-500 nl injections of biocytin (Sigma; 5% in phosphate buffer) in the lateral suprasylvian visual cortical area. After a 24 hr survival time, the animals were deeply anesthetized and perfused with 0.9% phosphate buffered saline followed by fixation with a solution of 1.25% glutaraldehyde and 1.0% paraformaldehyde in 0.1M phosphate buffer. The brain was sectioned transversely on a vibratome at 50 μm. The tissue was processed immediately to visualize the biocytin.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document