scholarly journals Fast Track Open Partial Nephrectomy: Reduced Postoperative Length of Stay with a Goal-Directed Pathway Does Not Compromise Outcome

2008 ◽  
Vol 2008 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bilal Chughtai ◽  
Christa Abraham ◽  
Daniel Finn ◽  
Stuart Rosenberg ◽  
Bharat Yarlagadda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Clinical Pathway ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Foley Catheter ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Postoperative Length

Introduction. The aim of this study is to examine the feasibility of reducing postoperative hospital stay following open partial nephrectomy through the implementation of a goal directed clinical management pathway.Materials and Methods. A fast track clinical pathway for open partial nephrectomy was introduced in July 2006 at our institution. The pathway has daily goals and targets discharge for all patients on the 3rd postoperative day (POD). Defined goals are (1) ambulation and liquid diet on the evening of the operative day; (2) out of bed (OOB) at least 4 times on POD 1; (3) removal of Foley catheter on the morning of POD 2; (4) removal of Jackson Pratt drain on the afternoon of POD 2; (4) discharge to home on POD 3. Patients and family are instructed in the fast track protocol preoperatively. Demographic data, tumor size, length of stay, and complications were captured in a prospective database, and compared to a control group managed consecutively immediately preceding the institution of the fast track clinical pathway.Results. Data on 33 consecutive patients managed on the fast track clinical pathway was compared to that of 25 control patients. Twenty two (61%) out of 36 fast track patients and 4 (16%) out of 25 control patients achieved discharge on POD 3. Overall, fast track patients had a shorter hospital stay than controls (median, 3 versus 4 days;P= .012). Age (median, 55 versus 57 years), tumor size (median, 2.5 versus 2.5 cm), readmission within 30 days (5.5% versus 5.1%), and complications (10.2% versus 13.8%) were similar in the fast track patients and control, respectively.Conclusions. In the present series, a fast track clinical pathway after open partial nephrectomy reduced the postoperative length of hospital stay and did not appear to increase the postoperative complication rate.

Effectiveness of a Clinical Pathway for Inpatients Undergoing Ileal/Ileocecal Resection for Chronic Radiation Enteritis with Intestinal Obstruction

2015 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liang Zhang ◽  
Jing-Feng Gong ◽  
Jian-Ning Dong ◽  
Wei-Ming Zhu ◽  
Ning Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intestinal Obstruction ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Outcomes ◽  
Clinical Pathway ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Radiation Enteritis ◽  
Ileocecal Resection ◽  
Chronic Radiation ◽  
Postoperative Length

Surgery is associated with elevated morbidity and mortality in chronic radiation enteritis (CRE). The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of a fast-track clinical pathway (CP) on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing ileal/ileocecal resection for CRE with intestinal obstruction. There were 85 patients with CRE (January 2011 to March 2013) with intestinal obstruction admitted to our department for ileal/ileocecal resection. The patients were divided into a prepathway group and a pathway group. The clinical outcomes were then assessed and compared. The postoperative lengths of hospital stay were 8.52 days for the pathway group and 11.32 days for the prepathway group ( P = 0.02). The pathway group had a lower stoma rate (21.6 vs 56%, P = 0.033) and fewer postoperative moderate to severe complications (8.1 vs 25%, P = 0.043) compared with the prepathway group. Implementation of the CP may reduce stoma rate, postoperative moderate to severe complications, and postoperative length of hospital stay for patients undergoing ileal/ileocecal resection for the treatment of CRE with intestinal obstruction.

scholarly journals Partial Nephrectomy A Comparison between Different Modalities

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 34-39
Author(s):  
Ahmed Al Asker ◽  
Abdulmalik Addar ◽  
Mohammed Alghamdi ◽  
Saud Alawad ◽  
Mohammed Alharbi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Blood Loss ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Kidney Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Chi Square ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Institutional Review

Kidney cancer, with 4% of all malignancies, is one of the most common malignancies occurring among in adults. In Saudi Arabia, kidney cancer comprises 2.3% of all cancers, and its incidence has increased by 33%. Partial nephrectomy (PN) is considered as the gold standard for T1 renal masses.In this retrospective study, we did a chart review for all patients who underwent PNs between April 2013 and February 2019. Data comprised pre-sentation, tumor size, type of procedure (open vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic), and intra- and post-operative complications. Chi-square, ANOVA, and cross-tabulation were done using SPSS software. P > 0.05 was considered significant. Approval was obtained from the institutional review board of King Abdullah International Medical Research Center.In all, 69 patients were identified: 26 (37.7%) males and 43 (62.3%) females, with mean age = 54.53 ± 13.21 years; mean body mass index = 32.36 ± 7.03, and mean tumor size = 3.7 ± 1.72 cm. In terms of presentation, most patients (50, 72.4%) presented incidentally as opposed to symptomatic presentation. Of these patients, 18 (26.1%) underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN), 29 (42%) laparoscopic partial nephrec-tomy (LPN), and 22 (31.9%) robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). On comparing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) PN with OPN, we found that OPN had more blood loss and a longer hospital stay but a shorter operating room (OR) time.Results of PN irrespective of the procedure type, whether it was OPN, LPN, or RPN, were similar if performed by experienced surgeons. However, open procedures involved a higher blood loss, more operative time, and longer hospital stay when compared with minimally invasive techniques.

The Association between Prolonged Antibiotic Use in Culture Negative Infants and Length of Hospital Stay and Total Hospital Costs

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wesam Sourour ◽  
Valeria Sanchez ◽  
Michel Sourour ◽  
Jordan Burdine ◽  
Elizabeth Rodriguez Lien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Blood Culture ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Antibiotic Use ◽  
Hospital Length Of Stay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Multivariate Linear Regression Analysis ◽  
Negative Blood Culture ◽  
Total Cost

Objective This study aimed to determine if prolonged antibiotic use at birth in neonates with a negative blood culture increases the total cost of hospital stay. Study design This was a retrospective study performed at a 60-bed level IV neonatal intensive care unit. Neonates born <30 weeks of gestation or <1,500 g between 2016 and 2018 who received antibiotics were included. A multivariate linear regression analysis was conducted to determine if clinical factors contributed to increased hospital cost or length of stay. Results In total, 190 patients met inclusion criteria with 94 infants in the prolonged antibiotic group and 96 in the control group. Prolonged antibiotic use was associated with an increase length of hospital stay of approximately 31.87 days, resulting in a $69,946 increase in total cost of hospitalization. Conclusion Prolonged antibiotics in neonates with negative blood culture were associated with significantly longer hospital length of stay and increased total cost of hospitalization. Key Points

scholarly journals A Retrospective Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of an Asthma Clinical Pathway in Pediatric Inpatient Practice

2008 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 233-241
Author(s):  
Elisa Edwards ◽  
Kristie Fox
Keyword(s):  
Drug Therapy ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Clinical Pathway ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Readmission Rates ◽  
Asthma Education ◽  
Children's Hospital ◽  
Children’S Hospital ◽  
Pediatric Inpatient

OBJECTIVE To determine if the asthma clinical pathway implemented at Wolfson Children's Hospital reduces the length of hospital stay. To determine if pathway use affected the use of asthma education, the use of appropriate discharge medications based on asthma classification, and readmission rates. METHODS A list of patients aged 2 to 18 years discharged from Wolfson Children's Hospital between September 1, 2004 and August 31, 2006 with the diagnosis of asthma was generated. Medical records of eligible patients were reviewed for demographic information, asthma pathway use, duration of hospital stay in days, readmission rates, receipt of asthma education, and medications prescribed upon discharge. Patients placed on the asthma clinical pathway were compared to a control group with asthma who were matched based on age and discharge date. Length of stay was averaged for each group. Asthma education, discharge medications, and readmission rates were compared between the two groups. RESULTS Forty-three patients placed on the asthma clinical pathway were compared to a 43 patients in the control group that were matched for age and discharge date. Use of the asthma clinical pathway reduced hospital stay by 0.372 days (P = .0373). Receipt of asthma education (P = .3864), the use of appropriate drug therapy prescribed upon discharge (P = .1398), and readmission rates (P = .5486) were unaffected by pathway use. CONCLUSIONS The asthma clinical pathway used at Wolfson Children's Hospital reduces length of hospital stay, but has no bearing on receipt of asthma education, use of appropriate drug therapy upon discharge, or readmission rates.

Fast Track Postoperative Management after Elective Colorectal Surgery: A Controlled Trail

2009 ◽  
Vol 75 (12) ◽  
pp. 1247-1251 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo V. Feo ◽  
Serena Lanzara ◽  
Davide Sortini ◽  
Riccardo Ragazzi ◽  
Mario De Pinto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Epidural Analgesia ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Oral Feeding ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Intestinal Function ◽  
Elective Colorectal Surgery ◽  
Early Ambulation ◽  
Colorectal Resections

In the attempt to reduce postoperative complications and costs and improve outcomes, the concept of fast track surgery has been proposed. Improvements in anesthesia techniques and a better understanding of the pathophysiologic events occurring during and after surgery have made it possible. A group of patients undergoing colorectal resections with a fast track approach were investigated; specifically, the effects on postoperative morbidity, resumption of intestinal function, and duration of hospitalization. Fifty patients were managed according to a protocol, which included epidural analgesia, early ambulation, and oral feeding (fast track group); they were compared with 50 patients managed with a different protocol: no epidural analgesia, early ambulation, and early oral diet (control group). Primary outcome end-points reported include morbidity, time to passage of flatus and stool, and length of hospital stay. Fourteen complications occurred in the fast track group and 13 in the control group ( P = not significant (NS)). Resumption of intestinal function occurred after 3 days, and length of hospital stay was 5 days in the fast track group compared with 4 and 7 days respectively in control patients ( P = NS, P < 0.01). Patients undergoing elective colorectal resections can be managed safely with fast track protocols reducing hospital stay.

Cost comparison of robotic, laparoscopic, and open partial nephrectomy.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 394-394
Author(s):  
Mehrdad Alemozaffar ◽  
Steven Lee Chang ◽  
Ravi Kacker ◽  
Maryellen Sun ◽  
William C DeWolf ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Sensitivity Analysis ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Hospital Costs ◽  
Cost Comparison ◽  
Renal Tumors ◽  
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Fixed Costs ◽  
Average Hospital ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy

394 Background: Laparoscopic and robotic partial nephrectomy (LPN and RPN) are increasingly common minimally invasive alternatives to open partial nephrectomy (OPN) for management of renal tumors. The cost discrepancies of these approaches warrants evaluation. We compared hospital costs associated with RPN, LPN, and OPN. Methods: Variable hospital costs including operating room (OR) time, supplies, anesthesia, inpatient care, radiology, pharmacy, and laboratory charges were captured for 25 patients who underwent OPN, LPN, and RPN at our institution between 11/2008 -9/2010. Fixed costs of acquisition of a laparoscopic suite and a robotic system (including maintenance) were amortized over 7 years. We considered alternative scenarios through one-way and multi-way sensitivity analysis. Results: We found similar overall variable costs for OPN, LPN, and RPN. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that RPN and LPN are more cost effective than OPN (excluding fixed costs) if the average hospital stay is < 2 days, or OR time less is than 204 and 196 mins, respectively. By including fixed costs of equipment, RPN and LPN are always more costly than OPN. Conclusions: There was no difference among variable hospital costs of OPN, LPN, and RPN. Minimizing OR time and hospital stay reduces RPN and LPN costs to levels comparable to OPN. Inclusion of fixed costs makes LPN and RPN more expensive than OPN, but increased utilization and efficiency can decrease cost per case. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Fast-track Cardiac Surgery in Children: Feasibility in Bangladeshi Setting

1970 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
SA Quader ◽  
R Sarker ◽  
F Ahmed ◽  
MK Hasan ◽  
AK Beg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Surgery ◽  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Fast Track ◽  
Heart Surgery ◽  
Open Heart Surgery ◽  
Postoperative Mortality ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Mortality And Morbidity ◽  
Surgical Closure ◽  
Fast Tracking

Background: Fast-track recovery protocols in cardiac surgery is gaining worldwide popularity and have contributed to significant reductions in the postoperative hospital stay and cost without any increase in postoperative mortality and morbidity. The aim of this study was to find out the feasibility of fast track paediatric cardiac surgery in Bangladeshi setting. Method: It was a prospective study conducted in National Institute of Cardio-vascular Diseases, Dhaka, from July 2009 to June 2010. All patients, between 3 to 18 years, underwent surgical closure of atrial or ventricular septal defect under cardio-pulmonary bypass. 20 patients from our unit served as fast track group and 30 patients from other units of the same hospital served as conventional group. Fast track patients were extubated in less than 6 hours after surgery, shifted from ICU in less than 24 hours and geared up to discharge home within 3 days of surgery. Result: 18 (90%) of the 20 patient of the fast track group were discharged within 3 days of surgery, 2 patients cannot be discharged within this time frame. Mean post operative hospital stay for study group was 3.1 days, whereas the mean hospital stay in the control group was 7.5 days. Follow-up was 100% complete at 30 days. There was no major in-hospital or out-of-hospital complications in either group. No patient was readmitted at our centre or elsewhere for any complication arising from this process. Conclusion: Fast tracking is feasible and safe in low-risk paediatric open-heart surgery in Bangladeshi scenario. A multidisciplinary approach with a set protocol is required to achieve this goal in a safe and reproducible manner. Keywords: Cardiac surgery; Congenital heart disease; Fast track; Hospital discharge. DOI: 10.3329/cardio.v3i1.6427Cardiovasc. j. 2010; 3(1): 50-54

scholarly journals PERBANDINGAN ANTARA PEMBERIAN ANTIBIOTIKA PROFILAKSIS PADA SEKSIO SESAR SESUAI ALUR KLINIS RSUP DR SARDJITO DENGAN ANTIBIOTIKA DOSIS MULTIPEL TERHADAP KEJADIAN INFEKSI LUKA OPERASI

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 75
Author(s):  
Ardian Rahmansyah ◽  
Mohammad Hakimi ◽  
Rukmono Siswishanto
Keyword(s):  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Surgical Site Infection ◽  
Clinical Pathway ◽  
Intervention Group ◽  
Group Versus ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Site Infection ◽  
Short Term

Background: Clinical pathway recommend the use of short-term prophylaxis antibiotics for cesarean section. Long-term antibiotics or multiple doses was found in clinical practice. There are differences in the mode of administration and the number of doses administered at sardjito hospital.Objective: To determine the effectiveness of short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in cesarean section appropriate to clinical pathway in the prevention of surgical site infection (ssi), the incidence of fever, dysuria events, length of stay.Method: The study used randomized clinical trial. The study subjects who underwent cesarean section and meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria in the period July 2013 to January 2014 divided into an intervention group (n = 52) who received ampicillin 2 gram pre and post-cesarean section, and a control group (n = 54) who received ampicillin 2 gram pre cesarean section and 1 gram every 8 hours for 6 times. Observed on days 3 and 10 post-cesarean section. The primary outcomes assessed were the incidence of surgical wound infection based on the criteria of surgical site infection from Centers for Disease Controland Prevention. Secondary outcomes assessed were the incidence of fever, dysuria events, length of stay. Homogeneity analysis were conducted on subject. Outcome analysis performed bivariate with t test and chi squared test.Results and Discussion : A total of 106 subjects can be analyzed. SSI events in the intervention group at day 3 was 3.8% (n = 52) and control group was 1.84% (n = 54) with p>0.05 RR 2.077 (95% CI 0.194 to 22.219). SSI on day 10 of 7.7% (n = 52) in the intervention group versus 9.3% (n = 54) in controls with p<0.05 RR 0.831 (CI 95%, 0.236 to 2.924). Fever events on day 3 by 5.8% in the intervention group versus 3.7% incontrols with p>0.05 RR 1.558 (95% CI 0.271 to 8.948) and on day 10 was 3.8% versus 3.7 % with p>0.05 RR 1.038 (95% CI 0.152 to 7.102). Dysuria not found on day 3 and but on 10 found 5.8% in the intervention group versus 11.1% with p>0.05 RR 0.519 (IK95% 0.137 to 1.968). Length of stay after cesarean section for 3.21 ± 0.412 days in the intervention group and 3.26 ± 0.442 days in the control group with p>0.05 (95% CI -0.213 - 0.117).Conclusion: There is no significant difference in the incidence of surgical wound infections, the incidence of fever, dysuria, length of stay between short-term prophylaxis antibiotics ampicillin appropriate to clinical pathway and long-term or multiple doses prophylaxis antibiotics. Short term antibiotics prophylaxis are more efficiently with the same effectiveness in preventing outcomes research.Keywords: prophylaxis antibiotics, ampicillin, short term regimen, long term regimen, cesarean section, surgical site infection. 

scholarly journals Comparative outcomes and predictive assessment of trifecta in open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy cases with renal cell carcinoma: a 10-year experience at Ramathibodi Hospital

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chaichant Soisrithong ◽  
Wit Viseshsindh ◽  
Wisoot Kongchareonsombat ◽  
Charoen Leenanupunth ◽  
Wachira Kochakarn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hospital Stay ◽  
Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Operative Time ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
P Value ◽  
Open Partial Nephrectomy ◽  
Robotic Assisted

Abstract Purpose: To compare perioperative and trifecta outcomes of open partial nephrectomy (OPN), laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN), and robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RPN) in patients with small renal mass at Ramathibodi Hospital, and to determine predictive factors in connection with trifecta. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 141 patients who underwent partial nephrectomy by eight experienced surgeons from January 2009 to December 2018. Baseline preoperative characteristics, postoperative and trifecta outcomes of the three treatment modalities were compared and analyzed. Univariate analysis was performed to determine predictive factors for trifecta achievement. Results: A total of 70 patients had complete data available. 18 OPN, 11 LPN and 41 RPN cases were identified and reviewed. All preoperative and perioperative parameters were similar, except for operative time, which was significantly shorter in the OPN group compared with those undergoing LPN and RPN (135 vs 189 and 225 min, respectively; p-value = 0.001). Of these 70 patients, 59 were deemed eligible for and included in trifecta analysis, which revealed similar trifecta outcomes (64.29.%, 45.45%, and 64.71% in the OPN, LPN, and RPN groups, respectively; p-value = 0.388). Univariate analysis showed that length of hospital stay was a negative associated factor for trifecta achievement (p-value = 0.007, 95% CI =0.619 (0.44-0.88)).Conclusion: Although OPN displayed the shortest operative time, the trifecta achievement rate was not significantly different among the three groups. The sole parameter, which was negatively associated with trifecta outcome achievement, was the length of hospital stay.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document