scholarly journals Systematic Review on Surgical and Nonsurgical Treatment of Type II Odontoid Fractures in the Elderly

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yohan Robinson ◽  
Anna-Lena Robinson ◽  
Claes Olerud
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Nonsurgical Treatment ◽  
Bony Union ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Odontoid Fractures

Odontoid fractures type II according to Anderson and d’Alonzo are not uncommon in the elderly patients. Still, due to the paucity of evidence the published treatment guidelines are far from equivocal. This systematic review focuses on the published results of type II odontoid fracture treatment in the elderly with regard to survival, nonunion, and complications. After a systematic literature research 38 publications were included. A cumulative analysis of 1284 published cases found greater survival if elderly patients with odontoid fractures type II received surgical treatment (RR = 0.64). With regard to nonunion in 669 published cases primary posterior fusion had the best fusion results. The systematic literature review came to the following conclusions. (1) Surgical stabilisation of odontoid fractures type II improves survival in patients between 65 and 85 years of age compared to nonsurgical treatment. (2) Posterior atlantoaxial fusion for odontoid fractures type II in the elderly has the greatest bony union rate. (3) Odontoid nonunion is not associated with worse clinical or functional results in the elderly. (4) The complication rate of nonsurgical treatment is similar to the complication rate of surgical treatment of odontoid fractures type II in the elderly.

scholarly journals The optimal treatment of type II and III odontoid fractures in the elderly: a systematic review

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeroen G. J. Huybregts ◽  
Wilco C. H. Jacobs ◽  
Carmen L. A. M. Vleggeert-Lankamp
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Optimal Treatment ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Odontoid Fractures

scholarly journals Type II odontoid fractures in the elderly: early failure of nonsurgical treatment

2000 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Kuntz ◽  
Sohail K. Mirza ◽  
Abel D. Jarell ◽  
Jens R. Chapman ◽  
Christopher I. Shaffrey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Screw Fixation ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Nonsurgical Treatment ◽  
Morbidity And Mortality ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Geriatric Population ◽  
Odontoid Fractures ◽  
Nonsurgical Management ◽  
Cervical Orthosis

The optimum treatment of Type II odontoid fractures in the geriatric population remains controversial. Coexisting medical conditions encountered in the elderly patient often increase operative risk and make cervical immobilization difficult to tolerate. Previous studies have shown increased morbidity and mortality and decreased fusion rates for Type II odontoid fractures treated with cervical orthoses in the geriatric population, whereas low morbidity and mortality rates with operative management have recently been documented. To investigate the role of surgical and nonsurgical treatment, a retrospective analysis was performed of patients with Type II odontoid fractures who were at least 65 years old and were consecutively admitted to a single medical center from 1994 to 1998. Twenty patients met inclusion criteria. In 12 patients nonsurgical management with a cervical orthosis was attempted. The nonsurgical management failed early in six patients, with one associated death. Eleven patients were treated surgically with either anterior odontoid screw fixation or posterior C1–2 transarticular screw fixation and modified Gallie fusion. Postoperatively one patient required revision of the C1–2 transarticular screws, and there was one death. In conclusion Type II odontoid fractures in this elderly population were associated with early 10% morbidity and 20% mortality rates. Nonsurgical management of Type II odontoid fractures failed early in six (50%) of 12 patients, whereas surgical treatment failed early in one of 11 (9%) patients. Both the nonsurgical and surgical treatments resulted in approximately 10% morbidity and 10% mortality rates.

Surgical Treatment of Unstable Type II Odontoid Fractures in Skeletally Mature Individuals

Spine ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 35 (Supplement) ◽  
pp. S209-S218 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alpesh A. Patel ◽  
Ron Lindsey ◽  
Jason T. Bessey ◽  
Jens Chapman ◽  
Raja Rampersaud
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Odontoid Fractures ◽  
Unstable Type

scholarly journals Liver and Pancreatic Resection in the Elderly

HPB Surgery ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 259-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. J. Garden
Keyword(s):  
Survival Rate ◽  
Liver Resection ◽  
Mortality Rate ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Pancreatic Resection ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Pancreatic Resections

Background: Liver resection, or pancreaticoduodenectomy, has traditionally been thought to have a high morbidity and. mortality rate among the elderly. Recent improvements in surgical and anesthetic techniques, an increasing number of elderly patients, and an increasing need to justify use of limited health care resources prompted an assessment of recent surgical outcomes.Methods: Five hundred seventy-seven liver resections (July 1985–July 1994) performed for metastatic colorectal cancer and 488 pancreatic resections (October 1983–July 1994) performed for pancreatic malignancies were identified in departmental data bases. Outcomes of patients younger than age 70 years were compared with those of patients age 70 years or older.Results: Liver resection for 128 patients age 70 years or older resulted in a 4% perioperative. mortality rate and a 42% complication rate. Median hospital stay was 13 days, and 8% of the patients required admission to the intensive care unit (ICU). Median survival was 40 months, and the 5-year survival rate was 35%. No difference were found between results for the elderly and those for younger patients who had undergone liver resection, except for a minimally shorter hospital stay fortheyoungerpatients (median, 12 days vs. 13 days p=0.003). Pancreatic resection for 138 elderly patients resulted in a mortality rate of 6% and a complication rate of 45%. Median stay was 20 days, and 19% of the patients required ICU admission, results identical to those for the younger cohort. Long-term survival was poorer for the elderly patients, with a 5-year survival rate of 21% compared with 29% for the younger cohort (p=0.03).Conclusions: Major liver or pancreatic resections can be performed for the elderly with acceptable morbidity and mortality rates and possible long-term survival. Chronologic age alone is not a contraindication to liver or pancreatic resection for malignancy.

scholarly journals Endonasal endoscopic pituitary surgery in the elderly

2018 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. 429-436 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Wilson ◽  
Sacit B. Omay ◽  
Ashutosh Kacker ◽  
Vijay K. Anand ◽  
Theodore H. Schwartz
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Complication Rate ◽  
Pituitary Adenomas ◽  
Statistical Tests ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Medical Complications ◽  
Tumor Diameter ◽  
Complication Rates ◽  
Pseudoaneurysm Formation ◽  
Significant Difference

OBJECTIVEPituitary adenomas are benign, slow-growing tumors that cause symptoms either through mass effect or hormone overproduction. The decision to operate on a healthy young person is relatively straightforward. In the elderly population, however, the risks of complications may increase, rendering the decision more complex. Few studies have documented the risks of surgery using the endonasal endoscopic approach in a large number of elderly patients. The purpose of this study was to audit a single center's data regarding outcomes of purely endoscopic endonasal transsphenoidal resection of pituitary adenomas in elderly patients and to compare them to the current literature.METHODSA retrospective review of a prospectively acquired database of all endonasal endoscopic surgeries done by the senior authors was queried for patients aged 60–69 years and for those aged 70 years or older. Demographic and radiographic preoperative data were reviewed. Outcomes with respect to extent of resection and complications were examined and compared with appropriate statistical tests.RESULTSA total of 135 patents were identified (81 aged 60–69 years and 54 aged 70 years or older [70+]). The average tumor diameter was slightly larger for the patients in the 70+ age group (mean [SD] 25.7 ± 9.2 mm) than for patients aged 60–69 years (23.1 ± 9.8 mm, p = 0.056). There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss (p > 0.99), length of stay (p = 0.22), or duration of follow-up (p = 0.21) between the 2 groups. There was a 7.4% complication rate in patients aged 60–69 years (3 nasal and 3 medical complications) and an 18.5% complication rate in patients older than 70 years (4 cranial, 3 nasal, 1 visual, and 2 medical complications; p = 0.05 overall and 0.013 for cranial complications). Cranial complications in the 70+ age category included 2 postoperative hematomas, 1 pseudoaneurysm formation, and 1 case of symptomatic subdural hygromas.CONCLUSIONSEndonasal endoscopic surgery in elderly patients is safe, but there is a graded increase in complication rates with increasing age. The decision to operate on an asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic patient in these age groups should take this increasing complication rate into account. The use of a lumbar drain or lumbar punctures should be weighed against the risk of subdural hematoma in patients with preexisting atrophy.

Coronary artery disease in the elderly

1999 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
SK Glen ◽  
NA Boon
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Elderly Subjects ◽  
Younger Patients ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
Morbid Conditions

Coronary artery disease is extremely common among elderly people and accounts for half of all deaths in those who are more than 65 years old. Although the condition is essentially the same as that encountered in younger patients, the management of coronary artery disease in elderly subjects can be difficult because the anticipated benefits and risks of the various treatment options are often altered by the presence of co-morbid conditions. Moreover, the results of the major outcome studies that underpin most treatment guidelines may not be relevant to the needs of many elderly patients for several reasons.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document