scholarly journals Early Invasive Cancer and Partial Intraoperative Electron Radiation Therapy of the Breast: Experience of the Jules Bordet Institute

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Philippson ◽  
S. Simon ◽  
C. Vandekerkhove ◽  
D. Hertens ◽  
I. Veys ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Selection Process ◽  
Tumour Size ◽  
Clinical Results ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Electron Radiation ◽  
Recurrence Rates

Objectives. The aim of this prospective phase II study is to evaluate the treatment of early-stage breast cancer (T1 N0) with intraoperative electron radiation therapy (IOERT) in terms of local control, early complications, and cosmesis.Patients and Methods. From February 2010 to February 2012, 200 patients underwent partial IOERT of the breast. Inclusion criteria were unifocal invasive ductal carcinoma, age ≥40 years, histological tumour size ≤20 mm, and no lymph node involvement. A 21 Gy dose was prescribed over the 90% isodose line in the tumour bed. Median follow-up is 23.3 months (7–37).Results. Acute toxicity was not frequent (Grade 1: 4.5%, Grade 2: 1%). The cosmetic result was considered to be very good or good in 92.5%. One ipsi lateral out-quadrant recurrence at 18 months was observed. The crude and actuarial local recurrence rates after median follow-up were 0.5% and 0.9%, respectively.Conclusion. The preoperative diagnostic work-up must be comprehensive and the selection process must be rigorous for this therapeutic approach reserved for small ductal unifocal cancers. After a 23.3-month median follow-up time, the clinical results of IOERT for selected patients are encouraging for the locoregional recurrence and the toxicity rates. The satisfaction of our patients in terms of quality of life was extremely high.

scholarly journals Intraoperative radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer: experiences from Iran

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahid Zangouri ◽  
Hamid Nasrollahi ◽  
Ali Taheri ◽  
Majid Akrami ◽  
Peyman Arasteh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Patient Selection ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Intraoperative Radiation Therapy ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Intraoperative Radiation

Abstract Background and objective Currently no definite guideline exists on the use of intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) among patients with early stage BC. We report our experiences with IORT among breast cancer (BC) patients in our region.Methods All patient who received radical IORT from April 2014 on to March 2020 were included in the study. Patient selection criteria were as followed: age equal or older than 45 years old; all cases of invasive carcinomas, moreover in lobular carcinomas only after MRI and confirmation, and in cases with ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS) only those with low, intermediate grade, tumor size of equal or less than 2.5cm and a margin of 2-3mm; those between 45 and 50 years old with a tumor size of 0-2cm, those between 50 and 55 years old with a tumor size of 2-2.5cm, and those ≥55 years old with a tumor size of 2.5-3cm; those with invasive tumors a negative margin and in cases of DCIS a margin of 3mm; a negative nodal status (exception in patients with micrometastasis); and a positive estrogen receptor status. Results Overall, 252 patients entered the study. Mean (SD) age of patients was 56.43±7.79 years. In total, 32.9% of patients had a family history of BC. Mean tumor size was 1.56±0.55 cm. Median (IQR) follow-up of patients was 24 (13, 36) months. Overall, 6 patients (2.4%) experienced recurrence in follow-up visits, among which three (1.2%) were local recurrence, two (0.8%) were regional recurrence and one patients (0.4%) had metastasis.Median (IQR) time to recurrence was 23 (13, 36) among the six patient who had recurrence. Overall, 11 patients (4.3%) with DCIS in our study received IORT. All these patients had free margins in histopathology examination. None of these patients experience recurrence.Conclusion For the first time, we categorized patients according to age and tumor size and older patients with larger tumor sizes were considered appropriate candidates for IORT. Our series showed a successful experience with the use of IORT in a region where facilities for IORT are limited using our modified criteria for patient selection.

Uncommon Breast Malignancies: Presentation Pattern, Prognostic Issue and Treatment Outcome in an Italian Single Institution Experience

2013 ◽  
Vol 99 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-44
Author(s):  
Claudia Maria Regina Bareggi ◽  
Dario Consonni ◽  
Barbara Galassi ◽  
Donatella Gambini ◽  
Elisa Locatelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Invasive Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Medullary Carcinoma ◽  
Mucinous Carcinoma ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Tubular Carcinoma ◽  
Breast Malignancies

Aims and background Often neglected by large clinical trials, patients with uncommon breast malignancies have been rarely analyzed in large series. Patients and methods Of 2,052 patients diagnosed with breast cancer and followed in our Institution from January 1985 to December 2009, we retrospectively collected data on those with uncommon histotypes, with the aim of investigating their presentation characteristics and treatment outcome. Results Rare histotypes were identified in 146 patients (7.1% of our total breast cancer population), being classified as follows: tubular carcinoma in 75 (51.4%), mucinous carcinoma in 36 (24.7%), medullary carcinoma in 25 (17.1%) and papillary carcinoma in 10 patients (6.8%). Whereas age at diagnosis was not significantly different among the diverse diagnostic groups, patients with medullary and papillary subtypes had a higher rate of lymph node involvement, similar to that of invasive ductal carcinoma. Early stage diagnosis was frequent, except for medullary carcinoma. Overall, in comparison with our invasive ductal carcinoma patients, those with rare histotypes showed a significantly lower risk of recurrence, with a hazard ratio of 0.28 (95% CI, 0.12–0.62; P = 0.002). Conclusions According to our analysis, patients with uncommon breast malignancies are often diagnosed at an early stage, resulting in a good prognosis with standard treatment.

Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes With Intraoperative Radiation Therapy for Early Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110474
Author(s):  
Orli Friedman-Eldar ◽  
Christina Layton ◽  
Iago De Castro Silva ◽  
Mecker G Moller ◽  
Ahkeel Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Oncologic Outcomes ◽  
Intraoperative Radiation Therapy ◽  
Perioperative Outcomes ◽  
Wound Complications ◽  
Intraoperative Radiation ◽  
Areola Complex

Background For selected patients with early-stage breast cancer (BC), intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) has emerged as a convenient alternative to standard whole breast irradiation (WBI). We report a single institution experience with IORT in terms of oncologic outcomes, toxicities, and cosmesis. Methods Clinicopathological and perioperative outcomes of patients who underwent IORT for early-stage BC at a public hospital from 2017 to 2020 were retrospectively retrieved. Toxicity was categorized to acute or chronic based on 6 months post-IORT cutoff. Results 85 patients underwent IORT and had complete data, aged 49‐85 years (mean 62). Intraoperative radiation therapy added 23 minutes on average to the total operative time. Final stage was 0, I, and II in 40%, 58.9%, and 1.1% of patients, respectively. Mean tumor size was 0.8 cm (range .1-2.1), with ductal histology comprising 94% of cases. Surgical margins were positive in 2 patients, and adjuvant WBI was required in 5 patients. After a median follow‐up of 17 months (range 3-41), none of the patients had local recurrence and no mortality was recorded. Early wound complications included wound dehiscence (n = 1), seroma/hematoma (n = 15), and re-operation with loss of nipple-areola complex (n = 1). Chronic skin toxicities were reported in 10 (12%) patients and good or excellent cosmetic outcome was reported in 93% of patients. Conclusions Utilizing IORT among low-risk early BC patients may be a safe and more convenient alternative to traditional WBI, with low toxicity rate, acceptable cosmetic results, and good oncologic outcomes at 17 months. Longer follow-up and further prospective controlled studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Is CTLA4 targeting the Achilles’ heel of Merkel cell carcinoma?

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e21567-e21567
Author(s):  
Richard Cheng Han Wu ◽  
Kari Lynn Kendra ◽  
Dukagjin Blakaj ◽  
Hiral A. Shah ◽  
Joanne M. Jeter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Merkel Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Neuroendocrine Differentiation ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Merkel Cell ◽  
Number Of Patients

e21567 Background: Merkel Cell Carcinoma (MCC) is a cutaneous malignancy with neuroendocrine differentiation, linked to infection with polyomavirus (MCPyV) in 80% of cases. PD1 inhibitors have recently been approved for this indication with ORR, 33-56%; CR, 11-24%; PFS, about 17 months; OS, about 12 months. Nivolumab was tested in the neoadjuvant setting with similar responses with pathological CR, 47%. Methods: Adjuvant pilot study (NCT03798639) with two immunotherapy regimens administered for one year to patients with completely resected MCC at high risk of recurrence (primary lesion of 2 cm or greater, positive or close margins ( < 2 cm), perineural or lymphovascular invasion, mitotic index ≥ 20 mitotic figures per mm2, lymph node involvement (stage pIIIA or pIIIB) with or without extracapsular extension, or completely resected stage IV disease). Arm 1, nivolumab 480 mg q 4 wks and radiation therapy (RT) 50-60 Gy in 25-30 fractions, per standard of care. Arm 2, nivolumab 240 mg q 2 wks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg q 6 wks. Primary objective was feasibility and completion of treatment in this population. Safety profile (CTCAE v5.0) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after 18 months were secondary endpoints. Patients were randomly allocated 1:1. Results: Ten patients were screened from January 2019 until April 2020, when COVID put the study on hold and the sponsor discontinued the free drug supply. Seven were enrolled. Four were allocated to Arm 1 and three to Arm 2. Patient characteristics in Table. All patients have completed treatment and are in follow-up. Arm 1: all four patients completed radiation therapy and immunotherapy with no dose modifications or delays. Arm 2: one patient had nivolumab delayed 2 weeks for cellulitis, and another missed the last four last doses of nivolumab for cholecystitis and pancreatitis requiring surgery, unrelated to the immunotherapy. Adverse events (AE) were as expected. Arm1 caused more grade 2 and 3 AEs then Arm2 (no grade 3). One patient each discontinued treatment, in Arm 1 for progression and Arm 2 for immunotoxicity (temporal arteritis grade 2). One recurrence was observed in Arm 1 and none in Arm 2. Conclusions: The number of patients expected to recur at 1 year is 20%. Our observed data is insufficient to establish efficacy. However with no patient recurring in the ipilimumab arm after 18 months of follow-up and lower observed side effects, we would favor this regimen for the next trial. Clinical trial information: NCT03798639. [Table: see text]

Segmental superficial parotidectomy in the surgical treatment of benign parotid tumours

2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-359 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Eski ◽  
M F Sökmen ◽  
I Yilmaz
Keyword(s):  
Surgical Treatment ◽  
Tumour Size ◽  
Superficial Parotidectomy ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Superficial Lobe ◽  
Effective Option ◽  
Tumour Location ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Parotid Tumours

AbstractObjective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of segmental superficial parotidectomy in the surgical treatment of benign parotid tumours.Methods:Patients who underwent parotidectomy for benign primary parotid tumours limited to the superficial lobe were retrospectively reviewed. Tumour location, size, surgical procedure, follow-up period, complications and recurrence rates were noted.Results:The study included a total of 39 patients: 22 underwent segmental superficial parotidectomy (group 1) and 17 underwent superficial parotidectomy (group 2). The mean follow-up period was 41.79 months (range, 13–85 months). There were no recurrences in either group during the follow-up period. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of tumour size, complications or recurrence rates.Conclusion:Segmental superficial parotidectomy is a safe and effective option in the surgical treatment of benign parotid tumours.

Changes In The Use Of Radiation Therapy Among Adolescents and Young Adults With Early Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma: Implications For Survival and Risk Of Secondary Malignancies

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 722-722
Author(s):  
Ana Xavier ◽  
Luciano J Costa
Keyword(s):  
Young Adults ◽  
Multivariate Analysis ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Secondary Malignancies ◽  
Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma

Abstract Background Early stage classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable disease with the combined use of chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT). There has been a recent trend to abandon RT, driven mostly by concerns of development of secondary malignancies (SMN). However, it is unknown whether the omission of RT in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with early stage HL affects survival and the risk of developing SMN. Methods We used data from the National Cancer Institute's Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results program (SEER-13) to determine the overall survival (OS) and the risk of SMN among AYA with early stage HL treated or not with radiation therapy. Inclusion criterion was the diagnosis of stage I or II HL in the period of 1995-2010 as first malignant neoplasm among patients age 13 to 40 years. Patients with less than 6 months of follow up and patients with unknown use of RT were excluded. Follow up was updated to the end of 2012 (November 2012 submission). Cases were divided in two “eras”, 1995-2002 and 2003-2010, with the latter being expected to reflect changes in the use of RT. The impact of the era, RT, age, race, gender, and stage on survival were accessed utilizing multivariate analysis. Cumulative incidence of SMN among early stage HL survivors was calculated using a competing risk model, treating death from any cause in absence of SMN as the competing risk. Results A total of 5,336 early stage HL cases were included in the analysis with median follow up of 89 months (range 7-191). Median age of patients was 27 years, 2,459 (46%) were male, 1,327 (24.8%) had stage I, 512 (9.7%) had classical HL non otherwise specified, 4,231 (79.2%) had nodular sclerosing HL, 442 (8.3%), had mixed-cellularity HL, 130 (2.4%) had lymphocyte-rich HL, and 21 (0.4%) had lymphocyte depleted HL. Most patients were white (4,438; 83.2%), 513 (9.6%) black, 337 (6.4%) other ethnicity, and 44 (0.8%) unknown. There where 2,793 patients in the 1995-2002 era and 2,542 patients in the 2003-2010 era. Radiation was included in the initial treatment of 1,659 (59.4%) patients in the former and 1,351 (53%) patients in the latter era (P<0.001). Factors associated with use of RT were earlier era, white race and stage II HL. Within the 1995-2002 era, there was a trend towards better survival among patients treated with RT (5-year survival 95.0% vs. 93.6%, P=0.058). In the 2003-2010 cohort survival was superior among patients treated with RT (5-year survival 97.3% vs. 95.9%, P=0.008). In multivariate analysis, diagnosis of HL in the 1995-2002 era (HR=1.73, 95% C.I. 1.31-2.28, P < 0.001), black race (HR= 2.18, 95% C.I. 1.63-2.91, P <0.001), male sex (HR=1.55, 97% C.I. 1.24-1.93, P < 0.001), and omission of RT (HR=1.31, 95% C.I. 1.05-1.64, P=0.017) were associated with higher mortality. The cumulative incidence of SMN was not significantly different between patients treated or not with radiation, while the risk of death was higher among patients not treated with RT (Figure). Conclusion There has been a reduction in utilization of RT among AYA with early stage HL in the US. Omission of RT was associated with increased overall mortality but no reduction in incidence of SMN and should not be adopted outside clinical trials. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Recurrence rates of resected appendix carcinoid tumors: A 20-year experience at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 221-221
Author(s):  
Jennifer Murphy ◽  
Andrew Rosowicz ◽  
Leonard Saltz ◽  
Philip Paty ◽  
Michael P. La Quaglia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Right Hemicolectomy ◽  
Carcinoid Tumors ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
Recurrence Rates ◽  
Incidental Appendectomy ◽  
Average Size

221 Background: NETs of the appendix are rare neoplasms most often discovered during incidental appendectomy. Risk of nodal metastases based on single institution series has suggested that appendix carcinoid tumors > 2 cm should undergo a right colectomy. Unlike other tumors, lymph node involvement does not change management given the lack of adjuvant therapies. We sought to evaluate our experience of patients with resected appendix carcinoid, the risk of recurrence, and the benefit of surveillance following resection. Methods: A single institution database of all patients with diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumors was queried for all resected appendix carcinoid tumors. Excluded were patients with large and small cell neuroendocrine tumors, goblet carcinoid, and patients with inaccessible patient records. Results: 88 patients were included from August, 1994 through December, 2013. The mean age at diagnosis was 37.1(9.9-75.8). There were 19 (22%) children (less than 18 years of age) and 69 (78%) adults. Females represented 72% of all patients. All patients had well differentiated tumors. Median follow-up was 2.5 years (1-16.5 years, 45% of which had longer than 3-year follow-up). 43/88 (49%) patients underwent right hemicolectomy (average size 2 cm) and 45/88 (51%) simple appendectomy (average size 0.9 cm). Most patients were followed with CT scans and laboratory evaluations and frequency of surveillance was inconsistent. There were no recurrences (0/88). Ten-year survival was 100%. Conclusions: This is one of the largest series of resected appendix carcinoid reported and no patients recurred. Prognosis was excellent and in the absence of metastatic disease, excessive imaging and/or laboratory testing should be avoided. We question the use of routine right hemocolectomy in these patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document