scholarly journals Missed Opportunities: Evolution of Patients Leaving without Being Seen or against Medical Advice during a Six-Year Period in a Swiss Tertiary Hospital Emergency Department

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Nicolas Carron ◽  
Bertrand Yersin ◽  
Lionel Trueb ◽  
Philippe Gonin ◽  
Olivier Hugli
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
Medical Advice ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Against Medical Advice ◽  
Missed Opportunities ◽  
Left Without Being Seen ◽  
Frequent Reason ◽  
Retrospective Database

Aim.The study aimed at describing the evolution over a 6-year period of patients leaving the emergency department (ED) before being seen (“left without being seen” or LWBS) or against medical advice (“left against medical advice” or LAMA) and at describing their characteristics.Methods.A retrospective database analysis of all adult patients who are admitted to the ED, between 2005 and 2010, and who left before being evaluated or against medical advice, in a tertiary university hospital.Results.During the study period, among the 307,716 patients who were registered in the ED, 1,157 LWBS (0.4%) and 1,853 LAMA (0.9%) patients were identified. These proportions remained stable over the period. The patients had an average age of38.5±15.9years for LWBS and41.9±17.4years for LAMA. The median time spent in the ED before leaving was 102.4 minutes for the LWBS patients and 226 minutes for LAMA patients. The most frequent reason for LAMA was related to the excessive length of stay.Conclusion.The rates of LWBS and LAMA patients were low and remained stable. The patients shared similar characteristics and reasons for leaving were largely related to the length of stay or waiting time.

scholarly journals Discharge against medical advice from the emergency department in a university hospital

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Feras H. Abuzeyad ◽  
Moonis Farooq ◽  
Salah Farhat Alam ◽  
Mudhaffar Ismael Ibrahim ◽  
Luma Bashmi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Small Sample ◽  
Medical Advice ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
High Risk Population ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Against Medical Advice ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Collection Form

Abstract Background Patients discharged against medical advice (DAMA) act as a high-risk population for the Emergency Department (ED), regardless of their presentations, and can pose a serious burden for the hospital. This study examines the prevalence, demographic and clinical characteristics, reasons, and clinical outcomes of a small sample of DAMA patients in a teaching university hospital, including readmission, morbidity, and mortality. Methods A prospective, descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the ED of King Hamad University Hospital (KHUH) with 98,992 patient visits during a 1-year period from June 2018 to June 2019. Consenting DAMA patients were asked to complete a data collection form. Results Patients (n = 413) had a mean age of 44.1 years with a female majority (57.1%). The majority were categorized as triage level-3 (87.7%). The main reasons for DAMA included refusal of the procedure/operation (23.2%), long ED waiting time (22.2%), subjective improvement with treatment (17.7%), and children at home (14.8%), whereas the least selected reason was dissatisfaction with medical care (1.2%). Follow-up of DAMA patients revealed that 86 cases (20.8%) were readmitted to the ED within 72 h of which 41 (47.7%) cases were morbidity and 2 (2.3%) were mortality. Marital status was a predictor of DAMA patients who revisit the ED within 72 h. Conclusion The results act as a pilot study to examine a small sample of DAMA patients’ characteristics, diagnosis, and ED revisits. Hospitals should investigate further the DAMA population on a larger scale, reasons for refusing procedures, and utilize this knowledge to improve the healthcare process.

scholarly journals Rate and causes of discharge against medical advice from a university hospital emergency department in Iran: an ethical perspective

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sanaz Rouhbakhsh Halvaei ◽  
Hojat Sheikh Motahar Vahedi ◽  
Ayat Ahmadi ◽  
Maryam Sadat Mousavi ◽  
Alireza Parsapoor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Medical Staff ◽  
Medical Advice ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
P Value ◽  
Emergency Ward ◽  
Ethical Perspective ◽  
Against Medical Advice ◽  
Discharge Against Medical Advice ◽  
Clinical Records

Discharge against medical advice (DAMA) is a common problem in the health-care system. It imposes risks to both patients and medical staff and could be the subject of ethical deliberation. This cross-sectional study was conducted in 2017 on 400 patients who were discharged against medical advice from the emergency ward of Shariati Hospital, Tehran, Iran. Patients’ information was collected using clinical records and telephone calls. The collected data were analyzed using STATA software. DAMA rate was 12% in the emergency department of Shariati Hospital. Male gender was found to be a risk factor for DAMA (OR: 1.90; CI (95%): 1.44 - 2.52; P < 0.0001). In addition, younger patients were more likely to leave hospital against medical advice (p-value: 0.04). The more common reasons for DAMA were feeling better, long delay in diagnostic and therapeutic procedures and the hectic ambience of the emergency ward. Patients’ self-discharge is a multi-dimensional phenomenon that is affected by patients’ characteristics, medical conditions and hospital circumstances. It raises some ethical concerns, mainly due to a conflict between patients’ autonomy and beneficence. It is helpful for the medical staff to create an effective relationship with patients who are at higher risk of DAMA, in order to increase their compliance and prevent the consequences of leaving hospital against medical advice.

Factors Affecting Discharges against Medical Advice in an Emergency Department of a Tertiary Care Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-35
Author(s):  
Trishna Shrestha ◽  
Sneha Pradhananga ◽  
Kabita Hada Batajoo ◽  
Manjita Bajracharya
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Health Care Costs ◽  
Medical Advice ◽  
Health Concern ◽  
Against Medical Advice ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Tertiary Center ◽  
Care Costs ◽  
Leaving Against Medical Advice

Introduction: Patients leaving against the advice of the treating team before being certified as fit is a major concern and challenge for the treating professionals as it possesses adverse medical outcomes. This study hence aimed at identifying the prevalence and major factors affecting such discharges so that advocacy can be done to help prevent it. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted at emergency department of a tertiary center in Lalitpur from 15th May 2019 to 15th August 2019. All the patients visiting the emergency department were included in the study and a non-probability purposive sampling method was used excluding the patients who denied giving reasons for them leaving against medical advice. Data was collected using pre-structured questionnaire and analyzed using SPSS-v21 software. Results: A hundred and fifteen patients (4.08%) left against medical advice out of 2812 patients who presented to emergency department. There were 63 male patients (54.8%), 75 patients of the total patients in the age group of 15-44 years (65.2%) and those living within a distance of 1km from the hospital (53%). The most common reason for the patients leaving against medical advice was found to be due to financial constraint (38.3%) followed by preference to other hospitals (16.5%). Conclusion: Patients leaving against medical advice possesses a small percentage of actual hospital admissions but is still a major health concern as it drastically increases the morbidity, re-admission rates and total health-care costs. Hence, understanding the general characteristics and predictors of such discharges is of utmost importance to help improve the patient outcome and reduce the health-care costs.  

scholarly journals Patients who leave the emergency department against medical advice

2016 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 88-94 ◽  
Author(s):  
Choung Ah Lee ◽  
Joon Pil Cho ◽  
Sang Cheon Choi ◽  
Hyuk Hoon Kim ◽  
Ju Ok Park
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Medical Advice ◽  
Against Medical Advice

scholarly journals Audit of documentation proficiency of emergency department patients who are discharged against medical advice before and after implementation of a checklist

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 28
Author(s):  
Sze Joo Juan ◽  
Ghee Hian Lim ◽  
Beng Leong Lim
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Medical Advice ◽  
Against Medical Advice ◽  
Documentation Quality ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Discharge Against Medical Advice ◽  
Emergency Department Patients ◽  
A Prospective Study

Objective: Documentation of the discharge against medical advice (AMA) is poorly performed in the emergency department (ED). Little is known about the impacts of a checklist on this. Our study aimed to compare the quality of AMA documentation before and after implementation of a checklist.Methods: A retrospective review was conducted followed by a prospective study; each over three months of AMA interactions in our ED pre and post implementation of a checklist. An 11-point checklist was used to determine documentation quality during these two periods. Quality was assessed based on the number of points fulfilled on this tool. Documentation was classified as “good” (8-11), “average” (4-7) and “poor” (0-3). The primary outcome measured was the proportions of discharged AMA records that showed “good”, “average” and “poor” documentation. Secondary outcomes were compliance rates to each of the categories of the checklist before and after its use.Results: 339 and 309 complete records were retrieved from the retrospective and prospective arms respectively. The proportions of case records in the three grades before and after use of the checklist respectively were: poor, 199/339 (59%) vs. 7/313 (2%); fair, 133/339 (39%) vs. 66/313 (21%) and good 7/339 (2%) vs. 240/313 (77%); all p-values were statistically significant. There were also statistically significant differences in compliance rates to each of the categories of the checklist pre and post checklist implementation.Conclusions: This study shows improvement in quality and compliance rates in the audit categories after the implementation of an AMA checklist.

Ocular emergencies presenting to an emergency department in Central Spain from 2013 to 2018

2019 ◽  
pp. 112067211989642
Author(s):  
Alicia Galindo-Ferreiro ◽  
Hortensia Sanchez-Tocino ◽  
Yago Varela-Conde ◽  
Cecilia Diez-Montero ◽  
Minal Belani-Raju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Primary Health Care Providers ◽  
Ocular Surface Diseases ◽  
Classification Of Diseases

Purpose: To determine the frequency of ocular conditions among patients presenting to an emergency department at a tertiary hospital in Spain. Methods: A retrospective, longitudinal analysis of all patients who presented to the ocular emergency department of Rio Hortega University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain, from 2013 to 2018 was performed. Data on demographics, ophthalmic examination, and diagnosis were collected. Diseases were classified according the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Results: We had 20,822 patients, of which 10,878 (52.2%) were women. The main age categories were 45–65 years (7391 patients; 35.5%) and 15–45 years (5979 patients; 28.2%). Most of the patients (17,793; 85.5%) were discharged on the same day. Conjunctival pathology was the most common cause of presentation (4110; 19.7%), followed by corneal disorders (4025; 19.3%). Acute conjunctivitis was diagnosed in 2920 (14%) and ocular trauma in 2125 (10.2%) patients. Non-emergency ophthalmic conditions were diagnosed in 1581 (7.6%) patients. Retinal detachments and peripheral holes occurred more commonly in patients aged 45–65 years ( p <0.001). Corneal or conjunctival disorders and lid inflammation ( p <0.001) were more frequent in women, whereas men had higher incidences of trauma ( p <0.001). Conclusion: Most of our patients presented ocular surface diseases. Men were more vulnerable to trauma, mainly superficial foreign body. The majority of the patients presented with uncomplicated ocular conditions that would be managed more cost-effectively by primary health care providers. We advocate greater education of primary care physicians and patients in managing simple ocular emergencies to reduce the cases presenting to an emergency department of a tertiary hospital.

Characteristics and Short-Term Recidivism Rates of Patients Who Leave the Emergency Department Against Medical Advice

2007 ◽  
Vol 14 (5 Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. S208-S209
Author(s):  
R. Ding ◽  
J. Jung ◽  
T. Kirsch ◽  
F. Levy ◽  
M. McCarthy
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Medical Advice ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Against Medical Advice ◽  
Recidivism Rates
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document