scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Modulation in Colorectal Cancer: What’s New and What to Expect

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Jacobs ◽  
Evelien Smits ◽  
Filip Lardon ◽  
Patrick Pauwels ◽  
Vanessa Deschoolmeester

Colorectal cancer (CRC), as one of the most prevalent types of cancer worldwide, is still a leading cause of cancer related mortality. There is an urgent need for more efficient therapies in metastatic disease. Immunotherapy, a rapidly expanding field of oncology, is designed to boost the body’s natural defenses to fight cancer. Of the many approaches currently under study to improve antitumor immune responses, immune checkpoint inhibition has thus far been proven to be the most effective. This review will outline the treatments that take advantage of our growing understanding of the role of the immune system in cancer, with a particular emphasis on immune checkpoint molecules, involved in CRC pathogenesis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Romain Cohen ◽  
Benoît Rousseau ◽  
Joana Vidal ◽  
Raphaël Colle ◽  
Luis A. Diaz ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 117-117
Author(s):  
M. Cecilia Monge B. ◽  
Changqing Xie ◽  
Seth M. Steinberg ◽  
Suzanne Fioraventi ◽  
Melissa Walker ◽  
...  

117 Background: The benefit of immune checkpoint inhibition is limited to the small percentage of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) patients whose tumors present mismatch repair (MMR) gene abnormalities; immunotherapy has not shown benefit in patients with MMR proficient CRC. Oncolytic immunotherapy represents a unique therapeutic platform. This phase I trial tests the safety of the combination of pexastimogene devacirepvec (Pexa-Vec) plus durvalumab (durva) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CRC. Methods: Eligible patients with advanced proficient mixed match repair (pMMR) CRC received intravenous infusion of Pexa-Vec at dose level 3 x 108 plaque forming units (pfu) (DL1) or at 109 pfu (DL2) every 2 weeks for 4 doses and durva 1500 mg every 28 days. Response was assessed with CT every 8 weeks. Adverse events were recorded and managed. The primary endpoint included safety, tolerability and feasibility of this combination therapy. Samples of tumor and peripheral blood were collected for assessment of immune parameters. Results: Sixteen patients (6 males and 10 females) enrolled with a median age of 52.1 years (range 39-69) from Dec, 2017 to Oct, 2018. Four patients were treated with Pexa-Vec at DL1 and durva;twelve patients were treated with Pexa-Vec at DL2 and durva.The most common treatment related adverse events (TRAE) included fever 15/16 (94 %), hypotension 12/16 (75 %), chills 12/16 (75%), fatigue 8/16 (50%), sinus tachycardia 7/16 (44%) and rash 6/16 (38%). Grade 3/4 TRAEs were reported in 8/16 (50%)patients; the most common were fever 7/16 (44 %), lymphopenia 2/16 (13%), neutropenia 1/16 (6%) and anemia 1/16 (6%). 14 patients were evaluable for response analysis; one patient 1/14 (7 %) achieved a confirmed partial response (lasting 7.1 months) and continues to receive treatment, while 13 patients had progressive disease. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 2.2 months (95% CI: 2.2-2.3 months) and the median overall survival (OS) was 7.5 months (CI: 4.9-10.1 months). Conclusions: Combination therapy of Pexa-Vec with durva ICI issafe, well tolerated and demonstrates possible activity in patients with advanced pMMR CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03206073.


JAMA Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric X. Chen ◽  
Derek J. Jonker ◽  
Jonathan M. Loree ◽  
Hagen F. Kennecke ◽  
Scott R. Berry ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 4918-4918
Author(s):  
Rachel Cantrell ◽  
Leah A. Rosenfeldt ◽  
Duaa Mureb ◽  
Balkrishan Sharma ◽  
Alexey Revenko ◽  
...  

A serious and life-threatening cancer-associated sequelae is venous thromboembolism (VTE). Indeed, VTE is the second leading cause of death in cancer patients, second only to the malignancy itself. Cancer patients with VTE or at high risk for VTE are generally treated with anticoagulants, which limit thrombin generation. While it's been widely accepted that thrombin plays a role in cancer progression, the effects thrombin has on other cell types within the tumor microenvironment (TME) have not been thoroughly studied. An understudied role of thrombin may be found in its ability to drive T cell functions. Recently, we have identified thrombin as a potential enhancer of CD8+ T cell effector functions by signaling through the protease activated receptor 1 (PAR-1). Our preliminary data shows that thrombin increases CD8+ T cell survival in a PAR-1 dependent fashion. CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) play a critical role in tumor clearance through their cytolytic and anti-tumor cytokine producing capacity. However, the hostile tumor microenvironment (TME) promotes a gradual reduction in CD8+ TIL capacity to produce cytokines and kill targets. Specific components of the TME, including PDL1 expression, are associated with loss of T cell functionality. A promising strategy to block the interaction of CD8+ TILs and the inhibitory TME components is immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) therapy, as shown by effective blockade of PD1 signaling by anti-PD1 antibodies. However, these ICI therapies leave many patients unresponsive, highlighting the necessity to uncover additional underlying mechanisms involved in modulating CD8+ T cell responses against cancer. Our preliminary findings lead us to hypothesize that thrombin, in conjunction with PD1 blockade, may work in synergy to promote CD8+ T cell killing of tumors. Consistent with our hypothesis, preliminary results suggest that thrombin is necessary for a robust anti-tumor immune response following ICI in vivo. Here, cohorts of C57BL/6 mice with low or normal circulating prothrombin levels bearing B16 tumors were treated with an anti-PD1 antibody or control IgG. Anti-PD1 therapy significantly limited tumor growth in mice with normal prothrombin levels, but had no impact on tumor growth in mice with low prothrombin levels. A major implication of our findings is that limiting thrombin generation with anticoagulants may be detrimental in the context of immune checkpoint inhibition treatment. Better defining the potential risk of reducing ICI efficacy by concurrent treatment with anticoagulants will require a detailed understanding of the role thrombin plays in cancer immunobiology. Disclosures Revenko: Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Monia:Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Employment. Palumbo:Ionis Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document