scholarly journals Identification of Pediatric Oral Health Core Competencies through Interprofessional Education and Practice

2015 ◽  
Vol 2015 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Hallas ◽  
J. B. Fernandez ◽  
N. G. Herman ◽  
A. Moursi
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Core Competencies ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Pediatric Dentistry ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
New York University ◽  
University College

Over the past seven years, the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at New York University College of Dentistry (NYUCD) and the Advanced Practice: Pediatrics and the Pediatric Nurse Practitioner (PNP) program at New York University College of Nursing (NYUCN) have engaged in a program of formal educational activities with the specific goals of advancing interprofessional education, evidence-based practice, and interprofessional strategies to improve the oral-systemic health of infants and young children. Mentoring interprofessional students in all health care professions to collaboratively assess, analyze, and care-manage patients demands that faculty reflect on current practices and determine ways to enhance the curriculum to include evidence-based scholarly activities, opportunities for interprofessional education and practice, and interprofessional socialization. Through the processes of interprofessional education and practice, the pediatric nursing and dental faculty identified interprofessional performance and affective oral health core competencies for all dental and pediatric primary care providers. Students demonstrated achievement of interprofessional core competencies, after completing the interprofessional educational clinical practice activities at Head Start programs that included interprofessional evidence-based collaborative practice, case analyses, and presentations with scholarly discussions that explored ways to improve the oral health of diverse pediatric populations. The goal of improving the oral health of all children begins with interprofessional education that lays the foundations for interprofessional practice.

scholarly journals Engaging and Educating Older Adults and Caregivers in Age-Friendly Healthcare

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 686-686
Author(s):  
Erin Emery-Tiburcio ◽  
Rani Snyder
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
New York ◽  
Health System ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Health Resources ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
New York University ◽  
The Us ◽  
Treatment Plans

Abstract As the Age-Friendly Health System initiative moves across the US and around the world, not only do health system staff require education about the 4Ms, but older adults, caregivers, and families need education. Engaging and empowering the community about the 4Ms can improve communication, clarify and improve adherence to treatment plans, and improve patient satisfaction. Many methods for engaging the community in age-friendly care are currently in development. Initiated by Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA)-funded Geriatric Workforce Enhancement Programs (GWEPs), Community Catalyst is leading the co-design of Age-Friendly Health System materials with older adults and caregivers. Testing these materials across the country in diverse populations of older adults and caregivers will yield open-source documents for local adaptation. Rush University Medical Center is testing a method for identifying, engaging, educating, and providing health services for family caregivers of older adults. This unique program integrates with the Age-Friendly Health System efforts in addressing all 4Ms for caregivers. The Bronx Health Corps (BHC) was created by the New York University Hartford Institute of Geriatric Nursing to educate older adults in the community about health and health behaviors. BHC developed a method for engaging and educating older adults that is replicable in other communities. Baylor College of Medicine adapted and tested the Patient Priorities Care model to educate primary care providers about how to engage older adults in conversations about What Matters to them. Central to the Age-Friendly movement, John A. Hartford Foundation leadership will discuss the implications of this important work.

scholarly journals Using electronic health records to characterize prescription patterns: focus on antidepressants in nonpsychiatric outpatient settings

JAMIA Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 233-245 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J Deferio ◽  
Tomer T Levin ◽  
Judith Cukor ◽  
Samprit Banerjee ◽  
Rozan Abdulrahman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
New York ◽  
Drug Product ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Academic Medical Center ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Prescription Patterns ◽  
Off Label ◽  
Electronic Health

Abstract Objective To characterize nonpsychiatric prescription patterns of antidepressants according to drug labels and evidence assessments (on-label, evidence-based, and off-label) using structured outpatient electronic health record (EHR) data. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted using deidentified EHR data from an outpatient practice at a New York City-based academic medical center. Structured “medication–diagnosis” pairs for antidepressants from 35 325 patients between January 2010 and December 2015 were compared to the latest drug product labels and evidence assessments. Results Of 140 929 antidepressant prescriptions prescribed by primary care providers (PCPs) and nonpsychiatry specialists, 69% were characterized as “on-label/evidence-based uses.” Depression diagnoses were associated with 67 233 (48%) prescriptions in this study, while pain diagnoses were slightly less common (35%). Manual chart review of “off-label use” prescriptions revealed that on-label/evidence-based diagnoses of depression (39%), anxiety (25%), insomnia (13%), mood disorders (7%), and neuropathic pain (5%) were frequently cited as prescription indication despite lacking ICD-9/10 documentation. Conclusions The results indicate that antidepressants may be prescribed for off-label uses, by PCPs and nonpsychiatry specialists, less frequently than believed. This study also points to the fact that there are a number of off-label uses that are efficacious and widely accepted by expert clinical opinion but have not been included in drug compendia. Despite the fact that diagnosis codes in the outpatient setting are notoriously inaccurate, our approach demonstrates that the correct codes are often documented in a patient’s recent diagnosis history. Examining both structured and unstructured data will help to further validate findings. Routinely collected clinical data in EHRs can serve as an important resource for future studies in investigating prescribing behaviors in outpatient clinics.

scholarly journals Engaging primary care providers in managing pediatric eating disorders: a mixed methods study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Lebow ◽  
Cassandra Narr ◽  
Angela Mattke ◽  
Janna R. Gewirtz O’Brien ◽  
Marcie Billings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment

Abstract Background The primary care setting offers an attractive opportunity for, not only the identification of pediatric eating disorders, but also the delivery of evidence-based treatment. However, constraints of this setting pose barriers for implementing treatment. For interventions to be successful, they need to take into consideration the perspectives of stakeholders. As such, the purpose of this study was to examine in-depth primary care providers’ perspective of challenges to identifying and managing eating disorders in the primary care setting. Methods This mixed methods study surveyed 60 Pediatric and Family Medicine providers across 6 primary care practices. Sixteen of these providers were further interviewed using a qualitative, semi-structured interview. Results Providers (n = 60, response rate of 45%) acknowledged the potential of primary care as a point of contact for early identification and treatment of pediatric eating disorders. They also expressed that this was an area of need in their practices. They identified numerous barriers to successful implementation of evidence-based treatment in this setting including scarcity of time, knowledge, and resources. Conclusions Investigations seeking to build capacities in primary care settings to address eating disorders must address these barriers.

“I felt useless”: a qualitative examination of COVID-19’s impact on home-based primary care providers in New York

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Ksenia Gorbenko ◽  
Emily Franzosa ◽  
Sybil Masse ◽  
Abraham A Brody ◽  
Orla Sheehan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
New York ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Home Based Primary Care ◽  
Home Based

Abstract 184: Patterns of Outpatient Follow-up after Acute Myocardial Infarction: Follow-up Frequency is Associated with Utilization of Evidence-based Therapies

2013 ◽  
Vol 6 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Vigen ◽  
Yan Li ◽  
Thomas M Maddox ◽  
Stacie Daugherty ◽  
Steven M Bradley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Acute Myocardial Infarction ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Beta Blockers ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Multivariable Analyses

Background: ACC/AHA guidelines recommend that patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) follow-up within several weeks of hospital discharge. Recommendations regarding intensity of following-up in the year following AMI are not provided. The relationship between frequency of follow-up and use of evidence-based therapies following AMI is unknown. Methods: 6,838 patients from 2 multicenter prospective AMI registries, PREMIER and TRIUMPH registries were studied. We divided the number of patient self-reported outpatient follow-up visits with cardiologists, primary care providers, or both into tertiles: low, medium, and high. The primary outcome was use of statins, beta blockers, aspirin, ACE/ARBs, and a composite of all four medications at 12 months among eligible patients. The association between tertiles of visits following AMI among patients who had at least one visit and primary outcome was evaluated using hierarchical multivariable modified Poisson models. Results: Mean number of follow-up visits in the year following AMI was 6 (IQR 3 - 8) and 189 (4%) of patients had no visits. In lowest tertile, patients had 1 to < 4 visits, in the medium tertile, 4 to < 7 visits, and in highest tertile, 7 to 59 visits. Patients in medium and high intensity tertiles were older, more likely to have insurance, and had higher GRACE 6-month mortality risk scores compared to the lowest tertile. In multivariable analyses, patients in the medium tertile were more likely to use statins and ASA than those in the lowest tertile (Figure). There were no differences in use of individual medications when comparing the highest and medium tertiles although individuals in the highest tertile were less likely to use all four medications. Conclusions: Significant variability exists in follow-up frequency following AMI and 4% of the cohort had no follow-up. Patients who had medium intensity visits were more likely to use some evidence-based medications than those with low intensity. Higher intensity visits was not associated with greater medication use. It is possible that the observed differences may be attributed to unmeasured differences among patients rather than the actual follow-up visits. Prospective studies are needed to assess key elements of outpatient visits that may lead to better utilization of evidence-based therapies.

scholarly journals Strengthening the approach to oral health policy and practice in Canada

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 82-85
Author(s):  
Shauna Hachey ◽  
Joanne Clovis ◽  
Kimberley Lamarche
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Policy ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Health Impact ◽  
Oral Health Care ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Oral Diseases ◽  
Policy And Practice

Abstract Evidence suggests that Canadian children from marginalized populations experience higher rates of oral diseases than their more fortunate counterparts. Oral health care in Canada is a nearly exclusively privatized and siloed system. In order to close the gap in child oral health, a combination of cohesive strategies and accessible providers is essential. The Health Impact Pyramid is a paradigm to guide health policy and programming with ready application to oral health care in Canada for the delivery of evidence-based oral health interventions with high impact. A collaborative approach among primary care providers (oral health and nonoral health), educators and the public sector, and the utilization of oral health service providers to their full scope of practice is needed to access priority populations and to deliver the most impactful interventions. Strengthening the approach to oral health care in Canada is necessary to reduce the inequities in oral health and, in turn, overall child health.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document