scholarly journals A Prospective Multicentre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Osmotic Release Oral System (Oros®) Hydromorphone in Opioid-Naive Cancer Patients: Results of the Korean South West Oncology Group Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 293-299 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun-Kee Song ◽  
Hyunjeong Shim ◽  
Hye-Suk Han ◽  
DerSheng Sun ◽  
Soon-Il Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Intensity Difference ◽  
Front Line ◽  
Long Acting

BACKGROUND: Osmotic release oral system (OROS®) hydromorphone is a potent, long-acting opioid analgesic, effective and safe for controlling cancer pain in patients who have received other strong opioids. To date, few studies have examined the efficacy of hydromorphone for pain relief in opioid-naive cancer patients.OBJECTIVES: A prospective, open-label, multicentre trial was conducted to determine the efficacy and tolerability of OROS hydromorphone as a single and front-line opioid therapy for patients experiencing moderate to severe cancer pain.METHODS: OROS hydromorphone was administered to patients who had not previously received strong, long-acting opioids. The baseline evaluation (visit 1) was followed by two evaluations (visits 2 and 3) performed two and 14 weeks later, respectively. The starting dose of OROS hydromorphone was 4 mg/day and was increased every two days when pain control was insufficient. Immediate-release hydromorphone was the only accepted alternative strong opioid for relief of breakthrough pain. The efficacy, safety and tolerability of OROS hydromorphone, including the effects on quality of life, and patients’ and investigators’ global impressions on pain relief were evaluated. The primary end point was pain intensity difference (PID) at visit 2 relative to visit 1 (expressed as %PID).RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were enrolled in the present study. An improvement in pain intensity of >50% (≥50% PID) was observed in 51.0% of the full analysis set and 58.6% of the per-protocol set. The mean pain score, measured using a numerical rating scale, was significantly reduced after two weeks of treatment, and most adverse events were manageable. Quality of life also improved, and >70% of patients and investigators were satisfied with the treatment.CONCLUSIONS: OROS hydromorphone provided effective pain relief and improved quality of life in opioid-naive cancer patients. As a single and front-line treatment, OROS hydromorphone delivered rapid pain control.

scholarly journals Role of Oxycodone Hydrochloride in Treating Radiotherapy-Related Pain

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Yinxia Wang ◽  
Ligang Xing
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Analgesic Drugs ◽  
Oxycodone Hydrochloride ◽  
Radiation Esophagitis

Radiotherapy is commonly used to treat cancer patients. Besides the curable effect, radiotherapy also could relieve the pain of cancer patients. However, cancer pain is gradually alleviated about two weeks after radiotherapy. In addition, cancer patients who receive radiotherapy may also suffer from pain flare or radiotherapy-induced side effects such as radiation esophagitis, enteritis, and mucositis. Pain control is reported to be inadequate during the whole course of radiotherapy (before, during, and after radiotherapy), and quality of life is seriously affected. Hence, radiotherapy is suggested to be combined with analgesic drugs in clinical guidelines. Previous studies have shown that radiotherapy combined with oxycodone hydrochloride can effectively alleviate cancer pain. In this review, we firstly presented the necessity of analgesia during the whole course of radiotherapy. We also sketched the role of oxycodone hydrochloride in radiotherapy of bone metastases and radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Finally, we concluded that oxycodone hydrochloride shows good efficacy and tolerance and could be used for pain management before, during, and after radiotherapy.

Amitriptyline in Neuropathic Cancer Pain in Patients on Morphine Therapy: A Randomized Placebo-controlled, Double-blind Crossover Study

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sebastiano Mercadante ◽  
Edoardo Arcuri ◽  
Walter Tirelli ◽  
Patrizia Villari ◽  
Alessandra Casuccio
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Blind Crossover Study ◽  
Double Blind Crossover Study

Aims and Background Amitriptyline is the most common analgesic adjuvant used in cancer patients with neuropathic pain, even though no specific studies have demonstrated a benefit. A randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind crossover study was designed to evidence the effects of amitriptyline in patients with neuropathic cancer pain. Methods Sixteen advanced cancer patients with neuropathic pain on systemic morphine therapy, no longer receiving oncologic treatment, presenting moderate pain (about 4 or more, but less than 7, on a numerical scale of 0-10) in the last week, and given a stable morphine dose in the last 2 days were admitted to the study. During the first week of study, patients were administered 25 mg of amitriptyline or equivalent drops of placebo at night for 3 days and 50 mg for the following 4 days. Doses for patients aged more than 65 years were 15 mg (first 3 days) and 30 mg (3 days after). After a week, a crossover took place for the second week, with the other treatment at an inverse sequence. Opioid consumption, pain intensity, symptoms and adverse effects, mood, sleep, patient's preference, quality of life before starting the study, the first week after and the second week after were recorded. Results No significant benefits in analgesia were found in the global pain intensity of the previous week of treatment, the least pain intensity or the pain evaluated just after a week of treatment, at the moment of the visit, when amitriptyline was compared with placebo. A significant difference was evidenced for the worst pain (P < 0.035). No differences in opioid doses during the period of study were found. Drowsiness, confusion and dry mouth were significantly more intense with amitriptyline than with placebo (P < 0.036, 0.003, and 0.034, respectively). There were no substantial differences between the two treatments in Spitzer's quality of life score and for each item. No differences in patients' preference for the two treatment periods were found. The analgesic effects of amitriptyline were slight and associated with adverse effects. Conclusions In light of the results obtained in the study, the extensive use of the drug for cancer pain should be questioned.

scholarly journals Analgesic Effect of a 5% Lidocaine Patch in Patients With Opioid Treatment-Resistant Neuropathic Cancer Pain

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jui-hung Tsai ◽  
I-Ting Liu ◽  
Pei-Fang Su ◽  
Ying-Tzu Huang ◽  
Ge-Lin Chiu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Transdermal Patch ◽  
Analgesic Treatment ◽  
Opioid Treatment ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract PurposeLimited efficacy has been observed when using morphine to treat neuropathic pain. Lidocaine patches reduce neuropathic pain in post-herpetic neuralgia, but their benefits for cancer-related neuropathic pain remain unclear. This study aimed to demonstrate a useful treatment for cancer-related neuropathic pain. The primary endpoint was pain intensity evaluated by the visual analog scale (VAS). The secondary endpoints were the pain relief score and the quality of analgesic treatment. MethodsWe assessed the efficacy and safety of lidocaine patches in patients experiencing neuropathic cancer pain. Terminal cancer patients with opioid treatment resistance participated in the 3-day study. ResultsThe results showed a statistically significant difference in the median VAS over three days (Kruskal-Wallis test, P<0.0001). The median VAS pain intensity from Day 1 to Day 3 was 4.0 with 95% C.I. (3.3, 5.0), 3.0 (2.5, 3.5) and 2.5 (2.0, 3.0), respectively. The difference between the median VAS pain intensities of any two days was statistically significant (Wilcoxon signed-rank test, P < 0.0001). There was no statistically significant difference in the pain relief score or the quality of analgesic treatment. ConclusionIn this study, the 5% lidocaine transdermal patch reduced the VAS pain intensity in neuropathic cancer patients with morphine resistance. The transdermal patch is generally useful and well-tolerated.

Pain Education for Underserved Minority Cancer Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (24) ◽  
pp. 4918-4925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen O. Anderson ◽  
Tito R. Mendoza ◽  
Richard Payne ◽  
Vicente Valero ◽  
Guadalupe R. Palos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
African American ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Pain Education ◽  
Perceived Pain

Purpose Previous studies found that African American and Hispanic cancer patients are at risk for undertreatment of pain. We evaluated the efficacy of a pain education intervention for underserved minority patients. Patients and Methods Ninety-seven underserved African American and Hispanic outpatients with cancer-related pain were enrolled onto a randomized clinical trial of pain management education. The patients in the education group received a culture-specific video and booklet on pain management. The control group received a video and booklet on nutrition. A research nurse met with each patient to review the materials. We measured changes in pain intensity and pain-related interference 2 to 10 weeks after the intervention, as well as changes in quality of life, perceived pain control, functional status, analgesics, and physician pain assessments. Results Physicians underestimated baseline pain intensity and provided inadequate analgesics for more than 50% of the sample. Although the ratings for pain intensity and pain interference decreased over time for both groups, there was no statistically significant difference between groups. Pain education did not affect quality of life, perceived pain control, or functional status. African American patients in the education but not the control group reported a significant decrease in pain worst ratings from baseline to first follow-up (P < .01), although this decrease was not maintained at subsequent assessments. Conclusion Brief education had limited impact on pain outcomes for underserved minority patients, suggesting that more intensive education for patients and interventions for physicians are needed.

scholarly journals A Prospective, Multicenter, Open-Label Study of The Clinical Efficacy of Tapentadol Extended-Release in The Treatment of Cancer-Related Pain and Improvement of Quality of Life in Opioid-Naïve or Opioid-Resistant Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiyoon Jung ◽  
Hong Jae Chon ◽  
YoungJin Choi ◽  
SangEun Yeon ◽  
SeokYoung Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Neuropathic Pain ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Extended Release ◽  
Drug Reactions ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Observation Period

Abstract Purpose: This study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of tapentadol extended-release (ER) on pain control and the quality of life of patients with moderate to severe chronic cancer pain in clinical practice in Korea.Methods: In this prospective, open-label, multicenter trial, patients with sustained cancer pain as well as chronic pain, using or not using other analgesics were enrolled. Thirteen centers recorded a total of 752 patients, during the 6-month observation period, based on the tapentadol ER dose and tolerability, prior and concomitant analgesic treatment, pain intensity, type of pain, adverse effects, and clinical global impression change (CGI-C). A total of 752 patients were screened, 688 were enrolled, and 650 completed the study for efficacy and adverse drug reactions; among them 349 were cancer patients.Results: In total, 752 patients were screened, 688 were enrolled and 650 were completed the study for efficacy and adverse drug reactions, 349 of whom were cancer patients. Tapentadol ER significantly reduced the mean pain intensity including neuropathic pain during the observation period by 2.9 points (from a mean 7±0.87 to 4.1±2.02). Furthermore, the quality of life was observed to be significantly improved based on an objective observation, such as the CGI-C.Conclusion: This study showed that tapentadol ER was effective in patients with moderate to severe cancer pain and was also effective in neuropathic pain, and therefore it significantly improved the patients’ quality of life.

Cancer pain management

2014 ◽  
Vol 155 (3) ◽  
pp. 93-99
Author(s):  
Péter Heigl
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Life Expectancy ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Cancer Pain Management ◽  
Medical Activity ◽  
Short Summary ◽  
Adequate Quality

Pain is a significant and alarming symptom of cancer seriously affecting the activity and quality of life of patients. Recent research proved that inadequate analgesia shortens life expectancy. Therefore, pain relief is not only a possibility but a professional, ethical and moral commitment to relieve patients from suffering, as well as ensure their adequate quality of life and human dignity. Proper pain relief can be achieved with medical therapy in most of the cases and the pharmacological alternatives are available in Hungary. Yet medical activity regarding pain relief is far from the desired. This paper gives a short summary of the guidelines on medical pain management focusing particularly on the use of opioids. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(3), 93–99.

An Open-Label, Analgesic Efficacy and Safety of Pituitary Radiosurgery for Patients With Opioid-Refractory Pain: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

Neurosurgery ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. 146-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pierre-Yves Borius ◽  
Stéphanie Ranque Garnier ◽  
Karine Baumstarck ◽  
Frédéric Castinetti ◽  
Anne Donnet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Analgesic Efficacy ◽  
Standards Of Care ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label

Abstract BACKGROUND Hypophysectomy performed by craniotomy or percutaneous techniques leads to complete pain relief in more than 70% to 80% of cases for opioid refractory cancer pain. Radiosurgery could be an interesting alternative approach to reduce complications. OBJECTIVE To assess the analgesic efficacy compared with standard of care is the primary goal. The secondary objectives are to assess ophthalmic and endocrine tolerance, drug consumption, quality of life, and mechanisms of analgesic action. METHODS The trial is multicenter, randomized, prospective, and open-label with 2 parallel groups. This concerns patients in palliative care suffering from nociceptive or mixed cancer pain, refractory to standard opioid therapy. Participants will be randomly assigned to the control group receiving standards of care for pain according to recommendations, or to the experimental group receiving a pituitary GammaKnife (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden) radiosurgery (160 Gy delivered in pituitary gland) associated with standards of care. Evaluation assessments will be taken at baseline, day0, day4, day7, day14, day28, day45, month3, and month6. EXPECTED OUTCOMES We could expect pain improvement in 70% to 90% of cases at day4. In addition we will assess the safety of pituitary radiosurgery in a vulnerable population. The secondary endpoints could show decay of opioid consumption, good patient satisfaction, and improvement of the quality of life. DISCUSSION The design of this study is potentially the most appropriate to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of radiosurgery for this new indication. New recommendations could be obtained in order to improve pain relief and quality of life.

Pain management

2020 ◽  
pp. 629-633
Author(s):  
Marie Fallon
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Adverse Effects ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Daily Functioning ◽  
Opioid Analgesia ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Good Pain Relief

Pain occurs in more than 50% of patients with advanced disease, interferes with daily functioning and quality of life, and is very often undertreated. Patients can find it difficult to articulate the character of their pains, but it is important to determine whether it is somatic, neuropathic, or visceral since this has important implications for management. For most patients with cancer pain, a three-step approach combining simple or opioid analgesia (depending on severity) along with an adjuvant analgesic (depending on cause) will result in good pain relief, but the challenge is to achieve good pain relief without unacceptable adverse effects.

scholarly journals Application of quality control circle in the treatment of moderate cancer pain in inpatients

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 581-585
Author(s):  
Yehuan Liu ◽  
Beibei Lin
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Quality Control ◽  
Cancer Pain ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Management Tool ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

Abstract Context Pain is one of the most common and intolerable symptoms in cancer patients. But cancer pain control is still negative in China. Objectives This paper explores the application of quality control circle in the treatment of cancer pain in inpatients to improve the quality of life of patients with cancer pain. Method Established a quality control circle group to analyze the current status of cancer pain control in inpatients with moderate cancer pain, set goals, formulate corresponding countermeasures and implement and review them in stages. The plan-do-check-act method was cyclically applied. The Brief Pain Inventory was used to evaluate the cancer pain status of patients with cancer pain hospitalized before (January to April 2016) and after (September to December 2016) the implementation of quality control circle activities. Results The pain control effect of the observation group was significantly better than that of the control group. The mean (standard deviation) of pain severity and pain interference in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (6.21 [2.86] vs 4.31 [2.25], 10.54 [4.10] vs 7.25 [3.77]). There was significant difference after the implementation of quality control circle (P &lt; 0.01). Conclusion Quality control circle activities are used to manage patients with cancer pain, to improve the situation of pain control and to improve the quality of life of patients. This management tool and method is worthy of clinical promotion and application.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document