scholarly journals Depressed Mood Differentially Mediates the Relationship between Pain Intensity and Pain Disability Depending on Pain Duration: A Moderated Mediation Analysis in Chronic Pain Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Probst ◽  
Susanne Neumeier ◽  
Jürgen Altmeppen ◽  
Michael Angerer ◽  
Thomas Loew ◽  
...  

Research has shown that pain is associated with disability and that depressed mood mediates the relationship between pain and disability. The question of whether duration of pain moderates these effects was addressed in this cross-sectional study with 356 chronic pain patients. A simple mediation model replicated the notion that depressed mood explains a significant proportion of the relationship between pain and disability (in the study at hand: 12%). A moderated mediation model revealed that the indirect effect of pain on disability through depressed mood is moderated by pain duration: while depressed mood did not mediate the effect of pain on disability in chronic pain patients with shorter pain duration, depressed mood significantly mediated the effect pain exerts on disability in chronic pain patients with longer pain duration. Pain duration did not moderate the direct effect of pain on disability. Implications of these findings for the treatment of chronic pain might be that targeting depressed mood is especially relevant in chronic pain patients with longer pain duration to reduce the effect of pain on disability.

Author(s):  
Amy Frers ◽  
Jonathan Shaffer ◽  
Jack Edinger ◽  
Amy Wachholtz

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Delorme ◽  
Lucie Pennel ◽  
Georges Brousse ◽  
Jean-Pierre Daulouède ◽  
Jean-Michel Delile ◽  
...  

Chronic pain and substance use disorders frequently co-occur. Indeed, chronic pain is highly prevalent, affecting 23–68% of patients receiving opioid agonist treatments (OAT) worldwide. The majority of available estimates come from American studies, but data are still lacking in Europe. We aim to provide European estimates of the prevalence of chronic pain in patients receiving OAT using French data, since France is the first European country in terms of number of patients with OAT. The secondary objectives were to characterize the features and management of chronic pain, as well identify associated risk factors. We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study, recruiting patients treated either with buprenorphine or methadone in 19 French addiction centers, from May to July 2016. All participants had to complete a semi-directed questionnaire that collected sociodemographic and medical data, pain characteristics, and licit or illicit drug consumption. In total, 509 patients were included. The prevalence of chronic pain was estimated at 33.2% (95% CI: 29.1–37.3). Compared to non-chronic pain patients, chronic pain patients were older (38.4 vs. 36.1 years, p = 0.006), were more unemployed (66 vs. 52%, p = 0.003), had more psychiatric comorbidities (50 vs. 39%, p = 0.02), and split their OAT for pain management more frequently (24 vs. 7%, p = 0.009). Pain intensity was moderate or severe in 75% of chronic pain patients. Among patients with chronic pain, 15.4% were not prescribed, and did not self-medicate with, any analgesic drugs, 52.1% were prescribed analgesics (non-opioid analgesics, 76.3%; codeine, tramadol, opium, 27.2%; and morphine, fentanyl, oxycodone, 11.8%), and 32.5% exclusively self-medicated with analgesics. Moreover, 20.1% of patients with chronic pain also used illicit drugs for pain relief. On multivariate analysis, variables that remained significantly associated with chronic pain were age [OR = 1.03 (95% CI: 1.00–1.05], p = 0.02], anxiety [OR = 1.52 (1.15–2.02), p = 0.003], and depression [OR = 1.25 (1.00–1.55), p = 0.05]. Chronic pain is a highly prevalent condition in patients receiving OAT, and its appropriate management remains uncertain, since insufficient relief and frequent additional self-medications with analgesics or illicit drugs were reported by these patients. Increased awareness among caregivers is urgently needed regarding a systematic and careful assessment, along with an adequate management of chronic pain in patients receiving OAT.


2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 93-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela Mailis-Gagnon ◽  
Balaji Yegneswaran ◽  
SF Lakha ◽  
Keith Nicholson ◽  
Amanda J Steiman ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Pain clinics tend to see more complex chronic pain patients than primary care settings, but the types of patients seen may differ among practices.OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present observational study was to describe the pain and demographic characteristics of patients attending a university-affiliated tertiary care pain clinic in Toronto, Ontario.METHODS: Data were collected on 1242 consecutive new patients seen over a three-year period at the Comprehensive Pain Program in central Toronto.RESULTS: Musculoskeletal problems affecting large joints and the spine were the predominant cause of pain (more prevalent in women), followed by neuropathic disorders (more prevalent in men) in patients with recognizable physical pathology. The most affected age group was in the 35- to 49-year age range, with a mean pain duration of 7.8 years before the consultation. While 77% of the Comprehensive Pain Program patients had relevant and detectable physical pathology for pain complaints, three-quarters of the overall study population also had significant associated psychological or psychiatric comorbidity. Women, in general, attended the pain clinic in greater numbers and had less apparent physical pathology than men. Finally, less than one in five patients was employed at the time of referral.CONCLUSIONS: The relevance of the data in relation to other pain clinics is discussed, as well as waiting lists and other barriers faced by chronic pain patients, pain practitioners and pain facilities in Ontario and Canada.


2009 ◽  
Vol 51 (12) ◽  
pp. 1361-1362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexis Descatha ◽  
Guillermo Jasso-Mosqueda ◽  
Anne-Line Couillerot ◽  
Catherine Rumeau-Pichon ◽  
Anna Ozguler ◽  
...  

2001 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 142-151 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew J Cook ◽  
Dania C Chastain

OBJECTIVE: To further develop an empirically based classification system for chronic pain patients through the examination of age and sex differences, and incorporation of pain duration in the grouping algorithm.SUBJECTS: Three hundred seventy-four chronic pain patients (300 aged 13 to 59 years; 74 aged 60 to 89 years) assessed at an outpatient, multidisciplinary pain management centre.METHODS: Patients completed measures of demographic and descriptive information, pain intensity (box rating scale), perceived disability (modified Pain Disability Index) and affective distress (Symptom Checklist-90 Revised) before multidisciplinary treatment. Standardized scores from the assessment measures were entered into a series of hierarchical, multivariate cluster analyses to identify underlying patient subgroups.RESULTS: Age-based patient groupings from prior research were partially replicated. Significant differences in clinical presentations were observed across age and sex groups. Pain duration was found to make an important contribution to the patient groupings. 'Good control' (low pain, disability, distress) and variants of 'chronic pain syndrome' (elevated pain, disability, distress) groupings were identified across all analyses. Two variants of a 'stoic' profile were identified among older patients, with low levels of distress relative to pain and perceived disability. One of these profiles was associated with long pain duration and was found only among males. Several unique clinical profiles were identified for female patients.CONCLUSIONS: There are important age and sex differences in the clinical presentations of chronic pain patients. Some older patients present with unique clinical profiles that may reflect cohort differences, and/or physiological or psychological adjustment processes. There appears to be a greater number of distinct chronic pain presentations among females. Research on the classification of chronic pain patients within homogeneous diagnostic subgroups is needed.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document