scholarly journals Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia following Lenalidomide Maintenance for Multiple Myeloma: Two Cases with Unexpected Presentation and Good Prognostic Features

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdullah M. Khan ◽  
Jameel Muzaffar ◽  
Hermant Murthy ◽  
John R. Wingard ◽  
Jan S. Moreb

Lenalidomide maintenance following autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) is considered the standard of care for eligible patients with multiple myeloma (MM). A recent meta-analysis has provided additional evidence that lenalidomide maintenance is associated with a higher incidence of second primary malignancies, including both hematologic and solid malignancies. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) as a second primary malignancy is rarely described in the literature. Herein, we describe two patients with MM treated with induction therapy, ASCT, and lenalidomide maintenance that experienced cytopenias while on maintenance. ALL was unexpectedly diagnosed on bone marrow biopsy. One patient was diagnosed on routine biopsy performed as part of requirements of the clinical trial. Both patients had B-cell ALL, without known poor risk cytogenetics, and were managed with standard induction therapies resulting in complete remission. We also reviewed the literature for similar cases of secondary ALL (sALL) in MM patients exposed to immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). In conclusion, persistent cytopenias in responding MM patients receiving IMiDs maintenance should be an indication for bone marrow biopsy. Patients develop sALL after median of 32.5 months (range, 20–84) from being on lenalidomide or thalidomide maintenance, often presenting with cytopenias, display low tolerance to chemotherapy, but remission can often be achieved.

Leukemia ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 266-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Aldoss ◽  
Marzia Capelletti ◽  
Jihye Park ◽  
Romanos Sklavenitis Pistofidis ◽  
Raju Pillai ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 111 (6) ◽  
pp. 2984-2990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stella M. Davies ◽  
Michael J. Borowitz ◽  
Gary L. Rosner ◽  
Kristin Ritz ◽  
Meenakshi Devidas ◽  
...  

Abstract Minimal residual disease (MRD) as a marker of antileukemic drug efficacy is being used to assess risk status and, in some cases, to adjust the intensity of therapy. Within known prognostic categories, the determinants of MRD are not known. We measured MRD by flow cytometry at day 8 (in blood) and at day 28 (in bone marrow) of induction therapy in more than 1000 children enrolled in Pediatric Oncology Group therapy protocols 9904, 9905, and 9906. We classified patients as “best risk” if they had cleared MRD by day 8 of therapy and as “worst risk” if they had MRD remaining in bone marrow at day 28, and tested whether MRD was related to polymorphisms in 16 loci in genes hypothesized to influence response to therapy in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). After adjusting for known prognostic features such as presence of the TEL-AML1 rearrangement, National Cancer Institute (NCI) risk status, ploidy, and race, the G allele of a common polymorphism in chemokine receptor 5 (CCR5) was associated with more favorable MRD status than the A allele (P = .009, logistic regression), when comparing “best” and “worst” risk groups. These data are consistent with growing evidence that both acquired and host genetics influence response to cancer therapy.


2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 113-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne Ormerod ◽  
Christopher A. Fausel ◽  
Rafat Abonour ◽  
Patrick J. Kiel

2018 ◽  
Vol 182 (4) ◽  
pp. 513-520 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciano J. Costa ◽  
Kelly N. Godby ◽  
Saurabh Chhabra ◽  
Robert Frank Cornell ◽  
Parameswaran Hari ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 119 (12) ◽  
pp. 2764-2767 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meletios A. Dimopoulos ◽  
Paul G. Richardson ◽  
Nancy Brandenburg ◽  
Zhinuan Yu ◽  
Donna M. Weber ◽  
...  

Abstract In a retrospective pooled analysis of 11 clinical trials of lenalidomide-based therapy for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM; N = 3846), the overall incidence rate (IR, events per 100 patient-years) of second primary malignancies (SPMs) was 3.62. IR of invasive (hematologic and solid tumor) SPMs was 2.08, consistent with the background incidence of developing cancer. In a separate analysis of pooled data from pivotal phase 3 trials of relapsed or refractory MM (N = 703), the overall IR of SPMs was 3.98 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.51-6.31) with lenalidomide/dexamethasone and 1.38 (95% CI, 0.44-4.27) with placebo/dexamethasone; IRs of nonmelanoma skin cancers were 2.40 (95% CI, 1.33-4.33) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.23-3.66), respectively; IRs of invasive SPMs were 1.71 (95% CI, 0.86-3.43) and 0.91 (95% CI, 0.23-3.66), respectively. The risk of SPMs must be taken into account before initiating lenalidomide treatment. In the context of the observed survival benefit in relapsed or refractory MM patients, the benefit/risk profile of lenalidomide/dexamethasone remains positive.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document