scholarly journals A Novel Role for Cathepsin S as a Potential Biomarker in Triple Negative Breast Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. A. Wilkinson ◽  
Roberta E. Burden ◽  
Sara H. McDowell ◽  
Darragh G. McArt ◽  
Stephen McQuaid ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Cathepsin S ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Potential Biomarker ◽  
Repair Pathways ◽  
Improved Outcome

Cathepsin S (CTSS) has previously been implicated in a number of cancer types, where it is associated with poor clinical features and outcome. To date, patient outcome in breast cancer has not been examined with respect to this protease. Here, we carried out immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of CTSS using a breast cancer tissue microarray in patients who received adjuvant therapy. We scored CTSS expression in the epithelial and stromal compartments and evaluated the association of CTSS expression with matched clinical outcome data. We observed differences in outcome based on CTSS expression, with stromal-derived CTSS expression correlating with a poor outcome and epithelial CTSS expression associated with an improved outcome. Further subtype characterisation revealed high epithelial CTSS expression in TNBC patients with improved outcome, which remained consistent across two independent TMA cohorts. Furtherin silicogene expression analysis, using both in-house and publicly available datasets, confirmed these observations and suggested high CTSS expression may also be beneficial to outcome in ER-/HER2+ cancer. Furthermore, high CTSS expression was associated with the BL1 Lehmann subgroup, which is characterised by defects in DNA damage repair pathways and correlates with improved outcome. Finally, analysis of matching IHC analysis reveals an increased M1 (tumour destructive) polarisation in macrophage in patients exhibiting high epithelial CTSS expression. In conclusion, our observations suggest epithelial CTSS expression may be prognostic of improved outcome in TNBC. Improved outcome observed with HER2+ at the gene expression level furthermore suggests CTSS may be prognostic of improved outcome in ER- cancers as a whole. Lastly, from the context of these patients receiving adjuvant therapy and as a result of its association with BL1 subgroup CTSS may be elevated in patients with defects in DNA damage repair pathways, indicating it may be predictive of tumour sensitivity to DNA damaging agents.

scholarly journals Changes in DNA Damage Repair Gene Expression and Cell Cycle Gene Expression Do Not Explain Radioresistance in Tamoxifen-Resistant Breast Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 33-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Annemarie E. M. Post ◽  
Johan Bussink ◽  
Fred C. G. J. Sweep ◽  
Paul N. Span
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Breast Cancer Cohort ◽  
Tamoxifen Resistant ◽  
Repair Genes

Tamoxifen-induced radioresistance, reported in vitro, might pose a problem for patients who receive neoadjuvant tamoxifen treatment and subsequently receive radiotherapy after surgery. Previous studies suggested that DNA damage repair or cell cycle genes are involved, and could therefore be targeted to preclude the occurrence of cross-resistance. We aimed to characterize the observed cross-resistance by investigating gene expression of DNA damage repair genes and cell cycle genes in estrogen receptor-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells that were cultured to tamoxifen resistance. RNA sequencing was performed, and expression of genes characteristic for several DNA damage repair pathways was investigated, as well as expression of genes involved in different phases of the cell cycle. The association of differentially expressed genes with outcome after radiotherapy was assessed in silico in a large breast cancer cohort. None of the DNA damage repair pathways showed differential gene expression in tamoxifen-resistant cells compared to wild-type cells. Two DNA damage repair genes were more than two times upregulated (NEIL1 and EME2), and three DNA damage repair genes were more than two times downregulated (PCNA, BRIP1, and BARD1). However, these were not associated with outcome after radiotherapy in the TCGA breast cancer cohort. Genes involved in G1, G1/S, G2, and G2/M phases were lower expressed in tamoxifen-resistant cells compared to wild-type cells. Individual genes that were more than two times upregulated (MAPK13) or downregulated (E2F2, CKS2, GINS2, PCNA, MCM5, and EIF5A2) were not associated with response to radiotherapy in the patient cohort investigated. We assessed the expression of DNA damage repair genes and cell cycle genes in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. Though several genes in both pathways were differentially expressed, these could not explain the cross-resistance for irradiation in these cells, since no association to response to radiotherapy in the TCGA breast cancer cohort was found.

scholarly journals BMI‐1 silencing significantly reduces gene expression of DNA damage repair markers in human breast cancer (1047.5)

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giórgia Silveira ◽  
Mara Celes ◽  
Danilo Soave ◽  
João Paulo Oliveira‐Costa ◽  
Alfredo Ribeiro‐Silva
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Human Breast Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Human Breast ◽  
Damage Repair

366-OR: TCF19 Promotes Functional Beta-Cell Mass and Proliferative Capacity by Regulating DNA Damage Repair Pathways

Diabetes ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 68 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 366-OR
Author(s):  
GRACE H. YANG ◽  
JEE YOUNG HAN ◽  
SUKANYA LODH ◽  
JOSEPH T. BLUMER ◽  
DANIELLE FONTAINE ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Beta Cell ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Cell Mass ◽  
Beta Cell Mass ◽  
Proliferative Capacity ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Repair Pathways

scholarly journals Targeting DNA Replication Stress and DNA Double-Strand Break Repair for Optimizing SCLC Treatment

Cancers ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1289 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xing Bian ◽  
Wenchu Lin
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Replication Stress ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Repair System ◽  
Damage Repair ◽  
Repair Pathways

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC), accounting for about 15% of all cases of lung cancer worldwide, is the most lethal form of lung cancer. Despite an initially high response rate of SCLC to standard treatment, almost all patients are invariably relapsed within one year. Effective therapeutic strategies are urgently needed to improve clinical outcomes. Replication stress is a hallmark of SCLC due to several intrinsic factors. As a consequence, constitutive activation of the replication stress response (RSR) pathway and DNA damage repair system is involved in counteracting this genotoxic stress. Therefore, therapeutic targeting of such RSR and DNA damage repair pathways will be likely to kill SCLC cells preferentially and may be exploited in improving chemotherapeutic efficiency through interfering with DNA replication to exert their functions. Here, we summarize potentially valuable targets involved in the RSR and DNA damage repair pathways, rationales for targeting them in SCLC treatment and ongoing clinical trials, as well as possible predictive biomarkers for patient selection in the management of SCLC.

Abstract 2521: Race specific differences in DNA damage repair dysregulation in breast cancer and association with outcome

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aloran Mazumder ◽  
Athena Jimenez ◽  
Rachel Ellsworth ◽  
Stephen Freedland ◽  
Sophia George ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Repair ◽  
Damage Repair
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document