scholarly journals BMI‐1 silencing significantly reduces gene expression of DNA damage repair markers in human breast cancer (1047.5)

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Giórgia Silveira ◽  
Mara Celes ◽  
Danilo Soave ◽  
João Paulo Oliveira‐Costa ◽  
Alfredo Ribeiro‐Silva
2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard D. A. Wilkinson ◽  
Roberta E. Burden ◽  
Sara H. McDowell ◽  
Darragh G. McArt ◽  
Stephen McQuaid ◽  
...  

Cathepsin S (CTSS) has previously been implicated in a number of cancer types, where it is associated with poor clinical features and outcome. To date, patient outcome in breast cancer has not been examined with respect to this protease. Here, we carried out immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of CTSS using a breast cancer tissue microarray in patients who received adjuvant therapy. We scored CTSS expression in the epithelial and stromal compartments and evaluated the association of CTSS expression with matched clinical outcome data. We observed differences in outcome based on CTSS expression, with stromal-derived CTSS expression correlating with a poor outcome and epithelial CTSS expression associated with an improved outcome. Further subtype characterisation revealed high epithelial CTSS expression in TNBC patients with improved outcome, which remained consistent across two independent TMA cohorts. Furtherin silicogene expression analysis, using both in-house and publicly available datasets, confirmed these observations and suggested high CTSS expression may also be beneficial to outcome in ER-/HER2+ cancer. Furthermore, high CTSS expression was associated with the BL1 Lehmann subgroup, which is characterised by defects in DNA damage repair pathways and correlates with improved outcome. Finally, analysis of matching IHC analysis reveals an increased M1 (tumour destructive) polarisation in macrophage in patients exhibiting high epithelial CTSS expression. In conclusion, our observations suggest epithelial CTSS expression may be prognostic of improved outcome in TNBC. Improved outcome observed with HER2+ at the gene expression level furthermore suggests CTSS may be prognostic of improved outcome in ER- cancers as a whole. Lastly, from the context of these patients receiving adjuvant therapy and as a result of its association with BL1 subgroup CTSS may be elevated in patients with defects in DNA damage repair pathways, indicating it may be predictive of tumour sensitivity to DNA damaging agents.


Author(s):  
Annemarie E. M. Post ◽  
Johan Bussink ◽  
Fred C. G. J. Sweep ◽  
Paul N. Span

Tamoxifen-induced radioresistance, reported in vitro, might pose a problem for patients who receive neoadjuvant tamoxifen treatment and subsequently receive radiotherapy after surgery. Previous studies suggested that DNA damage repair or cell cycle genes are involved, and could therefore be targeted to preclude the occurrence of cross-resistance. We aimed to characterize the observed cross-resistance by investigating gene expression of DNA damage repair genes and cell cycle genes in estrogen receptor-positive MCF-7 breast cancer cells that were cultured to tamoxifen resistance. RNA sequencing was performed, and expression of genes characteristic for several DNA damage repair pathways was investigated, as well as expression of genes involved in different phases of the cell cycle. The association of differentially expressed genes with outcome after radiotherapy was assessed in silico in a large breast cancer cohort. None of the DNA damage repair pathways showed differential gene expression in tamoxifen-resistant cells compared to wild-type cells. Two DNA damage repair genes were more than two times upregulated (NEIL1 and EME2), and three DNA damage repair genes were more than two times downregulated (PCNA, BRIP1, and BARD1). However, these were not associated with outcome after radiotherapy in the TCGA breast cancer cohort. Genes involved in G1, G1/S, G2, and G2/M phases were lower expressed in tamoxifen-resistant cells compared to wild-type cells. Individual genes that were more than two times upregulated (MAPK13) or downregulated (E2F2, CKS2, GINS2, PCNA, MCM5, and EIF5A2) were not associated with response to radiotherapy in the patient cohort investigated. We assessed the expression of DNA damage repair genes and cell cycle genes in tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer cells. Though several genes in both pathways were differentially expressed, these could not explain the cross-resistance for irradiation in these cells, since no association to response to radiotherapy in the TCGA breast cancer cohort was found.


Animals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 502
Author(s):  
Filipe Almeida ◽  
Andreia Gameiro ◽  
Jorge Correia ◽  
Fernando Ferreira

Feline mammary carcinoma (FMC) is the third most common type of neoplasia in cats, sharing similar epidemiological features with human breast cancer. In humans, histone deacetylases (HDACs) play an important role in the regulation of gene expression, with HDAC inhibitors (HDACis) disrupting gene expression and leading to cell death. In parallel, microtubules inhibitors (MTIs) interfere with the polymerization of microtubules, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Although HDACis and MTIs are used in human cancer patients, in cats, data is scarce. In this study, we evaluated the antitumor properties of six HDACis (CI-994, panobinostat, SAHA, SBHA, scriptaid, and trichostatin A) and four MTIs (colchicine, nocodazole, paclitaxel, and vinblastine) using three FMC cell lines (CAT-MT, FMCp, and FMCm), and compared with the human breast cancer cell line (SK-BR-3). HDACis and MTIs exhibited dose-dependent antitumor effects in FMC cell lines, and for all inhibitors, the IC50 values were determined, with one feline cell line showing reduced susceptibility (FMCm). Immunoblot analysis confirmed an increase in the acetylation status of core histone protein HDAC3 and flow cytometry showed that HDACis and MTIs lead to cellular apoptosis. Overall, our study uncovers HDACis and MTIs as promising anti-cancer agents to treat FMCs.


2011 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yusuke Yamamoto ◽  
Yusuke Yoshioka ◽  
Kaho Minoura ◽  
Ryou-u Takahashi ◽  
Fumitaka Takeshita ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document