scholarly journals Management of Adult Patients with Primary Immune Thrombocytopenia (ITP) in Clinical Practice: A Consensus Approach of the Spanish ITP Expert Group

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
M. Eva Mingot-Castellano ◽  
M. Teresa Álvarez Román ◽  
Luis Fernando Fernández Fuertes ◽  
Tomás José González-López ◽  
José María Guinea de Castro ◽  
...  

Background and Objective. Diagnosis and management of primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) have changed dramatically in the last decade. The aim of the study was to obtain information about the opinion of the Spanish ITP Group (GEPTI) members regarding the best clinical practices for diagnosis and management of adult patients with ITP. Materials and Methods. A two-round Delphi method was carried out by sending to 129 experts a 90-item questionnaire developed by 11 specialists, with a 4-point Likert scale (“never,” “sometimes,” “frequently,” and “always”) for the assessment of responses. Results. Forty out of the 129 experts participated in the survey (participation rate 30.2%) and 39 completed the questionnaire (response rate 97.5%). Salient consensus points included the following: the need to indicate workup studies from a sustained platelet count < 100 x 109/L in the absence of a clear etiology; bone marrow aspiration in elderly patients with suspected ITP; beginning treatment in asymptomatic patients with a platelet count < 20 x 109/L; not exceeding 6-7 weeks of corticosteroid therapy; switching from corticosteroids to one thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TRA); switching to other TRA or other options as combinations of them with immunosuppressive drugs in case of failure; how to reduce tapering TRA; treating patients with symptomatic persistent ITP and platelet count > 20 x 109/L; and considering mucosal or severe bleeding as a basic criterion for hospital admission. Conclusions. The present consensus document provides a reference framework for the management of patients with ITP in clinical practice.

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul A Kyrle ◽  
Sabine Eichinger

Cyclic thrombocytopenia (CTP) is a rare disease, which is characterized by periodic fluctuation of the platelet count. The pathogenesis of CTP is unknown and most likely heterogeneous. Patients with CTP are almost always misdiagnosed as having primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The interval between ITP and CTP diagnosis can be many years. CTP patients often receive ITP-specific therapies including corticosteroids, thrombopoietin receptor agonists, rituximab and splenectomy which are followed by a transient increase in platelet count that is wrongly attributed to treatment effect with inevitable "relapse". CTP can be diagnosed by frequent platelet count monitoring which reveals a typical pattern of periodic platelet cycling. An early diagnosis of CTP will prevent these patients from being exposed to possibly harmful therapies. The bleeding phenotype is usually mild and consists of mucocutaneous bleeding at the time when the platelet count is at its nadir. Severe bleeding from other sites can occur but is rare. Some patients respond to cyclosporine A or to danazol, but most patients do not respond to any therapy. CTP can be associated with hematological malignancies or disorders of the thyroid gland. Nevertheless, spontaneous remissions can occur, even after many years.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 1096-1096
Author(s):  
Oluwamayokun T. Oshinowo ◽  
Renee Copeland ◽  
Christina Caruso ◽  
Meredith E. Fay ◽  
Traci Leong ◽  
...  

Background: Immune Thrombocytopenia Purpura (ITP) can result in severely low platelet counts and while most of the 4,000 new cases of pediatric ITP diagnosed each year self-resolve, 10% of these patients have major bleeding episodes. The platelet count remains the mainstay method for predicting hemorrhage and unfortunately has only proven to be loosely correlated to bleeding severity. Consequently, there currently exists no biomarker that accurately and reliably predicts which patients need immediate medical treatment, all of which have side effects, and which patients only require monitoring. To that end, we leveraged our Platelet Contraction Cytometer (PCC), a versatile system that measures platelet contraction forces at the single-cell level and at high-throughput, to study platelets of patients with ITP prospectively. Buchanan bleeding scores were used to distinguish patients with severe symptoms from asymptomatic patients. With 49 patients, we observed two significant findings: 1) Tracking both single platelet force measurements and platelet count enables stratifying patients into having major, minor, or no risk for bleeding. Accordingly, patients in the major risk category have a combined low platelet force and low platelet count. 2) Longitudinal studies showed that when major risk patients had increased platelet force or higher platelet counts, this was associated with the alleviation of major symptoms. Thus, when utilized together, platelet force and platelet count can more accurately predict bleeding severity in pediatric ITP patients. Platelet Contraction Cytometry: Our PCC utilizes a large array of fibrinogen "microdot" pairs patterned on a flat hydrogel of known stiffness. Thrombin-activated platelets adhere to these microdots, spread to the neighboring microdot, and contract, pulling the microdots closer together. As platelet force is directly proportional to the microdot displacement, only a single microscopy measurement is necessary to determine the force applied by each single platelet (Fig 1). As such, hundreds of platelets are measured in a controlled mechanical and biochemical environment (Myers et al, 2017) Results: With our cohort of 49 ITP patients, we observed that low average single cell platelet contraction forces highly correlate with severe bleeding symptoms (Buchannan scores 2-4). Using a regression tree, we found that an average force of 26nN best separates symptomatic from asymptomatic patients with a diagnostic sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 86.8% (AUC 0.97, 95% CI: 0.9361-1). However, platelets from some asymptomatic patients exerted forces of less than 26nN as well. In a more thorough examination, we found that majority of those asymptomatic patients with low platelet forces had platelet counts > 40,000/uL. Although our data shows that platelet count alone is a poor predictor of severe bleeding symptoms (AUC 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6757-0.9189), when a platelet count <40k/uL is coupled alongside our criterion of average contraction force <26 nN, we find that the specificity of our system increases to 94.7% and thus platelet count and platelet force synergistically predict which patients are symptomatic with high accuracy. Using a logistic regression model, we also found that with each 1nN decrease in average contraction force, the odds of the patient bleeding increases 2.1 (95% CI: 1.1-4.0) times that of being asymptomatic and when this decrease in contraction force is increased 5nN, the odds of a patient bleeding is 44.4 (95% CI: 1.8-1066.5) times that of being asymptomatic (Fig 2A-B). Moreover, when tracking individual patients (n=4) over time, we demonstrate that whenever a patient's blood sample is associated with increased single platelet average contraction force >26 nN or platelet count >40k/uL, bleeding symptoms are alleviated. Conversely, whenever a patient exhibited high platelet contractile force and low platelet count, the onset of bleeding symptoms correlated with a decrease in platelet forces. Unlike bulk or micro-clot assays, our assay functions as a "stress test" of single platelets by placing them in conditions that maximize contractility, and in both cases, the reduction in the subpopulation of highly contractile platelets is correlated with bleeding severity. As such, our work suggests that single platelet forces could be used as a diagnostic biomarker to assess bleeding risk in patients with ITP regardless of count (Fig 2C-D). Disclosures Bennett: Novartis: Research Funding. Lam:Sanguina, LLC: Equity Ownership.


Blood ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 120 (21) ◽  
pp. 1094-1094
Author(s):  
Kaelyn H. Lu ◽  
James N. George ◽  
Sara K. Vesely ◽  
Deirdra R. Terrell

Abstract Abstract 1094 Introduction With the availability of multiple new agents, management of patients with primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) has changed substantially since the initial practice guideline for ITP was developed by the American Society of Hematology (ASH). To document current practice and to determine how current practice is related to recommendations of 2 recent guidelines for ITP, an International Consensus report (ICR), 2010, and an updated ASH guideline, 2011, we surveyed practicing hematologists-oncologists in Oklahoma. Methods Separate surveys were developed for children and adults. Each survey had 3 clinical scenarios; each scenario had 5–7 management choices. Hematologists-oncologists were instructed to select 1 management choice. Questions were adapted from the clinical scenarios of the ASH guideline. Additionally, data were collected for [1] number of years in practice; [2] site of practice, (either University of Oklahoma Medical Center or community); and [3] the estimated number of patients with ITP seen each year. Oklahoma hematologists-oncologists were identified by searching the Oklahoma Board of Medical Licensure and the Oklahoma Osteopathic Association websites for all active physicians certified in adult/pediatric hematology/oncology as of 12/31/2011. Exclusion criteria were: physicians whose careers were devoted to full-time research/administration. Data was collected between 1/31/2012–3/15/2012. Only the stronger grades of recommendations by the ICR and ASH guidelines were used for comparison to the hematologists-oncologists' responses. Comparison of treatment responses to the number of years in practice was selected a priori, because it was hypothesized that hematologists-oncologists with fewer years in practice may more readily accept newer treatments while hematologists-oncologists with more years in practice may prefer more traditional management. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test were used to determine if treatment responses differed by number of years in practice. SAS version 9.2 was used; alpha was set at 0.05. Results All 13 (100%) Oklahoma pediatric hematologists-oncologists responded. For a child with a new diagnosis of ITP, a platelet count of 8,000/μL, and minor bleeding, 5 (38%) pediatric hematologists-oncologists selected observation without drug treatment (recommended by both guidelines). Because of the small number of pediatric hematologists-oncologists, no comparison of their responses to years in practice was performed. Eighty-three (82%) adult hematologists-oncologists responded. For an adult with a platelet count of 9,000/μL who had failed to respond to initial treatment with corticosteroids and IVIg, 32 (39%) selected splenectomy (recommended by ASH guideline); 31 (37%) selected rituximab and 13 (16%) selected thrombopoietin (TPO)-receptor agonists (both recommended by ICR). There was not a statistically significant difference between the number of years in practice for those who selected splenectomy versus all other treatment options (p = 0.07). Discussion Although both recent guidelines recommended that children with no/mild bleeding may be managed with observation regardless of the platelet count, only 5 (38%) pediatric hematologists-oncologists selected observation in this scenario. The practice guidelines have different recommendations for second-line treatment in adults: the ICR recommends TPO-receptor agonists and rituximab but not splenectomy; the ASH guideline recommends splenectomy but not TPO-receptor agonists or rituximab. For this clinical scenario, 39% of hematologists-oncologists selected splenectomy, 37% selected rituximab and 16% selected TPO-agents. These different choices and recommendations reflect the changing clinical practice. Although not statistically significant, the hematologists-oncologists who had been in practice for >20 years appeared to be more likely to select splenectomy (p=0.07), consistent with greater acceptance of newer treatments by younger hematologists-oncologists. Although these data may not be generalizable, the high survey response rate provides confidence that these data accurately reflect the judgment, if not the actual practice, of Oklahoma hematologists-oncologists. Conclusion These observations provide an estimate of actual current clinical practice for management of patients with ITP. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Rituximab for primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). George:Alexion, Inc.: Consultancy; Baxter, Inc.: Consultancy; Amgen, Inc.: Consultancy, PI for clinical trial involving romiplostim, PI for clinical trial involving romiplostim Other, Research Funding. Terrell:Amgen, Inc.: Consultancy; Baxter, Inc.: Consultancy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 177 ◽  
pp. 18-28 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Ebbo ◽  
S. Audonnet ◽  
A. Grados ◽  
L. Benarous ◽  
M. Mahevas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document