scholarly journals Evaluation of the Combined Application of AFP, AFP-L3%, and DCP for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Diagnosis: A Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Xueying Wang ◽  
Yangyu Zhang ◽  
Na Yang ◽  
Hua He ◽  
Xuerong Tao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Serum Biomarkers ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Combined Application

The role of α-fetoprotein (AFP) in the surveillance and diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been questioned in recent years due to its low sensitivity and specificity. In addition to AFP, several new serum biomarkers, such as lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of AFP (AFP-L3) and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP), have also been identified as useful HCC serological markers. However, the exact diagnostic value of the combinations of these biomarkers for detecting HCC in patients with liver disease remains unclear. Thus, we performed the current meta-analysis to assess performance of AFP+AFP-L3%+DCP for diagnosing HCC. Studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, CNKI, and WanFang Data databases. After full-text evaluation, 13 studies from 11 articles focusing on the combination of the three serum biomarkers for HCC detection were enrolled. Random-effects models were used due to the presence of heterogeneity. The pooled sensitivity and specificity for AFP+AFP-L3%+DCP were 88% and 79%, respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve was 0.91, and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 28.33 (95% CI 16.78-47.83). Subgroup analysis showed that the pooled sensitivity and specificity of AFP+AFP-L3%+DCP in the diagnosis of HCC versus cirrhosis patients were 0.81 and 0.82, respectively. In conclusion, the combination of AFP, AFP-L3%, and DCP may prove to be useful in the diagnosis and screening of HCC.

scholarly journals Diagnosis accuracy of serum glypican-3 level in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review with meta-analysis

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 353-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jian Li ◽  
Tiezheng Wang ◽  
Boxun Jin ◽  
Wenlei Li ◽  
Zhenshun Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Design Deficiencies ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Background: Previous studies have evaluated the diagnostic value of serum glypican-3 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the results remain inconsistent and even controversial. Thus, the aim of the present meta-analysis was to clarify the diagnostic accuracy of serum glypican-3 for hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods: A meta-analysis including 22 studies was performed with 2325 cases and 2280 controls. Relevant studies were searched in the EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science databases, covering relevant papers published until November 1, 2017. The quality of the studies was assessed by revised QUADAS tools. Sensitivity, specificity, and other measures were pooled and determined to evaluate the accuracy of serum glypican-3 in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma by random-effects models. Summary receiver operating characteristic curve (sROC) analysis was performed to summarize the overall test performance. Results: The results showed that the pooled overall diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and 95% confidence interval (CI) for serum glypican-3 in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma were 68% (56-79%) and 92% (82-96.0%), respectively. Besides, the summary diagnostic odds ratio and 95% CI for glypican-3 were 23.53 (8.57-64.63). In addition, the area under sROC and 95% CI was 0.87 (0.84-0.90). The major design deficiencies of included studies were differential verification bias, and a lack of clear exclusion and inclusion criteria. Conclusions: The results of this meta-analysis suggested that serum glypican-3 was acceptable as a moderate diagnostic marker in the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma compared with healthy individuals, which could elevate the sensitivity and specificity of diagnosis. Furthermore, more well-designed studies with large sample sizes are needed to show the effectiveness of glypican-3 in the differential diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma.

scholarly journals Meta-Analysis of Antinuclear Antibodies in the Diagnosis of Antimitochondrial Antibody-Negative Primary Biliary Cholangitis

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qian Zhang ◽  
Zhiqiang Liu ◽  
Shanshan Wu ◽  
Weijia Duan ◽  
Sha Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Antinuclear Antibodies ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Primary Biliary Cholangitis ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Antimitochondrial Antibody

Objective. The diagnostic value of antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) including anti-gp210 and anti-sp100 for primary biliary cholangitis/cirrhosis (PBC) has been widely reported. However, their diagnostic performances for antimitochondrial antibody- (AMA-) negative PBC were less well elucidated. Therefore, the aim of the current meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ANAs in patients with AMA-negative PBC. Materials and Methods. Literature on the diagnostic value of biomarkers for AMA-negative PBC was systematically searched in PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. The qualities of the retrieved studies were assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-version 2 (QUADAS-2) scale. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of the biomarkers were calculated with random-effects models. The areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic (AUSROC) curves were used to evaluate the overall diagnostic performance of ANAs. Results. A total of 11 studies (400 AMA-negative PBC patients and 6217 controls) were finally included in the meta-analysis. ANAs had an overall sensitivity of 27% (95% CI: 20%, 35%) and specificity of 98% (95% CI: 97%, 99%). The pooled sensitivities for anti-gp210 and anti-sp100 were 23% (95% CI: 13%, 37%) and 25% (95% CI: 13%, 43%), respectively, and their specificities were 99% (95% CI: 97%, 100%) and 97% (95% CI: 93%, 98%), respectively. Conclusions. ANAs exhibited high specificity but low sensitivity and therefore could be used as reliable biomarkers to reduce the necessity of liver histology.

scholarly journals The Diagnostic Value of LncRNAs for Bladder Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan Chen ◽  
Faiza Naz ◽  
Shi Fu ◽  
Mengran Shi ◽  
Haihao Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Positive Likelihood Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cochrane Library

Abstract Background: In recent years, qualitative and quantitative analysis of LncRNA has been reported as a potential method for early diagnosis of bladder cancer, but the results from each research are insufficient and not completely consistent. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of LncRNA for BC.Methods: We conducted a diagnostic meta-analysis and the diagnostic significance of LncRNA in blood, urine and tumor tissues was discussed. We searched the PUBMED, EMABASE, and Cochrane Library until June 2020. The current meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.2, Stata 16.0 and Meta-Disc 1.4 software. Results: A total of 18 researches involving early and/or advanced bladder cancer were finally included. The overall diagnostic accuracy was measured as follows: pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.72 (95%CI:0.70, 0.73) and 0.76 (95%CI: 0.75, 0.78). Pooled positive likelihood ratio and negative likelihood ratio were 3.09 (95%CI: 2.66, 3.58) and 0.37 (95%CI: 0.33, 0.42). Combined diagnostic odds ratio was 9.43 (95%CI: 7.30, 12.20). A high diagnostic accuracy was demonstrated by the summary receiver operating characteristic curve, with area under the curve of 0.82 (95%CI: 0.78, 0.85). UCA1 and H19 had the best diagnostic effect, their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 80%, 79% and 79%, 73% respectively, the combined diagnostic odds ratio was 16.85 and 12.67 respectively.Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests that LncRNA have great potential in the diagnosis of bladder cancer, UCA1 and H19 had the best diagnostic effect. LncRNA panel is the future development direction in the diagnosis of bladder cancer. However, larger sample researches are needed to further confirm our conclusion.

scholarly journals MicroRNA-21 as a diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Qu ◽  
Jizhi Yang ◽  
Ming Chen ◽  
Lihong Cui ◽  
Tianxi Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Diagnostic Marker ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Random Effect ◽  
Random Effect Model ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic

Background: MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) is one of the oncogenic miRNAs which may be a potential diagnostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: We systematically searched Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus from inception to August 15, 2018, and reference lists of identified primary studies. Two independent investigators extracted patient and study characteristics. The sensitivity and specificity of microRNA-21 for HCC detection and were analyzed with a random effect model. The area under summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to estimate overall test performance. Results: A total of 515 HCC patients, and 338 healthy or chronic hepatitis controls from six published studies were enrolled in this meta-analysis. All articles were published in English with moderate-to-high quality. The overall pooled sensitivity and specificity were 85.2% (73.3% to 88.4%) and 79.2% (68.4% to 87.0%), respectively. The AUC area was 0.89 (95% CI: 0.85-0.91). The studies had moderate heterogeneity (I2=70.11%). None of the subgroups investigated-ethnicity, controls, sample source-could account for the heterogeneity. Conclusion: MiR-21 is a helpful biomarker for early diagnosis of HCC. Nevertheless, the results of the test must be interpreted carefully in the context of medical history, erological tests and imaging examinations for HCC surveillance. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.5.685 How to cite this:Qu J, Yang J, Chen M, Cui L, Wang T, Gao W, et al. MicroRNA-21 as a diagnostic marker for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pak J Med Sci. 2019;35(5):---------. doi: https://doi.org/10.12669/pjms.35.5.685 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

scholarly journals Diagnostic value of RASSF1A methylation for breast cancer: a meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 39 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingyi Li ◽  
Chunpeng Wang ◽  
Binbin Yu ◽  
Xueyuan Zhang ◽  
Fang Shi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
High Specificity ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Diagnostic Biomarker ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Rassf1a Methylation

Abstract Background: Numerous studies reported that RAS-association domain family 1 isoform A (RASSF1A) methylation might act as diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer (BC), this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the value of RASSF1A methylation for diagnosing BC. Methods: Such databases as PubMed, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for literatures until May 2019. A meta-analysis was performed utilizing STATA and Revman softwares. Furthermore, subgroup analysis was adopted to determine likely sources of heterogeneity. Results: Totally 19 literatures with 1849 patients and 1542 controls were included in the present study. Sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of RASSF1A methylation for diagnosing BC were 0.49, 0.95, 19.0 and 0.83, respectively. The sensitivity (0.54 vs 0.43), DOR (30.0 vs 10.0) and AUC (0.84 vs 0.81) of RASSF1A methylation in Caucasian were higher than other ethnicities. The sensitivity (0.64 vs 0.57), DOR (21.0 vs 14.0) and AUC (0.89 vs 0.86) of methylation-specific PCR (MSP) were superior to other methods (q-MSP, OS-MSP and MethyLight). The sensitivity, DOR and AUC of serum RASSF1A methylation vs RASSF1A methylation in other samples (tissue or plasma) were 0.55 vs 0.40, 22.0 vs 14.0 and 0.86 vs 0.74, respectively. Conclusions: RASSF1A methylation might be a potential diagnostic biomarker for BC. Considering its low sensitivity and high specificity, it should combine with others to upgrade the sensitivity. Besides, under such conditions, MSP detection, serum RASSF1A methylation and Caucasian are shown to be more effective and suitable for diagnosing BC.

Serological tumor markers of hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 32-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek D. Hussein
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Sensitivity And Specificity ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Analysis Data ◽  
Significant Heterogeneity ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Clinical Value ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Random Effects Models ◽  
Low Sensitivity

Background The clinical value of serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) to detect hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been questioned due to its low sensitivity and specificity. Other than AFP, several new serum biomarkers including glypican-3 (GPC3), des-γ-carboxy prothrombin (DCP), α-L-fucosidase enzyme (AFU) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) have been identified as useful HCC markers. Material and methods A systematic search on PubMed, Web of Science and others was performed. Twenty-six case-control studies on HCC-related biomarkers published from 2000 to 2014 were included in this analysis. Data on sensitivity and specificity of tests were extracted and analyzed using the Meta-DiSc 1.4 statistical program. Fixed or random-effects models were used depending on the absence or presence of significant heterogeneity. Summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curves were obtained to evaluate the accuracy of the studied markers. Results The areas under the sROC curve of AFP, GPC3, DCP, AFU, VEGF and the combination of each of the last 4 markers with AFP were 0.869, 0.928, 0.832, 0.851, 0.834, 0.964, 0.972, 0.873 and 0.948, respectively. A combination of AFP+GPC3, AFP+DCP or AFP+VEGF was superior to AFP alone in detecting HCC. The area under the sROC curve of GPC3 alone was significantly higher than that of AFP, whereas the areas of DCP, AFU and VEGF were comparable to that of AFP. Conclusions GPC3, DCP, AFU and VEGF are suitable markers for HCC, and their determination with AFP may prove to be useful in the diagnosis and screening of HCC.

scholarly journals The Diagnostic Value of MicroRNAs as a Biomarker for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 2019 ◽  
pp. 1-14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Jiang ◽  
Jimin He ◽  
Yiqin Li ◽  
Yongcan Guo ◽  
Hualin Tao
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Publication Bias ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Healthy Individuals ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Diagnostic Efficacy ◽  
Random Effects Models

Background. Recently, the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) in diagnosing cancer has been attracted increasing attention. However, few miRNAs have been applied in clinical practice. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of miRNAs for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at early stages clinically. Methods. A literature search was carried out using PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases. We explored the diagnostic value of miRNAs in distinguishing HCC from healthy individuals. The quality assessment was performed in Review Manager 5.3 software. The overall sensitivity and specificity and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained with random-effects models through Stata 14.0 software. And heterogeneity was assessed using Q test and I2 statistics. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses were conducted based on the sample, nation, quality of studies, and miRNA profiling. The publication bias was evaluated through Deeks’ funnel plot. Results. A total of 34 studies, involving in 2747 HCC patients and 2053 healthy individuals, met the inclusion criteria in the 33 included literature studies. In the summary receiver operating characteristic (sROC) curve, AUC was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.90–0.94), with 0.84 (95% CI, 0.79–0.88) sensitivity and 0.87 (95% CI, 0.83–0.90) specificity. There was no publication bias (P=0.48). Conclusion. miRNAs in vivo can be acted as a potential diagnostic biomarker for HCC, which can facilitate the early diagnosis of HCC in clinical practice.

scholarly journals Accuracy of angiopoietin-2 for predicting organ failure in patients with acute pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 49 (2) ◽  
pp. 030006052098670
Author(s):  
Yongcai Lv ◽  
Yanhua Yao ◽  
Qi Liu ◽  
Jingjing Lei
Keyword(s):  
Acute Pancreatitis ◽  
Organ Failure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Characteristic Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Likelihood Ratios ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Angiopoietin 2

Objective Our aim was to assess the accuracy of angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) as a prognostic marker for acute pancreatitis (AP) with organ failure (OF). Methods We undertook a systematic search of the PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Chinese Journals Full-text, Wanfang, China Biology Medicine disc, and Weipu databases to identify eligible cohort studies on the predictive value of Ang-2 for AP with OF. The main outcome measures were sensitivity and specificity. The effects were pooled using a bivariate mixed-effects model. Results Six articles with seven case-control studies (n = 650) were included. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative likelihood ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for AP with OF were 0.93 (95%CI: 0.75–0.99), 0.85 (95%CI: 0.75–0.92), 6.40 (95%CI: 3.36–12.19), and 0.08 (95%CI: 0.02–0.36), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92–0.96), and the diagnostic odds ratio was 83.18 (95%CI: 11.50–623.17). Subgroup analysis showed that admission time of AP onset (< or ≥24 hours) was a source of overall heterogeneity. Sensitivity analysis supported this finding. Conclusion Ang-2 had high diagnostic accuracy for AP with OF; the best prediction of Ang-2 may be 24 to 72 hours after onset of AP.

scholarly journals Evaluation of alpha-l-fucosidase for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma based on meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lei Xi ◽  
Chunqing Yang
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Operating Characteristic ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Diagnostic Odds Ratio ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity ◽  
Review Manager

AbstractObjectivesThe main aim of the present study was to assess the diagnostic value of alpha-l-fucosidase (AFU) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).MethodsStudies that explored the diagnostic value of AFU in HCC were searched in EMBASE, SCI, and PUBMED. The sensitivity, specificity, and DOR about the accuracy of serum AFU in the diagnosis of HCC were pooled. The methodological quality of each article was evaluated with QUADAS-2 (quality assessment for studies of diagnostic accuracy 2). Receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC) analysis was performed. Statistical analysis was conducted by using Review Manager 5 and Open Meta-analyst.ResultsEighteen studies were selected in this study. The pooled estimates for AFU vs. α-fetoprotein (AFP) in the diagnosis of HCC in 18 studies were as follows: sensitivity of 0.7352 (0.6827, 0.7818) vs. 0.7501 (0.6725, 0.8144), and specificity of 0.7681 (0.6946, 0.8283) vs. 0.8208 (0.7586, 0.8697), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 7.974(5.302, 11.993) vs. 13.401 (8.359, 21.483), area under the curve (AUC) of 0.7968 vs. 0.8451, respectively.ConclusionsAFU is comparable to AFP for the diagnosis of HCC.

scholarly journals The diagnostic value of EBV-DNA and EBV-related antibodies detection for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Weixing Liu ◽  
Gui Chen ◽  
Xin Gong ◽  
Yingqi Wang ◽  
Yaoming Zheng ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma ◽  
Test Performance ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Diagnostic Value ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic ◽  
Ebv Dna ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Sensitivity Specificity

Abstract Background Numerous individual studies have investigated the diagnostic value of EBV-DNA, EA-IgA, VCA-IgA, EBNA1-IgA and Rta-IgG detection for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), but the conclusions remain controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to determine the value of EBV-DNA, EA-IgA, VCA-IgA, EBNA1-IgA and Rta-IgG detection in the diagnosis of NPC. Methods PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019145532. PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Chinese data libraries (Wanfang, CNKI, and CBM) were searched up to January 2019. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and positive likelihood, negative likelihood, and diagnostic odds ratios were conducted in this meta-analysis. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves evaluated the test-performance global summary. Publication bias was examined by Deek’s funnel plot asymmetry test. Results Forty-seven studies with 8382 NPC patients (NPC group) and 15,089 individuals without NPC (Control group) were included in this meta-analysis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood (+ LR), negative likelihood (-LR), DOR and AUC of EBV-DNA in diagnosis of NPC were: 0.76 (95% CI 0.73–0.77), 0.96 (95% CI 0.95–0.97), 14.66 (95% CI 9.97–21.55), 0.19 (95% CI 0.13–0.28), 84 (95% CI 50.45–139.88), 0.96 (SE: 0.001), and 0.55 (95% CI 0.54–0.57), 0.96 (95% CI 0.96–0.97), 12.91 (95% CI 9.55–17.45), 0.35 (95% CI 0.29–0.43), 39.57 (95% CI 26.44–59.23), 0.94 (SE: 0.002) for the EA-IgA, and 0.85 (95% CI 0.84–0.85), 0.89 (95% CI 0.88–0.89), 6.73 (95% CI5.38–8.43), 0.17 (95% CI 0.12–0.23), 43.03 (95% CI 31.51–58.76), 0.93 (SE: 0.007) for the VCA-IgA, and 0.86 (95% CI 0.85–0.88), 0.87 (95% CI 0.88–0.90), 7.55 (95% CI 5.79–9.87), 0.16 (95% CI 0.13–0.19), 50.95 (95% CI 34.35–75.57), 0.94 (SE: 0.008) for the EBNA1-IgA, and 0.70 (95% CI 0.69–0.71), 0.94 (95% CI 0.94–0.95), 9.84 (95% CI 8.40–11.54), 0.25 (95% CI 0.21–0.31), 40.59 (95% CI 32.09–51.35), 0.95 (SE: 0.005) for the Rta-IgG. The EBV-DNA had larger AUC compared with other EBV-based antibodies (P < 0.05), while the difference between EA-IgA, VCA-IgA, EBNA1-IgA and Rta-IgG was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Conclusions EBV-DNA, VCA-IgA, EBNA1-IgA and Rta-IgG detection have high accuracy in early diagnosis NPC. In addition, EBV-DNA detection has the higher diagnosis accuracy in NPC. On the other hand, EA-IgA is suitable for the diagnosis but not NPC screening.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document