scholarly journals Music Intervention to Orthopedic Patients: A Possible Alternative Solution to Control Pain

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Chuchu Wang ◽  
Fanli Tian
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Music Intervention ◽  
Postoperative Patient ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Mp3 Players ◽  
Patient Pain ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Control Pain ◽  
Orthopedic Patients

Aims and Objective. Pain is a common problem associated with postoperative orthopedic patients; the current study is aimed at evaluating music intervention as an alternative method to control pain. Methodology. The experimental design of the current study was comparative, descriptive, and quasi-experimental. 38 postoperative orthopedic patients were equipped with pocket-size MP3 players with prerecorded music tracks (instrumental and lyrical) in Hindi, English, and Urdu. After that, pre-post-pain scores were recorded with the help of designed brief patient logs. Ultimately, a satisfactory survey was completed at discharge. Major Findings. It was found that during the intervention of music, the pain was significantly reduced from 5.40 to 2.98. There was a slight relationship between listening time and pain relief. It was also found that the feedback was extremely positive and each patient suggested the use of music to others with 96.6% recommendation. Conclusion. From the current study, it was found that music intervention can be beneficial to postoperative patient pain control. Further, it is hoped that the findings of the current experimental work will lead to improvements in the care of postoperative patients.

The Effect of Listening to Music on Postoperative Pain in Adult Orthopedic Patients

2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa A. Schneider
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Holistic Nursing ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Orthopedic Patient ◽  
Quasi Experimental ◽  
Group A ◽  
Orthopedic Patients ◽  
Positive Effect ◽  
Surgical Unit

Purpose: Pain is a common occurrence after orthopedic surgery. Patients need additional resources to manage their pain. The purpose of this study was to determine if listening to music has a positive effect on pain scores and satisfaction in the postoperative adult orthopedic patient. There are limited studies demonstrating statistically significant decreases in postoperative pain in this group. A secondary purpose was to expose nurses on a standard medical-surgical unit to an intervention, supported by the holistic nursing model that they could use in their care. Design and Method: This study was a descriptive, comparative, quasi-experimental design. Patients listened to prerecorded music on individual CD players and recorded pre–post pain scores with the intervention. A satisfactory survey was completed at discharge. Findings: Results demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in patients’ pain scores after listening to music. Length of listening time had no effect. Patients expressed overall satisfaction, and 100% of participants would recommend this intervention to others. Conclusions: Listening to music is beneficial as an adjunct to pain medication and contributes to increased patient satisfaction. It is hoped that the information gained from this study will lead to an enhancement in the standard of care for postoperative patients.

High-Dose Ropivacaine Wound Infiltration for Pain Relief After Inguinal Hernia Repair

1998 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-196 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nils Pettersson ◽  
B-M Emanuelsson ◽  
Håkan Reventlid ◽  
Robert G. Hahn
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Hernia Repair ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Hernia Surgery ◽  
Wound Infiltration ◽  
Surgeon General ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Control Pain ◽  
Pain At Rest

Background and ObjectivesEarly data on ropivacaine, a recently introduced local anesthetic, indicate a longer duration of skin analgesia than with bupivacaine, along with lower toxicity. The objective of this study was to evaluate ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL for wound infiltration pain relief after hernia surgery, in higher doses than used before, in an open, nonrandomized design.MethodsTwenty otherwise healthy men underwent elective unilateral open hernia repair by the same surgeon. General anesthesia was used during surgery, and infiltration of the operating field with 300 mg (n = 10) or 375 mg (n = 10) ropivacaine, 7.5 mg/mL, was employed for postoperative pain relief. Any sign of an adverse event was recorded. Plasma concentrations of ropivacaine were monitored. Pain at rest and on mobilization was regularly assessed over 24 hours by a visual analog scale. Patients' ability to walk and void and the need for supplementary analgesics were recorded.ResultsNo serious adverse effects occurred. Plasma concentrations showed large variations but no toxic levels. No significant differences between the two groups were detected in pain scores which were low in both groups, at rest or on mobilization, or in the consumption of supplementary analgesics. At 4 hours, 19 patients were able to walk. Within 8 hours of surgery, all patients had passed urine without any problem. Wound healing was normal.ConclusionsInfiltration of ropivacaine 7.5 mg/mL during hernia surgery can be employed safely in doses of 300 mg and 375 mg to control pain after hernia surgery. The lower dose is recommended, since the higher one did not give any clinically relevant advantages.

scholarly journals Comparison of Continuous Infusion versus  Automated Bolus for Postoperative Patient-controlled Analgesia with Popliteal Sciatic Nerve Catheters

2009 ◽  
Vol 110 (1) ◽  
pp. 150-154 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manuel Taboada ◽  
Jaime Rodríguez ◽  
Maria Bermudez ◽  
Marcos Amor ◽  
Beatriz Ulloa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Continuous Infusion ◽  
Local Anesthetic ◽  
Patient Controlled Analgesia ◽  
Dosing Regimen ◽  
Postoperative Patient ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Dosing Regimens ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Infusion Technique

Background This investigation was designed to compare a new methodology of automated regular bolus with a continuous infusion of local anesthetic for continuous popliteal sciatic block; both regimens were combined with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). Methods Fifty patients undergoing hallux valgus repair were randomly allocated to receive an infusion of 0.125% levobupivacaine administered through a popliteal catheter as an automated regular bolus (n = 25) or as a continuous infusion (n = 25), both combined with PCA. Postoperative pain scores, incremental doses delivered by the PCA, local anesthetic consumed per hour, and the need for rescue tramadol analgesia were recorded. Results Both dosing regimens provided similar postoperative analgesia. Consumption of local anesthetic (5.14 ml/h, 5-5.75 ml/h) and dose request from the PCA (1, 0-5.4) was lower in the automated bolus group as compared to the continuous infusion group (5.9 ml/h, 5.05-7.8 ml/h; doses by PCA: 6.5, 0-20.5; P < 0.05). The need for rescue tramadol was similar in the two groups. Conclusion In continuous popliteal sciatic block, local anesthetic administered as an automated regular bolus in conjunction with PCA provided similar pain relief as a continuous infusion technique combined with PCA; however, the new dosing regimen reduced the need for additional PCA and the overall consumption of local anesthetic.

Improved acute pain management in oncology patients using early scheduled contact with a pain coach.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 293-293
Author(s):  
Johanna M. LaSala ◽  
Anne C. Chiang ◽  
Kimberly M Severino
Keyword(s):  
Pain Control ◽  
Short Interval ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Record Keeping ◽  
Pain Diary ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Ambulatory Oncology ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Oncology Practice ◽  
Control Pain

293 Background: Pain control is a challenging balance in the ambulatory oncology practice. Standard methods of pain reassessment resulted in poor pain control in the majority of patients given prescriptions for narcotics. We developed a proactive reassessment of pain using patient reported outcomes and a coach to assist in medication usage. The aim was to decrease the time to reassessment of pain to fewer than 5 days and achieve acceptable pain control in greater than 50% of patients receiving new narcotic prescriptions in an ambulatory oncology setting. Methods: Patients receiving a new narcotic prescription or a new dose were provided with a pain diary and an appointment with their pain coach at 48 hours. Using a standard pain scale 1-10, patients’ pain scores were recorded by the patient in their pain diary and communicated via nurse/patient phone contact at 48 hour intervals. Dosing intervention by the patient’s oncologist was made for unacceptable pain and reassessed at 48 hours. Uncontrolled pain at 96 hours was followed by in person appointment with the oncologist. Pain scores and days to reassessment were recorded using an Excel data collection tool for patients receiving new or dose adjusted narcotic prescriptions between August and December31, 2017. Results: There were 17 patients encounters where the patient received a new prescription or a dose change from August 1- Dec 31, 2017. Reassessment of pain was achieved in 100% of patients in fewer than 5 days. The average time was 2.6 days (range 2-4). Acceptable pain control (pain scores 0-3) at the time of reassessment was achieved in 53% of patients. Conclusions: Cancer related pain is an ongoing challenge in oncology practices. Barriers include lack of planned follow-up and patient education. The institution of a pain coach, pain diary and scheduled contact decreased the time to reassessment of pain and decreased pain scores during short interval reassessment periods achieving better pain control in 50% of patients during the evaluated period. Quality interventions in ambulatory settings are achievable though multiple patient interactions and record keeping require additional staffing resources to sustain this change.

scholarly journals The Association between Implementation an Enhanced Recovery after Cesarean Pathway with Standardized Discharge Prescriptions and Opioid Use and Pain Experience after Cesarean Delivery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer A. McCoy ◽  
Sarah Gutman ◽  
Rebecca F. Hamm ◽  
Sindhu K. Srinivas
Keyword(s):  
Cesarean Delivery ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Enhanced Recovery ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Baseline Survey ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Opioid Use ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Hospital Patients

Objective This study was aimed to evaluate opioid use after cesarean delivery (CD) and to assess implementation of an enhanced recovery after CD (ERAS-CD) pathway and its association with inpatient and postdischarge pain control and opioid use. Study Design We conducted a baseline survey of women who underwent CD from January to March 2017 at a single, urban academic hospital. Patients were called 5 to 8 days after discharge and asked about their pain and postdischarge opioid use. An ERAS-CD pathway was implemented as a quality improvement initiative, including use of nonopioid analgesia and standardization of opioid discharge prescriptions to ≤25 tablets of oxycodone of 5 mg. From November to January 2019, a postimplementation survey was conducted to assess the association between this initiative and patients' pain control and postoperative opioid use, both inpatient and postdischarge. Results Data were obtained from 152 women preimplementation (PRE) and 137 women post-implementation (POST); complete survey data were obtained from 102 women PRE and 98 women POST. The median inpatient morphine milligram equivalents consumed per patient decreased significantly from 141 [range: 90–195] PRE to 114 [range: 45–168] POST (p = 0.002). On a 0- to 10-point scale, median patient-reported pain scores at discharge decreased significantly (PRE: 7 [range: 5–8] vs. POST 5 [range: 3–7], p < 0.001). The median number of pills consumed after discharge also decreased significantly (PRE: 25 [range: 16–30] vs. POST 17.5 [range: 4–25], p = 0.001). The number of pills consumed was significantly associated with number prescribed (p < 0.001). The median number of leftover pills and number of refills did not significantly differ between groups. Median patient-reported pain scores at the week after discharge were lower in the POST group (PRE: 4 [range: 2–6] vs. POST 3[range: 1–5], p = 0.03). Conclusion Implementing an ERAS-CD pathway was associated with a significant decrease in inpatient and postdischarge opioid consumption while improving pain control. Our data suggest that even fewer pills could be prescribed for some patients. Key Points

scholarly journals International survey: real-world pain management strategies

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (Supplement_5) ◽  
Author(s):  
M Hagen ◽  
A Georgescu
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Real World ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Management Strategies ◽  
Pain Medication ◽  
International Survey ◽  
Nationally Representative ◽  
Online Panels ◽  
Control Pain

Abstract Background Pain is a nearly universal experience, but little is known about how people treat pain. This international survey assessed real-world pain management strategies. Methods From 13-31 January, 2020, an online survey funded by GSK Consumer Healthcare was conducted in local languages in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, Colombia, France, Germany, India, Italy, Japan, Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Mexico, Poland, Russia, Spain, Sweden, UK, and USA. Adults were recruited from online panels of people who agreed to participate in surveys. Quotas ensured nationally representative online populations based on age, gender, and region. Results Of 19,000 people (1000/country) who completed the survey, 18,602 (98%) had ever experienced physical pain; 76% said they would like to control their pain better. Presented with 17 pain-management strategies and asked to select the ones they use in the order of use, respondents chose an average of 4 strategies each. The most commonly selected strategies were pain medication (65%), rest/sleep (54%), consult a doctor (31%), physical therapy (31%), and nonpharmacologic action (eg, heat/cold application; 29%). Of those who use pain medication, 56% take some other action first. Only 36% of those who treat pain do so immediately; 56% first wait to see if it will resolve spontaneously. Top reasons for waiting include a desire to avoid medication (37%); willingness to tolerate less severe pain (33%); concerns about side effects (21%) or dependency (21%); and wanting to avoid a doctor's visit unless pain is severe or persistent (21%). Nearly half (42%) of those who take action to control pain have visited ≥1 healthcare professional (doctor 31%; pharmacist 18%; other 17%) about pain. Conclusions This large global survey shows that people employ a range of strategies to manage pain but still wish for better pain control. Although pain medication is the most commonly used strategy, many people postpone or avoid its use. Key messages More than three-quarters (76%) of respondents across countries seek better pain control. Pain medication and rest/sleep consultation are the most common pain management strategies. More than half of respondents (56%) wait to see if pain will resolve spontaneously before taking any action, and 56% of those who use pain medication try some other approach first.

Outcome Predictors After Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia

Neurosurgery ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (6) ◽  
pp. 1637-1645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideyuki Kano ◽  
Douglas Kondziolka ◽  
Huai-Che Yang ◽  
Oscar Zorro ◽  
Javier Lobato-Polo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Trigeminal Neuralgia ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Surgical Procedure ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Sensory Loss ◽  
Failed Surgery ◽  
Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Abstract BACKGROUND: Trigeminal neuralgia (TN) that recurs after surgery can be difficult to manage. OBJECTIVE: To define management outcomes in patients who underwent gamma knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSR) after failing 1 or more previous surgical procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed outcomes after GKSR in 193 patients with TN after failed surgery. The median patient age was 70 years (range, 26-93 years). Seventy-five patients had a single operation (microvascular decompression, n = 40; glycerol rhizotomy, n = 24; radiofrequency rhizotomy, n = 11). One hundred eighteen patients underwent multiple operations before GKSR. Patients were evaluated up to 14 years after GKSR. RESULTS: After GKSR, 85% of patients achieved pain relief or improvement (Barrow Neurological Institute grade I-IIIb). Pain recurrence was observed in 73 of 168 patients 6 to 144 months after GKSR (median, 6 years). Factors associated with better long-term pain relief included no relief from the surgical procedure preceding GKSR, pain in a single branch, typical TN, and a single previous failed surgical procedure. Eighteen patients (9.3%) developed new or increased trigeminal sensory dysfunction, and 1 developed deafferentation pain. Patients who developed sensory loss after GKSR had better long-term pain control (Barrow Neurological Institute grade I-IIIb: 86% at 5 years). CONCLUSION: GKSR proved to be safe and moderately effective in the management of TN that recurs after surgery. Development of sensory loss may predict better long-term pain control. The best candidates for GKSR were patients with recurrence after a single failed previous operation and those with typical TN in a single trigeminal nerve distribution.

Pain Relief following Stimulation of the Pontomesencephalic Parabrachial Region in Humans: Brain Sites for Nonopiate-Mediated Pain Control

1985 ◽  
Vol 48 (1-6) ◽  
pp. 195-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoichi Katayama ◽  
Takashi Tsubokawa ◽  
Teruyasu Hirayama ◽  
Takamitsu Yamamoto
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Stimulation Of

An Audit of Pain Control Pathways following Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

2011 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 248-252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Espeed Khoshbin ◽  
Ali N. Al-Jilaihawi ◽  
Nicholas B. Scott ◽  
Dhruva Prakash ◽  
Alan J. B. Kirk
Keyword(s):  
Pain Management ◽  
Pain Relief ◽  
Visual Analog Scale ◽  
Severe Pain ◽  
Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Analog Scale ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Audit Commission ◽  
Video Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery ◽  
Daily Pain

Objective To compare different modes of pain management following video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) to our national standard. Methods This is an audit based on patient's experiences. One hundred consecutive patients who underwent VATS with or without pleurodesis were managed by one of the following pain relief pathways: (A) thoracic paravertebral block + morphine patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), (B) percutaneous thoracic paravertebral catheter +/– morphine PCA, (C) thoracic epidural +/– morphine PCA, (D) morphine PCA alone, and (E) intravenous or subcutaneous morphine as required. Pain score was documented up to four times per day for each patient. The incidence of severe pain was defined as visual analog scale ≥7. The results were compared with the standard set by the audit commission for postoperative pain relief in the UK. The mean daily pain scores were calculated retrospectively for all patients. Results There were no statistically significant differences in mean daily pain scores irrespective of having a pleurodesis. The percentage of patients experiencing severe pain was 34% [mean visual analog scale = 8 (standard deviation = 1.0)]. This was almost seven times the standard. Among these pathways, B had the least percentage incidence of severe pain (16.7%) followed by A (25.0%) D (33.3%), C (35.7%), and E (52.4%). Conclusions We are not compliant with the standards set by the audit commission. Pain management in theater recovery needs to be targeted. In the light of these results, we recommend the use of percutaneous thoracic paravertebral catheter +/– morphine PCA for postoperative VATS pain relief.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document