scholarly journals Reformist Framework for Improving Human Security for Mobile Robots in Industry 4.0

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Anand Singh Rajawat ◽  
Pradeep Bedi ◽  
S. B. Goyal ◽  
Piyush Kumar Shukla ◽  
Atef Zaguia ◽  
...  

In this paper, the cooperation between human and robot companies plays a significant role in factories, contributing to greater productivity and efficiency. However, this development breaches established safety procedures when the workspaces are separated from the robot and the human being. These changes have been reflected in industrial robotic safety standards for the last 20 years. We have directed the expansion of a broad field of examination, which focuses on avoiding robotic humans’ effects and minimizing associated risks and consequences. The paper depicts an analysis of prominent safety systems projected and implemented in engineering robotic surroundings that contribute to safe, collective work between humans and robots. Besides, the current regulation has introduced a review and new concepts. The discussion includes multidisciplinary approaches such as estimating and evaluating human-robot collision injuries, mechanical equipment and software to minimize human-robot impacts, impact detection systems, and collision prevention strategies and minimizing their impact to proposed approach for Human Security with Mobile Robots in Industry 4.0 using SDN and CPS with GMM-GM machine learning model.

Author(s):  
Thomas G. Scarbrough

In a series of Commission papers, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) described its policy for inservice testing (IST) programs to be developed and implemented at nuclear power plants licensed under 10 CFR Part 52. This paper discusses the expectations for IST programs based on those Commission policy papers as applied in the NRC staff review of combined license (COL) applications for new reactors. For example, the design and qualification of pumps, valves, and dynamic restraints through implementation of American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Standard QME-1-2007, “Qualification of Active Mechanical Equipment Used in Nuclear Power Plants,” as accepted in NRC Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.100 (Revision 3), “Seismic Qualification of Electrical and Active Mechanical Equipment and Functional Qualification of Active Mechanical Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants,” will enable IST activities to assess the operational readiness of those components to perform their intended functions. ASME has updated the Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code) to improve the IST provisions for pumps, valves, and dynamic restraints that are incorporated by reference in the NRC regulations with applicable conditions. In addition, lessons learned from performance experience and testing of motor-operated valves (MOVs) will be implemented as part of the IST programs together with application of those lessons learned to other power-operated valves (POVs). Licensee programs for the Regulatory Treatment of Non-Safety Systems (RTNSS) will be implemented for components in active nonsafety-related systems that are the first line of defense in new reactors that rely on passive systems to provide reactor core and containment cooling in the event of a plant transient. This paper also discusses the overlapping testing provisions specified in ASME Standard QME-1-2007; plant-specific inspections, tests, analyses, and acceptance criteria; the applicable ASME OM Code as incorporated by reference in the NRC regulations; specific license conditions; and Initial Test Programs as described in the final safety analysis report and applicable RGs. Paper published with permission.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muzaffar Rao ◽  
Thomas Newe

The current manufacturing transformation is represented by using different terms like; Industry 4.0, smart manufacturing, Industrial Internet of Things (IIoTs), and the Model-Based enterprise. This transformation involves integrated and collaborative manufacturing systems. These manufacturing systems should meet the demands changing in real-time in the smart factory environment. Here, this manufacturing transformation is represented by the term ‘Smart Manufacturing’. Smart manufacturing can optimize the manufacturing process using different technologies like IoT, Analytics, Manufacturing Intelligence, Cloud, Supplier Platforms, and Manufacturing Execution System (MES). In the cell-based manufacturing environment of the smart industry, the best way to transfer the goods between cells is through automation (mobile robots). That is why automation is the core of the smart industry i.e. industry 4.0. In a smart industrial environment, mobile-robots can safely operate with repeatability; also can take decisions based on detailed production sequences defined by Manufacturing Execution System (MES). This work focuses on the development of a middleware application using LabVIEW for mobile-robots, in a cell-based manufacturing environment. This application works as middleware to connect mobile robots with the MES system.


2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (07-08) ◽  
pp. 558-562
Author(s):  
C. Härdtlein ◽  
F. Ried ◽  
S. Ziegler ◽  
A. Miller ◽  
J. Berg ◽  
...  

In Zeiten von Industrie 4.0 und einer zunehmenden Automatisierung und Flexibilisierung der Produktion nimmt die Werkzeuglogistik eine zentrale Rolle ein. Der Einsatz mobiler Roboter bietet das Potenzial, eine durchgängige Automatisierung des Materialflusses von Werkzeugen herbeizuführen. Eine Implementierung der Systeme ist jedoch mit zahlreichen soft- und hardwareseitigen Herausforderungen verbunden, die insbesondere von kleinen und mittleren Unternehmen bewerkstelligt werden müssen.   Tool logistics takes a central role within the framework of industry 4.0 and the targeted automation and flexibility in production. The use of mobile service robots allows for a holistic automation of the material flow of tools. Implementing such systems is associated with numerous software and hardware challenges, to be managed in particular by small and medium-sized enterprises.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. L. Cruz-Jaramillo ◽  
C. R. Torres-San Miguel ◽  
L. Martínez-Sáez ◽  
V. Ramírez-Vela ◽  
G. M. Urriologoitia-Calderón

This paper analyzes the possible head and chest injuries, produced in a Hybrid III dummy model of a six-year-old child during a rollover test, while the child uses a passive safety system low-back booster (LBB). Vehicle seats and passive safety systems were modeled with a CAD (Computer Aided Design) software; later, all elements were analyzed using the finite element method (FEM) with LS-DYNA® software. The border conditions were established for each study, in accordance with the regulations of Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards (FMVSS), and following the FMVSS 213 standard for the mounting and fastening of the infant, the FMVSS 208 for the dolly methodology test with the vehicle rollover was performed, implementing such analysis under the same conditions for a vehicle Toyota Yaris 2010. The numerical simulations were performed during an interval of 1 second, obtaining data values for periods of 2 milliseconds. This paper examines the efficiency of the system; three case studies were carried out: Study I: vehicle seat belt (VSB); Study II: the LBB system was secured by the seat belt; Study III: the LBB system with ISOFIX anchorage. The values of decelerations for the head and thorax of the infant were obtained, as well as neck flexion and thoracic deflection. The main factor to reduce injuries during a rollover accident is the correct anchorage of the LBB, and this is achieved with the ISOFIX system, since it prevents the independent movement of the LBB, unlike when it is fastened with the seat belt of the vehicle. The results show low levels of head and chest injury when ISOFIX is used because of reduced thoracic deflection during infant retention.


Author(s):  
Tran Viet Khoa ◽  
Yuris Mulya Saputra ◽  
Dinh Thai Hoang ◽  
Nguyen Linh Trung ◽  
Diep Nguyen ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document