scholarly journals A Rare Case of Pseudomembranous Colitis Presenting with Pleural Effusion and Ascites with Literature Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Hossain Salehi ◽  
Amir Mohammad Salehi

Clostridium difficile infection usually results from long-term and irregular antibiotic intake. The high-risk individuals for this infection include the patients undergoing chemotherapy due to malignancy, immunocompromised patients, and hospitalized patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. The most common clinical manifestation of Clostridium difficile infection is diarrhea. However, pleural effusion and ascites have rarely been observed. As mentioned, these manifestations can be developed in a patient being treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Therefore, the present study reports a rare case of Clostridium difficile infection manifesting with these rare manifestations who was a 78-year-old female patient with a history of COVID-19, orthopedic surgery, and antibiotic treatment with cefixime and gentamicin.

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S836-S837
Author(s):  
Khanh-Linh Le ◽  
Heather Young ◽  
Timothy C Jenkins ◽  
Robert Tapia ◽  
Katherine C Shihadeh

Abstract Background Prior to 2016, Denver Health Medical Center had a higher-than-expected rate of hospital onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI). A multifaceted CDI prevention plan was implemented, including the use of a probiotic as primary prevention for HO-CDI and antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in inpatients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. We aimed to study the effectiveness of probiotic use in this clinical context. Methods During the intervention, inpatient orders for a broad-spectrum antibiotic triggered a best practice advisory recommending once daily co-administration of 100 billion units of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus casei, L. rhamnosus, and L. acidophilus (BioK+ ®). To evaluate effectiveness and safety of this intervention, we performed a retrospective cohort study including adult inpatients who received > 24 hours of a broad-spectrum antibiotic between April 2016 and March 2018. The primary endpoint was the incidence of HO-CDI (> 3 days after admission) compared between patients who received antibiotics alone vs. antibiotics plus the probiotic. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of AAD, defined as a negative CDI test after antibiotic initiation, and the incidence of Lactobacillus species identified in clinical cultures. Results 3,291 patients were included; 1,835 received antibiotics alone and 1,456 received antibiotics plus the probiotic. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar, except patients in the antibiotic alone group had a greater incidence of cirrhosis and proton-pump inhibitor use (16.1% vs 10.1%, P < 0.001; 39.1% vs 31.5%, P < 0.001). Length of stay and antibiotic days of therapy were longer in the antibiotic plus probiotic group [6 days (IQR, 3–11) vs 6 days (IQR, 4–12), P = 0.014; 4 days (IQR, 3–7) vs 5 days (IQR, 3–7), P < 0.001]. The incidence of HO-CDI (37, 2% vs 35, 2.4%; P = 0.450) and AAD (231, 12.6% vs 199, 13.7%; P = 0.362) were similar between groups. Lactobacillus was identified in at least one clinical culture from 0.2% (3/1835) and 0.3% (4/1456) of patients in the antibiotic alone group and antibiotic plus probiotic group, respectively (P = 0.497). Conclusion In hospitalized patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics, co-administration of a probiotic did not appear to reduce the incidence of HO-CDI or AAD. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S835-S836
Author(s):  
Eric Wombwell ◽  
Mark E Patterson ◽  
Bridget Bransteitter ◽  
Lisa Gillen

Abstract Background Conflicting evidence in smaller randomized trials and meta-analyses regarding the protective effects of probiotics against Clostridium difficile infection underscore the need for further study. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of a single probiotic strain, Saccharomyces boulardii, at a standardized dose on hospital-onset C. difficile (HO-CDI) rates within hospitalizations administered broad-spectrum antibiotics. Methods Retrospective cohort study merging hospital prescribing data with C. difficile case data from the National Health Safety Network at a 220-bed level-2 trauma center nonacademic hospital. A convenience sample of 8,763 hospital admissions administrated at least one dose of a fluoroquinolone, clindamycin, or β-lactam class antibiotic during hospitalization was assessed. Hospitalizations were categorized by whether antibiotics were administered alone (control) or in conjunction with S. boulardii 20 billion colony-forming units daily (intervention). Associations between S. boulardii administration and HO-CDI incidence was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. A sub-group analysis evaluated the extent to which administering S. boulardii within or after 24-hours of antibiotic start changed the effect. Propensity scores incorporated to account for selection bias. Results Hospitalizations where S. boulardii was co-administered with antibiotics had a reduced likelihood of HO-CDI (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.32 – 0.93) compared with control hospitalizations. S. boulardii administered within 24-hours of antibiotic start had a reduced likelihood of HO-CDI (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.21 – 0.75). No effect observed if S. boulardii administered after 24-hours (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.45 – 1.64). Post-hoc analysis for disease latency, the average number of days to HO-CDI onset was 5.6, 6.4, and 8.0 days for antibiotic only, S. boulardii after 24-hours, and S. boulardii within 24-hours of antibiotic, respectively (P < 0.04). Conclusion Co-administering S. boulardii with broad-spectrum antibiotics is associated with a reduced risk of C. difficile in hospitalized patients, especially if started within 24-hours of antibiotic initiation. S. boulardii should be considered as preventative intervention to reduce the risk of HO-CDI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl_1) ◽  
pp. S308-S308 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Pettigrew ◽  
Ripal Jariwala ◽  
Kristen Zeitler ◽  
Jose Montero ◽  
Sandra Gompf ◽  
...  

Abstract Background While Clostridium difficile gastrointestinal infection (CDI) is the most common hospital-acquired infectious disease, C. difficile bacteremia (CDB) is exceedingly rare and its risk factors, mortality rate, and modalities of treatment are not well defined. Methods We conducted a retrospective, IRB approved, chart review of adult patients with a diagnosis of CDB admitted to our institutions from 2011 through 2017. Variables catalogued included previous antibiotic and proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use, co-morbid conditions, prior history of CDI, diarrhea at the time of CDB, active malignancy, and gastrointestinal (GI) disruption (e.g., perforated viscous, GI bleeding, abdominal malignancy). Treatment courses and outcomes for CDB were also gleaned. Results Seven patients with CDB were identified, with ages ranging from 35 to 81 years (median 65 years). Six (85.7%) patients had evidence of GI disruption and three (42.9%) were noted to have active cancer. Three (42.9%) patients had previous CDI by testing and three (42.9%) had complaints of diarrhea at the time of diagnosis. Six (85.7%) patients had exposure to PPIs before CDB diagnosis, and five (71.4%) had prior antibiotic exposure in the past 30 days. Five (71.4%) patients had a polymicrobial bloodstream infection, with the majority of organisms being enteric in nature. In terms of CDB treatment, the majority of patients received intravenous (IV) metronidazole and/or IV vancomycin in addition to broad-spectrum antibiotics due to the polymicrobial nature of their infection. Three (42.9%) patients died during their hospitalization, only one who had polymicrobial bacteremia. Conclusion CDI is the most common cause of hospital acquired infection, although rarely causes bacteremia. Notable findings in our population included older age, concomitant malignancy, evidence of GI disruption, and prior exposure to PPIs and antibiotics. Antibiotics chosen to treat CDB were IV metronidazole and/or IV vancomycin, with other broad-spectrum antibiotics utilized due to polymicrobial bacteremia. CDB is associated with a high mortality rate and is commonly manifested as a polymicrobial bloodstream infection. This is one of the larger case series that adds to the scant literature characterizing patients diagnosed with CDB. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3103-3107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine S. Kim ◽  
Kristy K. Ward ◽  
Nina R. Shah ◽  
Cheryl C. Saenz ◽  
Michael T. McHale ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Flatley ◽  
Ashley M. Wilde ◽  
Michael D. Nailor

Background & Aims: Probiotics, including Saccharomyces boulardii, have been advocated for the prevention of Clostridium difficile infection. The aim of this project was to evaluate the effects of the removal of S. boulardii from an automatic antibiotic order set and hospital formulary on hospital onset C. difficile infection rates.Method. Design: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with hospital onset C. difficile infection during the 13 months prior (control group) and the 13 months after (study group) removal of an automatic order set linking S. boulardii capsules to certain broad spectrum antibiotics. Setting: A large 800+ bed tertiary hospitalResults: Among all hospitalized patients, the rate of hospital onset C. difficile infection was 0.99 per 1000 patient days while the S. boulardii protocol was active compared with 1.04 per 1000 patient days (p=0.10) after S. boulardii was removed from the formulary. No difference in the rate of hospital onset C. difficile infection was detected in patients receiving the linked broad spectrum antibiotics during and after the removal of the protocol (1.25% vs. 1.51%, respectively; p=0.70).Conclusions: Removal of S. boulardii administration to patients receiving broad spectrum antibiotics and the hospital formulary did not impact the rate of hospital onset C. difficile infection in either the hospital population or patients receiving broad spectrum antibiotics.


2020 ◽  
Vol 25 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. e21-e21
Author(s):  
Mila Arnautovich ◽  
Ann-Christine Godard ◽  
Jean-Francois Turcotte

Abstract Background Acute otitis media (AOM) is extremely common. In fact, most children experience at least one ear infection before starting school. It is also recognized as the most frequent reason to administer antibiotics in children. However, many advocate for limited use of antibiotics in healthy children over 6 months of age using a watchful waiting approach. This applies even more for broad-spectrum antibiotics in the context of antibiotic stewardship. The Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) recommends using parenteral ceftriaxone only when oral drugs are not tolerated or amoxicillin-clavulanate fails. Objectives This primary aim of this study was to describe the use of ceftriaxone in the treatment of children with AOM. Secondary aims were to assess length of therapy and complications as well as determine if the use of ceftriaxone met the criteria of refractory AOM suggested by the CPS. Design/Methods We performed a retrospective observational cohort study of children aged between the ages of 6 months and 5 years with a diagnosis of AOM at a single tertiary care center. All children were seen between March 2017 and February 2019 in a pediatric outpatient medical day unit and received at least one dose of ceftriaxone. Chart review was performed and multiples variables were included in the analysis. Patients with insufficient chart data or with a congenital ear anomaly were excluded. Results A total of 276 patients were included. Patients were aged 17.5 ± 9 months and a majority were boys (N=160). Most patients were fully immunized (N=252). A history of penicillin allergy was reported for 59 patients. Previous AOM was common (N=205) while tympanostomy tubes were rare (N=12). With regards to the diagnosis of AOM, a majority (N=153) had bilateral AOM. Diagnosis of AOM was based on inflammation (N=204), bulging tympanic membrane (N=158) or middle ear effusion (N=118). Fourteen patients had a tympanic perforation. Almost all patients were febrile (N=266). One patient had a positive blood culture (streptococcus pneumoniae) and one had a mastoiditis. Among those who underwent bloodwork (N=212), white blood count was 15.2 ± 6.7 x 109. With regards to antibiotics, most patients (N=218) were initially given oral antibiotics, with amoxicillin given as a first line therapy for 99 patients. A minority of patients received amoxicillin-clavulanate prior to receiving ceftriaxone (N=105). Reasons for the use of ceftriaxone included intolerance to oral drugs (N=18), failure of (or recent exposure to) amoxicillin-clavulanate (N=89) and a history of penicillin allergy (N=50). Most patients were treated with a course of three days with only 51 patients receiving one or two doses. Conclusion In our cohort, the use of ceftriaxone was not limited to nonresponsive AOM. In fact, a minority of patients received ceftriaxone in the setting of intolerance to oral drugs or failure of amoxicillin-clavulanate. This goes against current CPS recommendations and suggests an overuse of broad-spectrum antibiotics. Obviously, this needs to be addressed in the context of antibiotic stewardship.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document