Saccharomyces boulardii for the Prevention of Hospital Onset Clostridium difficile Infection

2015 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Flatley ◽  
Ashley M. Wilde ◽  
Michael D. Nailor

Background & Aims: Probiotics, including Saccharomyces boulardii, have been advocated for the prevention of Clostridium difficile infection. The aim of this project was to evaluate the effects of the removal of S. boulardii from an automatic antibiotic order set and hospital formulary on hospital onset C. difficile infection rates.Method. Design: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients with hospital onset C. difficile infection during the 13 months prior (control group) and the 13 months after (study group) removal of an automatic order set linking S. boulardii capsules to certain broad spectrum antibiotics. Setting: A large 800+ bed tertiary hospitalResults: Among all hospitalized patients, the rate of hospital onset C. difficile infection was 0.99 per 1000 patient days while the S. boulardii protocol was active compared with 1.04 per 1000 patient days (p=0.10) after S. boulardii was removed from the formulary. No difference in the rate of hospital onset C. difficile infection was detected in patients receiving the linked broad spectrum antibiotics during and after the removal of the protocol (1.25% vs. 1.51%, respectively; p=0.70).Conclusions: Removal of S. boulardii administration to patients receiving broad spectrum antibiotics and the hospital formulary did not impact the rate of hospital onset C. difficile infection in either the hospital population or patients receiving broad spectrum antibiotics.

2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S835-S836
Author(s):  
Eric Wombwell ◽  
Mark E Patterson ◽  
Bridget Bransteitter ◽  
Lisa Gillen

Abstract Background Conflicting evidence in smaller randomized trials and meta-analyses regarding the protective effects of probiotics against Clostridium difficile infection underscore the need for further study. Our objective was to evaluate the effect of a single probiotic strain, Saccharomyces boulardii, at a standardized dose on hospital-onset C. difficile (HO-CDI) rates within hospitalizations administered broad-spectrum antibiotics. Methods Retrospective cohort study merging hospital prescribing data with C. difficile case data from the National Health Safety Network at a 220-bed level-2 trauma center nonacademic hospital. A convenience sample of 8,763 hospital admissions administrated at least one dose of a fluoroquinolone, clindamycin, or β-lactam class antibiotic during hospitalization was assessed. Hospitalizations were categorized by whether antibiotics were administered alone (control) or in conjunction with S. boulardii 20 billion colony-forming units daily (intervention). Associations between S. boulardii administration and HO-CDI incidence was evaluated by multivariate logistic regression. A sub-group analysis evaluated the extent to which administering S. boulardii within or after 24-hours of antibiotic start changed the effect. Propensity scores incorporated to account for selection bias. Results Hospitalizations where S. boulardii was co-administered with antibiotics had a reduced likelihood of HO-CDI (OR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.32 – 0.93) compared with control hospitalizations. S. boulardii administered within 24-hours of antibiotic start had a reduced likelihood of HO-CDI (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.21 – 0.75). No effect observed if S. boulardii administered after 24-hours (OR = 0.86, 95% CI 0.45 – 1.64). Post-hoc analysis for disease latency, the average number of days to HO-CDI onset was 5.6, 6.4, and 8.0 days for antibiotic only, S. boulardii after 24-hours, and S. boulardii within 24-hours of antibiotic, respectively (P < 0.04). Conclusion Co-administering S. boulardii with broad-spectrum antibiotics is associated with a reduced risk of C. difficile in hospitalized patients, especially if started within 24-hours of antibiotic initiation. S. boulardii should be considered as preventative intervention to reduce the risk of HO-CDI. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S836-S837
Author(s):  
Khanh-Linh Le ◽  
Heather Young ◽  
Timothy C Jenkins ◽  
Robert Tapia ◽  
Katherine C Shihadeh

Abstract Background Prior to 2016, Denver Health Medical Center had a higher-than-expected rate of hospital onset Clostridium difficile infection (HO-CDI). A multifaceted CDI prevention plan was implemented, including the use of a probiotic as primary prevention for HO-CDI and antibiotic-associated diarrhea (AAD) in inpatients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. We aimed to study the effectiveness of probiotic use in this clinical context. Methods During the intervention, inpatient orders for a broad-spectrum antibiotic triggered a best practice advisory recommending once daily co-administration of 100 billion units of a probiotic containing Lactobacillus casei, L. rhamnosus, and L. acidophilus (BioK+ ®). To evaluate effectiveness and safety of this intervention, we performed a retrospective cohort study including adult inpatients who received > 24 hours of a broad-spectrum antibiotic between April 2016 and March 2018. The primary endpoint was the incidence of HO-CDI (> 3 days after admission) compared between patients who received antibiotics alone vs. antibiotics plus the probiotic. Secondary endpoints were the incidence of AAD, defined as a negative CDI test after antibiotic initiation, and the incidence of Lactobacillus species identified in clinical cultures. Results 3,291 patients were included; 1,835 received antibiotics alone and 1,456 received antibiotics plus the probiotic. Baseline characteristics between groups were similar, except patients in the antibiotic alone group had a greater incidence of cirrhosis and proton-pump inhibitor use (16.1% vs 10.1%, P < 0.001; 39.1% vs 31.5%, P < 0.001). Length of stay and antibiotic days of therapy were longer in the antibiotic plus probiotic group [6 days (IQR, 3–11) vs 6 days (IQR, 4–12), P = 0.014; 4 days (IQR, 3–7) vs 5 days (IQR, 3–7), P < 0.001]. The incidence of HO-CDI (37, 2% vs 35, 2.4%; P = 0.450) and AAD (231, 12.6% vs 199, 13.7%; P = 0.362) were similar between groups. Lactobacillus was identified in at least one clinical culture from 0.2% (3/1835) and 0.3% (4/1456) of patients in the antibiotic alone group and antibiotic plus probiotic group, respectively (P = 0.497). Conclusion In hospitalized patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics, co-administration of a probiotic did not appear to reduce the incidence of HO-CDI or AAD. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (Supplement_2) ◽  
pp. S403-S403
Author(s):  
Kristin H Wheatley ◽  
Lauren Sterner ◽  
Tibisay I Villalobos-Fry

Abstract Background Antibiotics are the most prescribed drug class in children and use often results in reports of adverse reactions. Of these adverse reactions, allergic reactions are documented with an incidence of 10% of all antibiotic prescriptions. Documentation of the details of the reaction is incomplete in as many as 66–84% of encounters leading to increased use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and associated adverse outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of complete antibiotic allergy documentation and how antibiotic selection was affected in pediatric patients. Methods A retrospective chart review of electronic medical records was conducted for pediatric patients admitted to a pediatric unit with a documented antibiotic allergy between September 1, 2015 and May 31, 2017. Results The study sample included 536 encounters, 424 individual patients and 689 total allergies. Of all admissions during the study period, 10.3% of encounters had at least one antibiotic allergy documented. Approximately 40% of the encounters were in patients aged 12–17 years. A specific antibiotic was identified in 510 instances (74.0%) whereas an antibiotic class was documented in the remaining 179 instances (26.0%). Amoxicillin was the most commonly reported agent (25.4%). Rash (33.5%) and hives (14.8%) were the most commonly reported reactions. No reaction documentation was found in 78 entries (11.3%). Sixty-six entries (9.6%) did not include a date of occurrence and 452 (65.6%) did not include any specific comments regarding the allergy. Following evaluation of allergy documentation, 87 entries (12.6%) were classified as complete. Empiric broad-spectrum antibiotics were prescribed in 184 encounters (82.5%) compared with narrow-spectrum antibiotic therapy in 39 encounters (17.5%) when an allergy was documented. Conclusion Incomplete documentation of antibiotic allergies was identified in almost 90% of encounters within the pediatric population admitted to Lehigh Valley Reilly Children’s Hospital. Due to the preferential use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in patients with documented antibiotic allergies, an initiative is underway to standardize evaluation and documentation of allergies in patients receiving care within the health network. Disclosures All authors: No reported disclosures.


2013 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 3103-3107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Josephine S. Kim ◽  
Kristy K. Ward ◽  
Nina R. Shah ◽  
Cheryl C. Saenz ◽  
Michael T. McHale ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Hossain Salehi ◽  
Amir Mohammad Salehi

Clostridium difficile infection usually results from long-term and irregular antibiotic intake. The high-risk individuals for this infection include the patients undergoing chemotherapy due to malignancy, immunocompromised patients, and hospitalized patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. The most common clinical manifestation of Clostridium difficile infection is diarrhea. However, pleural effusion and ascites have rarely been observed. As mentioned, these manifestations can be developed in a patient being treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics. Therefore, the present study reports a rare case of Clostridium difficile infection manifesting with these rare manifestations who was a 78-year-old female patient with a history of COVID-19, orthopedic surgery, and antibiotic treatment with cefixime and gentamicin.


2001 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 171-180 ◽  
Author(s):  
George Dranitsaris ◽  
Diana Spizzirri ◽  
Monique Pitre ◽  
Allison McGeer

Background: There is a considerable gap between randomized clinical trials and implementing the results into practice. This is particularly relevant in the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in hospitals. Hospital pharmacists can be effective vehicles for bridging this gap and promoting evidence-based medicine. To determine the most effective way of using the pharmacist in this role, a prospective cefotaxime intervention study was conducted with randomization incorporated into the design as well as patient-related therapeutic outcomes.Methods: A total of 323 patients who were prescribed cefotaxime were randomized into an intervention or nonintervention group where only the former was challenged by pharmacists for inappropriate cefotaxime usage relative to hospital guidelines. The primary outcome was the appropriateness of cefotaxime prescribing between groups. Logistic regression analysis was then used to identify factors that were associated with successful clinical response.Results: Overall, 94% of orders in the intervention group met cefotaxime dosage criteria compared with 86% in the control group (p = .018). However, there was no impact with respect to promoting cefotaxime use for an appropriate indication (81% vs. 80%; p = .67). There was a trend for improved clinical outcomes in patients who received cefotaxime within hospital guidelines (OR = 1.73; p = .31).Conclusions: The pharmacist as a vehicle for promoting the appropriate use of broad-spectrum antibiotics in the acute care hospital setting can improve the dosing of such agents. However, several barriers to optimizing the impact of the pharmacist were implied by the data. Removing these barriers could increase the pharmacists' utility as an agent for improved patient care.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document