scholarly journals Xueshuantong Injection in Treating Deep Venous Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Trial Sequential Analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Wenhui Li ◽  
Feng Xu ◽  
Renyan Huang ◽  
Weijing Fan ◽  
Changgeng Fu ◽  
...  

Aims. In recent years, the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) presents an increasing trend year by year. The current evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of Xueshuantong injection for DVT is controversial. This systematic review (SR) aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Xueshuantong injection in the treatment of DVT systematically and provide an evidence-based reference for clinical treatment. Methods. Nine electronic databases were used to identify the literature consisting of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a date of search of 1 November 2020. Clinical effective rate and incidence rate of adverse events were investigated as primary outcomes. Patency rate of femoral vein, patency rate of popliteal vein, patency rate of posterior tibial vein, circumference difference, activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and D-dimer (D-D) were investigated as secondary outcomes. Revman 5.4.1 was used to analyze the results. Analysis of the power of evidence was performed with Trial Sequential Analysis (TSA). Results. A total of 12 articles including 1018 patients were included. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the clinical effective rate in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group, the incidence rate of adverse events in the experimental group was higher than that in the control group; after the operation, the patency rate of femoral vein, patency rate of popliteal vein, patency rate of posterior tibial vein, circumference difference, APTT, and D-D in the experimental group were significantly improved compared with those in the control group, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant. TSA suggested that the meta-analysis concerning the clinical effectiveness of Xueshuantong injection in the treatment of DVT was of adequate power to reach firm conclusions. Conclusion. Based on the current analysis, Xueshuantong injection as an add-on treatment provided better treatment effect for DVT with adequate power but this benefit should be considered with caution because of the small number of studies included in the meta-analysis and the high or unclear risk of bias of the included trials, suggesting that further studies are needed.

2018 ◽  
Vol 46 (7) ◽  
pp. 2513-2524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rui Xu ◽  
Qian Wang ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Ling Wu ◽  
Qi Liu ◽  
...  

Objective This meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to determine whether low-dose corticosteroids (LDCs) can improve survival or shock reversal from septic shock in adults. Methods A literature search was performed using several databases (Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Chinese Biological Medical Database) until 23 October 2017. The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO. Results Nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 1182) were included. LDC intervention improved 7-day shock reversal compared with the control group (relative risk, 1.36; TSA-adjusted 95% confidence interval, 1.20–1.54). LDCs had no statistically significant effects on gastrointestinal bleeding or superinfection. LDCs did not reduce 28-day mortality from septic shock (relative risk, 0.96; TSA-adjusted 95% confidence interval, 0.74–1.24). The TSA indicated that RCTs of about 3000 patients would be needed to draw definitive conclusions; similar results were obtained in a subgroup analysis of nonresponders. Conclusions LDCs improve 7-day shock reversal. However, whether LDCs improve 28-day survival from septic shock in adults remains unclear. The results of well-designed larger RCTs are needed.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunpeng Wang ◽  
Zheng Zhu ◽  
Yiqiu Wang ◽  
Dayuan Zong ◽  
Peng Xue ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Although myriad researches upon the associations between LncRNA H19 polymorphic variants (rs2839698 G﹥A, rs3024270 C﹥G, rs2107425 C﹥T, rs2735971 A﹥G and rs217727 G﹥A) and the susceptibility to cancer have been conducted, these results remained contradictory and perplexing. Basing on that, a systematic review and updated meta-analysis was conducted to anticipate a fairly precise assessment about these associations. Methods: We retrieved the electronic databases EMBASE, PubMed and Web of Science for valuable academic studies before October 1st, 2019. Ultimately, 24 of which were encompassed after screening, and the available data was extracted and integrated. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was adopted to evaluate the strength of these associations. For multi-level investigation, subgroup analysis derived from source of controls together with genotypic method was preformed. Eventually, 24 articles altogether embodying 52 studies were included. Results: The results illuminated that LncRNA H19 SNPs mentioned above were all irrelevant to cancer susceptibility. Nevertheless, crucial results were found concentrated in population-based control group when subgroup analysis by source of controls were performed in H19 mutation rs2839698 and rs2735971. Meanwhile, in the stratification analysis by genotypic method, apparent cancer risks were discovered by TaqMan method in H19 mutation rs2107425 and rs3024270. Then, trial sequential analysis (TSA) demonstrated that the results about such associations were firm evidence of effect, except rs2735971 polymorphism. Conclusion: Therefore, this meta-analysis indicated that LncRNA H19 SNPs were not associated with the susceptibility to human cancer. However, after the stratification analysis, inconsistent results still existed in different genotypic method and source of control. Thus, more high-quality studies on cancer patients of different factors were needed to confirm these findings.


Author(s):  
Jia Yao ◽  
Bo Peng ◽  
Xiayu Gong ◽  
Xiaoyan Shi ◽  
Simin Fan ◽  
...  

Background: The aim of the present study was to systematically review the efficacy and safety of mecobalamin combined with prokinetic agents in diabetic gastroparesis (DGP). Methods: A variety of databases were searched from inception to Nov 2, 2018. RCTs of mecobalamin combined with prokinetic agents group (experimental group) versus prokinetic agents only group (control group) in DGP were included. RevMan 5.3 and Stata 12.0 were used to perform the meta-analysis. Finally, 24 RCTs with 1,878 patients were included. Results: The total efficacy rate was significantly higher in the experimental group (mecobalamin combined with prokinetic drugs) compared with the control group (prokinetic drugs alone) (P<0.001), and the improvement was observed regardless of the administration route. Furthermore, the treatment group exhibited a significantly improved gastric emption rate (P<0.001), motilin (P<0.001) and recurrence rate (P<0.001), and there was no statistical difference in the incidence of adverse reactions between two groups (P=0.49). Conclusion: Mecobalamin combined with prokinetic agents can significantly improve total efficacy rate and gastric emptying rate, decrease serum motilin and the recurrence rate without increasing adverse reactions in DGP. Thus, mecobalamin may can be used as a new therapeutic option for DGP.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document